╌>

Hillary Clinton says Tulsi Gabbard is a 'Russian asset' groomed to ensure Trump reelection

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  badfish-hd-h-u  •  7 years ago  •  182 comments

Hillary Clinton says Tulsi Gabbard is a 'Russian asset' groomed to ensure Trump reelection

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Hillary Clinton said that Rep.   Tulsi Gabbard   is being groomed by Moscow to run as a third-party spoiler candidate in 2020 to help President Trump win reelection.

The former secretary of state   pushed the theory   on   Campaign HQ   podcast hosted by David Plouffe, President Barack Obama’s campaign manager in 2008.

Plouffe and Clinton discussed hurdles the Democratic nominee would face and compared the 2020 race to Clinton’s loss to Trump in 2016. Plouffe asked Clinton about the part third-party candidates, such as Jill Stein of the Green Party, played in 2016, allowing Trump to secure key states.

"They are also going to do third party again," Clinton, 71, said. "I'm not making any predictions, but I think they’ve got their eye on somebody who is currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate," Clinton said, referring to Gabbard, without mentioning the Hawaii representative by name.

"She is a favorite of the Russians. They have a bunch of sites and bots and other ways of supporting her so far. That's assuming Jill Stein will give it up, which she might not because she is also a Russian asset.

"They know they can't win without a third-party candidate, and so I do not know who it's going to be, but I can guarantee you they will have a vigorous third-party challenge in the key states that they most need it."

Gabbard, 38, has represented Hawaii in the House of Representatives since 2013. A major in the Hawaii Army National Guard, she served in a field medical unit of the in Iraq from 2004 to 2005 and was deployed to Kuwait from 2008 to 2009. This summer, she spent   two weeks in Indonesia   on a military training exercise.

In Tuesday's   Democratic debate , Gabbard   accused the   New York Times   of calling her a "Russian asset."

The newspaper published   an Oct. 12 news article   about Gabbard stating, "She is injecting a bit of chaos into her own party’s primary race, threatening to boycott that debate to protest what she sees as a 'rigging' of the 2020 election. That’s left some Democrats wondering what, exactly, she is up to in the race, while others worry about supportive signs from online bot activity and the Russian news media."

Gabbard said on the debate stage: "The   New York Times   and CNN have also smeared veterans like myself for calling for an end to this regime change war [in Syria]. Just two days ago, the   New York Times   put out an article saying that I’m a Russian asset and an Assad apologist, and all these different smears."

In 2016, Gabbard supported Bernie Sanders over Clinton. But she   congratulated Clinton   on becoming the Democratic presidential nominee, saying: "She becomes the first woman to lead a major political party into the general election. Say what you will about her, let's give credit where it due. This is one tough, smart woman. Most might wilt under the fire and criticism she's endured."

Gabbard   faces a 2020 primary challenge   for her House seat from Democratic state senator Kai Kahele.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    7 years ago

Not coincidental to BF seeding this article, Tulsi Gabbard is the Democratic candidate choice of libertarians and anarchists. 

Googling “ tulsi gabbard libertarian ” will lead you to an  entire galaxy of Libertarian newspapers, each singing her praises more fervently then the last .

BeingLibertarian.com eagerly lists us off all the reasons why Gabbard 2020 is a shoo-in, with a headline saying  “Democrat Tulsi Gabbard Will Likely Be Next President. 

ALibertarianFuture.com also goes to great effort to laud  Tulsi for her willingness to work against Democratic  interests, in this article explaining that Libertarian hero Rand Paul introduced Tulsi Gabbard’s Stop Arming Terrorists Act in the Senate. 

Libertarian Christians sing her praises even louder, with these next words being a direct quote from the article. “Thank you, Mrs. Gabbard, for having the courage to tell the truth. I don’t have to share your ideology to share your human conscience. You are  seeing through the double-bind foreign policy trap of our bipartisan war policy: Satan casting out Satan.
In today’s world, people who consider the United States satanic tend to be receiving money from Russia. But even aside from that, it makes you wonder how such a high-powered chameleon ended up with a reputation for being an uncompromising progressive. An examination of her recent polling trends reveal s he’s doing very nearly as well among people of both parties,  and this is extremely troubling given the extreme and total decency gap existing between them. The Democrats gave us Obama. The Republicans gave us W. Bush and Trump.

Jacobin Magazine, long regarded as one of the most professional and serious left wing magazines out there, recently did an article on all this. They gave it the headline, “ Why Tulsi Gabbard isn’t your Friend .” And there it all was. The whole tangled web. Tulsi Gabbard is the all-purpose fishing lure being trotted out by the people so carelessly trying to realign the national power structure in their interest. She’s got something for everyone, and all of it is dishonest.

 
 
 
NV-Robin6
Professor Silent
2.3  NV-Robin6  replied to  JohnRussell @2    7 years ago

I didn't like Tulsi from the getgo. Something is not right about her attitude. 

I also saw the video of Clinton and she didn't name Tulsi directly. It's chided it's who she's thinking. 

 
 
 
KDMichigan
Junior Quiet
2.3.1  KDMichigan  replied to  NV-Robin6 @2.3    7 years ago
and she didn't name Tulsi directly. It's chided it's who she's thinking. 

I love it when people come to the defense of the Hillaryious Hag Hillary, Lets wait and see what Abula has to say in response to Tulsi calling her out shall we?

I am running as a Democrat to take our party back, away from the control of people like Hillary Clinton and the warmongering and corrupt, powerful establishment and return our party into the hands of the people. Make it so the Democratic party is once again a party of, by and for the people, a party that will fight for the people, fight to protect the planet and that will fight for peace."
 
 
 
lib50
Professor Silent
2.3.3  lib50  replied to  Have Opinion Will Travel @2.3.2    7 years ago

Everybody should pause when a candidate gets as much praise and support from the gop and Russians. 

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
2.3.5  It Is ME  replied to  Release The Kraken @2.3.4    7 years ago
Remember when liberals were antiwar? When they come out in support of wasteful deployments because they hate one person

"Short memories" is the "IN THING" right now !

 
 
 
dave-2693993
Junior Silent
2.3.6  dave-2693993  replied to  It Is ME @2.3.5    7 years ago
"Short memories" is the "IN THING" right now !

You got that right and the one thing it seems most closely linked to is Political Agenda.

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
2.3.7  It Is ME  replied to  dave-2693993 @2.3.6    7 years ago
You got that right and the one thing it seems most closely linked to is Political Agenda.

Politicians are only out for their own selves.

Ever wonder how they come into congress as paupers, and leave as millionaires ?

AOC and the other 3 of the Taliban 4 can't wait for the bucks to roll in.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.3.8  JohnRussell  replied to  Release The Kraken @2.3.4    7 years ago

You know what sucks? Anarchists suck. Libertarians suck. 

The idea that you arent a real liberal if you dont want to betray the Kurds is bizarre, and on the evil side of bizarre. 

Tulsi Gabbard gave credence to Assad , the Syrian dictator who murdered hundreds of thousands of his own people.  She didnt have to personally meet with him, but she did. 

I like of some of what she says but she is not a Democrat , she is a mish mash of ideologies that appeals as much to libertarians as it does to progressives. Her campaign is going nowhere so she may be tempted to run as an independent to raise hell and try and help Trump. She has the ambition.  If she does run as an independent you dont think Russia will be throwing love her way? 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.3.9  JohnRussell  replied to  lib50 @2.3.3    7 years ago

Of course Putin and the Russians want Trump to win. He's such a bumbling oaf they cant help but make out no matter what he does. 

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Guide
2.3.12  al Jizzerror  replied to  Release The Kraken @2.3.11    7 years ago
the Democratic establishment neocon party.

That's an oxyMORONic comment.

 
 
 
dave-2693993
Junior Silent
2.3.14  dave-2693993  replied to  It Is ME @2.3.7    7 years ago
Politicians are only out for their own selves.

Yep.

 
 
 
NV-Robin6
Professor Silent
2.3.15  NV-Robin6  replied to  Have Opinion Will Travel @2.3.2    7 years ago

I'm not a fan of either one. 

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2.3.16  Ronin2  replied to  JohnRussell @2.3.8    7 years ago
Tulsi Gabbard gave credence to Assad , the Syrian dictator who murdered hundreds of thousands of his own people.  She didnt have to personally meet with him, but she did. 

Then you must be really pissed a botox Pelosi.

U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi met Syrian President Bashar al-Assad on Wednesday for talks criticized by the White House as undermining American efforts to isolate the hard-line Arab country.

Pelosi said Assad assured her of his willingness to engage in peace talks with Israel, and that she and other members of her congressional delegation raised their concern about militants crossing from Syria into Iraq, as well the Israeli soldiers kidnapped by the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah and the Palestinian group Hamas.

The Californian Democrat spoke to reporters shortly after talks with Assad at the end of a two-day visit to Syria.

She said the delegation gave the Syrian leader a message from Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert whose essence was that Israel was ready to hold peace talks with Syria.

She did not say more about the message, but Israel has previously made such talks conditional on Syria’s cutting off its support for hard-line Palestinian groups and Hezbollah.

“We were very pleased with the assurances we received from the president that he was ready to resume the peace process. He’s ready to engage in negotiations for peace with Israel,” Pelosi said.

Pelosi and accompanying members of Congress began their day by holding separate talks with Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem and Vice President Farouk al-Sharaa and then met Assad, who hosted them for lunch after their talks.

Pelosi’s visit to Syria was the latest challenge to the White House by congressional Democrats, who are taking a more assertive role in influencing policy in the Middle East and the Iraq war.

Bush voices criticism
Bush has said Pelosi’s trip signals that the Assad government is part of the international mainstream when it is not. The United States says Syria allows Iraqi Sunni insurgents to operate from its territory, backs the Hezbollah and Hamas militant groups and is trying to destabilize the Lebanese government. Syria denies the allegations.

“A lot of people have gone to see President Assad ... and yet we haven’t seen action. He hasn’t responded,” he told reporters soon after she arrived in Damascus on Tuesday. “Sending delegations doesn’t work. It’s simply been counterproductive.”

Guess Pelosi isn't a "true" Democrat either. Of course that was when a Republican was in the White House; so it is all good./S

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
3  Tacos!    7 years ago

When did so-called liberals become such warmongers? Remember when people used to march for peace?

Meanwhile Hillary Clinton sure knows an awful lot about what Russian bots are up to. Is she just super paranoid? Is she senile? Does she get her information from her own Russian bots?

What is the point of trying to make these connections with Gabbard? It seems to me that she has the right of it. It's all about smearing her, which is odd because it's not like she's leading in the polls or something.

Maybe the party is just that terrified of someone who might be moderate on some issues or more classically liberal as opposed to irrationally progressive like so many of the other candidates.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    7 years ago

Russia Russia Russia!

Is  poor Hillary's desperate cry for attention...

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
4.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    7 years ago
Russia Russia Russia!

SLOW DOWN !

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Silent
5  bbl-1    7 years ago

No, Clinton did not say that.  But, her statement could be true.  After all, Putin's boy just handed the ME to Russia and Iran.  Much is at stake here.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
5.2  Ronin2  replied to  bbl-1 @5    7 years ago
But, her statement could be true.

Try again. Her faulty thinking leaves a lot to be desired.

Nationally, third-party candidates did relatively well in this election. With most of the ballots now counted, Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson gained over 3% of the popular vote, and the Green party’s Jill Stein got 1%. Altogether, candidates who did not represent either of the two main parties got around 4.9% of the popular vote (in 2012, third-party candidates only managed 1.7%, and in 2008, 1.4%). It’s easy to see why people point the finger at third-party votes. In Michigan, where the election was so close that the Associated Press still hasn’t called the result, Trump is ahead by about 12,000 votes. That’s significantly less than the 242,867 votes that went to third-party candidates in Michigan. It’s a similar story elsewhere: third-party candidates won more total votes than the Trump’s margin of victory in Wisconsin, Arizona, North Carolina and Florida. Without those states, Trump would not have won the presidency.

I campaigned for Gary Johnson in my very conservative area. The few votes for him that were cast would have gone to Trump instead; if only two Establishment party candidates were allowed. Johnson garnered far more votes than Jill Stein. Of course Hillary and her backers are vain enough to think she would have received all of the third party votes. Next step by the Establishment will be to try and change the rules to make it even more difficult for third party candidates to get on the ballot.  Sure Hillary will be all in on that effort.

After all, Putin's boy just handed the ME to Russia and Iran.

Right, keep dreaming. Obama opened the door for Russia and Iran in Syria. After he sent in US troops, and start a bombing campaign is when Russian, China, and Iran were invited in. Syria had to give up a port, military base, and air fields to Russia. Since Obama made no secret he wanted to remove Assad.  Assad gave up Syrian assets to protect himself. Obama gift rapped Yemen to the Houthi. It was Bush Jr handed Iraq to Iran on a silver platter. But Trruuummmmppppp!!!!! Things went on long before Trump ever became president. But it seems the left have forgotten Obama's 8 years completely. They are even attributing some of Bush Jr's actions to Trump now.

Much is at stake here.

You are correct. The mental well being of the entire left is at stake. Four more years of Trump and there might not be enough sky for them to scream at. No amount of Russian sponsored pink pussy hat protests and parades will make them feel whole. They will have broken all of their crayons, and their coloring books will have long past been filled (almost completely in orange and yellow). The puppies and kittens will have grown up and gone to loving homes. Whatever will they do?

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
6  It Is ME    7 years ago

I guess 11 Morons are better than the ONE "Smart" person on the Democrat stage ?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7  JohnRussell    7 years ago

Tulsi Gabbard has a lot in common with some Trump supporters. She was a member of a cult too. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @7    7 years ago

What about Jill Stein? She was also called a Russian asset.  Let's see if I got it right - Stein worked for Russia as a third party candidate, but worked for the US Constitution when she demanded a recount after Trump won!  Correct?


 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
7.1.1  Ronin2  replied to  Vic Eldred @7.1    7 years ago

Common Vic.

You forgot the, "but Trruuummmmppppp!!!!!!"

Everything is acceptable so long as it is against Trump.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
7.1.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ronin2 @7.1.1    7 years ago

They've lost their conscience.

 
 
 
Dean Moriarty
Professor Silent
7.3  Dean Moriarty  replied to  JohnRussell @7    7 years ago

She has far more that is not in common with Trump supporters. She is a typical tax and spend Democrat that wants bigger more intrusive government, higher taxes and less personal freedom. All things Trump supporters are not going to support. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
7.4  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @7    7 years ago

I don't think someone name "Lalita" is a very credible source.

Tulsi has adopted Hinduism, same as her her mother.

Is Hinduism a cult?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
8  Vic Eldred    7 years ago

Gabbard is a veteran now being called a Russian asset because Clinton disagrees with her policy?

This is what happens when there is no accountability for the Russia hoax. Hopefully we get some action on that early next week.

So far not a single word of defense for Gabbard from her fellow (morally bankrupt) democrats!

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
8.1  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Vic Eldred @8    7 years ago
accountability for the Russia hoax

what Russia hoax ?

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
8.1.2  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Have Opinion Will Travel @8.1.1    7 years ago

No worries We’ll take care of dealing with this matter.

No Worries.... , ?

what the Fck am i worried about again ?

You Lying about no Russian Hoax ?

.

Well, 

your right then, No worries.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
8.1.3  Ronin2  replied to  igknorantzrulz @8.1.2    7 years ago

He means the hoax that the Democrats and Hillary tried to portray as Trump colluding with Russia. When Russia is working both sides to divide the US. Mueller couldn't prove collusion between Trump and Russia even with a full staff of Hillary and Obama sycophants.

Or would you care to explain these anti Trump actions by Russia?

The Russians were also accused of promoting discord after the election by simultaneously holding New York rallies, one in support of Trump’s victory and another under the name “Trump is NOT my President!” according to an indictment released Friday by U.S. Special Counsel Robert Mueller. There was a separate post-election, anti-Trump rally in Charlotte, North Carolina.

One Facebook group called “United Muslims of America” was allegedly created by the Russians to plan a rally called “Support Hillary. Save American Muslims” in July 2016 in Washington.

The group arranged for one American to hold a sign depicting Clinton and a fake quote attributed to her saying, “I think Sharia Law will be a powerful new direction of freedom,” according to the indictment.

No biggie, right? Well, on Friday prosecutors said 13 meddling Russians were not only behind pro-Trump rallies, but anti-Trump rallies as well, including a "Trump is NOT my President" rally in NYC "on or around Nov. 12," according to the indictment signed by Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

It's been widely reported that the indictment claims the goal of the meddling was to "sow discord in the U.S. political system, including the 2016 U.S. presidential election." It reads, in part, "Defendants and their coconspirators
used false U.S. personas to organize and coordinate U.S. political rallies in support of then president-elect Trump, while simultaneously using other false U.S. personas to organize and coordinate U.S. political rallies protesting the results of the 2016 U.S. presidential election." 

Putin must be a moron to try and squelch the power of his puppet in Washington.Trump can do so much for Russia when he is marginalized and has to constantly fight for survival./S

 
 
 
igknorantzrulz
PhD Silent
8.1.4  igknorantzrulz  replied to  Ronin2 @8.1.3    7 years ago
Or would you care to explain these anti Trump actions by Russia?

Would you care to explain why we've NEVER heard Trumpp, say a damn negative word about Putin, as if he had Trumpps balls in a vice.

Putin has shit on him, as no 'man' submits like that, especially one that is constantly arguing like a fifth grader, who was held back 3 times, but Daddy paid off school so now the 2nd grader is a first grade smack in our WH.

.

Russia and Putin own our treasonous traitor, sooner you face reality,   ah who am i kidding, you won't

 
 
 
It Is ME
Masters Participates
8.1.5  It Is ME  replied to  igknorantzrulz @8.1    7 years ago
what Russia hoax ?

Adam "Schifty" Schiff is going to let us know sooooon !

He has all that "Definitive" proof he's been claiming to have since 2016.

Now how 'bout those "Washington Nationals". jrSmiley_36_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
8.1.6  Greg Jones  replied to  igknorantzrulz @8.1    7 years ago

I sure wish the IGNORE feature still worked.

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Participates
11  GregTx    7 years ago

Hillaryious! 

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
12  Sunshine    7 years ago

384

 
 
 
al Jizzerror
Masters Guide
13  al Jizzerror    7 years ago

The title of this seed is:

Hillary Clinton says Tulsi Gabbard is a 'Russian asset' groomed to ensure Trump reelection

The seeded article itself directly contradicts the title:

"They are also going to do third party again," Clinton, 71, said. "I'm not making any predictions, but I think they’ve got their eye on somebody who is currently in the Democratic primary and are grooming her to be the third-party candidate," Clinton said, referring to Gabbard, without mentioning the Hawaii representative by name.

Clinton did NOT mention Gabbard by name and there are five Democratic women running for president this cycle: Gabbard, Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Minnesota Sen. Amy Kloubuchar, California Sen. Kamala Harria and author Marianne Williamson.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
13.2  Ronin2  replied to  al Jizzerror @13    7 years ago

The whole planet knows who she is talking about.  

Hillary is the best Russian bot Putin has.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
15  Jeremy Retired in NC    7 years ago
Hillary Clinton said....

Isn't Hillary blather on what started this whole "Russia" complex the Democrats and the left have lived on since November 2016?  

This bitch is like an STD.  You just can't fucking get rid of her.

 
 
 
lib50
Professor Silent
19  lib50    7 years ago

Hmm, why are the conservatives in such a snit about Tulsi?  Since when is there a low they won't applaud?  And like her or not, if she is being promoted by the bots and trolls, one has to ask why? 

 
 

Who is online







140 visitors