Biden calls Fox News' Peter Doocy a 'stupid son of a b----' after question about inflation
Category: News & Politics
Via: xxjefferson51 • 3 years ago • 192 commentsBy: Joseph A. Wulfsohn
Biden calls Fox News' Peter Doocy a 'stupid son of a b----' after question about inflation
The president lashed out against the White House correspondent during a meeting focused on the economy
President Biden lashed out at Fox News White House correspondent Peter Doocy for attempting to press him on inflation.
Biden met with the Competition Council and members of his cabinet Monday to discuss ways to lower prices for American families.
US President Joe Biden meets with members of his administration on efforts to lower prices for working families at the East room of the White House, in Washington, DC on January 24, 2022. (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP via Getty Images)
Following his prepared remarks, near the 8-minute mark of the live stream, members of the press began shouting questions, hoping for the president to take a few before they were shown the door by White House staff.
Biden knocked the first reporter, who asked about the administration's call with European leaders as tensions between Russia and Ukraine rise.
"The only reason I don't like doing is this because you never report on why it's called a meeting because you never report on why I've called a meeting, and this is important" Biden said. "I had a very, very, very good meeting, totally unanimity with all the European leaders will talk about it later. Thank you."
"Will you take questions on inflation then?" Doocy then asked. "Do you think inflation will be a political liability ahead of the midterms?"
As Doocy and the other reporters were being shooed away, Biden took a swipe at the Fox News correspondent.
"That’s a great asset, more inflation. What a stupid son of a b----," Biden said to his cabinet.
Doocy laughed off Biden's comments moments later on "The Five," saying "Yeah, nobody has fact-checked him yet and said it's not true,"
Last week, Biden similarly lashed out at Fox News White House correspondent Jacqui Heinrich for attempting to press him following his controversial remarks at his press conference about the escalating Russia-Ukraine conflict.
"Why are you waiting on Putin to make the first move, sir?" Heinrich asked.
Biden chuckled, softly replying, "What a stupid question."
The White House later walked back Biden's comment.
Early in his administration, Biden warned his staff to show colleagues and members of the press with respect.
"I’m not joking when I say this: If you’re ever working with me and I hear you treat another colleague with disrespect or talk down to someone, I promise you, I will fire you on the spot — on the spot. No ifs ands or buts," Biden said. "Everybody is entitled to be treated with decency and dignity."
Tags
Who is online
46 visitors
Yes this is an inappropriate public utterance from a PotUS.
Calling someone stupid, son of a bitch, etc. is poor behavior for a PotUS. Right? And clearly we can add making fun of deformities, handicaps, ugliness, ... , to practices that are inappropriate for a PotUS. Surely you agree.
Are you trying to slip in a what about ism in here? He said the same comment sans the sob remark part to Jacqui Heinrich last week too.
I asked you a principled question. I am not surprised you ran away from it.
You will not make this seed about anything other than it’s topic which was what Brandon said to two Fox News reporters.
[removed]
Douchey isn't a member of the press. He's not a journalist. He works for Faux 'news'
Why not simply say what you mean. "But Trruuuummmmppppp!!!!!!" and nothing else matters.
Quit trying to downplay what the human fuck up machine in the White House.
Ahh, seems that the White House doesn't seem to agree with you. He has press credentials; and he is on the list of White House press that is allowed at the meetings.
The left is just butt hurt that Doocy asks real questions of the human fuck up machine in the White House.
The human fuck up machine waddled out of the White House on 1/20/21
Right back at you: Do democrats have the right to adopt the very practices or policies they once denounced?
Go ahead TiG, give us the juvenile “he did it first” defense.
Democrats did not accuse their fellow democrats of treason or sedition when they sought to block the certification of Ohio’s electoral votes in Congress in 2004. They did not call Hillary Clinton traitorous for advising Biden not to concede any Trump victory on Election Night. They did not describe members of Congress or the media as traitors for repeatedly declaring Trump “illegitimate” over the last four years.
Napoleon once said “treason is a matter of dates.” And the key date in the United States, appears to be Nov. 7, 2020. That's the day democrats declared they could do anything because of Trump.
He wasn't talking to you.
Sorry, there is a newer much larger version in the White House now trying to destroy the US as fast as he can. You should look into the current state of the US and world since Brandon took office. Name one thing he has made better; and then check out the ever growing list of things he has made much, much, worse.
You're wrong. The big fat fuck up waddled out of the White House on 1/20/21.
Well I will say one thing. He makes me think of Star Wars movies when he walks. Reminds one of C3PO with the robotic movement. And here we all thought he was a puppet. Turns out robot.
Biden is tired of Doocy's attempts at gotchya questions . Other than that this is basically a non story.
He could be a combination of C3PO movement wise, but verbally he comes across as the Swedish Chef from the old Muppets show.
The only part of the questions that are "gotcha" are that they show that the Biden Administration is truly incompetent and haven't done a damn thing to benefit the country.
"Calling someone stupid, son of a bitch, etc. is poor behavior for a PotUS. Right? And clearly we can add making fun of deformities, handicaps, ugliness."
Biden is guilty of that too. For 50 years.
Have you forgotten how Acosta accosted Trump on multiple occasions
Doocy handled it with class, shrugging it off and making a joke of it. It is a breath of fresh air after listening to Acosta whine and make it about him every time he was called out for being fake news by Trump..
That was a gotchya question? I don't think Biden is up to real questioning. He is also very frustrated with how his radical policies have come down on his head.
I suggest you not translate other's words into stupid memes. You miss the point and come across as partisan and irrational.
Calm down and read what people write. Tone down your hyper-partisan bias and pay attention:
My opening sentence. ⇡
So let's take that as a given. Now, read my comment and attempt to give an objective, thoughtful response.
Is it possible for you to see a problem regardless of party or are the partisan blinders too firmly attached?
Have you ever read me make such a defense? No? Correct. So why, Vic, do you presume I would ever do that? Slimy tactic on your part.
Both parties have the 'right' to engage in dishonest practices. But it is wrong regardless of who does it.
You should already know this. Wrong is wrong regardless of party affiliation. Simple.
I find it amusing how certain Trump supporters are all worked up over my comment. I acknowledged a failure by Biden in my first sentence. I then tested the objectivity of an individual to see if they could admit that this kind of behavior is not fitting for a president of the USA regardless of party.
That individual and three others (you are one of them) failed (miserably) to be objective. If a D does something bad some will be all over it with hyperbole. If an R does something worse, some will defend in defiance of logic and facts. (And yes, the opposite is true, but here you, et. al. demonstrate uber-blind-R-partisanship at play).
It is pathetic when people must resort to dishonesty because they cannot accept the results of objectively dealing with facts.
Yes. See 1.1.1
Tone down the imagination and bias and attempt (LOL) to read the words objectively.
I read the words. I read them objectively. You made it a "what about ism" and now trying to walk it back.
It is fascinating watching you and your cohorts freak out when faced with a revealing test of objectivity. "Are all these things wrong?".
Real simple:
Instead of acknowledging that ALL the aforementioned behavior diminishes the office of the presidency, you and others flame out and attack.
You just cannot get past the partisan bias. It is fascinating and sad to see how deep partisanship will warp perception.
NONE of you acknowledged that all the stated behaviors were wrong. Instead ALL of you went on personal attack. Pathetic.
[This comment stands. Do not flag as "off topic" direct replies to unflagged comments. If it's on topic when your pals discuss it, it's on topic for everybody else.]
FFS, You ask a question. I answered your question. Not following the direction you tried to deflect the conversation to is not a personal attack. Get over yourself. Reality is, your feelings are hurt because you got called out and now decide to lash out.
Now, how about you stick to the subject and quit playing games by trying to deflect to the previous POTUS. Maybe if you had done that we wouldn't be doing this right now.
Just stop with the bullshit Jeremy. You cannot deal with the facts.
You still refuse to deal with the fact that bad behavior is bad behavior regardless of party.
Pathetic partisan non-thinking.
And EXACTLY where did I say it was acceptable? Just a hint for you dude - I never fucking did.
Now BACK TO THE ACTUAL TOPIC.
[Deleted]
Exactly. He’s clearly and obviously a journalist by any objective standard.
Exactly. That thing in the White House now is an abomination to the American people.
Attempt to deflect/derail the seeded topic away from what Biden said to what others in the past have said is duly noted.
Absolute bullshit.
My opening comment:
It takes no deep thinking to see that I start off acknowledging Biden's act and stating that such behavior is inappropriate for a PotUS.
Read the above again, real slowly this time. This is spot on topic.
Then, I made the analytical point about how such behavior is not only bad for Biden for any PotUS. I phrased this as principled questions to get those who are capable of even the slightest bit of objective analysis to see that criticism of Biden for his inappropriate utterances is exactly the same as criticizing other PotUS' for their inappropriate utterances:
You obviously recognized that your idol Trump is ALSO guilty of inappropriate utterances (much worse even) so instead of standing up to the principled questions you deflect and dodge.
If one holds a position that one cannot defend and then runs away when challenged (instead of standing up and being honest), that is pathetic.
My point stands. You confessed Biden’s sin and then immediately pivoted into a “but Trump” whataboutism to deflect some of the blowback from Brandon. Why deny it?
LOL, 'confessed his sin?" What hyperbole. I stated the obvious. Biden's comment was inappropriate for a PotUS.
I then asked you a principled question since obviously you cannot possibly admit that you evaluate Biden different from other PotUS' and especially different from the most recent PotUS Trump.
You are trying to hide behind a 'but Trump' (which is stupid since I stated Biden's fault upfront) instead of standing up and honestly admitting that your condemnation of Biden should apply to all presidents and that includes Trump.
I can easily state that no PotUS should make such statements and certainly not worse.
You, however, are so hobbled by your partisan bias that you must contrive escape hatches because the truth simply cannot be faced.
It is pathetic.
over and over again….🥱😴
Okay I will make this extremely simple.
If Biden, as PotUS, calls a member of the media a son-of-a-bitch, is that wrong?
If Trump, as PotUS, called a member of the media a son-of-a-bitch, would that be wrong?
This answer is very simple. It is 'yes'.
You will deflect; it will be pathetic.
But Trump!
And, yet again, you deflect.
It always amazes me that some can find fault in the 'other' party and be entirely blind to even worse faults within their own party.
Deflected as predicted. Pathetic in result.
Do democrats have the right to adopt the very practices or policies they once denounced?
[deleted]
We know for certain that they presume themselves to have the right to do exactly as you suggest. It’s how so many of them do things.
Who doesn't think Peter Doocy is a stupid son of a B?
What is it that you have against his mother that would justify that comment?
not about Doocy
Then who is it about?
not about Doocy
It’s the one who called Doocy’s mom that name.
By your ridiculous "interpretation", Trump called his own mother a bitch in jest but there was no jest
when he said it about McConnell and Schumer and some random tech guy at a rally.
You should come down off of this fake cross, it's a pointless argument you are trying to sustain.
Silly, just not funny.
Doocy is a stupid fox fake news idiot.
I'm sorry, thought we were talking about Doocy?
You were personally attacking him. He’s a great American! 🇺🇸🗽🦅
not about Doocy
also not Doocy
Neither are any of your comments.
But keep trolling.
And those who have attacked him.
Well said and right on!
As Biden continues his ongoing Trump impression, its fun to think of the hysterical response from the MSM had Trump done this:
"It's a war on journalism!"
"The President is trying to intimidate journalists like a third world dictator"
"The President is destroying our governing norms"
"The President is inciting violence against journalists"
But because the cranky old man who yells at clouds plays for the Democrats, the hypocrites will defend it.
Kudos to Doocy for laughing it off.
Indeed, Doocy played it very well. Much different than the one who CNN used to have in that position. Doocy like his father is a first class gentleman.
Biden apologized.
Next.
So the fuck what? His apology means nothing. He will continue to do it; and the left will continue to give him a complete pass.
Doocy doesn't think so.
So the fuck what? After 4 years of it, it's the 'new normal'.
Biden called Doocy and personally apologized to him.
Next.
He didn’t exactly apologize. He said it was “nothing personal.” That doesn’t sound like he’s sorry.
President Biden should have said he's sorry Douchey is a stupid son of a bitch.
Also, why should he be sorry?
I didn’t say he should be sorry. I said he wasn’t.
Biden wouldn't be the first person to apologize for something he wasn't actually 'sorry' for, would he?
I’m sure he wouldn’t. All I’m saying is that he did not apologize. He never said the words “I apologize.” He never said “I’m sorry.” He never indicated he regretted the words.
His whole approach was that what he said was ok and basically Doocy - or whomever - has no right or cause to be offended by it.
I don’t care. Apparently, Doocy doesn’t care. But I’m not going to say Biden apologized when he didn’t.
Can you link the transcript please?
Well said. He clearly did not apologize.
A transcript of which? The initial exchange or the phone call after? The White House has released a transcript of the initial exchange, but I am not aware of them releasing a transcript of the phone call. Not sure why they would. What we have is reporting from Doocy about what was said and the White House has not sought to refute anything he said.
You can read about both here .
The transcript which you used to post your characterization of what Biden said to Doocy.
Follow the link.
So where's the part about what you claimed:
Maybe you can block quote it from your link?
Here you go:
Above, I highlighted in bold the only content of your characterization of what Biden said:
And what Doocy says Biden said.
Doocy said NOTHING about 'no right or cause to be offended by it'. THAT came from YOU and YOU alone. Own it.
Excuse me? [deleted.] I own everything I have said and have made no attempt to deny anything I have said. I have given you links and quotes immediately upon request. Don’t come at me with your bullshit hostility.
I gave MY opinion of the character of the phone call (just like everyone else here has) based on Doocy’s first hand knowledge and reporting of it, which the White House has not disputed. I didn’t say any facts that were knowable to be untrue.
So I’m not worried even a LITTLE bit about owning it. I will own it the fuck away [[deleted][]] game with someone else. Come back when you have something [[][deleted] to contribute.]
If, as you claim, you 'own everything' you have said and aren't 'worried even a LITTLE bit' AND that you'll 'own it the fuck away', WHY did you characterize my saying 'Own it' is 'bullshit hostility'?
Well that there 'knowable to be untrue' thingy takes a strong stand for veracity. /s
BTFW, since you aren't admitting that your block quote doesn't support your claim, WHAT exactly are you pretending to own?
Please explain were you think you garnered the authority to tell me when to participate here on NT Tacos? Be specific.
[deleted]
Show us
It’s likely the closest thing to an apology thst the addled demented old mind of sleepy old perv Joe Brandon could come up with.
Thank you, @BrianStelter , for showing solidarity for your fellow journalist and demonstrating you uphold your principles regardless of partis– oh, wait, this is from 2018:
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) January 24, 2022
Lol....
Not about Doocy
Constantly off topic in his own 'article'.
Neither is your comment, again.
Trolling, trolling, trolling, keep those doggies trolling. Troll Hide!
Pay attention!
of course the media’s response, or lack thereof, to Biden insulting doocy is about doocy.
why are you so triggered by seeing cnn’s media expert’s statement on presidents calling reporters a son of a bitch?
Constantly off topic in his own 'article'.
Lol… try again.
LOL right. Guess I missed you seeding this.
I couldn’t have said it better myself. Thank you so much for saying that here!
Thanks for your support of the content of my seed here. Well done!
Great point! The double standards and hypocrisy of the lamestream media knows no bounds.
I think it’s funny, but you know if Trump had done it, the media would be calling it an assault on the Free Press.
If? Lol.
Unreal how they cover for the trumpturd.
What’s unreal is how you see that as “covering” for something.
Whatever, I couldn't think of the proper expression. Obviously you have no problem with anything trumpturd said or did.
Good for you President Biden. Douchey is a stupid son of a bitch!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is just as truthful as Dr. Fauci calling Rand Paul a moron.
It is hilarious how the Biden Administration get all flustered when ask actual questions. Biden and Psaki normally end up sounding more and more like the Swedish Chef as questions are ask meanwhile Harris gives her awful impression of the Wicked Witch from the Wizard of Oz.
There is a follow up to this story:
"President Biden reached out to Peter Doocy on Monday night and “cleared the air” after calling the Fox News White House correspondent a “stupid son of a bitch” an hour earlier .
Doocy told Fox News’ Sean Hannity that the president called him on his cellphone and told the reporter, “It’s nothing personal, pal” after the hot mic blunder in the White House East Room."
Nothing personal ???
I think we all know who the son of a bitch is
What if people started referring to the president as a “son of a bitch,” but you know, “nothing personal.”
Uhhhh - how 'bout the "Trump TDS" on NT - 'member, it wasn't personal, eh?
Sounds like a great plan to me! It’s easier though to just say Let’s go Brandon!
Yeah, and people are outraged, right? They make a big stink about how inappropriate it is to insult the president that way. But if the president calls someone a son of a bitch, it’s totally fine.
It’s how our wannabe masters, the bicoastal secular progressive urban elites think…
Actually, (and its sad) President Biden committed a political faux pas: Presidents are instructed not to "punch-down." Doocy's 'stock' just went up in conservative 'world.'
Both Steve and Peter Doocy should be angry that Biden called the formers wife and the latter’s mom a Bitch.
His wife the first lady probably forced him to make that call or sleep on the couch..
Yeah, the stupid son of a bitch waddled out of the White House on 1/20/21
No, that’s what came into the White House that sad day and hasn’t left yet.
Ah, did Biden say something mean to little Peter.
TFB
Yes, he called Peters mom a bitch and too many liberals are fine with such misogyny
Come down off your pedestal please,
you've been saying Let's go Brandon (fuck Joe Biden ) for months.
The irony is getting rusty already.
I'm not sure he is going to get your point.
When it comes to misogyny and bigotry you certainly have a firm grip on it.
It's especially bad when I stub a toe or ruin a square of tile by not cutting it correctly,
spill wine on the antique Persian carpet, miss a ramp on the highway because of Siri,
Did I mention Spill red wine
and I yell Sonofabitch!
It's certainly not a sign of misogyny.
Just a lot more polite than shouting FUCK, Fuck, Fucking Jesus h C.......
And you just HYPOCRITICALLY called Pres. Biden's mother a bitch (See YOUR Comment 13.1 above). No doubt you are exceedingly proud of your misogyny. Most reactionaries are.
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
There was no point. No one called Joe mamma a bitch like he called Peters mom. Unles. Trumps mom is called one
Only in response to another who called Trumps mother one.
So? That doesn't absolve you of your blatant hypocrisy and sinful misogyny.
Can't keep a clown down, lol
Trump called himself a dumb son of bitch. Do you honestly in you heart feel the Trump was trying to offend his own mother?
Do you think Trump was trying to offend Mitch McConnell's mother?
'Dumb son of a bitch': Trump rips McConnell at Mar-a-Lago- POLITICO
Trump's Rant About the 'Son of a Bitch' Who Installed His Microphone Last Night Was Peak Trump
The crowd, of course, loved it.
Donald Trump Microphone Rant - Trump Calls Man Who Installed Mic 'Son of a Bitch,' 'Bastard' (esquire.com)
Wow, SOB and a bastard in one rant!
Of course we can never let Truman off the hook either.
So Peter Doocy must be in some good company, and his mother has nothing to do with it.
Your faux outrage on her behalf is a sham.
That's rich!
Actually the reverse is the truth here…
Nice of you to share your own image with your friend.
Ah and you too sent a selfie to your friend.
The clown twins…
Sorry. I am not laughing at you; it's just the clown when it's on the floor! Bah ha ha ha
I vehemently disagree with President Biden's statement. It was inappropriate and he certainly knows better! For crying out loud, if he had not been so clear in his wording-we would be faced today with media 'mouthing his words" and interviewing speech experts to get it. This is a 'hit' against Joe! No excuses!
I hope he feels it is worth it for all the flack he is getting over it!
Yes it was Shakespeare who first uttered "whoreson"& "the son and heir of a mongrel bitch". ( King Lear, 1605 )
Son of a gun, became the polite phrase ( like Lets go Brandon )
but over time became so acceptable as to become a compliment.
English is such a complicated hot mess at times.
That it is. We all have our 'dashes' in corrupting speech and we love it. Precious me, I still get so wrapped up in politics sometimes and in 'crazy family times' that I, to my horror, utter "God damnit!" it just oozes out. And I wonder how that ever got started in the first place. One day I have to (plan?) to do research on that AWFUL phrase!
Chances are he doesn't remember it ever happening.
Whatever do you mean, "Right Down the Center" -right?
I mean that Joe has trouble remembering he is president, not Kalamata, so I doubt he remembers who Doocy is much less what he called him.
But, but, are you suggesting some conservatives and "Right Down the Center" won't be certain to stick it up the presidential 'wazoo' at the next briefing? You guys are such 'elephants' with your ability to repeat things.
Kalamata, wow, you 'butchered' that so I barely know who you mean, Tight on the Enter.
I am not suggesting anything of the sort, try reading what I actually said without trying to add what you want to believe I said.
But, you say so little in an opportunity of a 'lifetime' to communicate clearly. Try "expansion" of substantial content. Why don't-cha? Come to find out, we have members on this forum who are near or over President Joe Biden's age-you should watch where you point your ageism cracks.
Also, President Joe Biden wakes up most morning in the White House, why the heaven would he have a problem remembering is elected condition? You're just chucking vitriolic cracks without any rhyme or reason attached.
You don't like the way I responded? Oh my! I get a kick out of anyone that says "you should". All that means is "do what I think you should" and is a pretty arrogant statement. My comment is about Biden, not everyone his age. Not everyone his age shows the cognitive ability of a 5 year old.
He may wake up in the White House almost every day, the question is does he know where he is when he does? He has called Kalamata president Harris on multiple occasions.
Now that's just consuming whole sections of digits on tired repartee. Bye!
I totally understand, the truth can be painful. Bye.
One more thing. Truth: Some conservatives are not right down the center of anything politically. Color it: full of guile. So corrupted are some conservatives the GOP is in the thralls of a split right now.
The truth is often a painful thing for the political left to absorb
Says someone who believes the Big Lie is truth.
One more thing, both parties are in the thralls of a split right now. I am making popcorn and enjoying the show.
One party is full of guile. Guess which one. Hint: It's team color is: RED.
Nope, they are both full of idiots. They have faith that the American people are also.
It is the democrats, particularly their secular progressive left wing that are what you describe. And speaking of international political ID’s, that party is the red one.
Trump: “Joe Scarborough is a murderer and Mika Brzezinski had a botched facelift” (said out loud)
Biden: “stupid son of a bitch” (said under his breath in response to a question by a stupid son of a bitch on an unknowingly hot mic)
Gasp!! What kind of monster is Joe Biden!!
Just your run of the mill, feeble minded monster.
He is a monster to be sure. A vile demented, lazy, sleepy, one that roars when angered. He’s the let’s go Brandon monster.
You will answer to God for your lies about the POTUS.
You will answer to God for your lies about POTUS #45
Brilliant, witty, thoughtful retort.
What lies about 45 do you have in mind (if any)?
Bad form. God is not a 'tool' for retaliation. One should consider if there is any reason or something overlook (introspection) for why another would feel no other recourse left to him or her but to invoke Deity. And after self-inspection or reflection, supply an explanation for why one is right in holding to the view one continues to hold.
Jefferson, you are the believer in this 'dispute' between two people. Try not to bring God down to human level. God must always be kept 'high' even in the lowest of times for any believer.
I'm good with that Xx, are you?
I am since I know I’m speaking the truth.
I find it absolutely obtuse that you think that Trump bolsters your claim of veracity.
You do realize it was Dulay that brought God into it don't you?
See 17.1.9.
Trump is a great American who made America great again and puts America first. In 2025 he will pull us out of the hell hole Brabdon is making of our exceptional America and MAGA again!
Yes. That is correct.
Reflection: Donald Trump is some kind of hypnotist or 'wizard.' Because some conservatives, y'all are glamored. Donald LOST red states, turned them blue against Joe Biden. Instead of kicking Donald to the curb and moving on, he GASLIGHTED y'all into parroting the now famous: BIG LIE.
It should be a shame to be so duped. Somebody is going to write a book about it. It will be a best seller. 2020: How Donald lost the "reddest" states and still won devotion.
Trump will never be reelected to PotUS. I doubt that he will even seriously run. What will happen, unless the GOP gets a grip on reality, is that Trump will both divide and hold back the GOP which will cause it to lose the next presidential election. Unless, of course, the D party puts forth a complete loser.
Either way, a sitting president who attempted to steal a presidential election by coercion, suborning unconstitutional acts, lying, lawsuits, etc. is not a great American; he is a traitor, and anyone who thinks he is great American suffers IMO from a fundamental disconnect with reality.
That great 'dragon' Trump told a rally full of enthusiasts another bevy of well-aged and newly minted lies in Texas, last Saturday. Then he boosted himself with this one: 'I will pardon all January 6, 2021 'patriots'. . . . "
Liar! Trump did not pardon them when he was president or leave it 'on tap' in Washington to be carried out later. All the same, the usual dupes ate his words up!
Interesting that your comment was directed at someone else then.
Got a couple of question for ya Xx.
If Trump made America great, how could it become a hell hole in just one year?
Trump's greatness was short lived, wasn't it Xx?
If as you say, America is exceptional, how is it that merely changing the Executive rendered it a hell hole in just one year?
Sounds mediocre to me...
Nope. Just follow the ebb and flow of discussion. That's all.
The democrat party has a total and complete loser in the White House now.
He said that he’d pardon those that were overcharged or given sentences beyond that which is normal for the offense if committed anywhere else. That’s reasonable.
Joe Biden is so bad and so below mediocre that he and his policies have begun damaging the whole country this fast. Brandon is incompetence magnified.
Most secular progressives in America believe that as Cuomo said was never that great, and they almost all deny the exceptional nature of our country. That you suggest we are mediocre is no surprise.
Wow Xx, you replied to my comment TWICE yet neither responsive to my questions. Well done. /s
Go get someone to explain the definition of strawman.