Donald Trump Is Now 'America's No. 1 Traitor,' Says Veterans Group

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  jbb  •  one month ago  •  86 comments

By:   Yahoo

Donald Trump Is Now 'America's No. 1 Traitor,' Says Veterans Group
"Benedict Arnold can step aside," VoteVets says in its latest anti-Trump attack ad.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Lee Moran HuffPost July 4, 2020, 5:04 AM

Donald Trump has taken over from Benedict Arnold as "America's number one traitor," according to a group of veterans seeking to vote the president out of office this November.

"No one has betrayed those in uniform like Donald Trump," said the voiceover in the latest ad released by the progressive PAC VoteVets on Friday.

The 65-second spot references Trump's siding with Russia's President Vladimir Putin over U.S. intelligence on Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election and his dismissal of reports that U.S. officials knew Russia allegedly paid Taliban members to kill American troops.

"This July Fourth, Benedict Arnold can step aside, because Benedict Donald is America's number one traitor," the voiceover concluded.


This July 4th, there is a new name synonymous with traitor. Move over Benedict Arnold. Meet...#BenedictDonald#TRE45ONpic.twitter.com/zH0TgMf0Rb
— VoteVets (@votevets) July 3, 2020

The #BenedictDonald and #TRE45ON hashtags trended on Twitter as the ad was viewed more than 2 million times in its first 12 hours online.

VoteVets last month tore into Trump over the Russian bounty reports with this scathing video:

It also slammed Trump in May over what it described as "the most inappropriate" Memorial Day comment that a president has ever made:


This is the most inappropriate #MemorialDay comment that a @POTUS has ever made. Self-promotion on a day to remember the fallen, and wishing those remembering their deceased loved ones a "happy" holiday is appalling. #CadetBoneSpurspic.twitter.com/kRse4dnwiu
— VoteVets (@votevets) May 28, 2018

This article originally appeared on HuffPost and has been updated.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
smarty_function_ntUser_is_admin: user_id parameter required
[]
 
JBB
1  seeder  JBB    one month ago

Trump is less popular than anal warts with veterans!

 
 
 
Greg Jones
1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JBB @1    one month ago

released by the progressive PAC VoteVets on Friday.

Tells all we need to know.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
1.1.1  Jasper2529  replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    one month ago
released by the progressive PAC VoteVets on Friday. Tells all we need to know.

Ya think?  jrSmiley_82_smiley_image.gif

https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=VoteVets.org

https://www.factcheck.org/2020/04/votevets-org/

2020 PAC Contribution Data

Presidential
Total to Democrats: $10,000
Total to Republicans: $0

House
Total to Democrats: $296,933
Total to Republicans: $0

Senate
Total to Democrats: $80,000
Total to Republicans: $0

https://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/pacgot.php?cmte=C00418897&cycle=2020

But, MBFC claims ...

These media sources have a slight to moderate liberal bias.
VoteVets.org   is organized as a non-partisan political action committee  

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/votevets-org/

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
1.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Jasper2529 @1.1.1    one month ago

So what if they have a moderate to liberal bias? Does that make them wrong? Or are you of the opinion that every one who ever wore a uniform has to be conservative? 

 
 
 
Gsquared
1.1.3  Gsquared  replied to  Jasper2529 @1.1.1    one month ago

It certainly sounds like this group of veterans has solid American values.  You would expect them to donate to the Party of Treason or the Traitor in Chief?  I don't think so.

 
 
 
Kavika
1.1.4  Kavika   replied to  Jasper2529 @1.1.1    one month ago

So they're a liberal veterans group. Since their vets, they have put their life on the line for this country and swore an oath to protect and defend his nation against all enemies, foreign and domestic. They certainly can choose to be liberal if they want to, they have paid their dues.  

Are you a vet Jasper? If you are you can make the same choice. Easy Peasy

Nativos americanos y veteranos latinos para Biden / Harris

 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
1.1.5  1stwarrior  replied to  Kavika @1.1.4    one month ago

Not quite all Native Americans and Latinos - definitely not all.

 
 
 
Kavika
1.1.6  Kavika   replied to  1stwarrior @1.1.5    one month ago

Better brush up on your Spanish, I didn't say all. I know that there are some like you.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
1.1.7  1stwarrior  replied to  Kavika @1.1.6    one month ago

As you well know, I don't like either of them - and there are quite a number of folks in my neck of the woods who have the same feelings.  And, IF they were the only choices, I'd exercise my Constitutional right of not voting.

There are a "few" non-Dem/non-Repubs who are interesting, but just haven't found enough information on them - yet.

ps - Entiendo muy bien el español, recuerde, mi esposa, mi hija, su abuela y mi suegra son todas de Venezuela, por lo que el inglés es un idioma muy olvidado en nuestra casa.

Gracias y buenos noches.

 
 
 
CB
1.1.8  CB   replied to  Greg Jones @1.1    one month ago

Truth is truth. It ain't a little truth or a big truth or even a tiny bit 'pregnant,' it's simply fact no matter the background.

 
 
 
Kavika
1.1.9  Kavika   replied to  1stwarrior @1.1.7    one month ago

Funny it seems that many of your comments are supportive of Trump or attacking dems/liberals. 

If what you say is correct then you better prepare to not vote, since anything other than the two candidates is a waste of a vote. 

I'm well aware that your wife etc are from Venezuela. So you should know that I didn't say ALL.

Baamaapii 

 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
1.1.10  1stwarrior  replied to  Kavika @1.1.9    one month ago

Actually, no - IMHO, any vote for either of the two is a wasted vote.  Neither is the leader we NEED and I haven't seen anyone in either party who fits that bill right now.

I, as I have explained to you a couple of times, approve/support programs that are beneficial to the people, regardless of which party proposes/enacts them.  Hence, I "may" like some of the things this administration (not the President) has done/is doing and, on the flip side, there "may" be some things they are doing that I don't like.  Do the same for the Dem Congressional folks.  Did the same with Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush.  If it's good - OK; it it ain't - it sux.

I "try" not to be as obviously biased as many on NT are - but, as stated before, politics in today's world suck as they are no longer for the constituents, but for the office holders and their brethren.  Both parties suck - the vast majority of their leaders suck - we, the People, need to seriously clean house - very deeply and thoroughly.

But, will we???  Kinda doubt it during my remaining 20 - 40 years.

 
 
 
Kavika
1.1.11  Kavika   replied to  1stwarrior @1.1.10    one month ago

When you describe the ''people'' you should be aware that has a couple of meanings. For me, there is ''The People'' and the vast majority of items proposed by the right for ''The People'' are for shit. So I'm much more supportive of the left and their dealings with ''The People'' If need be we can take both parties' platform for ''The People'' and debate them. 

We can start with Bears Ears and work our way through Tongass, Alaska Wildlife Sanctuary, Pepple Mine, DAPL, sovereignty, removing Indians lands from trust status. One of the best is what the administration has done to the Mashpee Wampanoag.

Or how the ''border wall'' is being built right on Native land without their permission. Oh yeah, there is that old sovereignty thing again.

Reality should tell you there won't be a 3rd party or a 3rd party candidate that will ever get over 5% of the vote. It is a waste of a vote.

Biizitaagoziwin inwewin adbadad anishinaawin.

Maybe your good with the insults, I'm not. 

 
 
 
CB
1.1.12  CB   replied to  1stwarrior @1.1.10    one month ago

The old both parties suck 'thing' again. So just sat it out? (And let that other guy win.) Riggggggght. /s.

We ain't believing it. We vote. You sit it out, OKAAAAAYYYYY.

One snack * and a "Hey Now!" to that head-fake that just waddled by.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
1.1.13  1stwarrior  replied to  Kavika @1.1.11    one month ago

Not quite sure just where you see an insult - 'cause none have been addressed at you.

Yes, we have discussed the above issues, including the border wall.  Those are parts of the administration I have issues with.  In fact, so far this administration has done jack shyte for Native Americans.  I'm really concerned,  in a strange way, about what "his" Native American history month proclamation is gonna say - something like - "Hey ya'll, it it weren't for the rich white people, there would be no Native Americans" or some other horse shyte like that.

Obama and Clinton did actually work with and for the Native Americans.  Daddy Bush did a little, little Bush did nuthin'.  I don't see either Trump nor Biden changing the Washington concept of Tribal relationships.  Example - why isn't Diane Humetewa on his "short" list?  Hell, she's not even in consideration 'cause she ain't done nuthin for buzinesses/industry/economical growth.  But, then again, we're in the SW and we ain't got much power, ya know?  Oh, and she's "Indian" - they ain't too smart - well, they beat me in Atlantic City, but that was luck.

Kavika - I have never nor will I ever "insult" you.  We've been through too much together to carry that type of banter - especially among friends.

 
 
 
Kavika
1.1.14  Kavika   replied to  1stwarrior @1.1.13    one month ago
Kavika - I have never nor will I ever "insult" you.  We've been through too much together to carry that type of banter - especially among friends.

That comment was directed at Trump not you. 

Biizitaagoziwin inwewin adbadad anishinaawin translates to roughly ''his insulting Indian people''.

I'm really concerned,  in a strange way, about what "his" Native American history month proclamation is gonna say - something like -

All you have to do is check out what he did/said last year. https://indiancountrytoday.com/opinion/trump-s-effort-to-rebrand-native-american-heritage-month-does-not-and-will-not-deter-indigenous-movements-Zg0RSG7-w0C2HHLujBrYEw

 
 
 
r.t..b...
1.2  r.t..b...  replied to  JBB @1    one month ago

How any veteran can re-up in support of this guy is beyond me. Granted, I have never served  voluntarily nor been asked to involuntarily...but for the grace of the calendar. I missed being arbitrarily shipped off to Vietnam by four lucky years, but knew too many from my hometown who either died, were captured, or came back a shadow of the boy that left. Not knowing the details and only seeing the results leaves me aghast that our supposed commander-in-chief can so flippantly dismiss their sacrifice.
Let me give thanks to those who made that sacrifice for me...sadly a most simple gesture this poseur seems unable or unwilling to do.  

 

 
 
 
dennis smith
1.2.1  dennis smith  replied to  r.t..b... @1.2    one month ago

I was drafted in 1966 at 19 years old and sent to Vietnam. I had a hatred for over 20 years against any Dems, thanks to LBJ and his BS.  

At approx age 40 I was able to see that neither party was worth a shit and resigned myself to voting for whoever, no matter what party, held the most similar views that I did. Since then voted for Dems and Repubs inculding Obama for his 1st term only. His admin including Biden denigrated America to the point I will now vote only for Repubs.

 
 
 
CB
1.2.2  CB   replied to  dennis smith @1.2.1    one month ago
His admin including Biden denigrated America to the point I will now vote only for Repubs.

Dennis, I just have to ask this question. In light of the fact that many repubs, as you label them, just lied about not putting forward a supreme court justice in an election year if Trump is president and a justice dies and we are actually in the process of voting, . . . why is the lie not a denigration on republicans? Give me your best answer, please.

 
 
 
r.t..b...
1.2.3  r.t..b...  replied to  dennis smith @1.2.1    one month ago
I was drafted in 1966 at 19 years old and sent to Vietnam. I had a hatred for over 20 years against any Dems, thanks to LBJ and his BS.

Totally understandable. Thank you, Mr. Smith for your service...nothing more and nothing less.

Peace.

 
 
 
dennis smith
1.2.4  dennis smith  replied to  CB @1.2.2    one month ago

To clarify, I will only vote for Repubs for POTUS. As far as Congress, state, city and local government elections I will vote for whoever aligns most closely with my views.  

 
 
 
CB
1.2.5  CB   replied to  dennis smith @1.2.4    one month ago

How convenient. Repubs used that line of responding and look at where it landed us today. Donald Trump is the ringleader of all repub BS. He is no damn good, but you will vote for him. Figures.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
1.3  1stwarrior  replied to  JBB @1    one month ago

"HuffPost"?????????

BBBBBRRRRUUUUUHHHHHHAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHAAAAAAA.

A purely biased site - " It has been described as mostly liberal-leaning  - HuffPost regularly appended an editor's note to the end of stories about candidate  Donald Trump , reading: "Donald Trump regularly incites political violence and is a serial liar, rampant xenophobe, racist, misogynist and birther who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims—1.6 billion members of an entire religion—from entering the U.S." -  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HuffPost

You mean THAT totally unbiased HuffPost????

BS

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
1.4  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  JBB @1    one month ago

Rudy is one also.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
1.5  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  JBB @1    one month ago

Unfortunately, some still support him.

 
 
 
MUVA
2  MUVA    one month ago

Rich what a joke I worked with special forces while in service mostly EOD and Seal’s some RIV RON to a man I can tell you the men I know are voting Trump 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
2.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  MUVA @2    one month ago

that's a handful of people you know. you don't know everyone that served

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
2.2  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  MUVA @2    one month ago

My dad served in both Korea and Vietnam and he is not voting for Trump and neither is my friend's dad who also was in Korea. And for the record, my dad has voted for Republicans. 

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
2.2.1  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.2    one month ago

If my dad were still alive (USMC) he would not either.

 
 
 
MUVA
2.2.2  MUVA  replied to  Perrie Halpern R.A. @2.2    one month ago

My father a 35 year vet  served Korea, Vietnam, XO airborne command post. My brother a west point grad brother in law west point grad myself to combat deployments Iraq are all voting Trump.I still work with special force activities as a contractor on a weekly basis most of them volunteer they are also voting Trump. 

 
 
 
Kavika
2.2.3  Kavika   replied to  MUVA @2.2.2    one month ago

It makes no difference if they are West Point grads or high school grads their votes all count as one.

 
 
 
MUVA
2.2.4  MUVA  replied to  Kavika @2.2.3    one month ago

The point is they are smart vets smarter than most especially father.

 
 
 
Kavika
2.2.5  Kavika   replied to  MUVA @2.2.4    one month ago
The point is they are smart vets smarter than most especially father.

And there are many ''smart'' vets that didn't go to WP and were enlisted. It's still one vote per person. 

Your comment sounds pretty elitist.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
2.2.6  Trout Giggles  replied to  Kavika @2.2.5    one month ago

So....I take it I'm not smart because I was an enlisted airman? That college degree doesn't mean shit?

(ok...I'm not really smart because I didn't have a high enough GPA to go to OCS)

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
3  Mark in Wyoming     one month ago

And yet another group i had never heard of , thx jasper for the link showing what they stand for.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
3.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @3    one month ago

Yeah....Jasper has no bias

 
 
 
Gsquared
3.2  Gsquared  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @3    one month ago

They stand for solid American values.  Is there a problem with that?

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
3.2.1  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Gsquared @3.2    one month ago

No problem , just stated never heard of them. 

anyone have a different link they want me to read to find out more about them? or was the one sufficient and truthfully described that particular group?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3.2.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @3.2.1    one month ago

I never did either. There certainly are a lot of political groups. I'm just looking at who is online. Mark we may be better off doing our own investigating.

Oh, here:

"Notes:   VoteVets.org   is organized as a non-partisan political action committee (PAC) and non-profit 501(c)(4) status in the United States. Although a nonpartisan organization, it has been described as “closely aligned with Congressional Democrats,” and “liberal” in news stories. In a June 2011 press release, the organization specifically identified itself as the “largest progressive group of veterans in America.” (D. Van Zandt 2/4/2017)

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/votevets-org/

 
 
 
Gsquared
3.2.3  Gsquared  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @3.2.1    one month ago

Got it.  Have you looked at their website, votevets.org?  It contains a lot of information.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3.2.4  Vic Eldred  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.2    one month ago

I just visited their website and there is a huge picture of Rachel Maddow?

I had to step away! It got to me. A little Ginger Ale seems to help settle my stomach.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
3.2.5  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.2    one month ago

well im not a progressive by any definition , and im not a democrat , or what passes for one now days, so likely would not be something i am interested in .

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3.2.6  Vic Eldred  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @3.2.5    one month ago

You're kind of an independent?

Are you a Veteran?

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
3.2.7  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.6    one month ago

yes 10 years, military connected disabled and non compensable .

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3.2.8  Vic Eldred  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @3.2.7    one month ago

Thank you for your service.

What do you think of Vets like these? I know all are entitled to their opinion, but in the military it would be a minority opinion, correct?

https://www.aol.com/article/news/2016/11/11/why-veterans-voted-donald-trump-swing-states/21603486/

The people being supported here are all democrats.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
3.2.9  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.8    one month ago

i have been out almost 30 years now , things change , i really have no opinion on how other vets think or what their opinions are. to me the only opinion that matters in making the choices on who to vote for is my own , and some dont seem to like that or the fact that i have opinions that cross the entire political spectrum dependent on the issue at hand.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
3.2.10  Vic Eldred  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @3.2.9    one month ago

Yes, I've noticed that you are not an ideologue. As a matter of fact you may be one of our few independents. As always, it's been nice talking with you.

Have a good night, sir.

 
 
 
Gsquared
3.2.11  Gsquared  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @3.2.9    one month ago

Good for you.  Seriously.

Do you disparage other vets, or other Americans, just because they are Democrats, as some would like you to do, even though, as you have stated, you are not a Democrat?  I don't think you probably do.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
3.2.12  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Gsquared @3.2.3    one month ago

just did. and i doubt i fit with that org.

 
 
 
Gsquared
3.2.13  Gsquared  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @3.2.12    one month ago

Understood.  If you ever happen to develop an opinion that coincides with an issue they support, at least you now know who they are.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
3.2.14  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Gsquared @3.2.11    one month ago

LMAO, some could say i do that to everyone , im an equal opertunity disparager. status of any kind means nothing to me .

 i have a life time of experiences ( yes i would love to meet the little oriental guy at the herring run on the cape , when my moms water broke , and they rushed her away said i hope the child grows up to live in interesting times I would punch that guy right in the mouth) and my opinions are formed from those experiences as well as a very early interest in history , when i was younger thats all i was about , learning what came before.

Political party means nothing to me except as an identifier, there ARE some , principles dems hold i can get behind and some Rep i can , and both have principles i can not , nor will i ever get behind and to attempt to do so is what my grandfather told me is what is called a "fools errand". I belong to no party , nor will i belong to any party. I like the fact i can vote ALA carte across party lines for those i think best suit the job i think they should be doing if that is my choice.

 
 
 
CB
3.2.15  CB   replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.2    one month ago

I wonder if their leanings have something to do with justice, decency, dignity, and the pointed fact that our mutually shared government populated military has a structure that tells young men and women of each generation that honor and service can be deeply hampered by competing "tribal" interests? That men and women asked to face death should have the confidence that "home" will do fine and not tear itself into component parts while they are 'away'?

Military men and women are taught to 'jell' together into a well-oiled machine. It is the psychology of being in a pressure cooker and watching the best 'cream' rise to the occasion. The best bond together spiritually (for life). It changes millions upon millions for a lifetime.

Many Trump republicans and conservatives have no honor. Vote for your health back home - service-members!

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
3.2.16  Trout Giggles  replied to  CB @3.2.15    one month ago
Military men and women are taught to 'jell' together into a well-oiled machine.

You don't know how correct you are. We had to learn to work together and dismiss things like party politics, skin color, religion, and other personal beliefs or we wouldn't have gotten a damn thing done. I never served in combat but I imagine you don't particularly care what your buddy's politics are as long as he's watching your six and you are watching his.

 
 
 
CB
3.2.17  CB   replied to  Trout Giggles @3.2.16    one month ago

And yet here we are with this "flintstonian-looking" fool of a president going around verbally carving the country into regions, and tribes versus a more perfect union. Brother against brother, sister against sister, mother against son, father against daughter.

And there sits Donald Trump atop the big steaming pile of 'f-ed" up 'Merica, which is right where he wants it to be, so he can claim he fixed it! People need to wake the "F" up. We're being played by a minority of self-deluded selfish men and women in charge of the levers of power. Trump and some of his supporters know little and obviously are not interested in bonding with their fellow Americans. They are lying to us openly now. Listen up! Trump and some of his surrogates are OPENLY lying to us, and Donald has not even started that wannabe second four years term!

As the military bonds recruited men and women into one by putting them through a crucible, training, conflicts, battles, and wars, Donald Trump is attempting to switch this great nation into bonding. . . .with himself (alone) at its head. Look deeper my fellow Americans. You are being masterfully manipulated.

Lastly, I will drop this in your spirits. It is my opinion, that Donald Trump has asked nation-presidents for life for their a roadmaps; "how-to" guides to accomplishing the same here in the greatest democracy ever on Earth.

 
 
 
Kavika
4  Kavika     one month ago

Vote Vets supports veterans for public office. 

These are the vets that they are supporting this election cycle. Don't like it, take it up with Vote Vets or the vets themselves. 

Federal Offices

tammy-duckworth.jpg

U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth

U.S. Senate   – Illinois

  gary-peters.jpg

U.S. Senator Gary Peters

U.S. Senate   – Michigan

  jack-reed.jpg

U.S. Senator Jack Reed

U.S. Senate   – Rhode Island

  220px-Tom_Carper_official_portrait_112th_Congress.jpg

U.S. Senator Tom Carper

U.S. Senate   – Delaware

  Screen-Shot-2015-03-20-at-11.50.43-AM.png

Congressman Anthony Brown

U.S. House   – Maryland 4

  Screen-Shot-2016-03-06-at-10.02.02.png

Congressman Salud Carbajal

U.S. House   – California 24

  ruben-gallego.jpg

Congressman Ruben Gallego

U.S. House   – Arizona 7

  Ted-Lieu-Headshot.png

Congressman Ted Lieu

U.S. House   – California 33

  seth-moulton.jpg

Congressman Seth Moulton

U.S. House   – Massachusetts 6

  Screen-Shot-2015-12-28-at-10.41.00-PM.png

Congressman Jimmy Panetta

U.S. House   – California 20

  Screen-Shot-2017-12-06-at-14.13.22.png

Congressman Conor Lamb

U.S. House   – Pennsylvania 18

  Screen-Shot-2017-07-18-at-21.54.09.png

Congressman Gil Cisneros

U.S. House   – California 39

  Screen-Shot-2017-05-22-at-09.47.25.png

Congressman Jason Crow

U.S. House   – Colorado 6

  Screen-Shot-2017-11-01-at-22.02.59.png

Congressman Jared Golden

U.S. House   – Maine 2

  Screen-Shot-2017-05-22-at-09.45.36.png

Congresswoman Chrissy Houlahan

U.S. House   – Pennsylvania 6

  elaine-luria.png

Congresswoman Elaine Luria

U.S. House   – Virginia 2

  Screen-Shot-2017-11-12-at-22.20.45.png

Congressman Max Rose

U.S. House   – New York 11

  Screen-Shot-2017-06-13-at-10.04.03.png

Congresswoman Mikie Sherrill

U.S. House   – New Jersey 11

  MJ-Hegar-for-Congress.png

MJ Hegar for Senate

U.S. Senate   – Texas

  mark-kelley-profile.jpg.png

Mark Kelly for Senate

U.S. Senate   – Arizona

  Screen-Shot-2017-12-06-at-10.44.56.png

Gina Ortiz Jones for Congress

U.S. House   – Texas 23

  cal-cunningham.jpg

Cal Cunningham for Senate

U.S. Senate   – North Carolina

  Screen-Shot-2017-11-01-at-21.55.52.png

Amy McGrath for Senate

U.S. Senate   – Kentucky

  Jackie-Gordon-for-Congress.png

Jackie Gordon for Congress

U.S. House   – New York 2

  Screen-Shot-2017-11-12-at-22.17.31.png

Dan Feehan for Congress

U.S. House   – Minnesota 1

  moe-davis.jpg

Moe Davis for Congress

U.S. House   – North Carolina 11

  pam-keith.jpg

Pam Keith for Congress

U.S. House   – Florida 18

  Josh-Hicks.png

Josh Hicks for Congress

U.S. House   – Kentucky 6

  Jake-Auchincloss.jpg

Jake Auchincloss for Congress

U.S. House   – Massachusetts 4

  kai-kahele.jpg

Kai Kahele for Congress

U.S. House   – Hawaii 2

  Hillary-OConnor-Mueri.jpg

Hillary O'Connor Mueri for Congress

U.S. House   – Ohio 14

  Adrian-Perkins.jpg

Adrian Perkins for Senate

U.S. Senate   – Louisiana

  kim-mangone.png

Kim Mangone for Congress

U.S. House   – California 23

  61175005_2939063836111486_2474319810138210304_n.jpg

Phil Ehr for Congress

U.S. House   – Florida 1

State Offices

Screen-Shot-2015-08-28-at-4.45.56-PM.png

Governor John Bel Edwards

Governor   – Louisiana

  Screen-Shot-2018-01-12-at-11.53.46.png

Governor Tim Walz

Governor   – Minnesota

Non-Veterans We Support

andy-kim.jpg

Congressman Andy Kim

Non-Veteran   – New Jersey 3

  slotkin-1.png

Congresswoman Elissa Slotkin

Non-Veteran   – Michigan 8

  spanberger-1.png

Congresswoman Abigail Spanberger

Non-Veteran   – Virginia 7

 
 
 
Tacos!
6  Tacos!    one month ago
"This July Fourth, Benedict Arnold can step aside, because Benedict Donald is America's number one traitor," the voiceover concluded.

This so obviously dumb to anyone with at least a 5th grade education in American History. Keep this nonsense up and you'll reelect him. The more extreme and ridiculous the attacks on him are, the more sympathy he gets from voters.

 
 
 
Texan1211
6.1  Texan1211  replied to  Tacos! @6    one month ago

i am almost to the point of what will be worse---having Biden as President or listening to crap for 4 more years?

 
 
 
CB
6.1.1  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @6.1    one month ago

Joe Biden won't oppress Trump supporter privileges and rights, unless the aforementioned people claim rights belonging to others! So you can "rejoice."

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
6.1.2  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Texan1211 @6.1    one month ago
i am almost to the point of what will be worse---having Biden as President or listening to crap for 4 more years?

No brainer for me , all i have to do is turn off my hearing aides like i did the last 2 years i was married.

 
 
 
 
Texan1211
6.1.4  Texan1211  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @6.1.2    one month ago

ha ha!

good one!

 
 
 
Texan1211
6.1.5  Texan1211  replied to  CB @6.1.1    one month ago

you seem to have missed the point of my post.

I never claimed Biden would oppress anyone.

sounds like a strawman argument to me.

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
6.1.6  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  CB @6.1.3    one month ago

Was that meant for me or someone else? and if meant for me , what the flying finger fuck does it have to do with me?

 
 
 
CB
6.1.7  CB   replied to  Mark in Wyoming @6.1.6    one month ago

It goes back to something we shared together several days ago (on race and ethnicity). Then you were away. So now you're back and I am kindly sharing a thought. (Smile.) As for the "flying fucks" - nope.

 
 
 
CB
6.1.8  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.5    one month ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Texan1211
6.1.9  Texan1211  replied to  CB @6.1.8    one month ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
6.1.10  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Mark in Wyoming @6.1.6    one month ago

more like several WEEKS ago and we havent spoken since that i recall. so i will round file it .

 
 
 
CB
6.1.11  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @6.1.9    one month ago

removed for context

 
 
 
Texan1211
6.1.12  Texan1211  replied to  CB @6.1.11    one month ago

removed for context

 
 
 
CB
6.1.13  CB   replied to  Mark in Wyoming @6.1.10    one month ago

Yeah. I thought you would ignore it. Check.

 
 
 
CB
6.2  CB   replied to  Tacos! @6    one month ago

Whatever do you mean Tacos!, voters like who exactly?

 
 
 
CB
7  CB     one month ago

The article picture is interesting. So "clean." Who taught Donald how to properly salute?

 
 
 
Texan1211
7.1  Texan1211  replied to  CB @7    one month ago

so now we are reduced to criticizing our President over how he salutes, for Pete's sake? 

 
 
 
Gsquared
7.1.1  Gsquared  replied to  Texan1211 @7.1    one month ago

time.com/3425019/obamas-tea-cup-salute-causes-a-storm

Can you imagine that we were reduced by the Republicans to criticizing our President over a salute, for Pete's sake?

 
 
 
Texan1211
7.1.2  Texan1211  replied to  Gsquared @7.1.1    one month ago

if there is any problem with what others gave said. I suggest you take it up with them.

I'm not in the business of assigning words people don't actually say to them, and I don't take credit or blame for what others say.

 
 
 
CB
7.1.3  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @7.1    one month ago

Reduced, did you say?  Trump did not learn to salute during his military service and yet so 'crisp.'

 
 
 
CB
7.1.4  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @7.1.2    one month ago

And yet you chime in so often. . . . Just sayin'  We can take it up with "chimers." Chimers are handy. (Chuckles.)

 
 
 
Texan1211
7.1.5  Texan1211  replied to  CB @7.1.3    one month ago
Reduced, did you say? 

yes, It is right there in my post. Here, I'll repost it for you:

so now we are reduced to criticizing our President over how he salutes, for Pete's sake?  Trump did not learn to salute during his military service and yet so 'crisp.'

Being in the military isn't a prerequisite for learning to salute, but I am so happy you like how our President does it!

 
 
 
Texan1211
7.1.6  Texan1211  replied to  CB @7.1.4    one month ago
And yet you chime in so often. . . . Just sayin'  We can take it up with "chimers." Chimers are handy

Interesting, in a train-wreck-like kind of way.

I would ask what you mean, but what would be the point?

 
 
 
CB
7.1.7  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @7.1.5    one month ago

It is a crisp salute. Gotta love a crisp salute.  The rest of the image is lost on me. I can not muster respect for liars, cheaters, and thieves.

 
 
 
Texan1211
7.1.8  Texan1211  replied to  CB @7.1.7    one month ago
It is a crisp salute. Gotta love a crisp salute.

It IS!!

I love it too, and am very happy that you do!

Pretty snappy salute, eh?

 
 
 
Texan1211
7.1.9  Texan1211  replied to  CB @7.1.4    one month ago
And yet you chime in so often.

That tends to happen when people ask open questions on a forum meant for discussion.

Perhaps a private question would be better suited if "chiming in" is not welcomed?

 
 
 
CB
7.1.10  CB   replied to  Texan1211 @7.1.8    one month ago

Yes. I will honor the salute. I will let you do your best to be indulgent in anything more nuanced. Moving on. . . .

 
 
 
Texan1211
7.1.11  Texan1211  replied to  CB @7.1.10    one month ago
Yes. I will honor the salute.

Fantastic!

I will let you do your best to be indulgent in anything more nuanced.

Thanks for "allowing" me to do what I want.

What is that line?

oh, yeah!

"You're not the boss of me!"

 
 
 
Gsquared
7.1.12  Gsquared  replied to  Texan1211 @7.1.2    one month ago

Sure.  Whatever that means.

 
 
 
Texan1211
7.1.13  Texan1211  replied to  Gsquared @7.1.12    one month ago

what exact part needs to be clarified?

maybe I can help

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online

JBB
Gazoo


48 visitors