╌>

Hunter Biden Special Counsel Shoots Down GOP Witch Hunt

  
Via:  John Russell  •  3 years ago  •  30 comments


Hunter Biden Special Counsel Shoots Down GOP Witch Hunt
 

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Glenn Thrush
@GlennThrush

David Weiss, the special counsel in the Hunter Biden case, told House Republicans today that he was the lone, and ultimate “decision maker” and “at no time blocked” from doing anything he wanted, according to his opening remarks before a closed-door committee interview.

11:59 AM · Nov 7, 2023
·
15.2K
Views


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago

The Comer-Jordan-Gaetz theory is that Joe biden and Merrick Garland prevented Weiss from doing his job. 

David Charles Weiss  (born 1956) is an American attorney. He was nominated by President  Donald Trump  to be  United States Attorney  for the  United States District Court for the District of Delaware
 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @1    3 years ago

Recommended by  both democratic Delaware Senators, he was one  of only two District Attorneys retained by Biden, no doubt happy by Weiss's refusal to do anything with regards to Hunter Biden. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1    3 years ago

How many times are the 3 stooges on that committee going to push their ridiculous theory?  The very man at the heart of it says it never happened. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.1    3 years ago

"When he was specifically asked, did you ever request special attorney authority under Section 515, Mr. Weiss's response was yes, in the spring of 2022. So that that goes to the heart of the matter. He requested it was not given that request and never had that authority throughout the time and yet he pretends that somehow he did have that.

And then finally, of course, on October 8 of this year, he gets special counsel status when he requests that from the Attorney General

. So to me, that's the key takeaway. He won't answer a lot of questions. But that's the key takeaway, because this whole deposition was about the changing story we got from DOJ, regarding the authority that he had. And that answer, I think the key is, is entirely consistent with what Mr. Shapley said after the October 7, 2022 meeting, when he said USA Weiss requested Special Counsel authority when it was sent to DC and Main DOJ denied his request and told him to follow the process.   So once again Shapley and Ziegler's testimony continues to stand up to every single witness we brought in for an interview."

If he had already had the authority, why did he need special counsel status?  The special counsel appointment in October,  2023 makes no sense if you believe he already had all the authority he needed.  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.1.5  Sean Treacy  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.4    3 years ago
seems like the Justice Department has botched the whole thing from the very beginning. 

100%.  And it's not even debatable. I invite anyone who thinks otherwise to refuse to pay taxes this year and see if the DOJ, when it learns of your failure to pay, will simply let the SOL expire without any punishment or even restitution, which the DOJ did for Biden in 2014 and 2015. His 2016 and 2017 taxes were paid by a Democratic donor. 

It's impossible to learn the details of what actually happened and not believe Hunter Biden was protected, to an extraordinary degree.  Which is why these "rebuttal" stories avoid all of the details of what happened and focus on meaningless semantic disputes. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.6  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.1.2    3 years ago

Jim Jordan is a clown. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.7  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @1.1.3    3 years ago

If you start trolling this article you are going be deleted. 

 
 
 
Gazoo
Masters Silent
1.1.8  Gazoo  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.7    3 years ago

Damn right! How dare he post an opposing opinion!

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
1.2  goose is back  replied to  JohnRussell @1    3 years ago
He was nominated by President   Donald Trump    to be    United States Attorney    

Yes, JR that is true, but you are forgetting where he came from

Although Democrats point to Weiss’s appointment by President  Donald Trump  as evidence of his independence, the full story of his career is more nuanced, as he spent two years as acting U.S. attorney under President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden and then remained as a top deputy for the remainder of their term. Hunter Biden special counsel David Weiss once worked with Beau Biden - The Washington Post
 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
2  Sean Treacy    3 years ago

As usual, the headline misleads as the democrats trust people won't pay attention to details and will simply swallow whatever spin they were told. 

Weiss actually confirmed the IRS whistleblower's testimony and contradicted Garland. He requested special attorney status in 2022 inn order to bring charges in California and was denied.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago
I have voluntarily agreed to appear before this committee. To my knowledge, I am the first Special Counsel to testify before the submission of the Special Counsel report. I have done so out of respect for the committee's oversight responsibilities and to respond to questions raised about the scope of my authority.

I am in the midst of conducting an ongoing investigation and prosecution and will be limited as to what I can say at this point. I will prepare a report at the conclusion of the work by the Special Counsel's Office and will be able to share more information at that time

Today, I am prepared to address misunderstandings about the scope of my authority to decide where, when, and whether to bring charges in this matter. I do not intend to answer questions that could jeopardize the ongoing litigation, our investigations, or the rights of defendants or other individuals involved in these matters.

I am, and have been, the decision-maker on this case. I do not, however, make these decisions in a vacuum. I am bound by federal law, the principles of federal prosecution and DOI guidelines. As a result, there are processes that I must adhere to in making investigative and charging decisions. These processes did not interfere with my decision-making authority. At no time was I blocked, or otherwise prevented from pursuing charges or taking the steps necessary in the investigation by other United States Attorneys, the Tax Division or anyone else at the Department of Justice

As have said previously, I did not request Special Counsel status until August 2023. When I made that request, it was promptly granted.


Throughout this investigation, the career prosecutors on my team and I have made decisions based on the facts and the law. Political considerations played no part in our decision-making . Our analysis has been moored to the principles of federal prosecution, and going forward, my team and I will continue to abide by the same principles as we try to bring this matter to a just conclusion.
 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @3    3 years ago

What is the point of the continuing right wing witch hunt on this particular matter?

Its simple.  Donald Trump, their god, wants it. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.1.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1    3 years ago
"What is the point of the continuing right wing witch hunt on this particular matter?"

It's called following the evidence, of which there is a lot. It's common knowledge the whole Biden clan is corrupt.

After all, the left carried investigations against Trump to hell and back.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1    3 years ago
the point of the continuing right wing witch hunt on this particular matter?

Knowing you are from Chicago, I guess you assume that children of politicians getting special treatment from law enforcement is how government operates. Some people think that's  a bad idea and entitled kids should have to follow the law like the rest of us with no strings pulled in their favor. . 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @3    3 years ago

Why did he request it in 2023 if he always had the power to pursue the investigation?  Why didn't he mention in his opening statement that he was denied special attorney (different than special counsel)  status in 2022, which he then  admitted during the interview?  

He's just playing semantic games to distract from his actions.  

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
3.2.1  Snuffy  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.2    3 years ago

Agreed.  And if he always had the power to pursue the investigations, why did he also not mention that he tried to partner with the U.S. attorney's in both the District of Columbia and the central district of California and both declined to partner with him in an investigation and/or charges. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago
Decoding Fox News
@DecodingFoxNews
Judge Jeanine and Jesse Watters claimed Joe Biden got money from the Chinese but have no evidence to back it up. When Harold Ford Jr. points out that he wasn't in office at the time his brother paid him for a loan they say the payment was for past influence - with NO evidence.
These The Five right wingers are the biggest jackasses possible. Watch the video at the link
Someone says Biden was in the tank for China (because they were paying him) when he was the VP for 8 years, and also his three years so far as president. 
Evidence of this ?  LOL. They dont need no stinking evidence, they just need a bunch of morons in their tv audience. 
The old drunk Jeanine Pirro did shriek "Chinese Communist Party" a couple times though. 
 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @4    3 years ago
When Harold Ford Jr. points out that he wasn't in office at the time

That's the argument now? Lol.. Just pretending the lobbying industry doesn't exist? 

That's literally  the whole point of lobbying, exploiting political connections.  It's why so many former office holders become lobbyists.

 They dont need no stinking evide

Of course they have evidence, including a verified money trail. 

Why won't Biden simply produce the checks and documentation to prove there was a loan? 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.1    3 years ago

The morons on The Five said that Biden gave favorable treatment to China from 2009-2016, and also 2021-2023, as a quid pro quo for payments to him from China. . 

What is the EVIDENCE of that ? 

Not speculation, evidence. 

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.2  JBB  replied to  JohnRussell @4    3 years ago

The MAGA are up in arms that Biden might have been selling his political influence in 2018. They also demand to know why he and Obama were not in the White House on 9-11 and where Biden was the night the Lindberg Baby was abducted. Need I say any more?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.2.1  bugsy  replied to  JBB @4.2    3 years ago
The MAGA are up in arms that Biden might have been selling his political influence in 2018.

Not just 2018, nut also starting around 2014 when dementia Joe was Vice President.

"They also demand to know why he and Obama were not in the White House on 9-11 and where Biden was the night the Lindberg Baby was abducted"

Utter stupidity

"Need I say any more?"

Please don't

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
4.2.2  JBB  replied to  bugsy @4.2.1    3 years ago

original

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.2.3  bugsy  replied to  JBB @4.2.2    3 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
4.2.4  charger 383  replied to  JBB @4.2.2    3 years ago

.4.2.2 stands, member it was addressed to responded to it.  charger

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Guide
4.2.5  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JBB @4.2.2    3 years ago

Why is he wearing a puffy shirt, is he a pirate?

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5  Vic Eldred    3 years ago

The whole thing wreaks of a coverup. I don't expect to get to the bottom of it for years to come, if ever.

 
 

Who is online






83 visitors