╌>

Pentagon says there will be a livestream of firing squad's execution of the Fort Hood shooter

  

Category:  News & Politics

Via:  perrie-halpern  •  one month ago  •  10 comments

By:   Colleen Long and Gordon Lubold

Pentagon says there will be a livestream of firing squad's execution of the Fort Hood shooter
The execution of Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan is scheduled for Dec. 3 in Texas.

S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Oct. 8, 2026, 5:51 PM EDTBy Colleen Long and Gordon Lubold

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Thursday the public would be able to watch the firing squad execution of a former Army officer convicted of a mass shooting at Fort Hood, Texas.

Speaking from the USS Abraham Lincoln to the conservative news outlet Real America's Voice, Hegseth said Nidal Hasan is "going to get a firing squad of soldiers, and we'll make sure that people are able to watch it."

"People need to understand that there's serious consequences for these types of things," said Hegseth, who called the method of execution a "no-brainer."

Hegseth said the execution would be carried out at 1 p.m. Dec. 3 at Fort Hood — the same day of the week and time of day as Hasan's attack.

261005-Nidal-Hasan-vsb-2226-a5c91d.jpg Former Army psychiatrist Maj. Nidal Hasan appeared in court on Jan. 29, 2015, at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., where he is on military death row. Bell County Sheriff's Department

The execution will be livestreamed, according to a Defense Department official, though it's not yet clear on which platform.

The last military execution was in 1961, when Army Pvt. John Bennett was hanged after he was convicted of raping and attempting to kill an 11-year-old girl in Austria.

The last firing squad execution by the military was that of Pvt. Eddie Slovik in 1945 after he was court-martialed for desertion during World War II.

Hasan was convicted of premeditated murder in 2013 through the Army court system and sentenced to death.

Hasan, a former major and psychiatrist, opened fire at Fort Hood on Nov. 5, 2009, killing 13 people and wounding 32 others while shouting "Allahu akbar," or "God is great" in Arabic.

He was paralyzed from the waist down after he was shot during the attack, and he later told a panel of military mental health professionals that he wished he had been killed because it would have made him a martyr for his cause. He also said that if he were executed, he would still be considered a martyr.

NBC News reported this week that the firing squad idea was set in motion this year inside the Pentagon, according to two U.S. officials familiar with the planning.

President Donald Trump recently approved Hegseth's recommendation to carry it out, chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said on social media.

In his interview with Real America's Voice, Hegseth was asked if he knew whether Hasan had contacted Trump or made any final requests.

"Don't care," Hegseth said. "We'll see him on Dec. 3rd."

According to the Death Penalty Information Center, after a president approves the death sentence from a case in a military court, the service member can seek habeas relief from the federal court system.

If the habeas petition is ultimately denied, the servicemember, according to the center, would be led from death row down a flight of stairs to the United States Disciplinary Barracks's death chamber where the servicemember would — traditionally — be strapped to a gurney and executed by lethal injection. The Defense Department, however, has said Hasan will be executed by firing squad.

Hasan has represented himself throughout the yearslong legal process, though he had two lawyers with the U.S. Army Trial Defense Service who assisted as needed. It's not clear at the moment whether he will appeal his method of execution.


Tags

jrDiscussion - desc
[]
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1  Ozzwald    one month ago

Make

America

Gruesome

Again

???

Public execution so MAGA can stroke themselves while watching it???

And these are the people that have opposed artwork that displays any kind of nudity????  What a disgusting mindset they have!!!

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Participates
2  Veronica    one month ago

Hopefully the country won't regress back to the times when people were forced to witness the executions.  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Veronica @2    one month ago

When did that ever happen?

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.1.1  Snuffy  replied to  Sean Treacy @2.1    one month ago

Yeah, never forced. Executions were held in public until the late 1930's when they were moved behind prison walls. But people were never (from what i can find thru Google) forced to attend and watch. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Snuffy @2.1.1    one month ago
But people were never (from what i can find thru Google) forced to attend and watch. 

You can literally say anything that puts America in a bad light and some people will reflexively  believe it.  Our educational system has rotted minds.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
2.1.3  Ozzwald  replied to  Snuffy @2.1.1    one month ago

But people were never (from what i can find thru Google) forced to attend and watch. 

Don't tell Trump that, he'd decide to be the 1st POTUS to force people to watch. 

"No other president did this, they all wanted to but I'm the 1st one who actually did it."

b3e83da3-8aef-48a4-9325-c1fc12ab586e_1140x641.png

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Participates
2.1.5  Veronica  replied to  Ozzwald @2.1.3    4 weeks ago

A public execution is a form of capital punishment which may be attended by the general public. This definition excludes the presence of only a small number of witnesses called upon to assure executive accountability. [ 1 ] The purpose of such displays has historically been to deter individuals from defying laws or authorities. Attendance at such events was historically encouraged and sometimes even mandatory.

For those that think AI is all that:  

es, attendance at public executions was historically encouraged and sometimes even mandatory for the general public to deter individuals from defying laws or authorities. In some jurisdictions, laws required witnesses to be present to ensure the execution was conducted properly.

wikipedia.white.png Wikipedia

Historical Context of Public Executions

Encouragement and Mandates

Attendance at public executions was historically encouraged and, in some cases, made mandatory . This practice aimed to deter individuals from defying laws or authorities. The presence of witnesses was seen as a way to ensure that the execution was conducted properly and in accordance with legal standards.

Legal Requirements

In certain jurisdictions, laws explicitly required witnesses to attend executions. These witnesses were often considered public eyewitnesses, standing in for the general public. Their role was to verify that the execution was carried out as mandated by law.

Examples of Mandatory Attendance

Location Details
Virginia, USA Laws require "respectable citizens" to witness executions to ensure legality.
Historical Europe Public executions often drew large crowds, with attendance sometimes enforced.

The practice of mandatory viewing reflects a historical belief in the deterrent effect of public executions, although this view has evolved significantly over time. Today, most countries have moved away from public executions, and many have abolished capital punishment altogether.

Explore More

What were the laws regarding mandatory attendance at public executions?

Historically, attendance at public executions was often encouraged or even mandatory in many societies to ensure that the punishment served as a deterrent against crime . However, starting in the 19th century, state legislatures began to place restrictions on public attendance, with Connecticut being the first U.S. state to require executions to occur in private in 1830.

wikipedia.white.png Wikipedia

Of course the source will now be attacked - but luckily I won't see it.  The only reason I knew to refute it - OZ quoted.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.1.6  Snuffy  replied to  Veronica @2.1.5    4 weeks ago
Examples of Mandatory Attendance
Virginia, USA Laws require "respectable citizens" to witness executions to ensure legality.

In doing more research into this, the witnesses are volunteers. There is no legal mandate to drag witnesses in from the street. So my point stands, nobody was "forced" to witness an execution. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
2.1.7  Right Down the Center  replied to  Snuffy @2.1.6    4 weeks ago
So my point stands, nobody was "forced" to witness an execution. 

And there will be less celebrating than when Charlie Kirk was shot

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
3  TᵢG    one month ago

800

 
 

Who is online


Dismayed Patriot
CB
Freefaller


126 visitors