Scientists Found Hidden Physics Inside Van Gogh’s Starry Night
Photo: Art Images//Getty Images. The Museum of Modern Art, MoMA Highlights, New York: The Museum of Modern Art, revised 2004, originally published 1999, p. 35. Find out more about The Starry Night at: mo.ma/starrynight.
Details
-
- Title: The Starry Night
- Creator: Vincent van Gogh
- Creator Lifespan: March 30, 1853 - July 29, 1890
- Creator Nationality: Dutch
- Creator Gender: Male
- Creator Death Place: Utrecht, Netherlands
- Creator Birth Place: Groot-Zundert, Netherlands
- Date Created: 1889
- Location Created: Saint-Rémy-de-Provence
- Style: Post-Impressionism
- Provenance: Acquired through the Lillie P.Bliss Bequest
- Physical Dimensions: w921 x h737 mm
- Original Title: La nuit étoilée
- More Info: View more works by Vincent van Gogh on MoMA.org
- Type: Painting
- External Link: View MoMA's collection online
- Medium: Oil on canvas
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
- Scientists recently analyzed Vincent van Gogh’s Starry Night to see how well its famous swirls matched up with known atmospheric physics.
- After analysis, they found that not only did the shapes match up with our current ideas of atmospheric turbulence, but the colors used throughout the piece communicated fairly accurate physics at a remarkably small scale.
- Researchers think that Van Gogh could have come to understand these movements by “studying the movement of clouds and the atmosphere, or that he could have just had “an innate sense of how to capture the dynamism of the sky.”
The swirling colors and flowing brushstrokes of Vincent van Gogh’s Starry Night have secured the painting (and its artist) a place among the all-time greats. As a piece of art, Starry Night is undeniably beautiful, but beauty alone is often not enough to keep a painting so cemented in the minds and hearts of the public.
Beyond just being beautiful, Starry Night somehow manages to capture the feeling of a clear night sky. Capturing feeling may be the whole point of impressionism—Van Gogh is himself most often labeled a post-impressionist, a style separate from true impressionism that nonetheless uses many impressionist techniques—but Starry Night does a singular job at managing it. Something about those particular swirls of paint just… feels like the night.
Enough so that scientists began to wonder: how closely do those famous swirls actually mimic atmospheric physics? After significant analysis, a team of researchers from China and France have released a new paper, published today in the journal Physics of Fluids, exploring exactly that.
Specifically, the team wanted to look at how closely Van Gogh’s brush strokes mirrored atmospheric turbulence—disturbances in the atmosphere, often caused by differences in temperature , that churn things up and change the trajectory of everything from water vapor to photons.
It turns out, as unlikely as it may seem, that Van Gogh likely had a fairly complex understanding of how our atmosphere behaved. The analysis “reveals a deep and intuitive understanding of natural phenomena ,” Yongxiang Huang, one of the authors of the study, said in a press release .
To reach their conclusion, the team compared the 14 main shapes of the painting to a concept in atmospheric physics known as Kolmogorov’s theory. It’s a sub-idea that helps narrow the concept of an “ energy cascade”—the way that energy transfers from large scale patterns to smaller ones.
Kolmogorov’s theory , at a very basic level, dictates that the direction of the first main swirl has less and less of an impact on the other branching swirls the smaller and smaller they get.
But they didn’t just compare shape to theory. Instead, according to the press release, the team also used “relative brightness, or luminance, of the varying paint colors as a stand-in for the kinetic energy of physical movement” in order to complete a more in-depth analysis of the piece.
And on that level, the team found that there was even more physical alignment to be found. Specifically, they found that the relative brightnesses of colors used in the piece aligned well with a framework that describes movement and energy transfer on the smallest of scales known as Batchelor’s scaling.
Seeing both Batchelor’s scaling and Kolmogorov’s theory brought to life in the piece was extremely exciting for the scientists behind the study, as seeing both together in the atmosphere is rare.
It’s perhaps not surprising that scientists studying atmospheric physics would look at a master work of art and see… well… atmospheric physics. But as for how Van Gogh would have come to have the understanding necessary to paint this way, Huang stated that his “precise representation of turbulence might be from studying the movement of clouds and the atmosphere or an innate sense of how to capture the dynamism of the sky.”
Either way, capturing this movement remains a remarkable feat, especially considering the painting is from 1889. And it’s yet another reason to love the breathtaking swirls of Starry Night .
Tags
Who is online
440 visitors
Although my preference was for his less exaggerated examples of stars, I never realized that his Starry Night could have been an example of almost God-like omniscience.
I'm grateful to have been introduced to this seed, educating me as to a possibility I would never have dreamed of otherwise. Brings to mind Hamlet's comment: “There are more things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
S cientists began to wonder: how closely do those famous swirls actually mimic atmospheric physics? After significant analysis, a team of researchers from China and France have released a new paper, published today in the journal Physics of Fluids, exploring exactly that.
Specifically, the team wanted to look at how closely Van Gogh’s brush strokes mirrored atmospheric turbulence—disturbances in the atmosphere, often caused by differences in temperature , that churn things up and change the trajectory of everything from water vapor to photons.
Could Van Gogh have possessed an almost God-like omniscience, or been a student of astronomy, to have what could be depicted on his Starry Night as a galaxy that we now are aware exist in the universe?
Take note also how the points of light of the stars are surrounded by a lesser glow, exactly as Van Gogh depicted in his images of the stars. It is much more obvious when this photo is expanded.
An expansion of the top left corner of that galaxy photograph:
Notice how Van Gogh's Starry Night depicts the stars and see the resemblance.
or he just liked painting swirly circles
Maybe so, or maybe just coincidence.