Would Someone Who Wants The World To Know They Are Not A White Supremacist Go On Tucker Carlson's Show ?

  

Category:  Op/Ed

By:  john-russell  •  2 weeks ago  •  90 comments

Would Someone Who Wants The World To Know They Are Not A White Supremacist Go On Tucker Carlson's Show ?
Maybe the youthful Rittenhouse is being led along by forces beyond his control and doesnt really want to be seen as the same ilk as Carlson, but if that is true he sure is making some bad PR decisions. 


A ways back, young Kyle Rittenhouse was photographed sharing a moment with Proud Boys


Rittenhouse drank beers, flashed the “ok” symbol co-opted by white supremacy groups, and was “serenaded” with the official song of the far-right group Proud Boys on the same day he pleaded not guilty to charges , according to a filing obtained by WTMJ-TV .
Prosecutors Seek to Modify Kyle Rittenhouse's Bond Conditions | Law&Crime (lawandcrime.com)

60004ede9aa48.preview.jpg?resize=800%2C450

Rittenhouse went to the bar with his mom on the day he made bail, where she evidently bought him a celebratory beer. In Wisconsin 17 year olds can drink liquor in a bar if one of their parents is present. 

Presumably it was a "wink wink " coincidence that the white nationalist group the Proud Boys of "stand back and stand by" and Jan 6th fame had a couple representatives in the bar at the same time . In any case Rittenhouse seems happy to have posed with them. 

Now, after his acquittal, Rittenhouse is heading straight for the pinnacle of white nationalism in the mainstream media, the Tucker Carlson Show on Fox News , for his first big post verdict interview. This undoubtedly will be a much hyped event in MAGA world. 

Would someone who actually wanted the whole world to know that he is not a vigilante, not a strident advocate of militia activity, and most importantly not a new symbol of "white" power choose the notoriously problematic Tucker Carlson Show as the place to go and make peace with the many lasting questions about his behavior in Kenosha? 

I find that hard to believe. 

Maybe the youthful Rittenhouse is being led along by forces beyond his control and doesnt really want to be seen as the same ilk as Carlson, but if that is true he sure is making some bad PR decisions. 

Rather, I think what the future will show us is that Rittenhouse is MAGA all the way and most likely Carlson is a boyhood hero of his. Just as Trump is. It just hasnt come out yet. 


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  author  JohnRussell    2 weeks ago

Rittenhouse will be on Tucker Carlson's show on Fox News on Monday night. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
PhD Principal
1.1  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @1    2 weeks ago

So what?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  author  JohnRussell    2 weeks ago

Well, after three hours, this hasnt gotten a single comment. 

I guess I was completely correct. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
PhD Principal
2.1  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @2    2 weeks ago

That’s interesting since you just posted this two hours ago

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Guide
2.1.1  1stwarrior  replied to  Sparty On @2.1    2 weeks ago

Time is not on John's side.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
3  Ender    2 weeks ago

All one has to do is kill several people and be a right wing celebrity...

They have been shielding his true self. Now the fat piglet is free to wallow in the mud.

I bet anything him and is mother are far right conspiracy theorists.

What mother in their right mind would drive their child to a protest like that (with a weapon).

I bet we see his name pop up again for doing something that gets people hurt.

He was given free reign.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1  devangelical  replied to  Ender @3    2 weeks ago

look on the bright side. he's worth more dead than alive to the domestic terrorist cult now. give it time.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
3.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Ender @3    2 weeks ago
bet anything him and is mother are far right conspiracy theorists.

followed by

hat mother in their right mind would drive their child to a protest like that (with a weapon).

Perfect.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4  Vic Eldred    2 weeks ago

Within days of the shootings, then-presidential candidate Joe Biden referenced Rittenhouse as a “white supremacist” despite no evidence supporting that widely repeated claim. Here we see an attempt to support that terrible smear.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
4.1  Ender  replied to  Vic Eldred @4    2 weeks ago

I suppose him partying with the proud boys was just....well, it can only be one thing.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Guide
4.1.1  1stwarrior  replied to  Ender @4.1    2 weeks ago

Your truth to that is ???????

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
4.1.2  Ender  replied to  1stwarrior @4.1.1    2 weeks ago

Would you party and take pictures with them at a bar?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
4.1.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  Ender @4.1    2 weeks ago

Lol.  you think Biden can see through time?

Crazy how a picture four months after the shooting somehow proves what the FBI couldn't despite looking through his phone, computer etc..

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.2  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @4    2 weeks ago

I think it is fair to say that the Proud Boys and Kyle Rittenhouse (and his mother)  didnt show up at the same Kenosha bar by coincidence. 

Now he goes on Tucker Carlson? lol.  Tucker Carlson is the poster boy for white nationalist sympathy in the mainstream media. If Rittenhouse wanted to allay concerns he is "white" oriented he would go on with George Stephanopoulos or Lester Holt, not Tucker Carlson. 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Guide
4.2.1  1stwarrior  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2    2 weeks ago

I just love your conspiracy theories John - keep'm com'n.

 
 
 
Drakkonis
Masters Guide
4.2.2  Drakkonis  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2    2 weeks ago
Now he goes on Tucker Carlson?

I'm not in his shoes but as I sit here now I would not go on any program. Not until after I finished suing the socks off everyone who defamed me and maybe not even then. I would not want to be anyone's poster boy. But Rittenhouse appearing on Tucker Carlson doesn't make him a white supremacist.

Tucker Carlson is the poster boy for white nationalist sympathy in the mainstream media.

He's not in charge of who likes him. While I think Tucker makes a lot of good points he also, like most pundits, hyperbolizes them into exaggerations or even untruths, sometimes, which is why I generally don't watch him any more. 

If Rittenhouse wanted to allay concerns he is "white" oriented he would go on with George Stephanopoulos or Lester Holt, not Tucker Carlson. 

Maybe. I don't know a lot about those guys. My guess, though, is he's likely to be wary of being ambushed, as so often happens, and sees Tucker as the least likely to do that. That's just speculation on my part, though. 

 
 
 
zuksam
Junior Silent
4.2.3  zuksam  replied to  JohnRussell @4.2    2 weeks ago
f Rittenhouse wanted to allay concerns he is "white" oriented he would go on with George Stephanopoulos or Lester Holt, not Tucker Carlson

I'm sure he went with whomever offered the most money and wasn't going to attack him.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
4.2.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  zuksam @4.2.3    2 weeks ago
ure he went with whomever offered the most money and wasn't going to attack him.

His lawyers weren't cheap. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
4.3  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @4    2 weeks ago
Within days of the shootings, then-presidential candidate Joe Biden referenced Rittenhouse as a “white supremacist” despite no evidence supporting that widely repeated claim.

Please post a link to that quote Vic. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.3.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  Dulay @4.3    2 weeks ago

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
4.3.2  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.3.1    2 weeks ago

Major fail Vic. That all you got? 

 
 
 
Sparty On
PhD Principal
4.3.3  Sparty On  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.3.1    2 weeks ago

Nice link Vic ...... spot on.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.3.4  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sparty On @4.3.3    2 weeks ago

They ask and they recieve!

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
4.3.5  Dulay  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.3.4    2 weeks ago

The delusion continues. 

 
 
 
GregTx
Sophomore Participates
4.3.6  GregTx  replied to  Dulay @4.3    2 weeks ago
“There’s no other way to put it: the President of the United States refused to disavow white supremacists on the debate stage last night,” Biden’s tweet accompanying the video read

Rittenhouse lawyer slams Biden for calling teen 'white supremacist' (nypost.com)

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
4.3.7  Dulay  replied to  GregTx @4.3.6    2 weeks ago

Yet ANOTHER link that doesn't prove what the headline claims. 

Y'all are on a roll...

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4.3.8  XXJefferson51  replied to  Sparty On @4.3.3    2 weeks ago

Exactly?  What more proof do they need?  

 
 
 
Sparty On
PhD Principal
4.3.9  Sparty On  replied to  Dulay @4.3.5    2 weeks ago

And the liberal gaslighting continues ....hilarious!

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
4.3.10  Dulay  replied to  Sparty On @4.3.9    2 weeks ago

So liberals are so persuasive that they are responsible for you questioning your sanity and perception of reality? 

 
 
 
Sparty On
PhD Principal
4.3.11  Sparty On  replied to  Dulay @4.3.10    2 weeks ago

Oh, are we talking about me now?

Interesting ...... but not unexpected.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
4.3.12  Dulay  replied to  Sparty On @4.3.11    2 weeks ago
Oh, are we talking about me now? Interesting ...... but not unexpected.

Are you claiming that you are speaking for others being gaslighted Sparty?

Please link the testimonials they have shared with you. 

 
 
 
GregTx
Sophomore Participates
4.3.13  GregTx  replied to  Dulay @4.3.7    2 weeks ago

Your reply is obtuse. Did you bother to look at Biden's tweet?

 
 
 
Sparty On
PhD Principal
4.3.14  Sparty On  replied to  Dulay @4.3.12    2 weeks ago

I claimed no such thing, you brought me into this not i.

Now, answer my question please.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.3.15  Trout Giggles  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.3.1    2 weeks ago
"I don't know enough to know whether that 17-year-old kid, exactly what he did, but allegedly he's part of a militia coming out of the state of Illinois. Have you ever heard this president say one negative thing about white supremacists? Have you ever heard it? That's the reason I got back in this race because what happened in Charlottesville," Biden said in a 2020 interview with CNN's Anderson Cooper.

from your link. He "suggested" doesn't mean he actually said "Kyle Rittenshouse is a white supremacist.

All y'all need some writing lessons

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
4.3.16  Dulay  replied to  Sparty On @4.3.14    2 weeks ago
I claimed no such thing, you brought me into this not i.

Well you claimed that liberals were gaslighting. WHO are you alleging they are gaslighting Sparty? You seem to be claiming that it isn't YOU, so you MUST be speaking for others. I presume you have some evidence to support your claim in the form of some kind of testimonial from these 'victims' of liberal gaslighting. 

Now, answer my question please.

I presumed that you are speaking for yourself. Logically, you ARE speaking for yourself or for others who are questioning their sanity and/or perception of reality. 

PICK ONE and support it Sparty. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
4.3.17  Sean Treacy  replied to  Sparty On @4.3.9    2 weeks ago
And the liberal gaslighting continues ....hilarious!

It's really amazing how you can present them with direct evidence and they suddenly became unable to process basic information.  Playing stupid isn't a winning strategy in my book, but some progressives have proudly adopted it. 

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
4.3.18  Dulay  replied to  GregTx @4.3.13    2 weeks ago
Your reply is obtuse.

I don't think that word means what you think it does. 

Did you bother to look at Biden's tweet?

Yes and NOWHERE did Biden call Rittenhouse a 'white supremacist'.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.3.19  Trout Giggles  replied to  Dulay @4.3.16    2 weeks ago

I didn't know I was so good at manipulating people's thoughts!

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
4.3.20  Ender  replied to  Dulay @4.3.18    2 weeks ago

Seems like Biden said he was hanging with a militia, which seems to be true.

How people can change that, I don't know.

 
 
 
Sparty On
PhD Principal
4.3.21  Sparty On  replied to  Dulay @4.3.16    2 weeks ago
Well you claimed that liberals were gaslighting.

My comment was clear enough for most.

WHO are you alleging they are gaslighting Sparty? You seem to be claiming that it isn't YOU, so you MUST be speaking for others. I presume you have some evidence to support your claim in the form of some kind of testimonial from these 'victims' of liberal gaslighting.

See above, the proof is in the comment itself.

I presumed that you are speaking for yourself.

Wrong presumption .... not even close actually

Logically, you ARE speaking for yourself or for others who are questioning their sanity and/or perception of reality.

That comment is very illogical as nowhere was i speaking for myself.   Keep spinning Dulay.

PICK ONE and support it Sparty.

So there you go Dulay.

 
 
 
Sparty On
PhD Principal
4.3.22  Sparty On  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.3.17    2 weeks ago

Some have reached a new level of disinformation.

They are attempting to gaslight their gaslighting.

It's hilarious to watch.

 
 
 
Sparty On
PhD Principal
4.3.23  Sparty On  replied to  Dulay @4.3.18    2 weeks ago
Yes and NOWHERE did Biden call Rittenhouse a 'white supremacist'.

Spin baby spin, you are only fooling useful idiots .... no one else.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
4.3.24  Dulay  replied to  Sparty On @4.3.21    2 weeks ago
My comment was clear enough for most.

As it was to me. I am merely asking you to support your 'clear' allegation.

Please proceed. 

See above, the proof is in the comment itself.

Wrong presumption .... not even close actually

That comment is very illogical as nowhere was i speaking for myself.   Keep spinning Dulay.

GREAT, we're getting somewhere. 

So you aren't speaking for yourself. Then logically you ARE speaking for others. 

Now, please post a link to some testimonials from the innocent victims of this liberal gaslighting that you allege is occurring. It's YOUR assertion after all...

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
4.3.25  Dulay  replied to  Sparty On @4.3.22    2 weeks ago
Some have reached a new level of disinformation.

They are attempting to gaslight their gaslighting.

It's hilarious to watch.

The only one who has posted disinformation is YOU Sparty. 

You posted an allegation that you can't support. 

It's hilarious to watch your failed attempt to tap dance your way out of it.

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
4.3.26  Dulay  replied to  Sparty On @4.3.23    2 weeks ago

I have no need to 'fool' anyone. All 'our readers' need do is READ the links and decide for themselves who is telling the truth. 

 
 
 
Sparty On
PhD Principal
4.3.27  Sparty On  replied to  Dulay @4.3.26    2 weeks ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
5  Ender    2 weeks ago

Now I heard that fox news was with him for the entire trial and filmed a documentary...

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Guide
6  Paula Bartholomew    2 weeks ago

That was not a trial.  It was a 3 ring circus.  The judge should have worn a red rubber nose and over sized shoes.

 
 
 
Raven Wing
Professor Principal
6.1  Raven Wing  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @6    2 weeks ago

I had to laugh when he pulled out the magnifying glass to read something on his desk. 

It was indeed a fiasco. That buffoon of a judge should not be allowed to judge a dog show, much less a court of law. 

While Kyle may walk free by the jury's decision, but, he will still have to face the court higher up for what he did, and what he knows full well what he did. 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
6.1.1  XXJefferson51  replied to  Raven Wing @6.1    2 weeks ago

What he did is what the world and God recognizes as self defense!  

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
6.1.2  JBB  replied to  XXJefferson51 @6.1.1    2 weeks ago

You got a Bible verse expressing that belief?

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Guide
6.1.3  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Raven Wing @6.1    2 weeks ago

That judge should only judge pie eating contests.

 
 
 
Duck Hawk
Freshman Silent
6.1.4  Duck Hawk  replied to  Raven Wing @6.1    2 weeks ago

Does anyone else think that this judge has had a stroke? If you watch the video of him the left side of his face and mouth droop and don't move when he talks. His periods of forgetfulness and blank expressions are symptomatic of a stroke. It makes me wonder if he is fit to sit a bench. has he lost higher functions? Is there damage to the right frontal lobe? (My wife has had a couple and I know what they look like, I'm her PCA)

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
6.2  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Paula Bartholomew @6    2 weeks ago

no that would be the prosecutor with all the hijinx he attempted and failed at .

 Oh and lets not forget , the judge ? was appointed by a democrat , is a member of the democratic party , has donated and voted democrat most his life , the MSM has really dug into this guys past ....so it appears democrats have a runner ......

 
 
 
Sparty On
PhD Principal
6.2.1  Sparty On  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @6.2    2 weeks ago

Haters gotta hate Mark ..... it’s nothing more complicated than that.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
6.2.2  JBB  replied to  Sparty On @6.2.1    2 weeks ago

Paula and Raven Wing? Haters? Get outta here!

 
 
 
Sparty On
PhD Principal
6.2.3  Sparty On  replied to  JBB @6.2.2    2 weeks ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Guide
6.2.4  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Sparty On @6.2.1    2 weeks ago

[removed]

 
 
 
Paula Bartholomew
Professor Guide
6.2.5  Paula Bartholomew  replied to  Paula Bartholomew @6.2.4    2 weeks ago

[REMOVED]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
6.2.6  Tessylo  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @6.2    2 weeks ago

I see you're still making up stuff as you go along.

jrSmiley_78_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
PhD Quiet
6.2.7  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @6.2    2 weeks ago

Lead prosecutor should have worn a court jester's costume because he sure acted the part!

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
6.2.8  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Tessylo @6.2.6    2 weeks ago

And I see you are still illiterate as always on the subject, [deleted]

Since it's your c!aim something is made up, PROVE IT, [deleted]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Senior Participates
7  Jeremy Retired in NC    2 weeks ago

I see you are trying to inject race into something that had nothing to do with race.  Even included a picture with a bullshit statement.

How "woke" of you.  

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
7.1  Dulay  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7    2 weeks ago
Even included a picture with a bullshit statement.

Considering your avatar, that's pretty hypocritical. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Senior Participates
7.1.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Dulay @7.1    2 weeks ago

And what does that have to do with my statement?  Oh, BTW, mine isn't the one showing violence against a former president.  

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
7.1.2  Dulay  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7.1.1    2 weeks ago
And what does that have to do with my statement?

It's a picture with a bullshit statement Jeremy. 

Oh, BTW, mine isn't the one showing violence against a former president.  

That's pretty fucking hilarious since your party just spent hours claiming that a cartoon image isn't threatening. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Senior Participates
7.1.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Dulay @7.1.2    2 weeks ago
It's a picture with a bullshit statement Jeremy. 

That seems to have triggered you.  That's a plus.

That's pretty fucking hilarious since your party just spent hours claiming that a cartoon image isn't threatening.

When did independents do that?

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
7.1.4  Dulay  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7.1.3    2 weeks ago
That seems to have triggered you.  That's a plus.

Nope, just pointing out the hypocrisy. 

When did independents do that?

There isn't an 'Independent' party Jeremy.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Senior Participates
7.1.5  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Dulay @7.1.4    2 weeks ago
There isn't an 'Independent' party Jeremy.

That's my point.  Don't wrap me up in your sweeping generalizations.  

 
 
 
Dulay
Professor Principal
7.1.6  Dulay  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7.1.5    2 weeks ago
That's my point. 

Sure it is...

Don't wrap me up in your sweeping generalizations.  

How is stating the FACT that there is no Independent party a sweeping generalization Jeremy? 

 
 
 
Duck Hawk
Freshman Silent
7.1.7  Duck Hawk  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7.1.5    2 weeks ago

With an avatar like that, YOU have no means to call yourself an independent. You clearly have made you bed with the radical right.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Senior Participates
7.1.8  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Duck Hawk @7.1.7    2 weeks ago

I've "made my bed" to not put up with incompetence.  But if that's the way you think, that's on you.  Not my concern in the least.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.2  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7    2 weeks ago
I see you are trying to inject race into something that had nothing to do with race.  Even included a picture with a bullshit statement. How "woke" of you.  

I try to be very straightforward with my comments. I actually think I am pretty good at it. 

Right after the verdict, during an impromptu press conference, Rittenhouses lawyer Mark Richards told reporters that his client is not a white supremacist and that he was upset that anyone was calling him that. 

So, this seed has the question "Would Someone Who Wants The World To Know They Are Not A White Supremacist Go On Tucker Carlson's Show ?"

Given Rittenhouse's statements, and his lawyers, why is he going on a show that has been repeatedly connected to white nationalism? 

The question is straightforward. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Senior Participates
7.2.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @7.2    2 weeks ago
I try to be very straightforward with my comments. I actually think I am pretty good at it.

Being straightforward isn't the problem.  It's that most are TDS driven.  

So, this seed has the question "Would Someone Who Wants The World To Know They Are Not A White Supremacist Go On Tucker Carlson's Show ?"

And exactly what does race have to do with it?  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.2.2  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @7.2.1    2 weeks ago

Right after the verdict, during an impromptu press conference, Rittenhouses lawyer Mark Richards told reporters that his client is not a white supremacist and that he was upset that anyone was calling him that. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Senior Participates
7.2.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @7.2.2    2 weeks ago

Ok.  Now I get it.  This whole thing is in response to the blithering idiots who THINK the Rittenhouse case is about race.  Which, again, is injecting race into something where it's irrelevant.

 
 
 
RU4Real
Freshman Silent
8  RU4Real    2 weeks ago

Ritty should've taken the stance of his lawyers when they stated they reject him being offered internships, a new AR from Trump Jr. and the rest.  You would have beleived this kid's mother, worshipers would have advised him to lay low, but then again, the pic above...  Let the Proud Boys, Trump, Carlson, Ingram, KKK and the rest celebrate.  Play the defense team's game, stay low, let the crap boil over.  Even sensible righties have to admit this is a dumb play. 

I know some on here and other forms, blogs, networks state he should sue for defamation, but is it defamation if it is true?  And isn't that protection under the 1st Amendment?  I mean, that's always put up by person / group A when they trash talk person / group B.  Just as with the 2nd Amendment "right to bear arms" and that's it.  Funny how none of the loudest, strongest proponents of those amendments never seem to get past those two half-sentences...

 
 
 
Sparty On
PhD Principal
9  Sparty On    2 weeks ago

The joke will be on all the triggered media and government officials who tried to adversely influence justice.

Rittenhouse will own them all if he wants to and i hope he does,  

Then he can use their money to hire a full time SEAL protection detail to crack any skulls that might try to get frisky with him

Bad moon risen for the triggered ....

 
 
 
Duck Hawk
Freshman Silent
10  Duck Hawk    2 weeks ago

Modern SEALS suck!!. Worthless fucks that protected a war criminal. I have lost all respect for SEALS, there isn't any tier 1 or tier 2 unit that want to work with them.

 
 
 
Sparty On
PhD Principal
10.1  Sparty On  replied to  Duck Hawk @10    2 weeks ago
there isn't any tier 1 or tier 2 unit that want to work with them.

Bullshit

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
10.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Duck Hawk @10    2 weeks ago

How did you get on the subject of SEALS?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Senior Principal
10.2.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Trout Giggles @10.2    2 weeks ago
How did you get on the subject of SEALS?

Day drinking maybe??? I was wondering the same thing................jrSmiley_19_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
10.2.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @10.2.1    2 weeks ago

Hey, I like Duck Hawk. I thought maybe he accidentally posted in the wrong seed. I was giving him a chance to explain

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Senior Principal
10.2.3  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Trout Giggles @10.2.2    2 weeks ago

Guess I should have put this jrSmiley_18_smiley_image.gif in my comment. Sorry.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
10.2.4  Trout Giggles  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @10.2.3    2 weeks ago

Actually my bad. He was responding to Sparty's comment

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Senior Principal
10.2.5  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Trout Giggles @10.2.4    2 weeks ago

Hate it when people just respond out of the blue and you don't know who they are addressing. It's almost as bad as one responding to ones self to avoid addressing the person directly ..........hehehehe

That's why I like this "please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed." in your seeds.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Expert
10.2.6  Sean Treacy  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @10.2.5    2 weeks ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
10.2.7  Tessylo  replied to  Sean Treacy @10.2.6    2 weeks ago

I see my fan club is still hanging on my every word.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Senior Principal
10.2.8  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Sean Treacy @10.2.6    2 weeks ago

Usually just thinking they're being cute, in a juvenile sort of way, I guess.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
11  Tessylo    2 weeks ago

"Hate it when people just respond out of the blue and you don't know who they are addressing. It's almost as bad as one responding to ones self to avoid addressing the person directly ..........hehehehe"

I know my fan club really missed me while I was gone.  

 
 
Loading...
Loading...

Who is online




Nowhere Man


46 visitors