╌>

Comey to be arraigned today

  

Category:  Op/Ed

By:  vic-eldred  •  last year  •  46 comments

Comey to be arraigned today
“I sent them. Something we’ve, I probably wouldn’t have done or maybe gotten away with in a more organized investigation, a more organized administration. In the George W. Bush administration … or the Obama administration, two men that all of us, perhaps, have increased appreciation for over the last two years. In both of those administrations there was process.” He revealed, “So if the FBI wanted to send agents into the White House itself to interview a senior official, you would work...

Link to quote: No glory in James Comey getting away with his abuse of FBI power


James Comey will appear in court for an arraignment today. Believe it or not the judge supposedly "randomly" chosen happens to be a Biden appointed judge: U.S. District Judge Michael Nachmanoff. Nachmanoff will read the two charges against Comey and ask Comey how he will plea. Based on the recent history of blue district juries, Comey will confidently plead innocent to both counts. BTW the two charges are lying to Congress and obstructing a congressional investigation.


Based on the way I expect this to play out we should keep in mind that there are two components to this case:

1) The legal implications.

The first charge is that he lied to congress when he testified under oath that he had not authorized leaks to the media by FBI subordinates, primarily through Andrew McCabe (who admitted that he lied 3 times under oath according to the Inspector General of the DOJ. The second charge is that he obstructed justice by lying to congress.) Will there be a conviction?  Will justice even come into play in this case?  I'm very skeptical.

2) The moral implications.

The moral issues are really the more important ones. Comey was the FBI Director when the Russia/hoax took place. Comey was presiding over an investigation of Hillary Clinton having classified emails on a private server, which was then destroyed when it was under subpoena. He also presided over baseless investigations of the newly elected President.

In the case of Clinton, he said that she broke the law by having classified material on a private server, but he didn't think a jury would convict her. He took it upon himself to make that decision. The decision belonged to the DOJ, but the AG at the time had already compromised herself by secretly meeting with Bill Clinton when Hillary was supposedly being investigated.

In the case of Trump, he met with the new President and assured him that he wasn't the subject of an investigation (a lie.) Then Comey memorialized that private conversation by creating 4 memos, which he kept privately for clearly devious reasons, either to embarrass the President or maybe as an insurance policy to keep his job. Later he took one of those memos and gave it to a friend who was a professor at Columbia University and instructed him to leak it to the media. It was Comey who hired Christopher Steele who was working for the Hillary Clinton campaign to cook up a BS smear job of her opponent. Under Comey's leadership the FBI submitted fraudulent FISA warrant requests to spy on Trump and his associates.  

I'm not skeptical about how history will judge Comey on honesty and morality:  Guilty


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  author  Vic Eldred    last year

Today at 10:00 AM EST

G2qlqXkXsAIu-Ki?format=jpg&name=large

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    last year

Are you going to be brining back your John Durham avatar? This place could use a few cheap laughs again. 

News reports today suggest Durham's statements to DOJ indicate he found no wrongdoing by Comey related to the topic of this indictment. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2    last year

John Durham proved that you can't get a conviction in certain jurisdictions.

Even when he got a confession, Judge Boesberg let the convicted walk.


As to the news reports that you are getting, do they mention anything about the IG report on Comey?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    last year

When someone blows your nonsense up in your face all you do is change the topic. It appears John Durham will be a witness that is going to help Comey.  The only reason this case could go to trial is because Trump will DICTATE that it will. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.1    last year

Tell us how John Durham can help Comey with lying to congress and obstruction of a congressional investigation?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.2    last year

Because he spent two or three years investigating this matter, among other things, and found nothing warranting an indictment. Of course he will be called to testify. That will be reasonable doubt right there. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.4  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.3    last year

He wasn't investigating the matter to which Comey is being charged.

All of which involves Comey's testimony before congress.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.5  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.3    last year
ing this matter, among other things, and found nothing warranting an indictment. Of course he will be called to testify. That will be reasonable doubt right there. 

Is that how that works?  If Trump had just called Cyrus Vance to the stand he would have won that BS case in New York?  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.6  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.4    last year
He wasn't investigating the matter to which Comey is being charged.

Its so easy to dunk on you it should be embarrassing

did john durham investigate whether comey had lied to congress
copilot
Yes, John Durham did investigate whether James Comey had lied to Congress, but he concluded there was insufficient evidence to support criminal charges.

Durham, appointed as special counsel to examine the origins of the FBI’s Trump-Russia investigation, spent nearly four years probing potential misconduct by federal officials, including former FBI Director James Comey. In August 2025, federal prosecutors in Virginia consulted Durham to assess whether Comey had made false statements to Congress, particularly during his 2020 Senate Judiciary Committee testimony.

Here’s what emerged from Durham’s involvement:

  • Durham told prosecutors he found no evidence to support charges of false statements or obstruction against Comey. His investigation did not uncover proof that Comey had knowingly lied or acted with criminal intent.

  • Durham’s findings were cited by prosecutors in a declination memo, which recommended against charging Comey. This memo also referenced two other investigations—one by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Washington, D.C., and another by prosecutors in Virginia—that reached the same conclusion: no probable cause to indict Comey.

  • Despite these findings, Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan rejected the recommendations and pursued a three-count indictment. A grand jury ultimately indicted Comey on two counts—making a false statement to Congress and obstruction—but rejected a third count.

  • Durham’s report specifically addressed Comey’s 2020 testimony, in which he claimed not to recall an intelligence report about Hillary Clinton allegedly trying to link Trump to Russia. Durham concluded that Comey’s statements, even if inaccurate, did not meet the legal threshold for false statements charges due to lack of evidence of intent.

So while Durham did investigate the matter, his findings ultimately undermined the case against Comey, and he became a key figure in Comey’s defense. Let me know if you’d like to explore the details of the indictment or the broader implications of Durham’s report.
 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.7  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.6    last year
Durham’s report specifically addressed Comey’s 2020 testimony, in which he claimed not to recall an intelligence report about Hillary Clinton allegedly trying to link Trump to Russia. Durham concluded that Comey’s statements, even if inaccurate, did not meet the legal threshold for false statements charges due to lack of evidence of intent.

But this case is about Comey instructing other FBI agents to leak information.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.8  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.7    last year
co pilot
-
-
John Durham found no evidence to support charges that James Comey lied to Congress about authorizing leaks. Multiple investigations reached the same conclusion.
 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.9  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.8    last year

Maybe the Grand Jury did find evidence.

Fortunately, we don't rely on copilot for trial resolutions.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.10  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.9    last year

John Durhams findings is not something that would have come up at the grand jury. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.11  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.10    last year

But you will admit that the Grand Jury needed reason to indict?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.12  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.11    last year

While JR checks with copilot for an answer, I must get some exercise.

Be back later.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.13  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.12    last year
While JR checks with copilot for an answer,

better than checking your dubious sources

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.1.14  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.13    last year

What Durham did or did not do is irrelevant.

The Gand Jury indicted him, now he will answer to the charges.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.15  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.13    last year

We don't really need big brother determining truth.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.16  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.15    last year

Who do you think is the personification of big brother nowadays?    Trump!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.17  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.16    last year
Who do you think is the personification of big brother nowadays?

"The Biden administration’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced this week that it has launched what is being dubbed a Disinformation Governance Board to combat “misinformation.”

"A government agency creating a “ministry of truth” to combat what it deems misinformation? And it’s going to fall under the leadership of DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas? The guy presiding over the worst border crisis of our lifetimes, who publicly denies it is a crisis at all  while privately admitting  it is? Who better to give more responsibility in a democracy that largely rejects government intervention over free speech? What could possibly go wrong?"

Joe Biden’s ‘Ministry of Truth’


And let us never forget how the FBI under Garland & Wray interfered with social media. They even managed to portray the Hunter laptop as "Russian disinformation."

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.18  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.17    last year

Trump is the PotUS now, Vic.   If you were just 1% as critical of Trump as you are with Biden, we might actually be able to have a conversation.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.19  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.18    last year

And why would I be critical of the remedy?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.20  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.19    last year

Oh maybe because Trump:

  • is a constant embarrassment to this nation
  • is an abysmal human being, a lifelong con-man
  • is a narcissistic, pathological liar, and psychopath
  • is fiscally irresponsible
  • continually attempts to circumvent the CotUS
  • continually attempts to violate the law
  • engages in irresponsible tariffs which raise consumer prices instead of stabilize/lower them
  • pursues vindictive lawsuits against political opponents using the power and influence of the presidency
  • threatens/coerces law firms and private businesses to do his bidding
  • fires watchdogs, inspectors generals, and anyone who seems unloyal to him personally (versus being loyal to the CotUS)
  • surrounds himself with incompetent sycophants
  • disgraces the USA with his belligerent, braggadocios, and downright stupid (showing his stupidity) comments
  • is a child-man given enormous powers
  • continues to try to normalize the use of the military in US cities
  • creates chaos and then pretends to be the hero
  • uses the presidency for his own personal enjoyment rather than as a solemn duty to serve the people
  • is the only PotUS who tried to steal a US presidential election with fraud, incitement, lying, and coercion.
  • obstructed the return of classified documents for months (felony charge)

And that is just off the top of my head.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.21  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.20    last year

What slander!

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.22  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.21    last year

Slander = lies.   Facts are not slander.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.23  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.22    last year

The only fact you have demonstrated is that you are obsessed with Trump.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.24  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.23    last year

Trump is the key problem in the USA today.   And people like you keep propping him up.   So too bad if people like me oppose that.

The only fact you have demonstrated is that you are obsessed with Trump.

That is quite telling of the alternate reality you choose to embrace.   You deny every single line item I put forth.  

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.25  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.24    last year

He is part of the remedy. He will be replaced in 3 years by likeminded people, and they may even be more effective because they will be far more polished. The point is the left's revolution has finally met its match, and they are going down.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.26  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.25    last year

Trump is a disaster.   

The point is the left's revolution has finally met its match, and they are going down.

And there you go again with this boogeyman crap as you flat out ignore the bad of Trump as (incompletely) enumerated @2.1.20

Looks to me like an irrational 'get those leftists' objective no matter what damage it does to the USA and its people.

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Junior Quiet
2.1.27  Igknorantzruls  replied to  TᵢG @2.1.20    last year
And that is just off the top of my head

and Vic sees all of this as owning the 'left', that the 'right' cannot afford, cause they are out of their collective gord, if they can;t, or should I say won't, see the harm that the mental midget with the Dicktater tot obsessions' is really in dress rehearsel for his new version of an old play, on words, asz the emperor has no close to watt his herd has heard, and thisis not an act. It is a fact, 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3  author  Vic Eldred    last year

A lectern has been set up outside the courthouse.

G2vQaKXWAAAwPY8?format=jpg&name=small

Will Comey (the left's knight in shining armor) speak?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @3    last year
Will Comey (the left's knight in shining armor) speak?

Comey was a Republican most of his adult life.   He left the party in 2016 (or, rather, the party left him) and has been an independent since.

So it seems that 'the Left' to you consists of those who do not support Trump.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @3.1    last year

Morning Joe also claims to be Republican. None of which has anything to do with Comey's actions or the fact that some like the things he did.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.2  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.1    last year

Both were Republicans.   

Again, seems as though you define ‘the Left’ as anyone who does not support Trump.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.3  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @3.1.2    last year

The left is what it always has been since the late 60s when they were staging violent protests and setting off bombs. The only difference is that then they were protesting against "the establishment" and today they are "the establishment."

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.4  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.3    last year
The left is what it always has been since the late 60s when they were staging violent protests and setting off bombs.

Based on your comments, 'the Left' to you are those who do not support Trump.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.5  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  TᵢG @3.1.4    last year

Shall we dance?

The left is responsible for just about every evil this country has endured for the past 60 years.

It sounds to me like you associate the left with democrats. No, TiG, the left is an extreme ideology that has recently dominated the democrat party. Not to be confused with never Trumpers or liberals.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
3.1.6  Right Down the Center  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.5    last year
the left is an extreme ideology that has recently dominated the democrat party

They are leading the common sense dems and even the past liberals by the nose and few are speaking up against them.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.7  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Right Down the Center @3.1.6    last year

Correct. The democrat party lacked spine and critical thinking.  Schumer and the rest of them are petrified of people like AOC.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3.1.8  TᵢG  replied to  Vic Eldred @3.1.5    last year
The left is responsible for just about every evil this country has endured for the past 60 years.

The boogeyman!

It sounds to me like you associate the left with democrats.

I made no statement about my view of 'the Left' (or 'the Right').

No, TiG, the left is an extreme ideology that has recently dominated the democrat party. Not to be confused with never Trumpers or liberals.

What do you consider to be 'extreme ideology'?   It seems that every problem is deemed as from 'the Left' and every challenge to Trump is seen by you as coming from 'the Left'.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4  JohnRussell    last year
2) The moral implications.

Its disturbingly humorous that Trump butt kissers have the nerve to talk about "moral implications". 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @4    last year

Are you talking about me?

Btw Fox News' Alexandria Hoff is at the courthouse.

OIP.ouuBU50eHBPZPhtenT-5KgAAAA?w=312&h=200&c=12&rs=1&qlt=100&o=6&cb=12&pid=23.1

Alexandria is in Alexandria!

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Junior Quiet
4.2  Igknorantzruls  replied to  JohnRussell @4    last year
Its disturbingly humorous that Trump butt kissers have the nerve to talk about "moral implications"

I absolutely goy a good laugh at that one myself. What a fckn waste of time and money. Trump is so damn pathetic!

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5  author  Vic Eldred    last year

Does anyone think leftwing media will televise him entering the building?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @5    last year

Why would anyone care about that? 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @5.1    last year
Why would anyone care about that? 

Well, the MSNBC & CNN was absolutely giddy about seeing Trump appear for court appearances, why not show Comey in the perp walk?

BTW Comey must have went through a back door. He entered pled not guilty and left already. Nobody got a glimpse.

 
 

Who is online




84 visitors