╌>

Where are they now part 2

  

Category:  Op/Ed

By:  vic-eldred  •  7 months ago  •  46 comments

Where are they now part 2
"I want to refer information that may constitute possible criminal activity in violation of federal criminal law committed by one or more former employees of the intelligence community," ODNI's general counsel wrote in the referral to the Justice Department.

Today I thought we would look at the far-left activist prosecutors who used lawfare against Trump. All seem to be in deep shit.


1 Fani Wilis

OIP.flP7X9dmfEHGXEb1Kr5C7QHaFD?rs=1&pid=ImgDetMain&o=7&rm=3

From the much acclaimed "Co-Pilot:"

"Fani Willis, the Fulton County District Attorney in Georgia, is currently facing  multiple criminal and professional charges  tied to her handling of high-profile cases, particularly the failed RICO prosecution of Donald Trump and others.

1. Disqualification from the Trump RICO case
Willis was disqualified from overseeing the RICO case against Donald Trump and 18 others because she had a  secret romantic relationship  with Nathan Wade, the special prosecutor she handpicked to run the investigation  The American Tribune.com . This disqualification was a major procedural and ethical issue, and it led to the case being dismissed.

2. Federal grant controversy
She is under investigation for receiving a  $2 million federal grant  from the Biden Justice Department’s Office of Justice Programs in 2022 while pursuing the Trump case  The American Tribune.com +1 . The grant was reportedly awarded as a “sole-source” (noncompetitive) contract, raising questions about whether federal funds were used to incentivize politically sensitive prosecutions.

3. Political and prosecutorial misconduct allegations
Georgia state Senator Greg Dolezal is leading a probe into whether the grant was a reward or incentive for a politically useful prosecution  www.patriotnewsalerts.com . The investigation also examines coordination between Willis’s office and the Biden White House, with internal emails suggesting close support for her Trump case  USSA News +1 .

4. Professional misconduct and ethics concerns
Willis has faced  professional misconduct charges  for conflicts of interest, including her relationship with Wade and her role in the Trump case. These issues have drawn scrutiny from both state and federal lawmakers.

5. Potential criminal liability
While no criminal indictment has been formally issued yet, the combination of  conflict-of-interest violations, misuse of federal funds, and alleged political interference  could lead to criminal charges if the investigations proceed and evidence is presented in court.

In summary, Fani Willis is currently facing  ethical, professional, and potential criminal charges  related to her disqualification from the Trump RICO case, the controversial $2 million federal grant, and alleged political coordination with federal officials."

what charges does fani willis face? - Search


2 Jack Smith

1570178631.0.jpg


Currently under investigation

"Former U.S. Department of Justice special counsel  Jack Smith  is the subject of an  Office of Special Counsel (OSC) investigation  into whether his prosecutions of former President Donald Trump were politically motivated and whether they violated the law  FactCheck.org .

Nature of the OSC Investigation

  • Trigger:  The investigation was opened in August 2025 after Republican Senator Tom Cotton accused Smith of acting politically in expediting Trump’s cases before the 2024 election  FactCheck.org .

  • Allegations:  Cotton claimed Smith’s actions were driven by political motives, citing a brief filed months before the election that revealed new details about Trump’s alleged election interference. Cotton also alleged potential violations of the  Hatch Act , a civil statute that prohibits federal employees from engaging in partisan political activity  FactCheck.org .

  • Scope:  The OSC is examining whether Smith’s conduct — including the timing and content of his filings — crossed legal or political boundaries. The Hatch Act violations could have led to dismissal from federal service if proven  FactCheck.org .

Context of Smith’s Work

  • Smith was appointed by Attorney General Merrick Garland in November 2022 to lead two major investigations:

    1. Election interference  after the 2020 presidential election, including Trump’s role in the January 6 Capitol attack.

    2. Classified documents case  involving Trump’s retention of sensitive materials at Mar-a-Lago  Wikipedia .

  • In both cases, Smith secured grand jury indictments against Trump, but the cases were dismissed before trial due to constitutional prohibitions against prosecuting a sitting president  Wikipedia .

Current Status

  • Smith  resigned from the DOJ in January 2024 , days before Trump took office, and has since been fired from his federal role by the Trump administration  FactCheck.org .

  • The OSC investigation is ongoing, but legal experts note that given Smith’s resignation and the political context, some view it as “performatory” rather than a serious enforcement action  FactCheck.org .

In summary:  Jack Smith is not facing criminal charges himself, but he is under investigation by the OSC for alleged political motivation in his Trump prosecutions and possible Hatch Act violations."


3 Judge Boesberg

washington-dcjudge-james-e-boasberg-chief-judge-of-the-federal-district-court-in-dc-stands.jpg?s=612x612&w=0&k=20&c=4lCJz9QLaaRq_BoCqc1EUhvymr7NuG1dwRW99-tsJyA=

Facing possible impeachment

"A divided appeals court panel ordered District Judge James Boasberg on Tuesday to end a contempt probe into Trump administration officials involved in migrant deportation flights – determining the jurist abused his discretion in launching the criminal inquiry. 

In a 2-1 ruling, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals found the Obama-appointed judge overstepped his authority by pursuing possible contempt charges against former Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and other top executive branch officials involved in the deportation of hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador last March."

Appeals court rules Judge James Boasberg abused his power, ordered to end criminal contempt probe against Trump officials


4 Michael Atkinson

Atkinson101019.jpg?ve=1&tl=1


Under investigation for perjury during the Vindman sham.

"The referrals come after DNI Tulsi Gabbard released documents earlier this week exposing what was described as a "coordinated effort" by elements within the intelligence community—including then-Inspector General Michael Atkinson, to "manufacture a conspiracy" that was used as the basis to impeach Trump in 2019.

An intelligence official told Fox News Digital that the language in the referral is broad, but that it's specifically directed at Atkinson and the whistleblower who reported concerns about President Trump's July 2019 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. 

The documents Gabbard released earlier this week include transcripts from Atkinson’s closed-door testimony before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, which were withheld from the House Judiciary Committee during the first impeachment trial. House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rick Crawford, R-Ark., led a vote to release the transcripts in March.

ODNI said the documents confirmed that Atkinson "failed to conduct basic due diligence and willfully exceeded his statutory jurisdiction to mischaracterize the president’s phone call with Zelensky as an ‘urgent concern’ to Congress."

Atkinson, during his investigation, found that the whistleblower showed indications of "political bias" and was "in favor of a rival political candidate," while still deeming the complaint a matter of "urgent concern."

ODNI sends criminal referral to DOJ over Trump 2019 impeachment | Fox News

 

 


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1  author  Vic Eldred    7 months ago

“The wheels of justice grind slowly, but grind fine, ” the aphorism goes. When it comes to the novel and, at times, appallingly unconstitutional “lawfare” that has been waged against Donald Trump, it looks like justice will indeed prevail." 

Trump is finally winning the ‘lawfare’ battle

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
1.1  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    7 months ago
" ... it looks like justice will indeed prevail." 

Are they bringing in the always independent Judge Aileen Cannon?

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Vic Eldred @1    7 months ago
Trump is finally winning the ‘lawfare’ battle

jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

Fanni Willis:

While no criminal indictment has been formally issued yet, the combination of  conflict-of-interest violations, misuse of federal funds, and alleged political interference could lead to criminal charges.

Yes, and people digging at where they believe a rainbow ends 'could' find a pot of gold.

Jack Smith:

Under investigation

Oooooh! Scary! LOL!

Jack Smith kicked Republicans ass's and they're bitter and sore but he did everything above board and they have nothing on him which is driving these fucking stupid bigots crazier than they already were and it's hilarious to watch.

With Judge Boesberg, just because an appeals court ruled he may have abused his power, I doubt very highly he will be impeached, that's just pie in the sky wishing from dumb fuck conservatives desperate to defend their criminal in the white house.

Michael Atkinson:

Another total joke of an investigation. Gabbard's likely going to get fired long before Atkinson would see any censure.

These investigations from this fraudulent administration are nothing but jokes that will not stand the test of time or objective scrutiny. Any sad sorry cuck frantically jerking off to these stories thinking Trump won is going to be sorely disappointed when the climax of these cases doesn't even dampen their dirty little socks.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  JohnRussell    7 months ago
willfully exceeded his statutory jurisdiction to mischaracterize the president’s phone call with Zelensky 

Yikes! The only person who mischaracterized the phone call with Zelensky was Trump, who called it "perfect" about a thousand times. 

This entire seed is hallucinatory. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  author  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @2    7 months ago

Do you know the difference between a classified Presidential phone call and an unclassified one?

When a democrat president makes one it is classified. When a Republican makes one it is unclassified.

Trump wanted to reinstate the Ukrainian investigation of Burisma & Hunter Biden that president Biden PUBLICLY threatened the Ukrainians to end!

It's a strange world, isn't it?


Oh well, since everyone is signing off at 11:22 AM, I best do the same.

Have a good one.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    7 months ago

you are as misinformed about ukraine as you are about most things connected to politics. 

trump was led, like a child, to believe that Hillary Clintons server was being held for safekeeping by the ukrainans , and that it was ukraine, not russia , that tried to interfere in the 2016 election. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
2.1.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.1    7 months ago
trump was led, like a child, to believe that Hillary Clintons server was being held for safekeeping by the ukrainans , and that it was ukraine, not russia , that tried to interfere in the 2016 election.

I looked and looked and looked and looked and don't see anything to back up your claim.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1.2    7 months ago
There is no credible evidence to support Donald Trump’s claims that Hillary Clinton’s email server was being held in Ukraine or that Ukraine, rather than Russia, interfered in the 2016 U.S. election. Multiple official testimonies, intelligence assessments, and bipartisan investigations have consistently found that Russia—not Ukraine—was responsible for interfering in the 2016 election to help Trump and harm Clinton’s campaign.

Key points from authoritative sources:

No evidence of Ukrainian interference: Testimonies from Trump administration officials, including those who served on the National Security Council, confirmed there was no factual basis for claims that Ukraine interfered in the 2016 election. The U.S. intelligence community and the Mueller Report both concluded that Russia was behind the election interference, not Ukrainepolitico.com+2.
Trump’s public statements: Trump publicly called on Russia to hack and release Clinton’s emails during the 2016 campaign, and later promoted the debunked theory that Ukraine was involved as a way to deflect from Russia’s role en.wikipedia.org+2.

Conspiracy theory origins: The idea that Ukraine interfered was pushed by Trump allies and conservative media, but it has been widely discredited. The Senate Intelligence Committee and other investigations found that Russian operatives, including Paul Manafort and Konstantin Kilimnik, actively spread this false narrative to shift blame away from Russiareuters.com+2.

In summary, Trump’s assertions about Ukraine and Clinton’s server are unsupported by evidence and contradict the findings of U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies. Would you like more details on the origins of this conspiracy theory or the official responses to it?
 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
2.1.4  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.3    7 months ago

Took you an hour to dredge that up?  I guess finding any news reports was falling through so you went with a "chat".  Sorry not agreeing to ANY TOS or policy to read fiction.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.5  JohnRussell  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1.4    7 months ago

You are incapable. I'll leave it at that. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
2.1.6  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.5    7 months ago
You are incapable.

No.  I'm fully capable.  Just not as gullible as yourself and those like you.  

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.1.7  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.5    7 months ago
You are incapable. I'll leave it at that. 

It's not a matter of capability; it's a matter of deniability. You're playing a game with those who regularly move goal posts on a whim, who reject any and all court rulings against their dear Leader while claiming anyone under investigation by this administration is already guilty of whatever it was that they were accused of 'because Trump'. It literally is their 'Trump' card that they can play at any time anywhere in any discussion.

They really couldn't care less about facts.

Trump promotes conspiracy theory: Clinton's deleted emails are in Ukraine

Trump, according to the text of his call with the country's president in July, asked for a "favor" involving cybersecurity company CrowdStrike and "a server."
and...

Trump speaks on Clinton's deleted emails: 'I think they could be' in Ukraine

During a meeting with the president of Ukraine, President Trump said he believed Hillary Clinton's deleted emails could be in Ukraine. He added that Clinton deleting the emails was an example of "corrupt government."
and...

Trump Repeats False Ukraine Claims

President Donald Trump called into “Fox & Friends” a day after the impeachment hearings ended and repeated false statements that have been debunked by fact-checkers and, in some cases, members of his own administration.
  • Trump repeated the baseless theory that the Democratic National Committee gave its computer server to a “Ukrainian company.” In fact, the DNC hired U.S.-based company CrowdStrike to investigate the cyberattack on its network during the 2016 elections, and CrowdStrike said it has “ never taken physical possession of any DNC servers.”
It took all of 2 seconds to Google these articles that someone supposedly " looked and looked and looked and looked and don't see anything". Again, these are not honest people you're debating, there is clearly nothing they wouldn't do to please their lord and master Donald Trump. I doubt any of them have any lips left to converse with after spending sooooooo much time kissing trumps ass.
 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.1.8  Snuffy  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.3    7 months ago

What was the question you asked the AI chat bot that gave you that information? Cannot click on that link to find the question as it doesn't exist from that link. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.9  JohnRussell  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.1.7    7 months ago

According to Jeremy your links dont mean a thing. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.10  JohnRussell  replied to  Snuffy @2.1.8    7 months ago

Do you agree that Trump falsely believed Ukraine meddled in the 2016 election and was hiding Clinton's server ? 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
2.1.11  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.9    7 months ago
What was the question you asked the AI chat bot that gave you that information?

I dind't say a goddamn thing about DP's links.  I mentioned yours specifically.  Lies like that are why many call your bullshit daily.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
2.1.12  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.1.7    7 months ago
It took all of 2 seconds to Google these articles that someone supposedly " looked and looked and looked and looked and don't see anything".

It took that short of time yet JR couldn't do it in the first place.  It took him an hour to give some "chat".

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.13  JohnRussell  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1.12    7 months ago

What I gave you is basically the same information Dismayed did.    Its not my problem if you cant process it. 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.1.14  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1.12    7 months ago
It took that short of time yet JR couldn't do it in the first place.

So now, after you supposedly "looked and looked and looked and looked", it's Johns fault for not linking them in the first place. How very honest of you.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.1.15  Snuffy  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.10    7 months ago

Do you agree that Trump falsely believed Ukraine meddled in the 2016 election and was hiding Clinton's server ? 

Was this your question that you asked the AI bot or are you just refusing to answer my question?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.16  JohnRussell  replied to  Snuffy @2.1.15    7 months ago

this is what a proposed to the AI

"trump believed that Hillary Clintons server was being held for safekeeping by the ukrainans , and that it was ukraine, not russia , that tried to interfere in the 2016 election."

if he didnt believe it the AI was free to say no. But as we know he did believe it.  This is not a secret. 

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.1.17  Snuffy  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.16    7 months ago
trump believed that Hillary Clintons server was being held for safekeeping by the ukrainans

Ahh, the old DNC server hack and Trump repeatedly confusing the DNC server with Hillary Clinton's email server that was kept in a closet at her home. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.18  JohnRussell  replied to  Snuffy @2.1.17    7 months ago

Trumps phone call to Zelensky included an ask that Zelensky investigate Clintons server.  It was ridiculous then as it is now.  This clown was the president of the United States, he had no good reason to drag a foreign country into his insanity. 

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
2.1.19  George  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.3    7 months ago
Trump publicly called on Russia to hack and release Clinton’s emails during the 2016 campaign, and later promoted the debunked theory that Ukraine was involved as a way to deflect from Russia’s role

This is the opinion of a fucking moron, and anybody who believes this is a moron. Full Stop

Here is Trumps actual statement:

"Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing, I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press,"

When trump said this the email server had been in FBI custody for a year, anyone who still propagates the lie that trump asked Russia to hack Hillary's emails has no integrity and probably never did in the first place.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.1.20  Snuffy  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.18    7 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.21  JohnRussell  replied to  George @2.1.19    7 months ago

Trump wanted help. At the time of this comment it was widely being discussed that Russia had hacked the DNC system, in fact that was what inspired Trump to ask Russia for help.  This was not to be the last time he would ask for foreign meddling in our elections either. He did it again in 2019 and 2022. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.22  JohnRussell  replied to  Snuffy @2.1.20    7 months ago

Do you agree that Trump falsely believed Ukraine meddled in the 2016 election and was hiding Clinton's server ? 

I notice you didnt answer MY question. 

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
2.1.23  evilone  replied to  Snuffy @2.1.17    7 months ago
Hillary Clinton's email server that was kept in a closet at her home. 

It wasn't kept in a closet at her home. It was kept in a bathroom of a Washington DC apartment used as office space. She did the exact same thing as the previous SoS for the exact same reasons. It's was done for the same reasons that many in Washington, including Hagseth use things like What'sApp now. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
2.1.24  TᵢG  replied to  Snuffy @2.1.20    7 months ago

Trump IS bad.   Why are you trying to admonish legitimate criticism of this psycopath?

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.1.25  Snuffy  replied to  evilone @2.1.23    7 months ago

I based my reply off an old PBS News doc that stated the server was located at her family home in New York. 

The computer server that transmitted and received Hillary Rodham Clinton's emails -- on a private account she used exclusively for official business when she was secretary of state -- traced back to an Internet service registered to her family's home in Chappaqua, New York, according to Internet records reviewed by The Associated Press. Hillary Clinton used private server for official email | PBS News

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.1.26  Snuffy  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.18    7 months ago

Trumps phone call to Zelensky included an ask that Zelensky investigate Clintons server.  It was ridiculous then as it is now.  This clown was the president of the United States, he had no good reason to drag a foreign country into his insanity. 

Nope, you're wrong again. Trump asked Zelensky to investigate CrowdStrike which is the company the DNC called in to investigate the hacking of their server. Had nothing to do with Clinton's emails server. The DNC server hack occurred between July 2015 and June 2016, the Clinton server was in the possession of the FBI as of August 12, 2015. 

“I would like you to do us a favor though because our country has been through a lot and Ukraine knows a lot about it,” Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, according to the notes from the call, which were released on Wednesday after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., called for an   impeachment inquiry   into the president. “I would like you to find out what happened with this whole situation with Ukraine, they say   Crowdstrike   [sic]... I guess you have one of your wealthy people... The server, they say Ukraine has it.”

CrowdStrike is a U.S-based security software vendor that   went public in June   and now has a market cap of $13.9 billion. The stock was down nearly 4% on Wednesday after the release of the summary, but later recovered slightly, closing down 0.8%.

Trump seems to be referring to CrowdStrike’s   role   in investigating the   2016 breach of the Democratic National Committee’s servers . Information from those servers was later leaked to the press, revealing confidential discussions among staffers running Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and other information. The U.S. Department of Justice ultimately   charged 12 Russian intelligence officers   with hacking the servers to interfere with the presidential election.

Why Trump asked Ukraine's president to look into CrowdStrike

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
2.1.27  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.1.14    7 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
2.1.28  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.13    7 months ago

You gave a bullshit AI chat.  No links.  You couldn't even tell Snuffy what the question you asked was.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
2.1.29  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1.27    7 months ago
Taunting [Split Personality]

far from it.  But I get it.  I called out one of your own.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.1.30  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1.29    7 months ago
I called out one of your own.

That's adorable. It's like watching kids pretend to fly, just a little more speed and get your arms up and that towel cape will certainly lift you off the ground if you just believe in yourself a little more.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
2.1.31  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @2.1.30    7 months ago
That's adorable.

You think it's adorable but it apparently made somebody cry.  

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
2.1.32  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1.31    7 months ago
it apparently made somebody cry.

jrSmiley_86_smiley_image.gif

Many things' conservatives do and say can illicit tears, they and their dear Leader are literal jokes incarnate.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.33  JohnRussell  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @2.1.31    7 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
3  Nerm_L    7 months ago

Political archeology.  (Digging up dead horses.)

512

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
3.1  Hallux  replied to  Nerm_L @3    7 months ago

Dead horses are close relatives of dead squirrels. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4  TᵢG    7 months ago

Remarkable that one can be inspired to write about others while supporting the most corrupt, incompetent PotUS in our lifetimes and never acknowledging the corruption, incompetence, lawfare, illegal actions, etc. of this psycopath.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5  JohnRussell    7 months ago

HGneMr7WYAEO0SR?format=jpg&name=small

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
6  charger 383    7 months ago

2.1 was locked to keep it from getting worse

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7  JohnRussell    7 months ago

190925-trump-ukraine-transcript-ew-342p.jpg

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.1  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @7    7 months ago

Trump promotes conspiracy theory: Clinton's deleted emails are in Ukraine

Trump is obviously, clearly , suggesting Crowdstrike gave the server to Ukraine.

Enough with this dissembling shit on this article. 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
7.1.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  JohnRussell @7.1    7 months ago
Enough with this dissembling shit on this article. 

That's like asking a dung beetle to stop collecting and rolling dung into balls. They can't admit they're wrong even though that fact has already been established numerous times. Again, you're not debating honest people. No one that continues to carry water for Donald Trump is an honest person. They are at best miserable bitter incels angry at the world, women and minorities for daring to ignore them. I recommend not feeding the resident trolls since facts and truth don't matter to them, they're only in it to try and get your goat. Trolls love goat.

 
 

Who is online



CB


118 visitors