╌>

The Framing of Tom Homan

  

Category:  Op/Ed

By:  vic-eldred  •  last year  •  24 comments

The Framing of Tom Homan
Homan said in a Fox News interview last month he "did nothing illegal" and told NewsNation the reports were "bullsh*t


entrapment

noun   [  U  ]

      formal

uk  

  / ɪnˈtræp.mənt /   us  

  / ɪnˈtræp.mənt /








the  act  of  causing  someone to do something they would not usually do by  tricking  them:

ENTRAPMENT | English meaning - Cambridge Dictionary


For some unknown reason FBI agents under Merrick Garland (September 2024) pretended to be businessmen looking to secure federal border security contracts and made a cash offer to Tom Homan. The amount of the offer was allegedly $50,000 and it was placed in a bag. Not much is known about the details other than the Biden DOJ opened an investigation which was later closed by the incoming Trump administration.

Congressional democrats who are scrambling to find any kind of issue which may benefit their losing cause have focused in on the incident. A few days ago, they grilled AG Bondi about it. Of course, the investigation was closed before Bondi actually became AG, so she referred them to ask those who had knowledge of the case.

This case again raises the question about government politization and weaponization by the radical left. Without knowing the details of what transpired after the offer was made, the question must be asked: Why would the FBI under Chris Wray try to set up and trap Homan?







Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  author  Vic Eldred    last year

They knew he was going to be the Border Czar.

GcFUaPtWoAAASzY?format=jpg&name=medium

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    last year

One of the senators asked Bondi what happened to the $50,000 Homan accepted and she refused to answer the question . You have Trump like gall in posting this seed.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2    last year

I watched it too.

She wasn't AG when the case was closed. What do you want from her?


 You have Trump like gall

Some might say the balls of a Lion.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    last year
Some might say the balls of a Lion.

Fools, maybe. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.2  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.1    last year

I call them as I see 'em

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Junior Quiet
2.1.3  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    last year
What do you want from her?

How about some truthful answers, and not disrespectful attacks on the oversight commiitte 

What an embarrassment that hearing was. Did you like her facial silence with only facial expressions as one inquisitor, asked her about the pictures that others have seen, where topless young girls give Trumperz a wet dream, on his heavy Epstein pants where exposed was his in seam...?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
2.1.4  Tacos!  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    last year
She wasn't AG when the case was closed.

You’re really going to try and sell the idea that Bondi knows nothing about the case? It says right there in the story that the case was closed by the Trump administration. Bondi is the Attorney General of that Trump Administration. This case has, at the very least, been in the news for a few weeks at this point. Why would she not know about the case? Do you imagine that someone else in her department locked up the files and threw away the key?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.5  JohnRussell  replied to  Tacos! @2.1.4    last year

Tom Homan is one of the top two or three heroes (to them) of the Trump administration. There is no way they are going to let him face any music. 

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
2.1.6  Thomas  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    last year
Some might say the balls of a Lion.

Brass??? Or on the Trump trophy wall?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.7  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tacos! @2.1.4    last year

Tacos, don't you think that the FBI requires a predicate/a reason to launch a sting operation on an individual?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
2.1.8  Tacos!  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.7    last year

Why? What does that have to do with whether or not the AG knows anything about a case?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.9  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tacos! @2.1.8    last year

They are two different questions.

1) Pam Bondi was sworn in on Feb 5th, 2025. If you recall Trump's first choice withdrew his own nomination and an Assistant AG was in charge at DOJ until Bondi was sworn in. The Homan case was closed during that early interim period and Bondi was not involved in the case. You can easily look it up with our beloved copilot.

2) The issue of whether the operation was legal is a valid point. The FBI has no right to launch a sting operation on someone with zero history of corruption. That would make it POLITICAL.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.10  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.9    last year

According to you, Pam Bondi is a person of zero curiosity. The subject of a video with one of MAGAs biggest stars accepting a very sizable bribe never came up in her earshot and no one under her command ever made her aware of this video.

Nobody but the brain dead cult believes such garbage. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
2.1.11  Tacos!  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1.9    last year
Pam Bondi was sworn in on Feb 5th, 2025.

So each new AG automatically knows nothing whatsoever about cases involving high ranking government officials? Even ones that closed just a few days before confirmation?Furthermore, they refuse to inquire, even when that investigation is front page news? Is that your claim?

You expect people to buy that? Just because you say so?

The issue of whether the operation was legal is a valid point.

Wait, so now we want to be concerned with the legality of the case itself? Doesn’t that seem like something the new Attorney General should be investigating???

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1.12  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tacos! @2.1.11    last year
So each new AG automatically knows nothing whatsoever about cases involving high ranking government officials?

I would argue that each new AG has their own set of priorities to attend to, which would fully occupy them.


Even ones that closed just a few days before confirmation?

You mean old one that are suddenly important politically? I'd say it might be best not to walk through mine fields.


Furthermore, they refuse to inquire, even when that investigation is front page news?

It sure is important to the opposition, just as the FBI spying on Catholics was to Republicans. What did Wray say about that? Oh ya, he didn't know what was going on in his own Department and he was shocked when he heard about it.


Is that your claim?

Yes, it is.


Wait, so now we want to be concerned with the legality of the case itself? Doesn’t that seem like something the new Attorney General should be investigating???

You may get your wish.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2.2  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @2    last year

You have Biden type gall in posting this unsubstantiated comment.

There is no evidence that Homan accepted anything, and how in hell would she know anything about some action that preceded her tenure as AG?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Greg Jones @2.2    last year

It has been reported there is a video. By the way Bondi did not deny the existence of the video at the hearing . 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
2.2.2  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Greg Jones @2.2    last year

No evidence intended to ever see the light of day thanks to this swamp administration.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
2.2.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.1    last year
It has been reported there is a video.

I looked and looked and I looked and looked and I looked and looked and I don't see your link to this "video".

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3  author  Vic Eldred    last year

It looks like it might be hiding and lurking time.

It's just you and I John,

"It's quarter to three, there's no one in the place except you and me
So, set 'em up, Joe, I got a little story I think you should know

We're drinkin', my friend, to the end of a brief episode
Make it one for my baby and one more for the road

I got the routine, put another nickel in the machine
Feelin' so bad, wish you'd make the music easy and sad

I could tell you a lot, but you've got to be true to your code
Just make it one for my baby and one more for the road
You'd never know it but buddy, I'm a kind of poet

And I got a lot of things I'd like to say
And when I'm gloomy, won't you listen to me?
'Til it's all talked away

Well, that's how it goes and Joe
I know you're gettin' anxious to close
So, thanks for the cheer, I hope you didn't mind my bendin' your ear
But this torch that I found must be drowned or it soon might explode

So, make it one for my baby and one more for the road.'
 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @3    last year
It's just you and I John,

That would be very bad for you. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
3.1.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1    last year

Lol

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Junior Quiet
3.1.2  Igknorantzruls  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1    last year

sounds like it would for you as well, cause Vic doesn't believe Trump could do anything wrong, and if he did, he was just about to kid, while goating you on to the edge of the cliff, so after you jumped cause you couldn't handle anymore, as you read the Cliffs notes on the way down we go, and not laughing all the way, even if paying $135.000.00 per Ho Ho Ho

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
4  George    last year

So the FBI agents that were involved have all disappeared? surely they have talked to the reporters and are willing to put their careers up to remove this criminal correct? or is this just another Smollett? proving that some will believe anything. 

 
 

Who is online




84 visitors