Fox Hack Claims Audio Tapes Of Biden Crimes
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Jesse Watters
@JesseBWatters
Senator Grassley just revealed that a highly credible FBI informant says the Burisma exec who allegedly bribed Joe Biden, has 17 audio recordings speaking with Joe and Hunter. This allegation should lead to the impeachment or resignation of Joe Biden, if true. The FBI tried to cover this up by redacting these allegations in the document released to the House Oversight Committee. Primetime is calling on the Biden administration, the FBI and DOJ to release the tapes immediately.
Tags
Who is online
149 visitors
The timing of this "revelation" is amazing. Just when Trump and the right wing of American politics needs it most.
These alleged audio tapes were allegedly made years ago. Since they are allegedly in the possession of an anti-Biden Burisma executive he could have produced them at any point over the past few years.
If there are audios so damaging that they would cause Biden to be impeached or resign, where are they? Why are they still a secret?
This is all right wing gaslighting, and the old fool Grassley is participating and wallowing in it.
Let's see how much coverage the left wing media gives it
Lets see some evidence first. So far the republican committees are nothing but innuendo and "allegations'. We are now 6 months into Republican control of these committees and they have come up with nothing but three ex FBI agents who were let go for cause, and a murky connection to someone in Ukraine who claims to know something damaging about Joe Biden. Not exactly World News Tonight material.
We have the usual government obstruction. Do you now accept evidence?
You still haven't accepted the Russia hoax being a hoax.
You still haven't accepted the fact that Michael Brown died struggling to get officer Darren Wilson's gun.
That comment is hysterical coming from you! Do you have Schitt? Pelosi or Naders irrefutable proof that Trump colluded with Russia? Fucking hysterical that you now demand proof.
I always demand proof. I've never vouched for anything about Trump that I wasnt sure of. The allegations of the Steele Dossier were allegations, and I never said anything other than that.
Believe me, there is more than enough proof of Trumps wrongdoing to last a lifetime.
There's already more evidence than justified spying on the Trump campaign, a special counsel etc,
Donald Trumps campaign colluded with Russia. His son, for gods sake, met with what he thought was a representative of the Russian government in order to get "dirt" on his fathers political opponent. I dont even need another example to demonstrate "collusion". His campaign manager "colluded" with a Russian spy. He himself asked "Russia" to hack his political opponents computers. The only possible "hoax" was that the Steele Dossier did not pan out. It wasnt a "hoax" , it was bad information.
Michael Brown did not die struggling to get the cops gun. I dont know where you getting that from. Brown, who was unarmed, was shot by Wilson from a distance too far for him to have been "struggling" to get the officers gun.
[Deleted]
When you have to resort to a personal attack you have epically failed.......again
hey Tex, do you think Putins' Russia was pulling for Hillary to win in 2016 ?
that's rich coming from you
If you want to counter what I said, then counter it.
is not a counter. Trump Jr met with a woman he thought represented the Russian government in order to get dirt on Hillary. That is not an opinion it is a known fact. There are emails that prove that intent. I call that collusion.
If you keep up with non responsive crap like "that is a lie" instead of making a case for your viewpoint, I am going to start deleting you.
I dont resort to personal attacks, I make cogent points. The "personal attacks" are an extra added attraction.
What part of my post was a lie?
I am not going to get into a long back and forth with your nonsense, like some of these people unfortunately end up doing.
If you dont get specific right now I am going to start deleting you.
Mueller never said Don Jr was innocent , he said he didnt think he could win a conviction because Don Jr didnt understand he was breaking the law. Don Jr intended to get dirt on Hillary from a representative of Russia, he just didnt realize it was illegal.
You realize how hypocritical your position is don't you John? It's almost like you embrace the hypocrisy of your position.
You are going to be joining Texan.
ewe claim, rather sheepishly i might add, that there was no collusion between Russia and the Trump campaign. I sorta remember where there was an afwul LOT of intersection between the two, just not quite enough to prove without a doubt, collusion, but to thinking individuals, it is a moot point, i guess. and by the way, when i am eventually able to FLY, i will be FLYING and FCKING,as in giving flying fcks all over the place !
Who have i personally attacked? but your personal attack tells me what i need to know about you.
So yes, you embrace the hypocrisy of your position.
People can respond.
but , i'm just a silent freshman....
So, if you don't like it , you can put someone on ignore.
Simple right?
I told you to stop posting vague comments. If you disagree with what I say bring some information.
Yet you tell someone to stop commenting to you, which can't or won't be enforced.
There’s actually lots of evidence of Trump-Russia collusion
Web Trump quite openly ran on a pro-Russia platform, adopting Russian views on the conflicts in Syria and Ukraine, defending Putin’s character, and vowing to break up the NATO alliance.
Bipartisan Senate Report Shows 2016 Trump, Russia Collusion
Web The most important evidence of collusion has either already been exposed ( Trump officials taking a meeting with a Russian agent offering Vladimir Putin’s help with the campaign ) …
As it turns out, there really was collusion between the Trump campaign ...
Web Aug 19, 2020 · Although Mueller’s report detailed evidence of Russian interference and the Trump team’s welcome receipt of help from Moscow, there was insufficient evidence on the so-called “collusion” —...
Mueller Confirms: Don Jr. Was Too Stupid to Collude
Web Apr 18, 2019 · April 18, 2019 For the entirety of the special counsel’s investigation into possible collusion between Russia and the Trump …
Donald Trump Jr. 'Knew of Moscow's Involvement': Report
Web Jul 12, 2017 · (NEW YORK) — Donald Trump Jr . was told in an email before meeting a Russian lawyer who he thought had material damaging to Hillary Clinton that it was part …
June 2016: Trump Jr., Kushner and Manafort meet with Russians at Trump Tower in Manhattan
On June 3, 2016, Goldstone, the publicist, reached out to Trump Jr. with a request from the younger Agalarov that would set off the now-infamous Trump Tower meeting in New York. Goldstone said the Russians had documents that could “incriminate” Clinton, and Trump Jr. replied, “if it’s what you say I love it.”
really george?
dopting Russian views on the conflicts in Syria and Ukraine,
Lol. First off, even if true, it's not collusion. That would make any opinion agreeing with the view of any other country "collusion." That's insane.
Second, of course, the US took a much harder stand against Russia under Trump than Obama did. Remember Obama refusing to give weapons to the Ukrainians after Russia attacked? Trump armed the Ukrainians.
Nothing you've linked to demonstrates collusion.
Trump Jr colluded with a Russian who promised dirt on Hillary. The fact that the special counsel decided not to prosecute him for it doesnt change shit. The word collusion often connotes illegality but it is not necessary to support use of the term. The meeting was secret and dishonest.
Let me ask you this, from all you know, do you think the Trump campaign was willing to collude with Russia? Did they do a single thing to discourage Russia meddling in the campaign? To the contrary, Trump openly encouraged it.
And his son, on the receipt of an email promising dirt on Hillary from a source that was described, to him, as connected to the Russian government said "...I love it".
What did Trump Jr promise or give Russia during this meeting?
I find it highly amusing the party that solicited negative information about Trump from Russian officials is so upset by that meeting.
So stop complaining about something that is under your own control and stop asking for things that cannot be enforced...
My business? Ah, this is a comment site...
I am not the one with last worditis... You could easily stop yet you think you have to have the last word on everything
On Jun 3, 2016, at 10:36 AM, Rob Goldstone wrote:
Good morning
Emin just called and asked me to contact you with something very interesting.
The Crown prosecutor of Russia met with his father Aras this morning and in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father.
This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government's support for Mr. Trump - helped along by Aras and Emin.
What do you think is the best way to handle this information and would you be able to speak to Emin about it directly?
I can also send this info to your father via Rhona, but it is ultra sensitive so wanted to send to you first.
Best
Rob Goldstone
T
On Jun 3, 2016, at 10:53, Donald Trump Jr. wrote:
Thanks Rob I appreciate that. I am on the road at the moment but perhaps I just speak to Emin first. Seems we have some time and if it's what you say I love it especially later in the summer. Could we do a call first thing next week when I am back?
Best,
Don
Sent from my iPhone
video at link
Let's hear the recordings and then discuss the merits.
By this time, 12 hours or so after Fox News publicized this allegation, we can easily assume that most of MAGA not only accepts that these tapes exist, but is trying to spread the "allegation" all over social media.
This is a headline from the far right website The Daily Caller today
Grassley Reveals Existence Of Biden Tapes Related To Bribery Allegations
Nothing about "if' or that it is an unproven allegation, rather they state the innuendo as if it were established fact.
It's true John. Get used to it
It might be true, how on Earth do you know it is true?
Watters is certainly not someone to be trusted. He is a Tucker wannabe.
And how do you know it isn't. Maybe wait for the facts?
Why don't you read what people write?:
On your say so? On Jim Jordans? On Chuck Grassley's or James Comer's ? LOL.
So you think the FBI is engaged in a conspiracy to falsely claim they were told of the existence of these tapes?
if Trump wasn't the founder of a cult, he would have been and should have been
Too bad he doesn't do a convincing Jim Jones immatation and fly to Guyana