╌>

US becoming a ‘developing country' on global rankings that measure democracy, inequality

  
Via:  John Russell  •  2 years ago  •  11 comments


US becoming a ‘developing country' on global rankings that measure democracy, inequality
So while the gigantic size of the American economy counts in its scoring, so too does unequal access to the wealth it produces. When judged by accepted measures like the Gini coefficient, income inequality in the U.S. has risen markedly over the past 30 years. By the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's measurement, the U.S. has the biggest wealth gap among G-7 nations. These results reflect structural disparities in the United States, which are most pronounced for African...

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



www.msn.com   /en-us/news/opinion/us-becoming-a-developing-country-on-global-rankings-that-measure-democracy-inequality/ar-AA11SIxk

US becoming a ‘developing country' on global rankings that measure democracy, inequality


8-9 minutes   Invalid Date




( The Conversation ) – The United States may regard itself as a " leader of the free world ," but an index of development released in July 2022 places the country much farther down the list.

In its global rankings, the United Nations Office of Sustainable Development dropped the U.S. to   41st worldwide , down from its previous ranking of 32nd. Under this methodology – an expansive model of 17 categories, or "goals," many of them focused on the environment and equity – the U.S. ranks between Cuba and Bulgaria. Both are widely regarded as developing countries.

The U.S. is also now considered a "flawed democracy," according to  The Economist's democracy index .

As a political historian who studies U.S.  institutional development,   I recognize these dismal ratings as the inevitable result of two problems. Racism has cheated many Americans out of the health care, education, economic security and environment they deserve. At the same time, as threats to democracy become more serious, a devotion to "American exceptionalism" keeps the country from candid appraisals and course corrections.

‘The other America'


So while the gigantic size of the American economy counts in its scoring, so too does unequal access to the wealth it produces. When judged by accepted measures like the  Gini coefficient,   income inequality in the U.S. has risen markedly over the past 30 years. By the  Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's measurement,   the U.S. has the biggest wealth gap among G-7 nations.

These results reflect structural disparities in the United States, which are most pronounced for African Americans. Such differences have persisted well beyond the demise of chattel slavery and the repeal of Jim Crow laws.

Scholar W.E.B. Du Bois first exposed this kind of structural inequality in his 1899 analysis of Black life in the urban north, " The Philadelphia Negro ." Though he noted distinctions of affluence and status within Black society, Du Bois found the lives of African Americans to be a world apart from white residents: a "city within a city." Du Bois traced the high rates of poverty, crime and illiteracy prevalent in Philadelphia's Black community to discrimination, divestment and residential segregation – not to Black people's degree of ambition or talent.

More than a half-century later, with characteristic eloquence, Martin Luther King Jr.   similarly decried   the persistence of the "other America," one where "the buoyancy of hope" was transformed into "the fatigue of despair."

To illustrate his point, King referred to many of the same factors studied by Du Bois: the condition of housing and household wealth, education, social mobility and literacy rates, health outcomes and employment. On all of these metrics,   Black Americans fared worse  than whites. But as King noted, "Many people of various backgrounds live in this other America."

The benchmarks of development invoked by these men also featured prominently in the 1962 book   " The Other America ," by political scientist  Michael Harrington, founder  of a group that eventually became the Democratic Socialists of America. Harrington's work so unsettled President John F. Kennedy that it reportedly   g alvanized him  into formulating a "war on poverty."

Kennedy's successor, Lyndon Johnson, waged this metaphorical war. But poverty  bound to discrete places . Rural areas and segregated neighborhoods stayed poor well beyond mid-20th-century federal efforts.

In large part that is because federal efforts during that critical time accommodated rather than confronted the forces of racism,   according to my research .

Across a number of policy domains, the sustained efforts of segregationist Democrats in Congress resulted in an incomplete and patchwork system of social policy. Democrats from the South cooperated with Republicans to doom to failure efforts to   achieve universal   health care  or  unionized workforces . Rejecting proposals for strong federal intervention, they left a checkered legacy of   local funding for education  and  public health .

Today, many years later, the effects of a welfare state tailored to racism is evident - though perhaps less visibly so - in the inadequate  health policies  driving a  shocking decline  in average American life expectancy.

Declining democracy


There are other ways to measure a country's level of development, and on some of them the U.S. fares better.

The U.S. currently ranks 21st on  the United Nations Development Program's index , which measures fewer factors than the sustainable development index. Good results in average income per person – $64,765 – and an average 13.7 years of schooling situate the United States squarely in the developed world.

Its ranking suffers, however, on appraisals that place greater weight on political systems.

The Economist's  democracy index  now groups the U.S. among "flawed democracies," with an overall score that ranks between Estonia and Chile. It falls short of being a top-rated "full democracy" in large part because of a fractured political culture. This growing divide is most apparent in the divergent paths between "red" and "blue" states.

Although the analysts from The Economist applaud the peaceful transfer of power in the face of an   insurrection intended to disrupt  it,  their report laments  that, according to a January 2022 poll, "only 55% of Americans believe that Mr. Biden legitimately won the 2020 election, despite no evidence of widespread voter fraud."

Election denialism carries with it the threat  that election officials in Republican-controlled jurisdictions will reject or alter vote tallies that do not favor the Republican Party in upcoming elections, further jeopardizing the score of the U.S. on the democracy index.

Red and blue America also differ on access to modern reproductive care for women. This hurts the U.S. gender equality rating,  one aspect  of the United Nations' sustainable development index.

Since the  Supreme Court overturned  Roe v. Wade, Republican-controlled states have enacted or proposed grossly  restrictive abortion laws , to the point of  endangering a woman's health .

I believe that, when paired with structural inequalities and fractured social policy, the dwindling Republican commitment to democracy lends weight to the classification of the U.S. as a developing country.

American exceptionalism


To address the poor showing of the United States on a variety of global surveys, one must also contend with the idea of  American exceptionalism , a belief in American superiority over the rest of the world.

Both political parties have long promoted this belief, at home and abroad, but "exceptionalism" receives a more formal treatment from Republicans. It was the first line of the Republican Party's national platform of  2016  and   2020  ("we believe in American exceptionalism"). And it served as the organizing principle behind Donald Trump's vow to restore " patriotic education " to America's schools.

In Florida, after  lobbying by Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis , the state board of education in July 2022 approved standards rooted in American exceptionalism while barring instruction in  critical race theory,   an academic framework teaching the kind of structural racism Du Bois exposed long ago.

With a tendency to proclaim excellence rather than pursue it, the peddling of American exceptionalism encourages Americans to maintain a robust sense of national achievement – despite mounting evidence to the contrary.




Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    2 years ago
The U.S. currently ranks 21st on    the United Nations Development Program's index   , which measures fewer factors than the sustainable development index. Good results in average income per person – $64,765 – and an average 13.7 years of schooling situate the United States squarely in the developed world. Its ranking suffers, however, on appraisals that place greater weight on political systems.
 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  Sean Treacy    2 years ago

Good job Biden!

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @2    2 years ago

I think this trend predates Biden. 

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2.1.1  Ronin2  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1    2 years ago

Democrats are no better at better at lowering the gap than Republicans- in fact many times they are worse; like Obama.

Democrats talk a great gap about closing the income disparity gap; but like so many other things what they practice isn't what they preach.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2.1.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Ronin2 @2.1.1    2 years ago
Democrats talk a great gap about closing the income disparity gap;

yeah, look at their success in  California and New York. Models of income equality. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3  Greg Jones    2 years ago

The false narrative of systemic racism grew exponentially under Obama.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
4  Nerm_L    2 years ago

The Economist is a privately owned news business located in the United Kingdom.  The Democracy Index is published by the Economist EIU (Economist Intelligence Unit) and is not associated with any public entity.  The EIU Democracy Index focuses attention on political metrics which does not give high value to social or economic measures.      The Democracy index for the United States has been in decline since 2008.

During the pandemic the Executive branch of government imposed lockdowns, mandates, and restrictions in an undemocratic manner that curbed civil liberties.  The Federal response to the pandemic was authoritarian/autocratic and not democratic which obviously lower the score of the United States on the democracy index.  The United States has gradually adopted a system that imposes restrictions on civil liberties in an authoritarian manner rather than through a democratic process.

The Federal government has been moving toward governing by Executive Order and bureaucratic regulation, neither of which is a democratic process.  Congress has adopted the practice of one party dominance and use of parliamentary maneuvers to enact very partisan legislation which is a weakening of the democratic process.  Both the President and Congress have been attempting to manipulate the Judicial branch in an undemocratic manner making the judicial branch a partisan extension of politics and weakening the independence of the judiciary.

The political system of the United States has become dominated by only two political parties that has severely limited political diversity.  The two party dominance in the United States has intruded upon governing processes to the extent that executive and legislative functions of government increasingly serve partisan political interests that do not represent the population.  Government becoming an extension of political parties is an attribute of autocratic and totalitarian governments.

The political system of the United States has increasingly allowed political parties to manipulate elections through an election process (primaries) that disenfranchises voters and deliberately limits participation.  Participation in selection of candidates requires a declaration of affiliation (and support) to the political ideology of a political party.  The political parties use that undemocratic restriction on participation for the purpose of partisan propaganda and promotion of partisan political ideology.

Democracy, itself, is strictly a political system based upon the conduct of elections and the functioning of government.  Democracy is not about social or economic disparities.  In the United States, issues of social and economic disparities have been utilized as justification for weakening democracy.  Authoritarian/autocratic remedies for social and economic disparities is not democracy; that's social and economic totalitarianism.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
5  Buzz of the Orient    2 years ago

Why?  BLAME BLAME BLAME!!!   Work together towards healing the gap?  NO WAY!!!

Create an enemy to blame - that will make ALL Americans happy. 

Welcome to the "exceptional" nation - America. (Bring your own gun).

 
 
 
squiggy
Junior Silent
5.1  squiggy  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @5    2 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
5.2  Jack_TX  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @5    2 years ago
Work together towards healing the gap?  NO WAY!!!

We're light years apart on how that should be done.  So no.  

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
6  Drinker of the Wry    2 years ago

Amazingly, Venezuelans not only want to leave their country, but don't want asylum in Mexica but rather come to the dysfunctional US instead.

 
 

Who is online



109 visitors