╌>

California’s Shadow Welfare System for Illegal Immigrants

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  s  •  2 months ago  •  14 comments

California’s Shadow Welfare System for Illegal Immigrants

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


California runs the nation’s largest welfare system, devoting more than $180 billion annually to food, health care, and other programs for the poor and downtrodden. To sustain the arrangement, the state imposes the nation’s highest tax rates.

In theory, these programs are supposed to help struggling Californians. In reality, many serve large numbers of illegal immigrants. Today, California oversees a shadow welfare system that allows noncitizens to receive health care, rental assistance , college grants , tax credits , low-cost car insurance , and even smartphones on the taxpayers’ dime.

We visited four public-services offices in Southern California, each of which admitted that illegal aliens can enroll in public-welfare programs or receive benefits on their children’s behalf. In total, California taxpayers spent at least $11 billion subsidizing illegal immigrants in the last fiscal year. The state’s shadow welfare system, it seems, shows no signs of slowing down.

Local officials were remarkably transparent. In Glendale, we spoke to a welfare officer about California’s Cash Assistance Program for Immigrants (CAPI), a state-funded alternative to Supplemental Security Income that provides monthly cash assistance to low-income noncitizens who are elderly or disabled.

“If [you are] a citizen, you cannot get CAPI,” he said. “I don’t care about legal or not. Not being [a] citizen [is the key].”

In Los Angeles, we heard more of the same. We asked another welfare officer about the benefits available to illegal immigrants and their children. While some state programs are closed to illegals, we learned, they are open to those aliens’ U.S.-born children.

“If you were born here and the child was born here, you get money for two,” the officer said of CalWORKs, the state’s version of the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program. “Because she is not and the child is, she only gets money for the child, and not for her.”

These benefits add up. In California, illegal immigrants can qualify for CAPI, public health insurance , and various tax credits . Their children qualify for others, including CalWORKs and, as in other states, Section 8 rental subsidies . All told, a family of five in California with two illegal-alien parents, two U.S.-born children, and one illegal-alien grandparent can receive public services worth more than $100,000 per year.

State leaders are proud of it. In a recent podcast episode, Governor Gavin Newsom bragged about his “controversial” decision to extend Medi-Cal coverage to illegal immigrants. His wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, encouraged people to sign up for the California Earned Income Tax Credit, a program whose promotional materials assure applicants that “no Social Security number” is “no problem.”

The governor’s office did not respond to our comment request by deadline.

How is all this possible?

Federal law generally prohibits states from using federal dollars to serve illegal aliens. To dodge those restrictions, California created parallel state- and locally funded programs that allowed the state to extend benefits to illegal immigrants. Perhaps as a result, more than one in four California residents today is foreign-born .

Medicaid is a good example. Federal law prohibits states from using federal dollars to provide wraparound coverage to illegal immigrants. So, California used a state-funding “bucket” within its Medi-Cal program to extend “full-scope” coverage to illegal aliens. The expansions enrolled some 1.7 million people, costing the state an estimated $10 billion annually—more than twice what the state legislative analyst originally projected.

California also uses a distinct legal category that enables certain migrants to qualify for state programs. The state deems certain aliens to be “permanently residing under color of law”—living in California with the “knowledge and permission” of immigration enforcement—and allows them to use this designation to enroll in Medi-Cal, CAPI, and other government programs. In practice, because aged or disabled individuals are typically not deported, this means elderly foreign retirees can arrive in California and receive extensive benefits.

Another way that California shuffles cash to illegal immigrants is through those aliens’ children. CalWORKs allows illegal-immigrant parents to receive benefits on behalf of their U.S.-born kids. BenefitsCal, the state’s welfare clearinghouse, even tells applicants that the program will accept a “statement” that the applicant “intend[s] to file or [is] taking steps to become federally eligible” to qualify for the program.

This model—permissive rules and large loopholes—costs the state billions per year. As benefits and eligibility continue to expand, that figure will only increase in the years ahead.

California shows no sign of paring back this largesse. In 2022, Newsom signed a bill into law that extended taxpayer-funded food benefits to illegal low-income residents. Beginning next October, qualified Californians 55 and older will become eligible for that program, regardless of immigration status. California’s Legislative Analyst estimates that it could cost up to an additional $400 million a year.

The state also has no citizenship requirements for various programs. California’s state-sponsored Low Cost Auto Insurance Program tells illegal-immigrant drivers that they may qualify for subsidized coverage “regardless of immigration status.” In 2025, Newsom signed legislation banning California LifeLine—a program that provides free phones and cell service—from requiring applicants to produce a Social Security number.

As we walked around several Los Angeles welfare offices, we saw cellphone providers pitching California LifeLine plans. When we approached one provider, a representative told us that applicants can use a Mexican consular identification card to enroll. The program’s website confirms as much.

Between health insurance, cash transfers, and other programs, California’s shadow welfare system doles out generous benefits to illegal immigrants at taxpayers’ expense. Ordinary Californians, meantime, are depleting their savings, working long hours, and taking on tons of debt simply to pay the bills.

Under Gavin Newsom’s social contract, working Americans must not only contend with rising taxes and ballooning living costs but also bear the burden of financing benefits for illegal immigrants and their families. In other states, citizenship establishes who qualifies for taxpayer-funded benefits. In California, citizenship merely determines who pays.


Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
[]
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1  seeder  Sean Treacy    2 months ago

It must make the ever dwindling numbers of middle class Americans in California so happy to know that as they struggle to tread water economically the state happily takes their money and simply gives it to foreigners, not only directly making them poorer through high taxes but driving up their cost of living at the same time. Having their own government exploit them so ruthlessly must be a real kick in the pants every morning when they go to work so foreigners can have free things. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  seeder  Sean Treacy    2 months ago
In California, illegal immigrants can qualify for CAPI, public health insurance , and various tax credits . Their children qualify for others, including CalWORKs and, as in other states, Section 8 rental subsidies . All told, a family of five in California with two illegal-alien parents, two U.S.-born children, and one illegal-alien grandparent can receive public services worth more than $100,000 per year.

I wonder how long Americans who work 50 hours a week and make the same or less money are going to put up with that. Such ruthless, and unjustifiable exploitation, becomes too much at some point, doesn't it? 

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
3  charger 383    2 months ago

Why they give them anything?  

Take care of Citizens 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
3.1  MrFrost  replied to  charger 383 @3    2 months ago

Take care of Citizens 

The Christian thing to do is take care of humans. 

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
3.1.1  charger 383  replied to  MrFrost @3.1    2 months ago

Separation of church and state. 

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
3.1.2  charger 383  replied to  MrFrost @3.1    2 months ago

Like the Crusades, battle of Jericho,  Sodom and Gomorrah, the great flood?, 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.3  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  charger 383 @3.1.2    2 months ago
the Crusades

What's wrong with the crusades?  They were a reaction to colonization of Christian lands by Muslim invaders.   

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
3.1.4  JBB  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.3    2 months ago

No, the Crusades were when Europeans in the Middle Ages invaded the Holy Land which was by then Muslim...

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
3.1.5  Gsquared  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.3    2 months ago
What's wrong with the crusades? 

Nothing unless someone is an anti-Semite who approves of the murder of thousands of Jews, and the murder of milliions of innocent Muslims.

The crusades were a series of religious wars in the medieval period. They were primarily between Christians and Muslims. Both sides fought for control over sacred, religious, lands in the Middle East.

In 1095 the newly elected Pope Urban II called on his followers to liberate Jerusalem, the holy land, from Muslim nonbelievers.

Whilst this call did not directly mention Jews, some Christians led their own crusades. Their aim was to destroy all enemies and non-believers of Christianity, not just those in Jerusalem.

The effects were devastating for the Jews. Thousands were targeted by Crusaders in the Rhineland in Germany in 1096. The crusaders aimed to entirely eliminate the Jewish population, either by converting them to Christianity, or, if they refused, by killing them . (Emphasis added)

This brutal attack was just one example of the antisemitism which was widespread throughout the Crusades.   (Emphasis added)

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.6  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  JBB @3.1.4    2 months ago

As I said, the crusades were a reaction to colonization of the Christian lands by Muslims and an attempt to reconquer them. 

As the eminent scholar Bernard Lewis wrote:

For almost a thousand years, from the first Moorish landing in Spain to the second Turkish siege of Vienna, Europe was under constant threat from Islam. In the early centuries it was a double threat—not only of invasion and conquest, but also of conversion and assimilation. All but the easternmost provinces of the Islamic realm had been taken from Christian rulers, and the vast majority of the first Muslims west of Iran and Arabia were converts from Christianity. North Africa, Egypt, Syria, even Persian-ruled Iraq, had been Christian countries, in which Christianity was older and more deeply rooted than in most of Europe. Their loss was sorely felt and heightened the fear that a similar fate was in store for Europe.
 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.7  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  Gsquared @3.1.5    2 months ago
nhousands were targeted by Crusaders in the Rhineland in Germany in 1096

They were not "crusaders" They were rogue peasant bands and were condemned the Pope. The crusader armies were never in the Rhineland

and the murder of milliions of innocent Muslims.

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.8  seeder  Sean Treacy  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.7    2 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
3.1.9  Gsquared  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.7    2 months ago

The so-called "rogue" peasant bands of the First Crusade that slaughtered Jews were organized and led by Catholic clergy and nobility.  Pope Urban II, who initiated the First Crusade, did not condemn the murder of Jews.

Subsequent Crusades resulted in the murder of Jews in Europe and the Holy Land.

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
3.1.10  charger 383  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.3    one month ago

It was a response to being told the Christian thing was to take care of humans in response to my statement to take care of Citizens. Crusades was shown as an example of how Christians take care of humans

 
 

Who is online




86 visitors