╌>

Adam Schiff faces censure vote over claims of 2016 Trump-Russia collusion

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  vic-eldred  •  3 years ago  •  75 comments

By:   Washington Examiner

Adam Schiff faces censure vote over claims of 2016 Trump-Russia collusion
Luna filed the privileged motion on Tuesday, seeking to remove Schiff from office and slap him with a $16 million fine over allegations he abused the trust of his constituents by pushing claims that Russia had meddled in the 2016 presidential race to help elect former President Donald Trump.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) introduced a measure to censure Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), seeking to condemn the California Democrat over his claims of Russian collusion in the 2016 election and to pressure him to leave office.

Luna filed the privileged motion on Tuesday, seeking to remove Schiff from office and slap him with a $16 million fine over allegations he abused the trust of his constituents by pushing claims that Russia had meddled in the 2016 presidential race to help elect former President Donald Trump.

"Schiff just hit the fan," Luna said in a tweet.

The motion comes after Schiff, who previously led the House Intelligence Committee, pushed unproven allegations of Trump-Russia collusion for years and touted British ex-spy Christopher Steele's discredited dossier. Those claims came under renewed scrutiny earlier this year after the release of the Durham report, which concluded the FBI had no proper basis for launching the Crossfire Hurricane investigation into Trump and Russia in 2016.

The report ultimately concluded the investigation was inherently flawed as there was no proper basis to conduct it in the first place, and it also found that former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's campaign played an outsize role in pushing collusion claims to the media and to the FBI.

Schiff rejected the motion, calling the resolution a "terrible misuse of House precedent and resources" and an "attack" on the Constitution.

"Our GOP colleagues are using the leverage and resources of the House majority to rewrite history and promulgate far-right conspiracy theories — all to protect and serve Donald Trump," Schiff said in a letter to colleagues. "This resolution plainly demonstrates the lengths our GOP colleagues will go to protect Donald Trump's infinite lies — lies that incited a violent attack on this very building."

A censure vote does not remove a lawmaker from office, nor does it hold any real punishment. Rather, the move is a symbolic vote to express dissatisfaction toward a lawmaker over their voting record or personal conduct. However, the move could come back to haunt Schiff as he runs to replace the retiring Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) in the Senate.

Luna's motion to censure builds on previous efforts from the congresswoman to expel Schiff from office, according to a separate resolution filed last month. The House is set to hold a procedural vote on Wednesday to decide how to move forward, with Democrats likely seeking to table the motion.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Vic Eldred    3 years ago

Alright, let us see some unity from House Republicans.  He was a liar, a leaker and a cheat. Do something about it!

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Expert
1.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    3 years ago

256

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2  Ronin2    3 years ago
Schiff rejected the motion, calling the resolution a "terrible misuse of House precedent and resources" and an "attack" on the Constitution. "Our GOP colleagues are using the leverage and resources of the House majority to rewrite history and promulgate far-right conspiracy theories — all to protect and serve Donald Trump," Schiff said in a letter to colleagues. "This resolution plainly demonstrates the lengths our GOP colleagues will go to protect Donald Trump's infinite lies — lies that incited a violent attack on this very building."

Bobble head boy is the last one to talk about abuse and misuse of power.

Time to take his power away. He can still bitch to the media; but at least he will be little more than a talking puppet.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ronin2 @2    3 years ago

Did you notice that common thread in all their defences?

It's basically: I was an evil scoundrel but it was to get Trump!

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3  evilone    3 years ago
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) introduced a measure to censure Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), seeking to condemn the California Democrat over his claims of Russian collusion in the 2016 election and to pressure him to leave office.

That and $4 will get you a cup of coffee. More political circuses.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  evilone @3    3 years ago

That's not the way Pelosi saw it.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3.1.1  evilone  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1    3 years ago
That's not the way Pelosi saw it.

How did that work for Pelosi? Did her target for censure up and leave or was it just another political blurb in the ongoing circus? It's the same circus - all we did was change ringmasters, Pelosi for McCarthy.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.2  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  evilone @3.1.1    3 years ago
How did that work for Pelosi?

She felt that she put two stains on the Trump Presidency. On one of those occassions she did the most laughable thing in the history of congress. She impeached a man who was no longer even President.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3.1.3  evilone  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.2    3 years ago
She felt that she put two stains on the Trump Presidency.

Again, that and $4 will get you a cup of coffee. This tit-for-tat partisanship isn't helping the country. 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.2  Ozzwald  replied to  evilone @3    3 years ago

That and $4 will get you a cup of coffee. More political circuses.

Especially since Schiff has every single American intelligence agency on his side, and even Putin admitted that they'd helped Trump.

Republican Senate committee backs intelligence agencies' findings that Russia meddled in 2016 election

Intel report: Putin directly ordered effort to influence election

But hey, forget all that, we gotta get back to that Hunter Biden's laptop....\sarc

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2    3 years ago

You are conflating two different things again.

BTW the FBI interfered in the last 3 elections. 

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3.2.2  evilone  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2    3 years ago
Especially since Schiff has every single American intelligence agency on his side

Schiff was doing then what Comer and Jordan are doing now. Claiming they have proof without ever showing any. It's just a fucking clown show...

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.2.3  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  evilone @3.2.2    3 years ago

Yes, he lied about proof being in plain sight. He also selectively leaked information from private sessions. He certainly earned it.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3.2.4  evilone  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.2.3    3 years ago
Yes, he lied about proof being in plain sight.

Yes. He lied. So did Jordan. So does most of Congress... 

He also selectively leaked information from private sessions. He certainly earned it.

I'm not giving any personal option  on whether he earned it or didn't. All I'm saying is it doesn't appear to do anything but waste time and help raise re-election cash from hyper partisans who eat this shit up with a spoon. Me? I'd rather they spent some actual time fixing immigration or spanking banks that feel the need to invest cash they don't have. Improving the electric and internet grids would help more people than investigating each other. Finding ways to help small businesses be more secure online. Finding fixes that really reduce medical costs and not just hide them. 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.2.5  Ozzwald  replied to  evilone @3.2.2    3 years ago
Claiming they have proof without ever showing any.

The evidence has all been shown, if you'd step out of your right wing blogsphere, you'd see it.  Even highly partisan Senate republicans could see it, or did you not click on my provided links?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.2.6  Sean Treacy  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2.5    3 years ago

I don't think you understand the concept of collusion. 

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3.2.7  evilone  replied to  Ozzwald @3.2.5    3 years ago
The evidence has all been shown

Evidence produced AFTER Shiff flapped his gums. You are arguing points NOT in the article. 

...if you'd step out of your right wing blogsphere, you'd see it.

HAHAHAHA! Your attempt to insult me makes me laugh.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
3.2.13  Ozzwald  replied to  Tessylo @3.2.11    3 years ago
that both sides nonsense is tiresome - no comparison between the Democrats and gop/gqp

Whataboutisms are the only defense they have, as feeble as it is.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.2.15  devangelical  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.14    3 years ago

... barr had it classified.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.2.17  devangelical  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.16    3 years ago
 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
3.2.18  George  replied to  devangelical @3.2.17    3 years ago

It doesn’t say what you think it says. Barr did not Classify Adam Schitt evidence. Why lie about something so stupid?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.2.21  devangelical  replied to  Texan1211 @3.2.19    3 years ago

you needed to read more than the headline...

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
4  Sparty On    3 years ago

Schiffty has no self awareness or shame.    

Just how our friends on the left like them.

Crooked as hell …..

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1  seeder  Vic Eldred  replied to  Sparty On @4    3 years ago

Pelosi liked him for successfully impeaching judges. I think we should review those proceedings.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
4.1.1  Sparty On  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1    3 years ago

Agreed, heads need to start rolling or shysters like Schiff will just keep doing it.    We need consequences.    Heavy duty consequences for asshats like Schiff.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
5  JBB    3 years ago

Well, this is really dumb motion because Russia really did "interfere in the 2016 American Presidential election" both to help Trump and to hurt Mrs Clinton. That is not debatable. These are proven facts. Trump has just never been convicted in a American court of law for conspiring directly with Russia regarding the implementation of the massive Russian interference campaign in the 2016 election, which was all to Trump's advantage!

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JBB @5    3 years ago
Trump has just never been convicted in a American court of law for conspiring directly with Russia regarding the implementation of the massive Russian interference campaign in the 2016 election

Even Mueller and his zero restriction investigation couldn't find anything on it.  But somehow, in the minds of the left and the idiots they follow (Schiff, Pelosi, etc.), it happened.  

Maybe you should look at ALL the information, not just those that soothe your hurt TDS riddled feelings.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.2.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  dennis smith @5.2.1    3 years ago

Some will look at the information.  When it's something they don't agree with they go into another temper tantrum, letting their feelings get in the way, and then they will double down on stupid.  

Other's have trouble comprehending the information or just won't look at it at all and try to play down the sources.

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
6  charger 383    3 years ago

          "Schiff just hit the fan," Luna said in a tweet.

Mr Potato Head meets the veg-o-matic

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
7  Sparty On    3 years ago

Schiffty lied to you

And Pelosi knew

Turk 182

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
8  Nerm_L    3 years ago

Nothing is going to happen.  But, then, that's not really the point.  The only thing that's necessary is for Luna to make allegations the same way Schiff made allegations.

Luna pulled a Schiff on Schiff.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
9  Sean Treacy    3 years ago

His lies about the FISA warrants alone (which the gullible media ran with) are enough to justify his censure.   

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
10  Jasper2529    3 years ago

The only thing that Schiff should feel flattered by is that he was able to hoodwink low-info voters and left wing media for years into believing he possessed "evidence in plain sight" but was never forced to present that evidence.

Rep.  Adam Schiff   (D-Calif.) said on Wednesday that he is “flattered” by a Republican push to  censure  him, suggesting that the resolution was driven by hopes of distracting from former President Trump’s legal woes.

“I’m flattered by it,” he continued. “But the fact that Speaker McCarthy would take up this MAGA resolution when we have so many pressing challenges before the country is really a terrible abuse of House resources.”

Schiff also accused his Republican colleagues of bringing forward the censure resolution as retaliation for his leading the first impeachment inquiry into the former president.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
10.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Jasper2529 @10    3 years ago
Schiff also accused his Republican colleagues of bringing forward the censure resolution as retaliation for his leading the first impeachment inquiry into the former president.

Seems that stupid doesn't realize his lies are what led to the first impeachment.  This could be seen as a start to correct the record.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
10.1.1  Jasper2529  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @10.1    3 years ago

Honesty, integrity, and self-awareness are not among Schiff's questionable attributes.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Quiet
10.1.2  pat wilson  replied to  Jasper2529 @10.1.1    3 years ago

So those are among his unquestionable attributes. 

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
11  Kavika     3 years ago

Representative Anna Luna (R) is Florida's version of George Santos.

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Expert
12  Kavika     3 years ago

The censure failed today in the House by a vote of 225 to 196.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
12.1  Ender  replied to  Kavika @12    3 years ago

It is all a smokescreen to take some heat off of their backs for 5 seconds...

All they have...

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
12.1.2  Ender  replied to  Texan1211 @12.1.1    3 years ago

Seems all trump sycophants do these days...

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
12.1.4  Ender  replied to  Texan1211 @12.1.3    3 years ago

Yep. Just as funny as republicans that have nothing better to do in the House.

But the faithful wave and cheer....

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
12.1.6  Ender  replied to  Texan1211 @12.1.5    3 years ago

Like Jordan?

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
13  evilone    3 years ago

Annnddd the vote failed. Maybe it's time to get on with real business? No?

 
 

Who is online







80 visitors