╌>

The Diseases Of The Negro

  
Via:  John Russell  •  3 years ago  •  48 comments


The Diseases Of The Negro
Cartwright also invented another 'disorder', dysaesthesia aethiopica, a disease "affecting both mind and body." Cartwright used his theory to explain the perceived lack of work ethic among slaves. Dysaesthesia aethiopica, "called by overseers 'rascality'," was characterized by partial insensitivity of the skin and "so great a hebetude of the intellectual faculties, as to be like a person half asleep."

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks

HISTORY


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



The Medical Association of Louisiana charged Cartwright with investigating "the diseases and physical peculiarities of the negro race". His report was delivered as a speech at its annual meeting on March 12, 1851, and published in its journal.   The most sensationalistic portions of it, on   drapetomania   and   dysaesthesia aethiopica , were reprinted in   DeBow's Review .   He subsequently prepared an abbreviated version, with sources cited, for   Southern Medical Reports .

"If they nonetheless became dissatisfied with their condition, they should be whipped to prevent them from running away."   In describing his theory and cure for drapetomania, Cartwright relied on   passages of Christian scripture dealing with slavery .

Cartwright also invented another 'disorder',   dysaesthesia aethiopica , a disease "affecting both mind and body." Cartwright used his theory to explain the perceived lack of work ethic among slaves.   Dysaesthesia aethiopica, "called by overseers 'rascality'," was characterized by partial insensitivity of the skin and "so great a   hebetude   of the intellectual faculties, as to be like a person half asleep." Other symptoms included "lesions of the body discoverable to the medical observer, which are always present and sufficient to account for the symptoms."

According to Cartwright, dysaesthesia aethiopica was "much more prevalent among free negroes living in clusters by themselves, than among slaves on our plantations, and attacks only such slaves as live like free negroes in regard to diet, drinks, exercise, etc." — indeed, according to Cartwright, "nearly all [free negroes] are more or less afflicted with it, that have not got some white person to direct and to take care of them."

https://wikizero.com/en/Samuel_A._Cartwright

Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago

Cartwright then has a section titled “Negro Consumption,” which he blames on “erythism of mind,” or “sulkiness and dissatisfaction.”

Drapetomania, or the Disease Causing Slaves to Run Away Drapetomania is from [drapeto, transliterated from the Greek] a runaway slave, and [mania], mad or crazy. It is unknown to our medical authorities, al- though its diagnostic symptoms, the absconding from service, is well known to our planters and overseers, as it was to the ancient Greeks, who expressed by the single word [drapeto] the fact of the absconding, and the relation that the fugitive held to the person he fled from. I have added to the word meaning run- away slave, another Greek term, to express the disease of the mind causing him to abscond. In noticing a disease not heretofore classed among the long list of maladies that man is subject to, it was necessary to have a new term to express it.

The cause, in the most of cases, that induces the negro to run away from vice, is as much a disease of the mind as any other species of mental alien- ation, and much more curable, as a general rule. With the advantages of proper medical advice, strictly followed, this troublesome practice that many negroes have of running away, can be almost entirely prevented, .....

To ascertain the true method of governing negroes, so as to cure and pre- vent the disease under consideration, we must go back to the Pentateuch, and learn the true meaning of the untranslated term that represents the negro race. In the name there given to that race, is locked up the true art of governing ne- groes in such a manner that they cannot run away. The correct translation of that term declares the Creator’s will in regard to the negro; it declares him to be the submissive knee-bender. In the anatomical conformation of his knees, we see “genuflexit” written in the physical structure of his knees, being more flexed or bent, than any other kind of man.

If the white man attempts to oppose the Deity’s will, by trying to make the negro anything else than “thesubmissive knee-bender” (which the Almighty declared he should be,) by trying to raise him to a level with himself, or by putting himself on an equality with the negro; or if he abuses the power which God has given him over his fellow-man, by being cruel to him or punishing him in anger, or by neglecting to protect him from the wanton abuses of his fellow-servants and all others, or by denying him the usual comforts and necessaries of life, the negro will run away: but if he keeps him in the position that we learn from the Scriptures he was intended to oc- cupy, that is, the position of submission, and if his master or overseer be kind and gracious in his bearing towards him, without condescension, and at the same time ministers to his physical wants and protects him from abuses, the negro is spellbound, and cannot run away. “HeshallserveJapheth; he shall be his servant of servants;”—on the conditions above mentioned—conditions that are clearly implied, though not directly expressed. According to my experience, the “genu flexit”—the awe and reverence, must be exacted from them, or they will despise their masters, become rude and ungovernable and run away.

On Mason and Dixon’s line, two classes of persons were apt to lose their negroes; those who made themselves too familiar with them, treating them as equals, and making little or no distinction in regard to color; and, on the other hand, those who treated them cruelly, denied them the common necessaries of life, neglected to protect them against the abuses of others, or frightened them by a blustering manner of approach, when about to punish them for misdemeanors. Before negroes run away, unless they are frightened or panic-struck, they be- come sulky and dissatisfied. The cause of this sulkiness and dissatisfaction should be inquired into and removed, or they are apt to run away or fall into the negro consumption.

When sulky and dissatisfied without cause, the experience of those on the line and elsewhere was decidedly in favor of whipping them out of it, as a preventive measure against absconding or other bad conduct. It was called whipping the devil out of them. If treated kindly, well fed and clothed, with fuel enough to keep a small fire burning all night, separated into families, each family having its own house— not permitted to run about at night, or to visit their neighbors, or to receive visits, or to use intoxicating liquors, and not overworked or exposed too much to the weather, they are very easily governed—more so than any other people in the world. When all this is done, if any one or more of them, at any time, are in- clined to raise their heads to a level with their master or overseer, humanity and their own good require that they should be punished until they fall into that submissive state which it was intended for them to occupy in all after time, when their progenitor received the name of Canaan, or “submissive knee- bender.” They have only to be kept in that state, and treated like children, with care, kindness, attention and humanity, to prevent and cure them from running away.

Samuel A Cartwright

  1.  Cartwright, Ssmuel A. (July 1851). "Diseases and Peculiarities of the Negro Race". DeBow's Review. Vol. 11, no. 1. pp. 64–74.
 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
1.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @1    3 years ago

Amazing what physicians and scientists came up with 175 years ago.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.1    3 years ago

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
1.1.2  Split Personality  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @1.1    3 years ago

and the remedies...like cocaine, laudanum etc 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago

I wonder if they teach that in American schools. 

In America , some people want to acknowledge slavery existed without acknowledging the racism. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
2.1  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @2    3 years ago

Most of the thinking of physicians and scientists of the 19th century aren’t taught in our school system.  What would you cut out to make room for this inclusion?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @2.1    3 years ago

This theory, and other similar ones , were used to justify and spread racism. That is part of our history whether you like it or not. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
2.1.2  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @2.1.1    3 years ago

It’s not a matter of me like it or not, it’s a matter of understanding the how these theories came about.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
2.1.3  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @2.1    3 years ago

Seems Dr Cartwright was just a Antebellum Era quack.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.2  Snuffy  replied to  JohnRussell @2    3 years ago

And some people seem to want to acknowledge racism in everything that happens today.  What is the point of dredging up a 170 year old journal article other than to try to link it to racism today.  Most everybody acknowledges that racism still exists today, but it is better and not as wide spread as it was in the past.  I would rather work towards the future then continue to rehash and relive the past, wouldn't you?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Snuffy @2.2    3 years ago

Racism today IS connected to the past. 

White people, in general, want to acknowledge slavery existed (what choice do they have?) but they do not want to pin it on racism. On this very seed someone has to mention Greece, Rome, pre-Columbian whatever, China, etc. 

Any explanation but racism. 

That is why information like this is useful. 

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
2.2.2  Snuffy  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.1    3 years ago

You're broad-brushing too hard.  Not all white people are infected like this, people are people.  

On this very seed someone has to mention Greece, Rome, pre-Columbian whatever, China, etc. 

You're the only one I can see who's done this.  It seems you are pushing racism for racism's sake rather than to educate and inform.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.3  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Snuffy @2.2    3 years ago

I have looked into the history of American racism probably more than anyone else on this forum. Once you know the truth it becomes important to give it the light of day. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
2.2.4  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.3    3 years ago

You are the master JR.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
2.2.5  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.1    3 years ago

A legitimate question is which came first, slavery or racism.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
2.2.6  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  Snuffy @2.2.2    3 years ago
Not all white people are infected like this, people are people.  

Perhaps a prejudice against white people.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.7  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @2.2.5    3 years ago

Racism, in the United States, was devised as a justification for slavery. That is why "Dr. Cartwright" said what he did. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.8  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @2.2.6    3 years ago

Perhaps you dont know what you are talking about. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
2.2.9  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.8    3 years ago

Perhaps, what makes you think that you do?

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
2.2.10  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.7    3 years ago

So you agree that institutional racism followed slavery.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.2.11  JBB  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @2.2.10    3 years ago

That is a dim bulb conclusion! American slavery was based upon institutional racism! Jim Crow and the peonage system were also and were an extension of slavery just by other names.  

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
2.2.12  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JBB @2.2.11    3 years ago
That is a dim bulb conclusion! American slavery was based upon institutional racism!

Other’s disagree:

Throughout human history, societies have enslaved others due to conquest, war or debt, but not based on physical difference. The word "slave" in fact comes from "Slav": prisoners of Slavonic tribes captured by Germans and sold to Arabs during the Middle Ages. Prior to the Enlightenment, slavery was simply a fact of life, unquestioned. Race, on the other hand, is a much more recent idea, tied up with the founding of the U.S.

In colonial America, our early economy was based largely on slavery. When the new concept of freedom was introduced during the American Revolution, it created a moral contradiction: how could a nation that proclaimed equality and the natural rights of man hold slaves? The idea of race helped resolve the contradiction by setting Africans apart. The notion of natural Black inferiority helped our founding fathers justify denying slaves the rights and entitlements that others took for granted.
 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
2.2.13  CB  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @2.2.12    3 years ago

I must ask what distinction are you making above? A. Slavery came before race/ethnicity subordination in the United States?  B. Racialization is a social construct founded in the U.S.  C.  There has never been and/or is not now institutional racism in the U.S.  D. Something else.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
2.2.14  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  CB @2.2.13    3 years ago

A.

 
 
 
Ed-NavDoc
Professor Quiet
2.2.15  Ed-NavDoc  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.3    3 years ago

You may have "looked into it", but you have never experienced it personally as a person of color yourself. Being of Mexican American descent and having grown up in a small town on AZ/Mexico border, I grew up with it from the white Mormon minority that ran the town. The thing you routinely miss is that your truth does not necessarily mean other people's truths.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
2.2.16  Jasper2529  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.3    3 years ago
I have looked into the history of American racism probably more than anyone else on this forum. Once you know the truth it becomes important to give it the light of day. 

Have you also looked into the racism/slavery that existed and still exists in South America, Central America, Africa, and Asia and posted articles about it?

Please try to give so-called American systemic racism a rest, because it only exists in the fantasy minds of a minority of racists. Even a lot of black and brown people don't believe that swill anymore.

If you want to find the 20th/21st century root cause of systemic racism, look no further than Planned Parenthood and learn how many millions of innocent babies they murder each year.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.2.17  Split Personality  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @2.2.5    3 years ago

Racism, or call it tribalism by race. Several other hominids were hunted to extinction before we became dominant.

Slavery is racism's child.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
2.2.18  CB  replied to  Jasper2529 @2.2.16    3 years ago

Jasper, Jasper, Jasper. So you think there is enough justice for everyone in this country, eh? Well, let's move on then: Who the "h" are republicans to insist what baby a girl or woman OUGHT to have because some conservative SAY SO? I suggest not being empowered to stop the implanting of a "child" in a girl's or woman's womb and becoming the equivalence of "barefoot  and pregnant" for the umpteenth time because some man secretes on the 'inside' -by hook or crook. . . leading to a lifetime of taking care of a ill-gotten 'gain' that SHALL NOT BE PROPERLY LOVED AND ALWAYS TOLD THE STORY OF HOW 'IT' CAME TO BE AN ALIEN. . . possibly abandoned. . . or forced to be fed.  .  . is a new IMPROVED form of slavery.

 
 
 
Drakkonis
Professor Participates
2.2.19  Drakkonis  replied to  JohnRussell @2.2.1    3 years ago

As evil as slavery and racism are, I think what you try to do here is much worse. What makes it even more evil is that I think you know it but continue anyway. I think you want racism as much as most people want to win the lottery. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
2.2.20  CB  replied to  Drakkonis @2.2.19    3 years ago

Wow. That OUGHT to fix broken things in this country just fine and dandy. :) Somebody wrote "as evil as slavery and racism are. . . " are, present tense, and then turned sideways to bite "the messenger" making a delivery. You can't make such idiocy up. It has to happen right before your eyes!  Shut your eyes and it will all just go away! People have tried that already, and its still there when they open them again!

 
 
 
bbl-1
Professor Silent
3  bbl-1    3 years ago

In order to justify subjugation of races many methods are employed.  The most successful and common method is religion--and the perversion of it.

Samuel Cartwright, a medical scholar of the time, used his influence and prestige to blunt the rising tide of Abolition in America.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  bbl-1 @3    3 years ago
The most successful and common method is religion

In  general, might makes right has always been the justification behind religion.  The great slaveholding societies of Rome, Greece,  West Africa, pre columbian America, China,  etc were not religiously based. Exceptions, like the Islamic states, do exist of course.  

Religion, specifically evangelical religion,  was the driving force behind abolition in this country. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    3 years ago

The preeminent  doctor in the county thought FDR's high blood pressure was good for him just a few generations ago.

The accepted beliefs of doctors often have short shelf lives. 

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
4.1  Snuffy  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    3 years ago

Indeed.  Most of us on this board are old enough to remember when there were ash trays in a doctors exam room and smoking EVERYWHERE was allowed.  

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
4.1.1  Split Personality  replied to  Snuffy @4.1    3 years ago

Automobiles were oft judged by how many ash trays they had, even those tiny little (*%&ers in the armrests.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
4.1.2  Snuffy  replied to  Split Personality @4.1.1    3 years ago

And now it's the number of drink and juice box holders...   

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
4.1.3  Split Personality  replied to  Snuffy @4.1.2    3 years ago

Too funny because it is so true.

I think there are 8 in my 4 door sedan, lol.

The ash tray is removable (it's in the trunk now)

but it has front and rear lighter sockets

now used to charge cell phones.

Evolution...

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago
The negro slaves of the South are the happiest, and, in some sense, the freest people in the world. The children and the aged and infirm work not at all, and yet have all the comforts and necessaries of life provided for them. They enjoy liberty, because they are oppressed neither by care nor labor.

The women do little hard work, and are protected from the despotism of their husbands by their masters. The negro men and stout boys work, on the average, in good weather, not more than nine hours a day. The balance of their time is spent in perfect abandon. Besides, they have their Sabbaths and holidays. White men, with so much of license and liberty, would die of ennui; but negroes luxuriate in corporeal and mental repose. …
from Cannibals All
by George Fitzhugh
 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Participates
6  GregTx    3 years ago

Racism is a derivative of bigotry which is a derivative of tribalism. Interestingly, so is partisanship. 

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
7  CB    3 years ago

One of the harder, I mean hardest, things to do in life is to bow down to someone whom you don't respect. Black people in this country have done this along with many others for a terribly long time. And yet . . . the imperfect system was all this country had and it was captured to it. After all, the white majority was afraid of how to manage suppressed people set free. Because the white majority understood something about its own nature: to attack when given the chance. Surprise! Black people and people of color, generally speaking, just want to enjoy freedom for freedom sake—a generation or several without someone fighting to steer us and tell us what we want/need to do for ourselves. That is, people of color in the United States simply want to 'breathe' freedom and liberty from its top to its bottom the way white people do it by far and large.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
7.1  CB  replied to  CB @7    3 years ago

And to be clear, I have great respect for all really great white people who eventually came to the rescue and salvation of my and other people of color. Without you, none of what is possible today for people of color would be so in this land. We strive to grow together with you in every endeavor because YOU cared to allow, aid, agree it be so. As for those who fight people of color assimilation-of any color and any tribe-I, we, wish you collectively just desserts to be determined when, where, and how.

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
7.2  CB  replied to  CB @7    3 years ago

Yet one more thing: To be truly free in the United States similar to a white majority means blacks can be liberals, progressives, and even conservative without someone mislabeling it: 'plantation-living' (there)!

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
8  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago
While we consider the flag which has been adopt-   ed by the Senate as a very decided improvement of the old United States flag   we still think the battle-flag on a pure white field was appropriate and hand-   some. Such a flag would be a suitable emblem of our young confederacy, and,   sustained by the brave strong arms of the South, it would soon take rank   among ensigns of the nations, and be hailed by the civilized world “THE   WHITE MAN’S FLAG.”  
R.3999e466589bf8ef346773cc66b19747?rik=dIdrhPtVWaxcLg&riu=http%3a%2f%2fep.yimg.com%2fay%2fgdhs%2f2nd-confederate-states-of-america-flag-3.gif&ehk=Pr6LP1eH7Gqrn8BP2mClym2NyuGGQK4xcgiTMx1HIC8%3d&risl=&pid=ImgRaw&r=0
May 4, 1863.   We are pleased to learn by our dispatch from Richmond that Congress has   had the good taste to adopt for the flag of the confederacy the battle-flag on a   plain white field, in lieu of the blue and white bars proposed by the Senate. The   flag, as adopted, is precisely the same as that suggested by us a short time   since, and is, in our opinion, much more beautiful and appropriate than either   the red and white bars or the white field and blue bar as first adopted by the   Senate. As a national emblem, it is significant of our higher cause, the cause of   a superior race, and a higher civilization contending against ignorance, infi-   delity, and barbarism. Another merit in the new flag is, that it bears no resem-   blance to the now infamous banner of the Yankee vandals.
WILLIAM   T.   THOMPSON   (1812–82),   “PROPOSED   DESIGNS   FOR   THE   2ND   NATIONAL   CONFEDERATE   FLAG,”   APRIL–MAY   1863.
 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
9  charger 383    3 years ago

In history of world, not having slaves is a relatively new thing

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
9.1  CB  replied to  charger 383 @9    3 years ago

Ignorance is no longer bliss. Slavery and racism are social constructs that a mature world grew out of and the hope is once and for all. Enlightenment brings its own rewards!

 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
11  CB    3 years ago

BTW, the white majority, those who hated and wanted to keep oppression of slaves, blacks, others, in place came up with all sorts of demonizations, classifications, and substandard beliefs for which to persuade themselves (delude themselves) into thinking the groups could not live without 'intervention' by white 'patriarchs.'  BTW, women were given this same type of treatment too. Because you have to condition and recondition people (brainwash them generationally and societally) to keep them 'knowing' their place.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
12  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago
Frank Conner, born in 1933, graduated from Newnan High School in Georgia and from the University of Georgia in marketing. In 2002, he published The South Under Siege, which was reviewed favorably in the same issue of Southern Mercury that featured this article as its cover story. He now lives in Newnan. Al- though not quite the most recent in publication, his essay is an appropriate final selection, because it summarizes the dominant neo-Confederate view of Southern history from the end of the Civil War to the present. Southern Mercury is an official publication of the Foundation for the Preservation of American Culture, the educational foundation of the Sons of Confederate Veterans.
from the book THE CONFEDERATE AND NEO CONFEDERATE READER edited by James Loewen. University of Mississippi Press
The South Under Siege
The Liberals Create a False Public Image of the Blacks
 The 20th century liberals (North and South) decided to use black civil rights as their main moral weapon against the white South, just as their 19th century predecessors had done prior to the War of Northern Aggression. After the turn of the 20th century, the white Southerners had disfranchised and segregated the blacks, in perhaps the mildest reaction possible at that time to the blacks’ transgressions. The blacks—then a childlike people—had been selling their votes to the Democrats en masse for $.25 apiece in national elec- tions. This so enraged the Northern Republicans (who believed that the blacks owed them) that in 1890 they almost succeeded at reinstating key elements of Reconstruction in the South (via the Force Bill). The white Southerners weren’t about to undergo any part of that experience again, so they disfranchised the blacks lawfully via universal poll taxes, literacy tests, etc. At the same time, due primarily to the ruinous practices of the Northern capitalists, many Southern blacks could no longer earn a living as share- croppers; so they moved into the towns. But they did not understand town life, and the white Southerners lacked the money and other resources to teach them; consequently, the blacks’ crime rates soared. Their homicide rate became seven times that of the whites. In sheer self-defense, the Southern whites segre- gated the blacks. The Northern liberals could not reasonably object to any of that. So instead, they began creating a false public image of the blacks. 
Early in the 20th’ century, the liberals took control of the humanities depart- ments in the colleges and universities of America. Previously, anthropologists had routinely recorded the notable differences in IQ among the races; but at Columbia, a liberal cultural anthropologist named Franz Boas now changed all of that. He decreed that there were no differences in IQ among the races, and the only biological differences between the blacks and whites were of super- ficial nature. The liberals swiftly made it academically suicidal to challenge Boas’ flat assertion. Meanwhile, the liberals in the media heaped special praise upon black athletes, musicians, singers, and writers—and treated them as typ- ical of the black race. The liberals were creating a false image of the blacks in America as a highly competent people who were being held back by the preju- diced white Southerners.
  The Liberals Destroy the Old South in the Name of Black Civil Rights 
World War II came and went. Now the liberals began putting real pressure on the white Southerners to integrate the blacks into the Southern society (while leaving the North’s de facto segregation untouched). Meanwhile, the segregated blacks (North and South) had spent 30 years studying the structure of the white society and learning how to duplicate much of it for a society of their own. In the post-WWII era, most Southern governors could measure the social progress of the blacks, and could also see the outside pressures build- ing: it was time for a major change. But to integrate the blacks smoothly into the white society, the Southern states would first have to equalize the education of the blacks with that of the whites. So in the early 1950s, a number of South- ern states pumped big money into the black school systems, to bring them up to par. But gradualism did not suit the liberals’ plans. As in the War of Northern Aggression, their objective was not to benefit the blacks despite their rhetoric, they’ve never cared anything about the blacks—but to destroy the belief system and way of life of the white Southerners. And so, beginning in 1947, Northern liberal writers launched a wide-spread hate campaign against the white South; and liberal Democrat Harry Truman pressured the Congress to enact a radical civil rights bill aimed squarely at the white South; and Truman did in fact deseg- regate the US government—including the armed forces—by presidential fiat that year, in 1954, the liberal Supreme Court rendered patently- unconstitutional Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas decision, to force the integration of white children and black children in the Southern schools. Had the Northern liberals attacked the white-Southern adults, that would have been bad enough; but they were going after the children. It didn’t take a rocket scientist to forecast the disastrous results of that move, to be en- forced by the hostile federal government; and the white Southerners did what they could to resist. But they never had a chance.
 The Northern liberals funded and guided the black civil rights organizations; and the liberal news media gave them nonstop propaganda coverage which transformed them into national heroes. US presidents sent the US Army to en- force the integration of public schools and universities in the South. Black lead- ers such as Martin Luther King, Jr. carefully selected as their targets those Southern towns and cities with incompetent officials who were bound to react with violence. Literally thousands of white Northern liberals and radicals accompanied out-of-state blacks to register black voters in Southern towns, while the liberal Northern and scalawag TV news crews awaited the inevitable explosions. The media, academia, and government at all levels vilified the white South- erners, their belief system, and their way of life in a propaganda campaign that blanketed America: the Southern blacks were saintly; the Southern whites were evil personified.
 As the result, the US Congress enacted the patently-unconstitutional Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965, both of which targeted only the South. Thus did the US government institute Reconstruction II, which is still in full effect. The Old South was destroyed, and its belief system and way of life were discredited outside the South. Then came the social-welfare programs for the blacks and affirmative action and social promotions in the schools. The integration tactics employed by the liberals, along with these additional measures, largely destroyed the blacks’ work ethic and academic learning and the black family resulting in insup- portable levels of black illegitimacy, poverty, and crime. Had the liberals really cared about the blacks, they would have reversed course and repaired the awful harm they had done the blacks. The fact that they did not do so speaks much louder about the real motives of the liberals than their high-flown rhetoric. Black civil rights was simply the best moral weapon with which to destroy the white Southerners as a people—just as it had been in the 19th century.
  The Liberals Begin the Final Stage of their Culture War Against the White South
 A coalition of white liberals and black activists now expanded Recon- struction II via a series of campaigns in the private sector; some of them tar- geted the white South; others, the conservative whites nationwide. For example, in the 1970s, the motion picture and entertainment-television companies launched a comprehensive hate-the-white-South campaign which is still in force, and which has probably been more destructive of our beliefs and values than all else combined. The colleges and universities adopted multicul- turalism—en-forced by political correctness—as academia’s official repudi- ation of the belief system and way of life of the white South.
A coalition of black activists and the news media and the liberals in government now attacked the big corporations as racist, and made them adopt quotas and other preferential treatment of blacks. The same type of coalition attacked the criminal justice system in America and polarized it racially (epitomized by the O. J. Simpson criminal trial), thus ruining it. That coalition is presently promoting hate-crime legislation as the final weapon to intimidate the whites (particularly the white Southerners) into total impotence via thought-crime laws. Thus reinforced, Reconstruction II is steadily shredding the traditional white society—first in the South and then in the rest of the nation. But the liberals are in a big hurry to replace Christianity with secular humanism and limited govern- ment with socialism. So now they are backing another major campaign against the white South. In the late 1980s, the NAACP and other black civil rights organizations ran into a brick wall. The blacks had been given equality under the law and even preferential treatment; yet they were obviously not performing up to par with the whites.
The problem was that the liberals’ civil rights campaign had given the blacks a belief system which emphasized black inferiority. Politically, the black activists could not touch that problem; but they still had to explain the blacks’ failure to perform in society. So they invented the concept of “institutional racism” on the part of the Southern whites: you couldn’t see it, but it was there, and it was ruining the blacks’ performance. This “institutional racism” was an integral part of the white Southerners’ belief system—which they had inherited from their Confederate forebears. To destroy that belief sys- tem, it would be necessary to vilify and discredit the Confederates and their be- lief system. And so in the early 1990s the process began whereby any obscure black could step up to a microphone and call the Confederate soldiers any vile name he could think up—such as “Nazi SS concentration-camp guards”; and the news media would not only run that as straight news, but would flood the South and the rest of the nation with it. The white South was swamped with such attacks, and had no way to respond to them. That discredited the Confed- erates’ public image, and set us up for the liberals’ next move. In the late 1990s, the various liberal-dominated institutions joined that cam- paign.
Liberal academia now swore that the South had fought the war solely over slavery, an unimaginably evil institution. Virtually the entire liberal media began calling the Confederates—and then today’s white Southerners—names that were just as irresponsible and vicious as the ones the blacks were spout- ing. PBS began broadcasting miniseries that were blatant hate-mongering anti- white-South propaganda. Congress began legislating against the white South’s heritage on the theory that we are all irredeemable racists. Local governments in the Southern states began restricting the public celebration of our Confederate heritage. Consequently, we conservative white Southerners are now aliens in our own homeland. And far worse treatment is awaiting us just around the cor- ner—un-less we fight back lawfully, and stop the attacks now.  Our Options As we can see from this account, the liberals will not get bored and stop at- tacking us of their own accord; and we cannot appease them. The only way we can prevent them (and their black-activist catspaws) from finishing the job of destroying us as a people and destroying our belief system and our way of life is by counterattacking the liberals successfully and discrediting them in the eyes of the public. The liberals continue to attack and destroy us only because we permit them to. For the first half of the 20th century, liberalism was the golden dream—and as such, it was bulletproof. But the tenets of liberalism have been official US government policy since 1965 (some will say 1933); and the public has now seen that it is unworkable because it ignores the realities of human nature. So liberalism is now vulnerable; it can be taken.
Frank Conner, born in 1933, graduated from Newnan High School in Georgia and from the University of Georgia in marketing. In 2002, he published The South Under Siege, which was reviewed favorably in the same issue of Southern Mercury that featured this article as its cover story. He now lives in Newnan. Al- though not quite the most recent in publication, his essay is an appropriate final selection, because it summarizes the dominant neo-Confederate view of Southern history from the end of the Civil War to the present. Southern Mercury is an official publication of the Foundation for the Preservation of American Culture, the educational foundation of the Sons of Confederate Veterans.
 
 
 
CB
Professor Guide
12.1  CB  replied to  JohnRussell @12    3 years ago
The blacks—then a childlike people—had been selling their votes to the Democrats en masse for $.25 apiece in national elec- tions. This so enraged the Northern Republicans (who believed that the blacks owed them) that in 1890 they almost succeeded at reinstating key elements of Reconstruction in the South (via the Force Bill). The white Southerners weren’t about to undergo any part of that experience again, so they disfranchised the blacks lawfully via universal poll taxes, literacy tests, etc. 

Blacks could not have been too "childlike" since by the time mentioned there had been blacks sufficiently sophisticated to get themselves elected to congressional seats!

The 14th & 15th Amendments With passage of a new Reconstruction Act (again over Johnson’s veto) in March 1867, the era of Radical, or Congressional, Reconstruction, began. Over the next decade, Black Americans voted in huge numbers across the South, electing a total of 22 Black men to serve in the U.S. Congress (two in the Senate) and helping to elect [President Andrew] Johnson’s Republican successor, Ulysses S. Grant, in 1868. 

It's clear that the "white Southerners" were deliberately sabotaging and taking every advantage of their status and positioning in the majority to 'stop up, ' obfuscate, confuse, and remove blacks from succeeding alongside themselves in the south. 

Blacks owed their slave masters nothing, not even for their freedom and liberty, because the majority of southern "gentlemen" fought to keep blacks as property and substandard citizens in the new republic.

Lawfully, a majority of white southerners disenfranchised blacks through poll taxation, literacy tests, and so forth. Question is this: Were any southern whites required to pay poll taxation, pass literacy tests, and,/or those so forths mentioned!

 
 

Who is online



230 visitors