╌>

Ukrainian prosecutors just blew up Trump's Hunter Biden conspiracy theories: report

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  john-russell  •  6 years ago  •  28 comments

By:   Matthew Chapman (Salon)

Ukrainian prosecutors just blew up Trump's Hunter Biden conspiracy theories: report
According to a new Ukrainian audit, there is "no evidence of wrongdoing on the part of Hunter Biden"

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



The pretext for President Donald Trump trying to extort Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky into announcing an investigation of former Vice President Joe Biden's family — a scandal which resulted in his impeachment — was a conspiracy theory that Biden's son Hunter had some sort of improper dealings in the country through his seat on the board of the energy firm Burisma.

But according to The Guardian, Ukrainian officials conducting an audit of Burisma just laid that narrative to rest.

"An audit of thousands of old case files by Ukrainian prosecutors found no evidence of wrongdoing on the part of Hunter Biden, the former prosecutor general, who had launched the audit, told Reuters," said the report. "Ruslan Ryaboshapka was in the spotlight last year as the man who would decide whether to launch an investigation into former vice president Joe Biden and his son Hunter, in what became a key issue in the impeachment of President Donald Trump."

"The audit was intended to probe whether cases Ryaboshapka had inherited from his predecessors had been handled properly, given the reputation of the prosecution service as being riddled with corruption and influence-peddling," said the report. "The audit was part of a broader reform of the prosecution service but became politically charged given some of the cases related to Burisma's founder."

"Ryaboshapka was fired in March after lawmakers accused him of not moving quickly enough in prosecuting cases," said the report. "Ryaboshapka said he was axed because he had started bringing real reform to the prosecution service for the first time in a way that threatened the interests of corrupt politicians."

You can read more here.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    6 years ago

Ukrainian prosecutors find no evidence against Hunter Biden

Audit probed energy company Burisma, of which Biden was a board member from 2014-2019

An   audit of thousands of old case files   by Ukrainian prosecutors found no evidence of wrongdoing on the part of Hunter Biden, the former prosecutor general, who had launched the audit, told Reuters.

Ruslan Ryaboshapka was in the spotlight last year as the man who would decide whether to launch an investigation into former vice president Joe Biden and his son Hunter, in what became a key issue in the impeachment of President   Donald Trump .

President Volodymyr Zelenskiy described Ryaboshapka as “100 percent my person” on a call in July 2019 in which Trump asked Zelenskiy to investigate Biden, the man who became his main rival in the 2020 presidential race.

After taking office, Ryaboshapka in October announced an audit of old cases he inherited, including those related to the energy company Burisma, of which Hunter Biden was a board member between 2014-2019.

The audit was intended to probe whether cases Ryaboshapka had inherited from his predecessors had been handled properly, given the reputation of the prosecution service as being riddled with corruption and influence-peddling.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  seeder  JohnRussell    6 years ago

So the whole thing was fake news and conspiracy nuttery from the right. And the president* of the United States was the main conspirator. His sorry ass should have been impeached. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @2    6 years ago

No problem JR. The Dems are planning to impeach him again next term...unless a miracle happens and Biden steals the presidency

All Trump did was make a get acquainted call to what's his name. Nothing remotely impeachable happened.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1    6 years ago
All Trump did was make a get acquainted call to what's his name

I dont know if you believe that or are being dishonest. But either way its unsettling. 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.1.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Greg Jones @2.1    6 years ago
The Dems are planning to impeach him again next term

They've had just cause for half a dozen impeachments this term.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
2.1.3  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.1    6 years ago

No, just typical.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @2    6 years ago

He was impeached, John, but the Senate exonerated him. They didn't even censure him like they did Clinton

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2.2.1  Ronin2  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.2    6 years ago

Clinton was guilty of perjury. He settled with the woman out of court, and then lost his license to practice law. That is a real crime. A real crime Democrats excused in the Senate; along with obstruction. (Funny how obstruction became a crime only for Trump with Democrats. They couldn't even come close to proving it.)

Several Democrats in the House voted to impeach Clinton. Only 1 ex-Republican voted to impeach Trump in the House. When it came to the Senate Democrats put party before country for Clinton. With Trump Democrats put party before country in both the House and Senate. Seems they will never learn.

What crime is Trump guilty of outside of upsetting leftists everywhere on a daily basis?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.2.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  Ronin2 @2.2.1    6 years ago
When it came to the Senate Democrats put party before country for Clinton.

Huh? Obviously some Senate Democrats had to vote to convict because he got censured.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.4  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.2    6 years ago

Correction noted TG. 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.2.5  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.4    6 years ago

I think people get confused over the word "impeachment". It simply is a word for "indictment". The House acts as a grand jury which hears evidence and determines if there is enough for a jury trial.

The Senate then acts as a jury and determines if there is enough evidence to convict. In this case, the Senate "found" not enough for a conviction.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.2.6  Ozzwald  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.2    6 years ago
It would be easier and less time consuming to name what he wasn't guilty of. 

The only one that comes to mind is " Mopery ", but I wouldn't put it past him.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
2.2.7  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.2.5    6 years ago

They probably did find it but blew it off.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
3  Nerm_L    6 years ago

The Ukrainian conclusion has the same value as Russian investigators concluding Donald Trump didn't violate Russian law.

The concerns in the United States are violations of US law.  And that requires an investigation in the United States.

What should be of concern to Biden is that Ukraine appears to be willing to share information.  Ukraine may not stonewall US investigations the way Russia did.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Nerm_L @3    6 years ago

The imagination is strong in you. 

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
3.2  cjcold  replied to  Nerm_L @3    6 years ago

But, but, but, Benghazi!!!!

 
 
 
zuksam
Junior Silent
4  zuksam    6 years ago

If Hunter committed a crime it was likely in the USA when he asked his dad to muscle the Ukrainian government to protect Hunter's employer. Ukrainian Law was violated but it was Joe Biden who committed those crimes that can be proven. The only evidence there would be against Hunter would be if his father testified and told the truth about conversations between himself and his son and that isn't likely but there's plenty of evidence against quid pro Joe including his own public admissions. In the end we already know Hunter is a shady character he has a long and colorful history but it's Joe Biden and his crimes we are most concerned with since he's the one running for President.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
4.1  cjcold  replied to  zuksam @4    6 years ago

With your imagination, you should be writing spy novels.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
4.3  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  zuksam @4    6 years ago

Where was the concern when Trump ran?

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
5  Paula Bartholomew    6 years ago

Trump will still make this an issue when campaigning.  If he still wants to go there, Biden should open the door of the Trump family ties to crime, then and now.  The first thing I would bring up is how his son (with dad's encouragement I'm sure) took money earmarked for children's cancer research and funneled it back into the Trump family pockets.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @5    6 years ago
The first thing I would bring up is how his son (with dad's encouragement I'm sure) took money earmarked for children's cancer research and funneled it back into the Trump family pockets.

Yep. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Quiet
5.1.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1    6 years ago

There are so many things Biden could use considering the Trump history and he should do so.

 
 

Who is online







106 visitors