Where are they now part 2
Today I thought we would look at the far-left activist prosecutors who used lawfare against Trump. All seem to be in deep shit.
1 Fani Wilis
From the much acclaimed "Co-Pilot:"
"Fani Willis, the Fulton County District Attorney in Georgia, is currently facing multiple criminal and professional charges tied to her handling of high-profile cases, particularly the failed RICO prosecution of Donald Trump and others.
1. Disqualification from the Trump RICO case
Willis was disqualified from overseeing the RICO case against Donald Trump and 18 others because she had a secret romantic relationship with Nathan Wade, the special prosecutor she handpicked to run the investigation The American Tribune.com . This disqualification was a major procedural and ethical issue, and it led to the case being dismissed.
2. Federal grant controversy
She is under investigation for receiving a $2 million federal grant from the Biden Justice Department’s Office of Justice Programs in 2022 while pursuing the Trump case The American Tribune.com +1 . The grant was reportedly awarded as a “sole-source” (noncompetitive) contract, raising questions about whether federal funds were used to incentivize politically sensitive prosecutions.
3. Political and prosecutorial misconduct allegations
Georgia state Senator Greg Dolezal is leading a probe into whether the grant was a reward or incentive for a politically useful prosecution www.patriotnewsalerts.com . The investigation also examines coordination between Willis’s office and the Biden White House, with internal emails suggesting close support for her Trump case USSA News +1 .
4. Professional misconduct and ethics concerns
Willis has faced professional misconduct charges for conflicts of interest, including her relationship with Wade and her role in the Trump case. These issues have drawn scrutiny from both state and federal lawmakers.
5. Potential criminal liability
While no criminal indictment has been formally issued yet, the combination of conflict-of-interest violations, misuse of federal funds, and alleged political interference could lead to criminal charges if the investigations proceed and evidence is presented in court.
In summary, Fani Willis is currently facing ethical, professional, and potential criminal charges related to her disqualification from the Trump RICO case, the controversial $2 million federal grant, and alleged political coordination with federal officials."
what charges does fani willis face? - Search
2 Jack Smith
![]()
Currently under investigation
"Former U.S. Department of Justice special counsel Jack Smith is the subject of an Office of Special Counsel (OSC) investigation into whether his prosecutions of former President Donald Trump were politically motivated and whether they violated the law FactCheck.org .
Nature of the OSC Investigation
-
Trigger: The investigation was opened in August 2025 after Republican Senator Tom Cotton accused Smith of acting politically in expediting Trump’s cases before the 2024 election FactCheck.org .
-
Allegations: Cotton claimed Smith’s actions were driven by political motives, citing a brief filed months before the election that revealed new details about Trump’s alleged election interference. Cotton also alleged potential violations of the Hatch Act , a civil statute that prohibits federal employees from engaging in partisan political activity FactCheck.org .
-
Scope: The OSC is examining whether Smith’s conduct — including the timing and content of his filings — crossed legal or political boundaries. The Hatch Act violations could have led to dismissal from federal service if proven FactCheck.org .
Context of Smith’s Work
-
Smith was appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland in November 2022 to lead two major investigations:
-
Election interference after the 2020 presidential election, including Trump’s role in the January 6 Capitol attack.
-
Classified documents case involving Trump’s retention of sensitive materials at Mar-a-Lago Wikipedia .
-
-
In both cases, Smith secured grand jury indictments against Trump, but the cases were dismissed before trial due to constitutional prohibitions against prosecuting a sitting president Wikipedia .
Current Status
-
Smith resigned from the DOJ in January 2024 , days before Trump took office, and has since been fired from his federal role by the Trump administration FactCheck.org .
-
The OSC investigation is ongoing, but legal experts note that given Smith’s resignation and the political context, some view it as “performatory” rather than a serious enforcement action FactCheck.org .
In summary: Jack Smith is not facing criminal charges himself, but he is under investigation by the OSC for alleged political motivation in his Trump prosecutions and possible Hatch Act violations."
3 Judge Boesberg

Facing possible impeachment
"A divided appeals court panel ordered District Judge James Boasberg on Tuesday to end a contempt probe into Trump administration officials involved in migrant deportation flights – determining the jurist abused his discretion in launching the criminal inquiry.
In a 2-1 ruling, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals found the Obama-appointed judge overstepped his authority by pursuing possible contempt charges against former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and other top executive branch officials involved in the deportation of hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador last March."
Appeals court rules Judge James Boasberg abused his power, ordered to end criminal contempt probe against Trump officials
4 Michael Atkinson

Under investigation for perjury during the Vindman sham.
"The referrals come after DNI Tulsi Gabbard released documents earlier this week exposing what was described as a "coordinated effort" by elements within the intelligence community—including then-Inspector General Michael Atkinson, to "manufacture a conspiracy" that was used as the basis to impeach Trump in 2019.
An intelligence official told Fox News Digital that the language in the referral is broad, but that it's specifically directed at Atkinson and the whistleblower who reported concerns about President Trump's July 2019 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
The documents Gabbard released earlier this week include transcripts from Atkinson’s closed-door testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, which were withheld from the House Judiciary Committee during the first impeachment trial. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rick Crawford, R-Ark., led a vote to release the transcripts in March.
ODNI said the documents confirmed that Atkinson "failed to conduct basic due diligence and willfully exceeded his statutory jurisdiction to mischaracterize the president’s phone call with Zelensky as an ‘urgent concern’ to Congress."
Atkinson, during his investigation, found that the whistleblower showed indications of "political bias" and was "in favor of a rival political candidate," while still deeming the complaint a matter of "urgent concern."
ODNI sends criminal referral to DOJ over Trump 2019 impeachment | Fox News

“The wheels of justice grind slowly, but grind fine, ” the aphorism goes. When it comes to the novel and, at times, appallingly unconstitutional “lawfare” that has been waged against Donald Trump, it looks like justice will indeed prevail."
Trump is finally winning the ‘lawfare’ battle
Are they bringing in the always independent Judge Aileen Cannon?
Fanni Willis:
Yes, and people digging at where they believe a rainbow ends 'could' find a pot of gold.
Jack Smith:
Oooooh! Scary! LOL!
Jack Smith kicked Republicans ass's and they're bitter and sore but he did everything above board and they have nothing on him which is driving these fucking stupid bigots crazier than they already were and it's hilarious to watch.
With Judge Boesberg, just because an appeals court ruled he may have abused his power, I doubt very highly he will be impeached, that's just pie in the sky wishing from dumb fuck conservatives desperate to defend their criminal in the white house.
Michael Atkinson:
Another total joke of an investigation. Gabbard's likely going to get fired long before Atkinson would see any censure.
These investigations from this fraudulent administration are nothing but jokes that will not stand the test of time or objective scrutiny. Any sad sorry cuck frantically jerking off to these stories thinking Trump won is going to be sorely disappointed when the climax of these cases doesn't even dampen their dirty little socks.
Yikes! The only person who mischaracterized the phone call with Zelensky was Trump, who called it "perfect" about a thousand times.
This entire seed is hallucinatory.
Do you know the difference between a classified Presidential phone call and an unclassified one?
When a democrat president makes one it is classified. When a Republican makes one it is unclassified.
Trump wanted to reinstate the Ukrainian investigation of Burisma & Hunter Biden that president Biden PUBLICLY threatened the Ukrainians to end!
It's a strange world, isn't it?
Oh well, since everyone is signing off at 11:22 AM, I best do the same.
Have a good one.
you are as misinformed about ukraine as you are about most things connected to politics.
trump was led, like a child, to believe that Hillary Clintons server was being held for safekeeping by the ukrainans , and that it was ukraine, not russia , that tried to interfere in the 2016 election.
I looked and looked and looked and looked and don't see anything to back up your claim.
Key points from authoritative sources:
No evidence of Ukrainian interference: Testimonies from Trump administration officials, including those who served on the National Security Council, confirmed there was no factual basis for claims that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 election. The U.S. intelligence community and the Mueller Report both concluded that Russia was behind the election interference, not Ukrainepolitico.com+2.
Trump’s public statements: Trump publicly called on Russia to hack and release Clinton’s emails during the 2016 campaign, and later promoted the debunked theory that Ukraine was involved as a way to deflect from Russia’s role en.wikipedia.org+2.
Conspiracy theory origins: The idea that Ukraine interfered was pushed by Trump allies and conservative media, but it has been widely discredited. The Senate Intelligence Committee and other investigations found that Russian operatives, including Paul Manafort and Konstantin Kilimnik, actively spread this false narrative to shift blame away from Russiareuters.com+2.
In summary, Trump’s assertions about Ukraine and Clinton’s server are unsupported by evidence and contradict the findings of U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies. Would you like more details on the origins of this conspiracy theory or the official responses to it?
Took you an hour to dredge that up? I guess finding any news reports was falling through so you went with a "chat". Sorry not agreeing to ANY TOS or policy to read fiction.
You are incapable. I'll leave it at that.
No. I'm fully capable. Just not as gullible as yourself and those like you.
It's not a matter of capability; it's a matter of deniability. You're playing a game with those who regularly move goal posts on a whim, who reject any and all court rulings against their dear Leader while claiming anyone under investigation by this administration is already guilty of whatever it was that they were accused of 'because Trump'. It literally is their 'Trump' card that they can play at any time anywhere in any discussion.
They really couldn't care less about facts.
What was the question you asked the AI chat bot that gave you that information? Cannot click on that link to find the question as it doesn't exist from that link.
According to Jeremy your links dont mean a thing.
Do you agree that Trump falsely believed Ukraine meddled in the 2016 election and was hiding Clinton's server ?
I dind't say a goddamn thing about DP's links. I mentioned yours specifically. Lies like that are why many call your bullshit daily.
It took that short of time yet JR couldn't do it in the first place. It took him an hour to give some "chat".
What I gave you is basically the same information Dismayed did. Its not my problem if you cant process it.
So now, after you supposedly "looked and looked and looked and looked", it's Johns fault for not linking them in the first place. How very honest of you.
Was this your question that you asked the AI bot or are you just refusing to answer my question?
this is what a proposed to the AI
"trump believed that Hillary Clintons server was being held for safekeeping by the ukrainans , and that it was ukraine, not russia , that tried to interfere in the 2016 election."
if he didnt believe it the AI was free to say no. But as we know he did believe it. This is not a secret.
Ahh, the old DNC server hack and Trump repeatedly confusing the DNC server with Hillary Clinton's email server that was kept in a closet at her home.
Trumps phone call to Zelensky included an ask that Zelensky investigate Clintons server. It was ridiculous then as it is now. This clown was the president of the United States, he had no good reason to drag a foreign country into his insanity.
This is the opinion of a fucking moron, and anybody who believes this is a moron. Full Stop
Here is Trumps actual statement:
When trump said this the email server had been in FBI custody for a year, anyone who still propagates the lie that trump asked Russia to hack Hillary's emails has no integrity and probably never did in the first place.
[✘]
Trump wanted help. At the time of this comment it was widely being discussed that Russia had hacked the DNC system, in fact that was what inspired Trump to ask Russia for help. This was not to be the last time he would ask for foreign meddling in our elections either. He did it again in 2019 and 2022.
Do you agree that Trump falsely believed Ukraine meddled in the 2016 election and was hiding Clinton's server ?
I notice you didnt answer MY question.
It wasn't kept in a closet at her home. It was kept in a bathroom of a Washington DC apartment used as office space. She did the exact same thing as the previous SoS for the exact same reasons. It's was done for the same reasons that many in Washington, including Hagseth use things like What'sApp now.
Trump IS bad. Why are you trying to admonish legitimate criticism of this psycopath?
I based my reply off an old PBS News doc that stated the server was located at her family home in New York.
[✘]
You gave a bullshit AI chat. No links. You couldn't even tell Snuffy what the question you asked was.
far from it. But I get it. I called out one of your own.
That's adorable. It's like watching kids pretend to fly, just a little more speed and get your arms up and that towel cape will certainly lift you off the ground if you just believe in yourself a little more.
You think it's adorable but it apparently made somebody cry.
Many things' conservatives do and say can illicit tears, they and their dear Leader are literal jokes incarnate.
[✘]
Political archeology. (Digging up dead horses.)
Dead horses are close relatives of dead squirrels.
Remarkable that one can be inspired to write about others while supporting the most corrupt, incompetent PotUS in our lifetimes and never acknowledging the corruption, incompetence, lawfare, illegal actions, etc. of this psycopath.
2.1 was locked to keep it from getting worse
Trump promotes conspiracy theory: Clinton's deleted emails are in Ukraine
Trump is obviously, clearly , suggesting Crowdstrike gave the server to Ukraine.
Enough with this dissembling shit on this article.
That's like asking a dung beetle to stop collecting and rolling dung into balls. They can't admit they're wrong even though that fact has already been established numerous times. Again, you're not debating honest people. No one that continues to carry water for Donald Trump is an honest person. They are at best miserable bitter incels angry at the world, women and minorities for daring to ignore them. I recommend not feeding the resident trolls since facts and truth don't matter to them, they're only in it to try and get your goat. Trolls love goat.