'Rape leaflets' for migrants enrage the UK — and prove Trump's point
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Something extraordinary happened in Britain this week: Our leftist government acknowledged a truth it has long denied.
Our leaders admitted they are importing men who are so backward, so misogynistic and so out-of-whack with Western values that they don't understand that rape is wrong.
The woke fools who run this country conceded, after years of denial, that President Donald Trump and the rest of the supposedly "racist right" were correct all along: Europe is being overrun by brutish men from afar who think they can do whatever the hell they want to women.
Of course, the Home Office didn't say so outright.
The bureaucrats didn't proclaim: "We have endangered you, ladies, by flooding your towns with sexist thugs from overseas."
That would require a level of honesty and decency our ruling class simply does not possess.
But they let it slip, quietly conceding that they've thrown our once-civilized nation open to men so regressive that they don't even know it's evil and disgusting to force yourself upon a woman.
The sniveling admission came in a series of leaflets drawn up by the government for the benefit of so-called "asylum seekers."
Reading them genuinely made me nauseous.
One says: "In the UK, both people must say 'yes' to sex."
3Home Office
"If you have sex with someone who does not want to," it continues, "this is called rape . . . a serious crime."
Will I be called "racist" if I say I don't want men in my country who don't know that forced sex is criminal and vile?
Another leaflet informs new arrivals to our country, "Child abuse is a serious crime in the UK."
It tells illegal immigrants they must not have "sexual contact with a child under 16" and it's a crime to "physically hurt a child" or "cut or harm a girl's genitals".
I don't feel reassured by these leaflets, but horrified.
I am sickened that anyone coming into my country can be so at odds with our values that they must be told not to rape kids or mutilate girls.
And I am disgusted that my government knows this.
It is fully aware that morally stunted foreigners are storming our green and pleasant land — so much so that it's producing leaflets essentially begging them: "Please don't rape our women."
Other leaflets inform illegals that you should not "make sexual comments to strangers" and must not hit, push or use "any physical violence" against your wife.
Let me speak frankly: If you don't know rape is wrong, I don't want you in my country.
If you don't know it's evil to sexually assault an infant, I want you out of Britain.
3Home Office
Go ahead and slander me as "racist."
Right now, in this insane political moment, the safety of my female loved ones matters far more to me than my supposed moral standing.
The British government — slyly, dishonestly — now admits that it has recklessly put this country's women at grave risk.
And its pathetic "solution" is not to properly police the borders, but to hand out leaflets.
The notion that a piece of paper could keep women safe is insane.
The illegal immigrants who bother to read these advisories will laugh and throw them in the trash.
What we need is armed border guards to keep illegal immigrants away — not paper pleas for foreigners to keep their hands off our women and kids.
It's hard to describe how furious Brits are over these demented leaflets.
My WhatsApp groups have been buzzing with rage.
Pals and family members are horror-struck beyond belief that we've descended to the point at which the government has to beg illegal migrants not to fiddle with kids or beat women.
What's infuriating is that those of us who've been raising concerns about the influx of men from regressive cultures have been tarred as "far right" reactionaries.
We've been smeared as Islamophobes, too, because let's be honest — most of these men are coming from Muslim lands where women are treated as cattle and prepubescent girls are married off.
Trump has been rabidly demonized by the woke for saying Europe is being "ruined" by out-of-control immigration.
The BBC and other turbo-smug institutions whispered "Nazi" when his administration's National Security Strategy declared that Europe faces "civilizational erasure."
But Trump was correct.
These "rape is bad" booklets prove it.
We have imported men who hate women, hate gays, hate Jews.
Such irrational bigotry is violently at odds with Western civilization.
We don't want it.
And it's not "far right" to say so — it's just right.
Tags
Who is online
86 visitors
Government PSA's aren't going to fix it...
Neither will the whining from libertarian communists.
next...
Yep, sounds like a communist for sure.
Libertarian communist?....
Libertarian Marxist?
Does he have any Nazi tattoos? We can add that label if he has or ever had...
Marxist libertarian??? That's a serious contradiction. The man's brain must be warped
Where were these booklets when our rapist in chief needed them read to him?
"our rapist"?
I suppose I had been under the mistaken belief that you were American, not British"?
(Oh well. its probably not important
)
Yea, I wasn't talking about Randy Andy but, hey, if the shoe fits...
"You know I'm automatically attracted to beautiful—I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. " "You can do anything. Grab 'em by the pussy. You can do anything" - Donald J Trump
I wonder what he isn't waiting for? /s
Perhaps one of his loyal servants can crawl out of his ass to explain why that isn't an admission of sexual assault.
And then there's this...
The only ones trying to escape the reality that Trump is clearly sexual predator are the dumb fuck misogynist idiots with their heads stuck up Trumps ass wishing they got to assault more women and "grab 'em by the pussy" like their hero.
I know, right?
Thanks to mass immigration, now Europe gets to experience the joys of pro rape culture. Look what happened to the number of rapes in European cities once mass immigration started. The Benefits of diversity!
All immigrant groups-- or just some?
(Curious minds want to know . . .)
Allowing immigration from people likely to be a net benefit and not commit crimes and excluding the others should be the goal of a rational immigration policy.
I think Denmark did a study of the various costs and benefits groups provide their economy. The gaps are big.
Her rape whistle?
Related:
Sweden had had a very low incidence of gun violence. But that's changed
Up until a few years ago, Sweden was counted among the European countries with relatively low levels of homicide.
However, the homicide rate has increased in Sweden, and is now higher than that of many other countries in the EU.
The increase in Sweden is primarily linked to an increase in gun violence.
Why do you think that is?
Good for you.
Right? Now she needs something a little smaller and easier to carry.
Christmas isn't too far away
"You know I'm automatically attracted to beautiful—I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. " - Donald J Trump
Civilization falls when uncivilized are allowed in
That is correct.
However it must be realized that not all immigrants are violent. (In fact many groups have had an extremely positive effect on the U.S.)
Overcrowding is a negative effect
You mean like the Aztec's when the Spanish "visited"?
or the
Millions of Native American who died when the Spanish, French and English invaded North America?
Rome fought the uncivilized for centuries virtually creating the Visigoths who destroyed the Roman Empire.
Or the Aztecs neighbors who were exploited as slaves and used as human sacrifice? The Spanish were welcomed by the victims of Aztec colonial oppression. Otherwise, even with a much more advanced culture (they used the wheel!) a couple hundred Spaniards could not have conquered the Aztecs so easily.
Lol. No the Visigoths were fleeing the Huns and were essentially granted asylum by the Romans who hoped to exploit them. It turns out letting a foreign nation with incompatiblr customs into your borders is a fucking lunatic idea and within two generations the Visigoths were sacking Rome.
You seem to have a deep personal problem with the behavior of your ancestors and relatives.
The Spanish used smallpox to kill 90% of the Aztecs and their former slaves alike in less than two years.
After three years the Aztecs were wiped out and the indigenous population who helped the Spanish and survived the smallpox
were now slaves to the Spanish who were as merciless as the Aztecs
Your blind spots are not my problem, pilgrim.
Alternate facts? It seems written explicitly to support your paranoid view of history.
SMH
The Spanish didn't know they were infected/carriers of smallpox and they certainly didn't know the Aztecs or anyone else had no immunity. Nobody understood how viruses worked or how to prevent them in the 1500s. Surgical hand washing wasn't even discovered until 1847 and most doctors rejected the idea that they were responsible for spreading disease and it wasn't widely accepted for decades till well after Louis Pasteur discovered germ theory.
Yes, the Spanish didn't use smallpox any more than the natives used syphilis as a weapon. Both sides were exposed to novel pathogens they had no previous exposure to and the natives fared worse.
Given my Ancestry DNA report, the Aztecs would be very distant relatives indeed. But yes, I do have a problem with societies that practice mass human sacrifice The world is much better off without them.
e Spanish used smallpox to kill 90% of the Aztecs
Now there's an alternate fact...
It seems written explicitly to support your paranoid view of history
My “paranoid view” of history is just history From Google AI:
You miss the point frequently, don't you? You are related to everyone who has gone before you. Period.
And there it is in a nut shell, your paranoid and simplistic view of history.
I'm pretty sure every Native American Indian would agree with you. /s
But that's not what caused Rome to fall.
The Romans spent 1400 years conquering and assimilating everywhere they could reach by land and sea, causing "tribe" after tribe to flee into neighboring non Roman territories, far more so than the Huns did in their scant 90 year existence.
By then the Roman Empire was divided between Rome and Constantinople when the Visigoths and Huns appeared.
True to form the Western Roman Empire, failing to eradicate the Visigoths, then tried to assimilate them.
The Visigoths revolted within two years but later became Roman allies against the Huns.
By 410 the Romans were using the Huns as mercenaries until Atilla came along, but when he died in 453, so did the Hunnic "empire".
By that time, the Western Roman empire was in disarray lacking central authority and the military was devastated after two successive civil wars.
They could not enforce Roman rules or collect taxes over such a vast territory let alone mount campaigns outside of Italy.
When Emperor Theodosius died and left the empire to two incompetent sons, it paved the way for the Germans to conquer Italy in 476 AD.
Ionically the Visigoths took Hispania and embraced all things Roman for 200 years before the Moors came.
The Eastern Roman Empire persisted for another thousand years teasing army after army to capture Constantinople ( Mehmed, 1453 )
The human history of the world is violent, filled with refugees and melded cultures and competing religions.
The Spaniards' treatment of the native tribes in Mexico was barbaric.
(But FWIW the Aztecs treatment of some of the smaller Mexican tribes was also barbaric)
You think that's a point? That it is somehow relevant? Lol. You are related to Hitler. Do you not have a problem with what he did because he's related to you?
m pretty sure every Native American Indian would agree with you. /s
Yeah. No shit. That's literally the point. They certainly understood that concept before they ever heard of white people. Sucked to be on the losing side of a war between Indian tribes. Again, you say these things as if they are somehow relevant to or rebut something I've claimed.
Lol. Of course it was. You copied and pasted facts below but don't get root cause. All the problems you listed are downstream of mass immigration and the problems it caused to the Empire, which was already a degraded vestige of the Republic.
They did not try to "eradicate them". They repeatedly tried to buy them off with land and autonomy. After inviting the Goths across the border in the hopes they'd serve as troops, the goths went on a rampage and started the war that essentially broke the western Empire after the Goths didn't like the amount help the Romans gave them. . . . And yet again, that's my point. Successful immigration policy is only possible with assimilation. Melting pot can work. As you detail without apparently understanding, giving land and semi-autonomy to a hostile power within a country's borders doesn't
.The human history of the world is violent, filled with refugees and melded cultures and competing religions.
Bravo! Thanks for getting the most basic of concepts correct! Competing, incompatible cultures cause violence and the destabilization of states, tribes, kingdoms etc. That is the story of history.
You are stubborn, I will grant you that.
You are hung up on sophomoric excuses like "incompatible" as if it makes a difference.
Humans need no such excuses. Which revolutions were caused by "incompatibility"?
The American? The French? The Russian? The Chinese?
The Visigoths didn't attack Rome because they were incompatible, they attacked because they were alike and wanted the power of the throne
which they proved in Spain by embracing everything Roman.
Define "civilized". Define and compare with those whom you are talking about
I don't really think there is a valid objective definition of civilized. While most would consider it an advanced state of social, cultural, and technological development, or showing good manners, politeness, and reasonable behavior, all of those would be subjective as a society that just developed the wheel could be considered "civilized" when compared the one that had not, but would be considered far from civilized for a society that had developed steam engine technology or hydroelectric power.
So, with two Presidential votes, we can see what kind of civilization some Americans are talking about.
The 'civilization' MAGA want to take America back to is that civilization they think was the greatest, back to the 1950's when America's leadership in WWII and, along with our allies, winning the war on both fronts which was great. But that greatness overshadowed the continued unresolved racial conflicts that simmered and finally boiled over in the 1960's. But MAGA of today don't care about that, they don't care about the imperfect parts of their desired civilization, they want to go back to the 1950's when they believed women wanted to stay at home and gays wanted to stay in the closet and black Americans wanted to stay in the background and take menial jobs and never aspire to be a bank manager or, God forbid, President. That's the real "civilization" these MAGA sycophants are desperate to get back to. And of course, that fantasy they have will never come true if they keep allowing more and more people who don't look like them into what they believe is "their" civilization.
I think you are describing the America MAGA wants people to picture: the idealized social order of the 1950s. My concern is that the governing project reaches much farther back institutionally, toward dismantling much of the regulatory framework built in response to the Gilded Age and later crises, while at the same time concentrating more power in the presidency. In other words, the cultural nostalgia may be for the 1950s, but the political and economic regression is toward a system with fewer restraints on concentrated private power and fewer restraints on the executive.
A quick definition and comparison of civilization would be before and after they let the barbarians in.
Why a country chooses to make things worse for it's Citizens is confusing
Back in the medieval days France thought England was full of barbarians and the English thought the same of the French. Who was correct?
Then the ones outside your gates ware the barbarians. the ones threating you
I think the current ones are worse because they are wild in a tame society that does not expect their behavior
Who are the barbarians?
The immigrants?
So the Trump Administration and MAGA?
no, they were in place not bring problems from foreign countries
outsiders that do not fit in and cause problems for the Citizens
of course they are..../s
Overpopulation is the real problem.
I agree. We are running out of potable water.
The US population has grown by 50 million people in the last twenty years and yes it's all immigration because we only have a birth rate of 1.59 births per woman in the USA well below replacement rates. Is it any wonder housing costs have skyrocketed because of a housing shortage? I also blame this huge increase for the insane prices for used Cars these days, the media claims it's because of pandemic chip shortages or the 2009 Cash for Clunkers program but that only destroyed 677,000 cars which is nothing compared to 50 million new customers who are primarily looking for used cars. Not to mention how a glut of cheap immigrant labor suppresses wages. Someone should ask the Democrats how this helps all the poor people they claim to care so much about.
very good points
“Someone should ask the Democrats how this helps all the poor people they claim to care so much about.”
i have asked one democrat on this site, multiple times, and never got a response.
Apparently the CDC feels otherwise.
Births have averaged 4 million plus from 2000 through 2009, dropped a bit to 3.8 through 2019 and down to 3.6 million the last 4 years.
In the flips side, deaths have steadily increased from 2 million in 2000 to 3.4 million in 2021, currently holding at 3million per year as the Baby Boomers have their final impact.
Apparently in their zeal to remain invisible immigrants are avoiding having babies.
The causes are multiple and complex but don't include immigrants apparently.
have housing costs skyrocketed - Search
I don't blame the Cash for Clunkers, it was a failure. The Global Supply fiasco and Covid had a bigger impact.
Adding 50 million in population doesn't mean they are all driving age yet but those that are 16 to 20 years old are not your typical new car buyers, strictly used car buyers and demand raises prices. Throw in the current Administrations interference in the market by favoring fossil fuels over electric and it has an nmpact.
Sorry to disagree again, it's not the size of the slice of pie that matters, it's the size of the pie.
Additionally wages have increased 39.5% since 2019, 3.5% currently but inflation is 3.4%
Someone should ask Democrats how to get non-Democrats to participate in reality.
Well if one democrat acts a certain way, then obviously that means that all Democrats act the same way!
[✘]
sums up the asininity and surrealism of how modern immigration policy as well as anything :
Imagine a Rip Van Winkle who had fallen asleep in, say, the mid-1990s, waking up today and trying to understand what was going on.
That does not bode well for the sheep.
It doesn't matter what language they get translated to.
No matter what, some leftist group made up of a bunch of AWFLs will claim because the pamphlets are in any language other than English, the British government is being racist to that nationality.
Well, here is ChatGPT's take on the article:
No AIs were harmed in the production of this reporting.