Candace Owens Says She’s Taking Legal Action Against Cardi B After Online Spat

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  tessylo  •  one month ago  •  16 comments

By:   Entertainment Tonight

Candace Owens Says She’s Taking Legal Action Against Cardi B After Online Spat

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Candace Owens Says She’s Taking Legal Action Against Cardi B After Online Spat


Wed, March 17, 2021, 4:58 PM

On Tuesday, Candace Owens took to Instagram to say she’s suing Cardi B after the two battled it out on Twitter. It all started on Monday, when the conservative political commentator slammed Cardi’s GRAMMY performance on Fox News. After Owens and the ‘WAP’ rapper went back and forth on Twitter, Cardi shared a tweet that she alleged was written by Owens, saying that the author’s husband had an affair with Owens’ brother. Later, Owens tweeted that she planned to sue Cardi and posted a 13-minute video about the whole ordeal on IGTV.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Tessylo    one month ago

So Candace Owens is yet another whiny little bitch on the 'right' who can dish it out but can't take it.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Senior Quiet
1.1  Ronin2  replied to  Tessylo @1    one month ago

Look up the definition of slander.

Unless Cardi B has absolute proof of her accusation she will settle this damn fast.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Ronin2 @1.1    one month ago

The dumb bitch Owens doesn't have a case.  She's ugly too!

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Masters Guide
1.1.2  Thrawn 31  replied to  Ronin2 @1.1    one month ago

No she won’t. Slander cases are INCREDIBLY hard to win. Cardi will b just fine and Owens isn’t actually going to file anything because any remotely honest lawyer will tell her she is going to lose since she started the whole thing in the first place.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1.3  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Thrawn 31 @1.1.2    one month ago

She's just blowing smoke up her supporters' asses.

The dumb ugly bitch doesn't have a leg to stand on.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Masters Quiet
1.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Tessylo @1    one month ago

I bet if Owens was a liberal Democrat you would be supporting her to the hilt!jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.1  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Ed-NavDoc @1.2    one month ago

That's a moronic thing to say.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Masters Quiet
1.2.2  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Tessylo @1.2.1    one month ago

Try reading some of your own comments here.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2  seeder  Tessylo    one month ago

Plus Candace, you dumb bitch, you haven't hurt Cardi B. one bit!  You've increased her sales!!!!!

 
 
 
Ronin2
Senior Quiet
2.1  Ronin2  replied to  Tessylo @2    one month ago

Because the "woke" and their money are soon parted supporting stupid things.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2.1.1  seeder  Tessylo  replied to  Ronin2 @2.1    one month ago

You forgot to mention 'liberal brown shirts'.

 
 
 
Hallux
Freshman Expert
2.1.2  Hallux  replied to  Ronin2 @2.1    one month ago

Sorta like the 'woke' that funded Steve Bannon?

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Masters Guide
2.1.3  Thrawn 31  replied to  Ronin2 @2.1    one month ago

Lol do you really wanna go down that road? 

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Masters Guide
3  Thrawn 31    one month ago

Lol she is t gonna sue anyone, Owens is full of shit. Plus I am pretty sure one has A LOT more money than the other and can ride it out for much longer. And besides dipshit Owens started it.

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
PhD Guide
4  Paula Bartholomew    one month ago

Don't want to get in a Twitter war you biatch, then stay off of Twitter.

 
 
 
Tacos!
PhD Expert
5  Tacos!    one month ago

It seems at first like it might be a straightforward issue. Either Owens wrote the tweet or she didn’t. But there is so much fake crap on the internet - especially about famous people - that gets retweeted all the time. Owens suggested it is a photoshopped tweet. If all Cardi did was retweet something she found (as opposed to creating the fake tweet herself), I don’t see her being held liable for defamation because this allegation would have already been existing on the internet.

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online






50 visitors