'JD Vance Is Weird,' Says Guy Who Signed Bill To Put Tampons In Boys' School Bathrooms
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
MANKATO, MN — The race for the White House intensified today with the announcement of Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as Kamala Harris's running mate, including Walz coming out swinging against his opponent for the second-highest office in the country, Ohio senator and Trump running mate J.D. Vance.
Walz took aim at Vance with a searing insult, referring to the Ohio senator as "weird" and not at all as normal like Walz, who recently signed a bill into state law that put tampons in boys' school bathrooms.
"J.D. Vance is such a weirdo!" Walz said after telling one of his aides to make sure all boys' restrooms remained fully stocked with feminine products. "Look at him with his lovely wife and beautiful children! Such a backward way to live life, am I right? Leave it to Donald Trump to choose a total whackjob like J.D. Vance. I hear he even goes to a church that doesn't stock little boy tampons! Can you believe that? Weirdo!"
Vance, who was a U.S. Marine, best-selling author, and venture capitalist before entering politics, now faces an uphill battle against being labeled "weird" by a man who insisted on making tampons available in boys' school bathrooms, adopted radical transgender treatment laws for children, and governs a state that allows babies who survive abortions to be killed outside the womb. "Vance is just so far out of the mainstream," Walz said. "Once people learn about his totally weird, extremist values, he'll be in trouble. He's so totally weird!"
At publishing time, Walz was preparing to host a furry drag queen story hour for children at the governor's mansion.
Tags
Who is online
429 visitors
So just the boys bathrooms? None in the girls bathroom?
Right, cause that's the important question....
Maybe it's weird but transgender girls don't need tampons. Seems as though Walz failed to put condoms in the girls bathrooms where they're needed.
Can you answer the question or not?
Why the girls' restrooms? They're not the one with penises
So they don't all turn into balloon animals?
Why put tampon dispensers in the boys restrooms. Boys do not menstruate
So NOW the left can differentiate between a boy and a girl.
Awww, such a shame about Cori Bush. I wonder if progressives should give that some consideration?....
NAHHH
Who cares really?
JD Vance is a heterosectional.
What is that?...
Ask your couch
Why would any couch know?
Keep spreading the lie- it is all Democrats have.
The lie? It is a joke. You know - Ha ha funny.
You may want to brace and cushion yourself, as potato's aren't always sweet, and between the cushions not always neat, cause some couches are smarter than others, obviously.
For where some couches are forced to watch fantasy Fox "news', and Country sing alongs, others indulge in PBS, and music such as the blues with mean riffs enjoyed by those smoking bongs
Not any worse than this lie:
lol
Vance is the most normal person of the 4 people at the head of the tickets.
Tim Walz is the only one that doesn't wear makeup.
That didn’t work well for Nixon in 1960.
He gives tampons to boys, wants little kids to come to his state to have their genitals mutilated and lies about fighting in war.
Also, pretty much everyone on camera wears makeup. Hate to break it to you.
What are the trumpsters afraid the boys will do with them, stuff 'em up their noses ?
Yes, and then they’ll magically turn into girls. Or worse - Democrats.
[✘]
Wasting tax payer money is a specialty of Democrats.
Providing solutions to non existent problems is another.
Oh, so you’re saying that the country would be much better off if not for the millions of tampon machines in boys rest rooms?
Just wondering. Does anyone care that the law doesn’t say that? Here’s the full text of the law:
There’s nothing in there about boys. A product is provided for those who need it. If you don’t need a tampon, don’t take one.
I'm picking up what you're putting down. So you're saying that government workers in Minnesota are too dumb to understand that menstruation products are gender based?
I’m saying that - contrary to what is being claimed - nothing in the law is forcing boys to take, or even encounter tampons. Although I don’t know why that would constitute a crisis, even if it were true.
'I'm picking up what you're putting down'
Groovy man!
Well, that sorta puts a damper on the hissy fitters, now doesn't it. Wonder if they are aware that they are sold in convenience stores and one doesn't need to prove gender to purchase them ? Also wonder if any guys out there ever had to purchase such a product for their 'girl' or females in their lives ?
Cause man, what a big deal about NOTHING !
You’d think so, but once these people decide they are going to be afraid of something, no amount of facts, rational thought, deep breathing, or soothing aromas will keep them from believing the end of the world is nigh.
A real man will buy menstrual supplies for their significant other at that time of the month iggy. I've had a few boyfriends that had no problem doing so.
It looks like some of the 'men' here are in need of these products, it's like they're having their periods.
MR. G did but I had to write down exactly what I wanted. There are so many different types, brands, etc. It confused him
I gotta say i had to take a picture of my wife’s products when i went to purchase them and then blow up the picture because there could have been something written on the package that made it different than 20 other products with very similar packaging.
[deleted][✘]
Where do they dredge up these lies and nonsense then and call Walz Timpon?
All they have is PD&D+Delusion and straight up lies. Even when proven false, they go with the lie.
'Does anyone care that the law doesn't say that'?
Obviously not. Why go with the truth when the maga cult believe any ridiculous bullshit that's put out against Dems?
Like the boxer in the Olympics who is a woman and people are still denying that?
For a lot of people, if it’s not something within their personal experience or understanding, then it’s Satan at work. You could throw facts at them all day long and it won’t mean a thing to them. They’re like flat-earthers.
The "must provide" part is important....
I don't know if the writers of this rule had thought of it, but the dispenser in the girls' bathroom might be empty. Not a problem if there was one in the Boy's bathroom.
I dont understand what is "dangerous" about putting tampons in bathrooms. Are they a choking hazard ?
Because only a radical loon would support a law forcing schools to supply male bathrooms with tampons. No different than a law forcing schools to stock bathrooms with pictures of rutabagas.
What is dangerous about it again?
This is yet another example of the right taking an inconsequential common sense requirement and blowing it up into a national emergency.
Lol. Do you think boys mensturate? I think you need to look up the phrase common sense.
DO you think it's "common sense" to force schools to put urinals in girls' bathrooms too?
I think the hysteria the right is bringing to this is pathetic.
Do you think boys will feel uncontrollably compelled to try to use tampons on themselves? What are you afraid of?
The law does not require that.
But if a school choose to do that, what would be the harm?
Think back to some time before your party signed on to all this nonsense. What would that John have said if someone in 1994 told him that men's bathrooms need to have tampons in them? Or that men can get pregnant. Or that it's impossible to define a woman. Or that biological men should fight women for our entertainment.
You would have laughed them out of the room.
That's how it still appears to the rest of us who haven't been infected by this insanity. When people start saying the most ludicrous of things like "the government must provide tampons to boys" it's becomes the sign of a mind that isn't really dealing with common sense or reality. They become so invested in this fantasy world where the rules of biology no longer apply that it's impossible for those of us who still deal with the world as it is to believe they are sane.
In 100 years when historians look back at this era, things like this are going to be example 1 of how out of our collective mind this country became.
Tampons for boys.
Seriously.
It's the sign of a very stupid, or dangerously crazy zealot who thinks boys need tampons and believes it is the role of government to mandate their placement in boys' bathrooms. I'm afraid of someone who believes that exercising any sort of power.
Where does the law limit the placement of tampons to female bathrooms?
Well, here is an article about it:
Where does the law mandate putting feminine hygiene products in boys restrooms?
Nothing, except for the blatant waste of taxpayer dollars.
Democrats are creating solutions using taxpayer money for problems that don't exist.
Where does the law mandate putting feminine hygiene products in boys restrooms?
In its text. It mandates students' bathrooms, not just bathrooms for females.
The implicit component of your argument is that because Minnesota is putting tampons in school bathrooms everyone should vote for Trump/Vance.
The political right really is shameless.
Yeah, really shameless to talk about a policy Walz is proud of. Should stick to making up stories about sexualized couches, I guess.
So, your whole argument against this legislation is that it doesn't specify girls restrooms as the location where the feminine hygiene products are to be available?
Did Walz wright the legislation?
I bet that the students who spearheaded the legislation had a hand in it.
Good for them. They probably knew that by leaving out which bathrooms specifically would cause reactionery heads to explode.
and oh yeah...
Mind your own business
Yes, it mandates they are available in all bathrooms.
He supported it, signed it, and bragged about it.
hat the students who spearheaded the legislation had a hand in it.
So? The only question is if it's a good law or not.
hey probably knew that by leaving out which bathrooms specifically would cause reactionery heads to explode.
No, they knew they were mandating putting tampons in boys bathrooms.
See Post 8.1.6
Oh.. Like setting up a statewide snitch network for people to rat on their neighbors for playing ball in the park or buying the wrong items at a store? That kind of minding your own business?
He is proud of it because he helped students when they requested it. He is obviously a thoughtful gentleman. Unlike the far right posters who will do anything to drag America back to the stone age.
Imagine thinking the failure of state government to provide boys with tampons will drag America back to the stone age.
Do you have a compelling interest in feminine hygiene products?
Wasn't that during the height of "Oh my god! Everybody is getting sick and dying!" early days of the pandemic? Once again, an understandable reaction. From Statnews
So he did what he thought best to protect the people of his state. From
Do you have anything else to hysterically over-react to?
Imagine something that is not mentioned in the law being so upsetting.
Imagine MAGA not being hair on fire mad and falsely indignant about some made up fakeass misleading false news story...
Can't, can you?
Are you missing some commas or other ways to make your sentence understandable?
you have a compelling interest in feminine hygiene products
not at all, that’s why i find it so bizarre that some people are so invested in feminine hygiene products that they they think the state should force their placement in boys’s bathrooms.
do you? Why are you so invested in forcing the placement of tampons in boys bathrooms?
what he thought best to protect the people of his state.
said every tyrant ever.
But sure tell people to mind their own business while justifying neighbors snitching on each other for walking outside.
The statute is self explanatory. I can’t help you if you can’t understand those words..
Putting bowls of rubbers in the boys restroom might be more useful.
First, what words in the text of the law mandates placement in boys’ bathrooms?
Second, even if they are in there, what is the harm? I have asked this a couple times now, as have others. Who is harmed? How?
It doesn’t. Why does it need to?
That is no comfort to preoperative trans boys having a period...
They’d have a problem with that, too. Basically anything that is different than what they’re used to is some kind of existential crisis.
Ohhhh, now we are segueing into the '(insert democratic office holder here) is tyrannical' phase. I thought that your opinion was that everything was going to be just fine because the Laws and rules of the CotUS were too strong to be overcome? Now here you are starting up the same line of reasoning that you tell the people to your left is fear mongering and impossible.
Nice. /S
I am willing to say that most every politician has uttered the phrase like "I did it because I thought it would best protect the people" be they tyrant or saint.
When you learn some more about tyrants you can give me a call- 1 800 382 5633
How much tax dollars?
The literal words. There is no limit on the word bathrooms, so all bathrooms used by students are covered.
The issue was debated the legislature. Per NPR:
asked this a couple times now, as have others. Who is harmed? How?
I don't know how to make this any plainer. We are all hurt by electing leaders who will promote nonsense in the name of their make believe world where boys need tampons.
No, it’s supposed to be available “to all menstruating students in restrooms regularly used by students in grades 4 to 12.” Precisely how this is accomplished is decided by the school districts.
What are you afraid of?
Get that strawman!. You offered that pathetic excuse to justify the state acting as intrusively as possible right after claiming you want people to mind their own business.
So, try taking a position that lasts longer than one post before proceeding any further.
Yes it says feminine hygiene products must be in the restrooms where they are needed. I guess that in Minnesota it is assumed that people can figure out where the feminine hygiene products are needed and don't need that level of micromanagement.
Oh, but I can understand those words, as can everyone else who is here. Can't you?
That covers all student bathrooms. There is no limiting factor on students. It's just a matter of reading.
Even if for whatever reason you can't parse the language, given a chance to specifically limit the requirement to female or gender neutral bathrooms the legislature voted against those limitations, which demonstrates their intent to apply it to all bathrooms.
I get why this is so embarrassing to his defenders and their need to obfuscate rather than attempt to defend such a batshit crazy use of government power, but at some point just face reality.
What are you afraid of?
I'll make this as simple as possible for you. Crazy people who think boys require access to tampons and that its the government's job to enforce it, having any power.
How? Specifically.
We already know you don’t like the guy because he’s a Democrat. Don’t pretend you’d be supporting him but for this one law.
This law does a nice thing for students who need it. If a student doesn’t need it, they don’t have to use it.
It’s really sad how social conservatives have this desperate need to embrace cruelty.
Yes, for instance, it is a known fact that when their condition is unaddressed and untreated both physically and mentally trans children are extremely likely to commit suicide. Yet, red state legislatures are passing laws that outlaw necessary help...
We are talking about innocent children who need therapies.
Pathetic excuse? It is called an accurate explanation. I told what and why he did what he did. I linked my sources.
So why don't you tell me how many people were cited? Anyone at all?
How many were prosecuted?
No one?
You know what? I find Walz to be an apparently well-grounded and upstanding man, no matter how much the hate-machine of politics tries to roll me over. A quietly refreshing change to the topsy-turvey world that Trump has drug with him and subjected us all to since 2015. Harris is smart, Walz is solid, and I hope they are going to beat the pants off of Trump/Vance, worse than the Rout of '20. America is ready to move on from Trump. Harris offers the chance to do that. I for one am going to take her up on that offer.
And the alternative is the never-stable, Misogynistic, lying piece of human waste that is Trump?
I thought you had a sense of decency?
Reminds me of "Don't say gay" law many left wing heads are still exploding over.
Good thing I never have.
oes a nice thing for students who need it.
Which is why no one objected to placing them in girls bathrooms.
This is beyond absurd. You now claim not putting tampons into boys bathrooms is "cruelty." Good lord, you must have lived the most sheltered life possible to believe not giving tampons to boys is cruelty.
And I'm not voting for him either.
understand those words, as can everyone else who is here
[✘] DEmocrats promote this bill.
Republicans say "fine, but the language mandates tampons in all bathrooms. That's silly. Let's just include limiting language so only girl and gender neutral bathrooms are required to stock tampons."
Democrats Vote no to the proposed amendment limiting the mandate to female and general neutral bathrooms.[✘]
In what 'male' bathrooms is/are this happening?
In what world do boys menstruate?
It appears that it is only you and other rwnj's claiming that boys need access to tampons and sanitary napkins.
MAGA never let facts like boys do not menstruate get in the way of their false indignation at fake outrageous imaginary scenarios...
[✘]
Where is 'gender neutral' in this bill?
The MAGA are not thinking this all the way though. Are they?
Thinking?
It would be nice if they embraced reality.
Minnesota. 4th grade and up. For those girls that think they are boys. Keep up please.
Good Point! MAGA operate on emotion. They really cannot help it...
8.1.58
For those who menstruate.
Keep up.
[deleted][✘]
That must be really difficult standing there at the urinal...
In fourth grade?
Except there are always toilets to sit on. Don't be obtuse.
What’s beyond absurd is that you identify a requirement in the law that is not there. What’s beyond absurd is that you care about any of this.
Again, even if they did put this in a boys bathroom, so what? If no one needs it, who cares? It hurts no one.
Sure, there could be a trans case, but it will be relatively rare. Maybe - just maybe - there is a school where a biological girl, identifying as a boy, uses the boys bathrooms and the administration knows it. Since this student is having periods, it means they aren’t going through the hormone therapy conservatives say they object to. So, in case of an emergency, this item is sitting in that restroom in case they need it.
Or maybe we’re talking about a biological girl who has no inclinations at all to being trans. She just finds herself suddenly needing some protection. She happens to be near the boys restroom, and the girls restroom is on the other side of the gym or the admin building, or whatever. She could just run into the boys restroom real quick and take care of business, but you would force her to risk embarrassment and take the long walk, possibly through other students to deal with her issue.
Ah yes. The familiar extreme conservative posing - pretending that you’re tougher than other people. You’re not. My life was not so sheltered by some standards. Perhaps it was by others. Unlike some, I don’t spend my days measuring myself against others and patting myself on the back when I think I’m winning.
No one is giving tampons to boys. They are located in a place in case somebody needs one. People take it or they don’t. No giving.
Regardless, because I’m a compassionate human being, if I can make life easier for the next generation, I’m happy to do it. Conservatives always claim to be devoted Christians, but they do not follow His teachings. Kindness and generosity are not on the agenda. Judgment and meanness are.
Minnesota has chosen to do a small thing that may help a small number of students, while hurting no one. And your reaction is anger and panic. I think that is beyond absurd.
That's not true.
So only 4th graders use the bathrooms?
A girl I went to school with started menstruating very early. I think she was around 11 if not younger. It could be possible that a 4th grader is getting their period. They are 9 or 10 years old. I've heard of children younger than that getting their periods, related to all the hormones in foods, etc.
[✘]
Yeah, you have. You absolutely have. I say this by your own standard. You have argued that since the law does not specifically limit the items to girls’ restrooms, they must be required in boys’ restrooms.
Therefore, if you do not specifically declare that there are other reasons you don’t approve of Tim Walz, then this law must be the only reason. This is your standard, not mine.
You have held this law up as the sign that he can’t be trusted to make good decisions. He made this one decision you don’t like, and therefore he’s a bad pick. But for this one decision, you could be persuaded to vote for him.
If that is not the case, then this law really isn’t that big a deal. You just want to scandalize a very minor issue that doesn’t affect anyone negatively, and you’re doing it in support of base political tribalism.
So you all go with the lie and dig in deeper when proven to be false.
Like the female boxer that you all claimed was a biological male.
yeah, you have
Wow! Where to begin? Such dishonesty combined with an argument that might be the most illogical I’ve seen.
For starters, I’ve never so much as hinted that "I'd be supporting him but for this one law". Pure, rank dishonesty to suggest that I have.
Then, you double down on your dishonest premise by claiming that his support for tampons for boys is the only criticism I’ve made of Palz. Ask your fellow travelers about that. There's plenty out there.
But as dishonest as your claims are, they don’t compare to how ass backwards and illogical your attempt was to apply my argument about what the statute means to what you imagine my reason is for not supporting Harris. I keep trying to make this as simple as I can for you. If you can’t get this, I have no idea how to further simplify it for you. Let's start with simply understanding how nouns function.
Take tampons out of the equation because it seems to have broken people’s brains. Imagine the legislature said “Schools must paint their bathrooms blue.” Bathrooms are a collective noun. The word encompasses boys bathrooms, girl bathrooms and unisex bathrooms. All types of bathrooms fall under the category bathrooms.
So if a state orders its schools to paint their bathrooms blue, all bathrooms are included under the mandate.
Now here’s where it gets tricky for some, substitute paint blue with supply tampons. It’s very simple.
Since they, like every other literate person in the world, gets that concept, the Republicans said “hey, let’s modify the word bathrooms by listing girl and unisex bathrooms.” Democrats said “No,all bathrooms must have tampons." Since Democrats had the numbers, the word bathroom stayed unmodified in the final legislative text.
This all played out in the legislature. It's public record. They voted on this point. Which makes it exceptionally dishonest to claim the language which the Minnesota legislature, the media, and all literate people agree encompasses all bathrooms, doesn't.
Now you want to apply the logic of that argument to your imagined reason for my not supporting Harris/Walz. Start with finding my equivalent declaration to the statute at issue. Oh, that’s right, it doesn’t exist. So you can’t do that, honestly.
But that didn’t stop you did it? You just pretended like I did.
The fact you and Tessy think that pointing out that boys don't menstruate undercuts my argument sums up this thread as well as anything. I couldn't have scripted a better answer myself.
The law has a condition. Your analogy does not. So you have created a straw man. Therefore, any "reasoning" you apply to it must fail. And you call me dishonest.
I'm not surprised you won't acknowledge your own words.
Aaaannnddd, you still haven't been able to define why any of this is an actual problem worthy of all this pearl clutching.
I know what the words mean. Perfectly. Using logic sounds wonderful.
Just because you "think" something makes sense to you, does not mean that it makes or does not make sense to anyone else.
You began your dystopian journey on thread number eight with this comment:
as if the sole purpose of the law was to specifically supply tampons in male bathrooms. It was not, as I specifically showed in 8.1.9 when I quoted and linked this article Minnesota schools now required to provide free menstrual products to students. I know that for you it matters that it does not state specifically in the text that females are supposed to have them, but I don't really give a shit. Tacos! provided the actual text of the law (thank you) in post 7
Everything after those exchanges is just me having fun at the expense of someone who is stuck in the 1950's and fighting to claw back the gains that people have made in securing their rights to exist within society. People who are widening the region of what it means to be content with their way of life and not having to hide who they are out of fear for "what people will say about them". They hurt no one. They bring joy to many who take the time to get to know them. Some of them are weird, no doubt, but they are generally good people. Most people are good people and just want to live in peace.
No, it doesn't. bathroom is not modified in the statute. . You know that. The media knows that. The Minnesota legislature knows that. Why you persist in claiming otherwise even after the specific issue was debated and voted upon by the legislature is beyond me.
m not surprised you won't acknowledge your own words
Lol. Another bullshit claim. By all means, find those words you claim I won't acknowledge. I'd love to see where you believe I claimed I was open to voting for Harris/ Walz.
Except the people who debated and voted on the bill publicly, you mean? This was all debated in public. I provided you a link from NPR demonstrating that. If you want to persist in your fantasies, go right ahead.
e purpose of the law was to specifically supply tampons in male bathroom
Get that strawman! I never said it was. The Minnesota state republicans agreed that providing free tampons in girls and unisex bathrooms was a good idea. I do too. I'm surprised Democrats do though. Providing taxpayer support for children and their parents is something that evil JD Vance supports.
exchanges is just me having fun at the expense of someone who is stuck in the 1950's
Lol. You and your imagination.
Isn't it great?
Sounds like
So your distinction has no difference. Just yelling Strawman does not make it so.
Providing Tampons in male bathrooms is what you are bitching about, isn't it?
And the point that you seem to totally and completely miss, even though you tell of the debates between legislators, is that he did not write the legislation. He signed it after it was crafted, debated and voted on. He said,"Good enough," put his signature on it and "Next!" The people who crafted the legislation were put into office in the normal democratic fashion of voting by their constituents. I suggest that you take it up with them.
Never said it was.
[✘] Aaaannnddd, you still haven't been able to define why any of this is an actual problem worthy of all this pearl clutching.
[✘]
That's a good question. None that I know of. That is why they don't need to be in the boys room. In fact it is a tremendous waste of money to install them but democrats are good at wasting money.
In fourth grade?
Of course. In can happen.
Two possible reasons:
1. The girl was held over ("left back") and had to repeat the grade.
And I don't know if this actually happens but I wouldn't be surprised if school systems allow kids to be held over twice-- in which case a 4th grader would be the same age as a 6th grader.
In recent years girls have begun getting their periods ever younger. This is attributed to excess nutrition (obesity) and hormones in food. My mom taught 2nd grade and had several very large girls who started menstruating in 2nd grade. 4th grade is normal now...
I mentioned that earlier as well in regards to girls starting to menstruate much earlier - due to hormones in foods, friends of my brother, their daughter was starting to develop breasts as well very early as well as menstruating. So it shouldn't be unusual to have them in 4th through 12th grade bathrooms.
I think when my friend started menstruating so early, this was due to thyroid issues.
Why, yes, yes it is.................
" The law’s text also says the products must be available to “all menstruating students in restrooms regularly used by students in grades 4 to 12, according to a plan developed by the school district.” That would include both boys, girls and gender-neutral bathrooms."
KHOU is extrapolating, the last sentence is trying too hard.
No, no it isn't
Good thing because they're not in boys rooms
Yes they are in some boys restrooms till today
That would include both boys, girls and gender-neutral bathrooms
was added by Sean. Not true
It's not true. sean added that last sentence. It does not include boys.
The statute does not state that sentence, sean added it, it is a lie.
Plus it's not true.
Until today? Where?
Open the link to the article and read. Sean did NOT add it. It is right in the article FFS
In his 'article' maybe. NOT IN THE STATUTE FFS
[deleted][✘]
Only when used improperly.
They're good for bloody noses
I put them in first aid kits - and not just in case I encounter a menstruating woman.
That's an excellent idea. I never thought of that. Sanitary napkins are good for wounds that won't stop bleeding or a wound that has to be drained
My stepfather did as well. His friends thought it was hilariously funny and made fun of him until one of their teen boys fell out of the boat and got sliced by the prop while camping in a very remote area of Canada. That feminine napkin saved the kid's life. None of those big strong men ever joked about it again.
Good idea - something that will absorb blood quickly
No,
But for some people they may be a "political hazard".
I keep hearing about how refreshing it is to feel the joy emanating from the Harris ticket, as a stark comparison to the doom and gloom on the right. Now the right is wringing their hands over tampons in public places. They wouldn’t know joy if it were wadded up and stuffed in their vaginas.
Tampons in boys' restrooms makes about as much sense as have rubber dispensers in girls' restrooms.
Ummm. I mean I'm not your dad, so maybe it's not my place to have "the Talk" with you. But you do know that condom usage often involves a female, yes?
Has it occurred to you that a friend might be willing to retrieve a thing needed by another friend who was too embarrassed to do it themselves?
No kid NEEDs condoms at school. No tampon is an emergency!
Of course they do to avoid unwanted pregnancy and unwanted STD.
What about after school?
They can get them from the vending machine at APCO like you did in 1952. There have always had condom dispensers in schools...
Try to get a local school board to approve condom machines!
Are you really unaware just how ridiculous you guys are being?
If it was up to me they would give kids condoms, birth control pills and the morning after pill for free in their school's lobby...
Exactly, but continue to require parental approval for an aspirin.
What skin off your back is it if a vulnerable fifth grade trans boy can discreetly obtain a tampon in an emergency at school?
Other than to be cruel and inflict shame and embarrassment?
On A Child! Perhaps a messed up child, but that is the point...
None.
Why limit the dispensary to tampons? Shouldn’t we support choice with menstrual cups, pads, tampons and menstrual panties.
Then stop being so weird about it since it is not weird at all...
What have I said that you found weird?
as much sense as have rubber dispensers in girls' restrooms.
What about "rubber dispensers" in boys' restrooms?
Vending machines for candy bars. Sandwiches. Even paper, pens, pencil.
But I think we should draw the line at having vending machines that dispense real Gold! (Of course Minors should not be allowed to use the Gold dispensing machines unless they are of legal age)>
Either you're missing the whole point of my harmless barb against this radical leftist tool, or simply deflecting.].
We normies are just showing what kind of progressive nut job that Walz really is by poking fun and ridiculing him.
He's a wacked out weirdo.
That is because you never had a valid point to begin with. School administrators and teachers do not and cannot allow sex at school. They are though responsible for making sure any girls who get their periods unexpectedly do not bleed all over their students and classrooms. Tampons are a necessity. Rubbers are not!
One is a necessity for hygiene. The other is for birth control and to limit the spread of venereal diseases! Can you comprehend this?
Maybe in the backwoods but in NY we don't call MAGA "Normie".
This is definitely considered weird as hell even in NYC and LA...
Not Trans BTW. This here is a full grown full blown MAGA Man!
I wasn't born yet in 1952 so I wouldn't know like you do.
There were several school board and districts where they did. In one the boys ripped them off the walls and threw them in the toilets. And rightfully so.
Is he though? Seems more whacked out and weird to get your knickers in a twist over a benign thing that doesn’t hurt you or anyone else.
I just literally lol'd at your comment and the typical projection and continue to laugh at and mock those who just have to have to prove that they refuse to admit when they're wrong, no matter how ridiculous or ludicrous.
'Normies'
lol
Projection
Seems the 'normies' are always getting their panties into a twist over something.
lol
Rightfully so? WTF?
I hope the idiot was arrested for vandalism
They were not. In fact they were commended for their actions.
Those machines were not wanted or needed in the boys restrooms. They should not have been installed in the first place. BTW the school never replaced the machines either.
So, in your world vandalism is encouraged and commended
Commendable Vandalism? That is just plain fucking weird!
Maybe if you used a little K-Y?
This is also the same Timmy who's push to feed the children failed.
Personally I think this argument has gone on long enough. I really think it's time to put this one to bed.
Before it's ended, I would like to add one more thought. When girls high school athletic teams travel to other schools for events, they are given the boys locker room as the visitors. (Same as boys teams are given the girls locker rooms when they visit). It stands to reason that these items should be available in the boys locker rooms to be available if needed.
I think this is being overblown. IMO a girl who thinks she's really a boy and wants to dress, act and look like a boy and use the boys bathroom in school is a lot less dangerous than a boy who dresses and acts like a girl so he can go into the girls bathrooms to peek at the girls.
And boys being boys, it's more likely they will take the tampons and napkins, add a little ketchup and use them for "school art". Boys can be juvenile.