╌>

Supreme Court Rejects Ghislaine Maxwell’s Appeal

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  hallux  •  last year  •  6 comments

By:   Corinne Ramey - WSJ

Supreme Court Rejects Ghislaine Maxwell’s Appeal
The longtime Jeffrey Epstein confidante had asked the high court to take up her challenge to her sex-trafficking conviction

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an appeal from   Ghislaine Maxwell, the   Jeffrey Epstein   confidante who is currently   serving a 20-year sentence   for sex trafficking.

The court didn’t give a reason for the denial, which leaves intact a federal appeals court ruling that upheld Maxwell’s conviction.


Maxwell, 63 years old, has emerged as a key figure in the White House’s effort to quell the clamor for the release of information related to Epstein, who died in jail while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. The Justice Department asked a judge to release materials from the grand jury investigations into her and Epstein, but those requests were denied.

A top department official this summer   interviewed Maxwell , who had been serving her prison sentence in Florida. After the interview, she was   transferred to a lower-security facility   in Texas.

A lawyer for Maxwell said her team was disappointed the court wouldn’t take up the appeal. “But this fight isn’t over,” said her lawyer,   David Markus. “Serious legal and factual issues remain, and we will continue to pursue every avenue available to ensure that justice is done.”

The Justice Department didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Maxwell’s bid to the Supreme Court revolved around whether her case was covered by an agreement Epstein reached with prosecutors in Florida.  Epstein pleaded guilty in Florida state court in 2008 to two prostitution offenses. Under that deal, federal prosecutors agreed not to charge his potential co-conspirators.

Her lawyers argued the agreement extended to the U.S. attorney’s office in Manhattan, which charged Maxwell in 2020. “This case presents a straightforward and important question about the government’s obligation to honor its promises in plea and non-prosecution agreements,” they wrote in a court brief.

The Justice Department said the agreement applied only to the U.S. attorney’s office in the Southern District in Florida, which negotiated the deal.

Maxwell was a close associate of Epstein’s for decades. At her trial, four women provided graphic testimony about how the financier sexually abused them while they were teenagers. The women said that Maxwell befriended them, arranged meetings with Epstein and at times took part in the abuse. Her lawyers argued that Maxwell was a scapegoat for Epstein.

During the interview this summer,   Maxwell told   Justice Department official   Todd Blanche   that there was no secret list of Epstein’s clients nor a campaign to blackmail powerful people in his orbit. She said she never witnessed any wrongdoing by President Trump, who had socialized with the financier in the past.

“The President was never inappropriate with anybody. In the times that I was with him, he was a gentleman in all respects,” Maxwell told Blanche, according to a transcript of the interview released by the Justice Department. 

The Bureau of Prisons lists Maxwell’s release date as July 17, 2037. 

The high court’s decision leaves Maxwell with little recourse   beyond seeking clemency   from the president.  When previously asked about the possibility of pardoning Maxwell, Trump said, “I’m allowed to do it, but it’s something I haven’t thought about.”


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Hallux    last year

I'm getting a sneaky feeling that Trump will pardon the 'lass' via the infamous autopen. 

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
1.1  Snuffy  replied to  Hallux @1    last year

I hope not but perhaps he will. But I think this should put to rest the idea that SCOTUS is joined at the hip with Trump. 

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  Hallux  replied to  Snuffy @1.1    last year

SCOTUS's record so far tells a different story.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
1.1.2  Snuffy  replied to  Hallux @1.1.1    last year

Based on opinion. I think a better way to look at it is to see (and time here is needed) how the rulings impact future presidents. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    last year

We are approaching the point where she will be "yesterday's news". 

 
 
 
Robert in Ohio
Professor Guide
3  Robert in Ohio    last year

So now will the Orange haired Man pardon her to keep his secrets "secret".

Stay tuned

 
 

Who is online




135 visitors