╌>

Iowa won't participate in U.S. food assistance program for kids this summer

  
Via:  John Russell  •  3 years ago  •  14 comments


Iowa won't participate in U.S. food assistance program for kids this summer
Officials in nearby Nebraska also announced last week that the state will not participate in Summer EBT, which would cost Nebraska about $300,000 annually in administrative costs, the Lincoln Journal Star reported. “In the end, I fundamentally believe that we solve the problem, and I don’t believe in welfare,” Nebraska Republican Gov. Jim Pillen told the Journal Star on Friday.

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Iowa   will not participate this summer in a   federal program   that gives $40 per month to each child in a low-income family to help with food costs while school is out, state officials have announced.

The state has notified the U.S. Department of Agriculture that it will not participate in the 2024 Summer Electronic Benefits Transfer for Children — or Summer   EBT   — program, the state's Department of Health and Human Services and Department of Education said in a Friday news release.

“Federal COVID-era cash benefit programs are not sustainable and don’t provide long-term solutions for the issues impacting children and families. An EBT card does nothing to promote nutrition at a time when childhood obesity has become an epidemic," Iowa Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds said in the news release.

She added, “If the Biden Administration and Congress want to make a real commitment to family well-being, they should invest in already existing programs and infrastructure at the state level and give us the flexibility to tailor them to our state’s needs."

States that participate in the federal program are required to cover half of the administrative costs, which would cost an estimated $2.2 million in Iowa, the news release says.

Some state lawmakers, including Democratic Sen. Izaah Knox of Des Moines, voiced their opposition to the decision.

“It’s extremely disappointing that the Reynolds administration is planning to reject federal money that could put food on the table for hungry Iowa kids,” Knox said in a statement. “This cruel and short-sighted decision will have real impacts on children and families in my district and communities all across Iowa.”

Officials in nearby Nebraska also announced last week that the state will not participate in Summer EBT, which would cost Nebraska about $300,000 annually in administrative costs, the Lincoln Journal Star reported.

“In the end, I fundamentally believe that we solve the problem, and I don’t believe in welfare,” Nebraska Republican Gov. Jim Pillen told the Journal Star on Friday.

But Nebraska will continue participating in a different federal program, called the Summer Food Service Program, which combines programming — like reading, physical activity and nutrition education — with food assistance, according to the Journal Star.

“We just want to make sure that they’re out. They’re at church camps. They’re at schools. They’re at 4-H. And we’ll take care of them at all of the places that they’re at, so that they’re out amongst [other people] and not feeding a welfare system with food at home," Pillen said.

A bipartisan group of Nebraska lawmakers have urged the state to reconsider, saying Summer EBT would address the needs of vulnerable children and benefit the state economically, the Journal Star reported.

At least 18 states and territories and two tribal nations — Cherokee Nation and Chickasaw Nation — have announced they intend to participate in Summer EBT in 2024, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. The list includes California, Arizona, Kansas, Minnesota, West Virginia, American Samoa and Guam, among others.

States, territories and eligible tribal nations have until Jan. 1 to notify the Department of Agriculture of their intent to participate in the program this summer.

This story originally appeared in   Los Angeles Times .


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    3 years ago
“In the end, I fundamentally believe that we solve the problem, and I don’t believe in welfare,” Nebraska Republican Gov. Jim Pillen told the Journal Star on Friday.

If he doesnt believe in welfare he doesnt believe in America. Without the social safety net we wouldnt be the country we are. Capitalism creates a poor underclass and without "welfare" there would be considerable social unrest. 

 
 
 
fineline
Freshman Silent
1.1  fineline  replied to  JohnRussell @1    3 years ago

More GOP political cruelty. They refuse to help their citizens in their formative years, when needed the most, and always find the funding for a new prison. The result of false churches, bigotry and greed. Merry Christmas  in the mid-west! The square states have always sucked!

 
 
 
SteevieGee
Professor Silent
1.2  SteevieGee  replied to  JohnRussell @1    3 years ago

What a great idea by Gov. Reynolds.  Proper nutrition is essential to brain development in children so this one little thing could secure GOP majorities in the Iowa statehouse for a generation.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
2  Greg Jones    3 years ago

We have all kinds of welfare in the US, and yet we have considerable social unrest.

Care to explain?

 
 
 
fineline
Freshman Silent
2.1  fineline  replied to  Greg Jones @2    3 years ago

False churches, bigotry and greed !

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
3  Ronin2    3 years ago

So Covid emergency relief programs are to be extended indefinitely?

So much for Democrat fiscal responsibility.

What about Brandon's booming economy, record low unemployment, and record high markets?

How can so many families still be hungry?

Or is Brandonomics all really a bunch of BS when inflation, gas prices, etc. are factored in?

 
 
 
fineline
Freshman Silent
3.1  fineline  replied to  Ronin2 @3    3 years ago

False churches, bigotry and greed !

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.1.1  bugsy  replied to  fineline @3.1    3 years ago

Made no sense the first time.

 
 
 
fineline
Freshman Silent
3.1.2  fineline  replied to  bugsy @3.1.1    3 years ago

[Deleted]

 
 
 
fineline
Freshman Silent
3.1.4  fineline  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.3    3 years ago

The GOP is responsible for Bidenomics. The GOP IS false churches, bigotry and greed. Think about the idea of religion, no matter the flavor. Two monkeys sitting on a branch, one monkey looks up at the sun, then turns to the other monkey and says "Give me all your money." The second monkey, being of a different species, refuses. The first monkey, being a larger species, takes from the second monkey what he wants and justifies the action with his religion.  

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
3.1.5  Snuffy  replied to  fineline @3.1.4    3 years ago
The GOP is responsible for Bidenomics.

WTF???  If the GOP is responsible, then why the hell is Biden out there promoting it for his re-election like the best thing since sliced bread? 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
3.1.7  Right Down the Center  replied to  fineline @3.1.4    3 years ago

It finally all makes sense. The gop came up with a disastrous economic policy and named it after biden so he would be blamed. I bet they were surprised when brain dead joe took it as his own and is now touting it as his. 

 
 

Who is online





73 visitors