Laura Ingraham Sounds a Lot Like Tucker Carlson in Wild Dystopian Rant
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Fox News host Laura Ingraham tried to gin up more fears Wednesday of a far-fetched dystopian future under President Joe Biden ’s leadership—suggesting that Donald Trump ’s legal woes were part of a sinister plot masterminded by Democrats to impose martial law.
She suggested Trump’s various criminal charges and even the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to boot him from the state’s ballot were all part of a calculated plan to make Trump’s supporters act out publicly, giving Biden the pretense to institute a “mass crack down on civil liberties”—which would ultimately clear the way for nationwide mail-in voting during the 2024 presidential election.
“What we are seeing in the courts, at the Department of Justice, and even in State Attorneys General’s offices, and given Democrats’ ‘ Trump is Hitler ’ rhetoric, is it not logical, even to consider, maybe to assume that some on the left are hoping to spark some type of civil unrest here?” Ingraham began.
“Which would be followed, of course, by a mass crackdown on civil liberties or the declaration of maybe a nationwide emergency, all as a way—a [protective] way—to usher in, I don’t know, nationwide mail-in voting?” she wondered.
“Remember, the left loved the lockdowns. They loved the 2020 riots, and they even loved the weapon that Jan. 6 gave them,” continued Ingraham, sounding like Fox News contributor Kellyanne Conway earlier in the day . “And, of course they really, really love the idea of universal mail-in or even internet voting.”
On the other hand, it requires no assumptions to see that Trump’s ambitions are rooted in “retribution,” because he has said so . His agenda for a second term, The Washington Post reported last month , includes potentially invoking the Insurrection Act to use the military against civilians.
According to that report, Trump has also said privately that he wants to use the Justice Department to go after his political adversaries, like Bill Barr and Gen. Mark Milley.
Trump also stated last year that the “termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution” was justified—all because he lost the 2020 election. And in a Fox News town hall earlier this month, he admitted that he would be “dictator” on “day one” and refused to rule out breaking the law if reelected.
Tags
Who is online
115 visitors
For God's sakes, this woman has a daily national television show. She can't control herself ?
And in a Fox News town hall earlier this month, he admitted that he would be “dictator” on “day one” and refused to rule out breaking the law if reelected.
So what do you call it when an article says something that is technically true but leaves out the part where he said he would only be a dictator on day one, not after that? How is that different from any president that signs a half dozen executive orders on day one?
How about Trump doesn't say at all that he wants to be a dictator on day one, or any day.
The way you people always make excuses for this asshole, every day, is unbelievable.
How about honesty in journalism?
I feel the same way about the nit picky bullshit every day. There are plenty of real things to criticize him for without making shit up or taking comments out of context. It lends to questioning credibility so when there is a valid point it is just ignored.
He is a worthless piece of shit. American media have been far too kind to him over the past 8 1/2 years.
We have an entire generation of high school age kids who think that this insanity is perfectly normal because they have never been told anything different.
How is that different from any president that signs a half dozen executive orders on day one?
So he said what every president does on day one. Like I said, nit picky
Now that is funny
What class are they teaching this in? The vast majority of high school kids in my town think he is a tool.
“The vast majority of high school kids in my town think he is a tool.”
[Deleted]
It was fun when she used to be on across from Lawrence O Donnell. It was like switching between opposing wing nuts.
Or complaining about this wing nut while posting an article from a leftist wing nut on the same day?