Why Can't We Have Nice Things??

These are "family cars". Not status symbols.

Keep in mind that the prices quoted include VAT (a sort of sales tax), about 20%. So these would be in the mid-20s in the States.

We can't have nice things because we've been naughty. 

Three nice cars and the price, wow.

The question is "Why can't we have nice things?"  Who says you can't?  All you have to do is pay for them.  Can't afford them?  Well, if you were to drop the tariffs on Chinese goods and lift the bans on whatever is Chinese, you COULD afford to have the nice things you want, but then politics seem to stand in your way, doesn't it, and politics is the day and night and life and death and heaven and hell and yes and no and black and white and what makes the world go round for Americans.  I wonder how much America and Americans would be capable of accomplishing and how much they would enjoy life if politics didn't get in the way. 

Americans are spoiled.   In this ranking we’re are #5 in the world and yet we can’t have nice things?

usnews

I don’t buy it.   Neither do the millions of people trying to immigrate here.

Do you have anything to say about the video?

Yes.  

It is not unusual for consumer goods to be available in one country and not another.   Many companies like Ford manufacture vehicles specifically for that market.   It’s dated for when i was involved with the big three in the 8o’s but a Ford Escort made in Germany was completely different that an Escort made in the US.    Just one example.

It is not unusual at all.

Why do American manufacturers not offer any inexpensive EVs?

That’s a question for them but ….  

Do you think they would offer them if they thought it would be profitable?

Until recently, Americans were buying gargantuan EVs such as Hummer, Lightning, etc. Those sales have fallen off a cliff. 

I watched Detroit ignore the writing on the wall when the Japanese arrived, refusing to build good small cars. Their market share went from over 50% to a little over 30%. Why were they so foolish? Books have been written, but the explanation that seems most likely is the laziness and greed of Detroit CEOs. They didn't rock the boat, took their golden retirement.

Mary Barra got $30 million last year.

You didn’t answer my question.

Do you think they would offer them if they thought it would be profitable?

I’ve got another question for you.    Have you ever run a company of any size successfully?

Why do American manufacturers not offer any inexpensive EVs?

I know this may sound a bit farfetched...but quite possible they want to make a profit?

Oh!

I think that is a big , but not the only reason , another deciding factor would be receiving countries vehicle regulations and what would need to be complied with, with that and the actual sales market would be things considered . I do agree the big one is the bottom line of profit  and what is acceptable for the maker on import . .

Back in 1984/85 , i had the chance to buy a porche 911, it was an 82/83 mdl year , for 3K,  problem was I was in my early 20s ( insurance here in the states would have eaten me alive ) and it was built to european safety specs of the times . so i would have had to have had it shipped back here to the states , at my cost , would have had to have paid to have it brought up to US specs to include the then emission standards , at that time it was actually cheaper to buy one that was already a legal import here , new than to make the expense on one in europe , and used .

 So the big3 reasons would be  profit margin , governmental regulation and compliance and market for the product .

Nice things are subjective. I wouldn’t consider three ev’s from three manufacturers who have shitty reliability records to be nice things. I’d bet that if all three were sold here all three would be major sales flops.

Agreed but that doesn’t change the substance of my comment.    Americans are spoiled.    No doubt about it

Do you have any data about the reliability of these manufacturers? I'm something of a gearhead and I've seen nothing to corroborate what you're saying. Renault and Stellantis are major, long time manufacturers, well known for a very long time. MG belongs to SAIC, a major Chinese manufacturer, present in Europe for several years now, with a decent reputation.

Look up jeep reliability. They are near the bottom and have been for a long, long, time. A true gearhead would know that.

renault left the US a long time ago due to shoddy craftsmanship and bad reliability, leading to extremely poor sales, and failure to meet fed regulations. 

I don’t know about saic as i will never own a chinese made or designed vehicle.

For a while in the 1980s I heard a lot of sad, "Saab Stories"...

I never owned a saab and thought they were butt ugly but It’s too bad saab ran into financial troubles and ended up being bought by gm. Saab owners were very brand loyal but were turned away by the gm rebadged models.

renault left the US a long time ago

... and of course nothing has changed as the decades passed...

Most 1980s Renaults sold in the US were built in Wisconsin.

But hey!

“... and of course nothing has changed as the decades passed...”

It’s possible. Why would a guy keep tabs on a foreign car company that made crappy cars for the US market, then pull out of the US market? Current euro car companies that sell in the US market are not known for being stellar reliability. Look up reliability ratings for vw, mercedes benz, bmw, audi.

“Most 1980s Renaults sold in the US were built in Wisconsin.”

Yep, built in kenosha wisconsin, designed in france.

I noticed there was nothing mentioned about jeep reliability. But hey!

I don't understand your criticism of Jeep, here. Jeep manufactures far more ICE cars than EVs, so what's your point?

Are you really saying that you proudly base your opinions on forty-year-old data?

“I don't understand your criticism of Jeep, here. Jeep manufactures far more ICE cars than EVs, so what's your point?”

What do you think this means,

Look up jeep reliability. They are near the bottom and have been for a long, long, time. A true gearhead would know that.

It’s pretty simple, even for the most basic.

Of course. But you seemed to be using Jeep's poor reliability as a criticism of EVs. 

I don't understand that.

No, i’m using jeep’s poor reliability as a criticism of the JEEP EV. 

OK. That's legitimate.

It has nothing to do with other EVs, but it's legitimate.

Americans are spoiled.

What do you mean by "spoiled"?

Take what we have for granted

It's possible to buy an EV at Walmart for $140.  TEOAYEAH 2X35W Ride On Truck Car, 12V Electric Vehicle  These things have been on the market for decades.  So, it's not like we're unfamiliar with rechargeable vehicles.

Any of those highlighted vehicles can be imported into the US and sold as long as they comply with the regulatory environment.  Why can't foreign manufacturers simply comply with US law?  Can't they compete with domestic manufacturers without cheating? 

Why would a vehicle that doesn't comply with US regulations be considered a 'nice thing'?  Those regulations are in place to protect consumers and the environment.  So, a vehicle that doesn't comply with those regulations cannot be 'nice'.

$140

That's a toy.

Those regulations are in place to protect consumers and the environment.

Not really. SUVs are considered trucks for fuel consumption rules and trucks have a much more favorable treatment than cars. Why? A cynic might imagine that this is a form of subsidy for American manufacturers. (No one else makes gargantuan crew-cabs with tiny beds and gorgeous chromed wheels.)

That's a toy.

Good catch!  The point is that kids have been playing with electric vehicles (yes, toys) for decades.  The target market of young people are quite familiar with battery operated cars, trucks, and vehicles of all types and sizes.  

These really are electric vehicles that kids have grown up with:  Hoverboards   Electric Scooter  Electric Skateboard   Some of these things are being used by young adults for commuting.  

Not really. SUVs are considered trucks for fuel consumption rules and trucks have a much more favorable treatment than cars. Why? A cynic might imagine that this is a form of subsidy for American manufacturers. (No one else makes gargantuan crew-cabs with tiny beds and gorgeous chromed wheels.)

Even trucks are required to comply with safety and environmental regulations.  Pointing out the non-uniformity of regulations may provide some insight into why we can't have nice things.

Foreign manufacturers will have to comply with the US regulatory environment.  And foreign manufacturers will try to exploit gaps in regulations just like domestic manufacturers do.  

I guess the huge subsidies that the US government has provided for the development of the ev car industry and subsidies for purchasers are NOT considered the "cheating" that you accuse others of doing.  Tell me that the US government has not put up billions of dollars towards the American chip industry.  I'm waiting to see it.  I think there's a word, starting with the letter "h" for accusing others of what one does themselves.

Governments everywhere subsidize their industry in all sorts of ways. Big Oil is the most heavily subsidized industry in the history of the world. EV subsidies are peanuts.

I guess the huge subsidies that the US government has provided for the development of the ev car industry and subsidies for purchasers are NOT considered the "cheating" that you accuse others of doing.  Tell me that the US government has not put up billions of dollars towards the American chip industry.  I'm waiting to see it.  I think there's a word, starting with the letter "h" for accusing others of what one does themselves.

That's nuthin' compared to the Federal subsidies for aviation and space.  For decades NASA was delivering private commercial satellites into orbit.  Today's smart phones wouldn't have been possible without support from the Federal government.  The Federal government provides all sorts of direct and indirect subsidies for a large number of commercial activities.  The Federal government has even provided direct and indirect subsidies to Chinese businesses and government.

China being allowed to steal technology from US businesses has been one of the largest subsidies in the history of mankind.  Most of China's progress has been the result of mimicking purloined technology. China has only recently become an innovator.  China no longer needs to be subsidized by the US.  Apparently the Chinese are worried about having to compete without cheating.

"Apparently the Chinese are worried about having to compete without cheating."

Would you please post a link that substantiates the truth of that? 

China's rules for foreign companies doing business in China are that they must share their technology with the Chinese and I believe in many cases even partner with Chinese corporations/individuals.  If foreign companies did not wish to comply with that requirement, nobody stopped them from going somewhere else instead, so China did not STEAL the technology, it was SHARED by foreign corporations willingly because they considered the benefit of the Chinese labour and/or consumers to be important to them.  I KNOW THAT TO BE A FACT, because my client, a Toronto-based manufacturing corporation, opened up a plant in Shanghai and was required to comply with that process.  

I also find it interesting that China was able to carry out space technology, including a lander on Mars that sent info back to Earth, when China has always been totally banned from NASA. 

China wasn't just capable of inventing or developing technology only recently.  China was inventing useful things while Europeans were painting themselves blue and hiding in caves.  

I'm surprised they left out the fork, but maybe that's because they mostly use chopsticks.  Besides what you see above, at least you admitted that more recently they've made a lot more recent technological advances, some of which have been made in such fields as robotics and quantum computing.

Napoleon was right to have been reputed to have said "Let China sleep, or you will awaken a tiger."

Would you please post a link that substantiates the truth of that?

Chinese Industrial espionage has been well documented.  Here's a new book on the subject:  Chinese Industrial Espionage  I haven't read it yet; it is in the queue. 

China's rules for foreign companies doing business in China are that they must share their technology with the Chinese ...

The Chinese government has operated a number of technology centers in the US since the 1970s. Here are some current examples (there are more):

1. China US Technology Innovation Center ( CUTIC), a non-profit business incubator
2. US China Clean Tech Center (UCCTC), partnered with Dept. Commerce
3. US China Clean Energy Research Center (CERC), partnered with Dept. of Energy

I have met Chinese officials at Gordon conferences attempting to acquire technology.  Long ago and far away the Chinese were attempting to recruit scientists and engineers in the US.  That changed after the Federal government opened the door for student visas.  One of my chemistry TAs was a Chinese national who was coerced into attending the university by the Chinese government.  

And where is it written that the Chinese are "worried" about having to compete.  China has clearly indicated it is willing to cooperate and share, America is not.  Don't make statements you are unable or unwilling to back up.