╌>

America's long history of anti-Haitian racism, explained

  
Via:  John Russell  •  2 months ago  •  30 comments

By:   DNyuz

America's long history of anti-Haitian racism, explained
This past week, Republicans amplified a barrage of strange and racist claims about Haitian immigrants, including falsely suggesting that they're

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


America’s long history of anti-Haitian racism, explained


Vox 10-12 minutes   9/15/2024





This past week, Republicans   amplified a barrage of strange and racist claims about Haitian immigrants, including falsely suggesting   that they’re consuming people’s house pets

The unfounded attacks came from   official party social media accounts ,   lawmakers , and from both members of the GOP’s presidential ticket. Vice presidential candidate   JD Vance said Monday   that “Haitian illegal immigrants” are “causing chaos,” while former President Donald Trump   emphatically, and falsely, claimed   during his Tuesday debate with Vice President Kamala Harris that, “they’re eating the pets of the people that live there, and this is what’s happening in our country.”

The comments echo well-worn tropes, and past attempts to tie Haitian immigrants to everything from the   spread of illness   to   upticks in crime

Republicans have elevated these messages as they seek to make immigration a flashpoint in the November election, capitalizing on   voters’ dissatisfaction with current trends . The attacks also come as   rampant political instability and gang violence in Haiti has displaced thousands of people   — and as the Biden administration has   approved temporary protections   and   humanitarian parole   for some new arrivals. 

The stereotypes the GOP is harping on, however, have been around for much longer.

In fact, as experts tell Vox, these types of ugly attacks are the byproduct of centuries of anti-Black racism and xenophobic sentiment, which have been used over and over to justify restrictive immigration policies that single out Haitian people. The decision to resurface them in 2024 is, once again, creating a palpably dangerous environment, and adding to this legacy. 

“It’s a part of a very old historic pattern,”   Regine Jackson , a sociologist and the Dean of Humanities at Morehouse College, told Vox. “It’s the idea that they could do something so inhuman, so un-American. That’s the message underneath, that these people will never be like us.”

Anti-Haitian racism has deep roots


Attacks on Haitian immigrants tap into the longstanding US framing of Haiti as a threat. 

“Racism and xenophobia against Haitians among white Americans can be traced all the way back to the Haitian Revolution when Haitians … [overthrew] the system of slavery and [established] the world’s first Black republic,” Carl Lindskoog, the author of a book   on the US’s detention of Haitian immigrants,   told Vox. “Since then, Haitians have been seen by many white Americans as a threat to white rule and have been treated as such.”

In 1804, Haitians successfully overthrew colonial rule and enslavement by France. Concerned that Haitians’ victory would inspire enslaved people in America to pursue a similar revolution, the US did not recognize Haiti’s independence for nearly six decades. 

Following the revolution,   France used military force to demand financial restitution   for loss of the colony, forcing Haiti to borrow money to cover its demands. The US and France provided those loans — and used them to continue exerting control over Haiti’s finances for years.   In total, a New York Times investigation   found that reparations to France cost Haiti’s economy $21 billion and directly contributed to poverty and financial problems that still plague the country to this day. 

The US also occupied Haiti by force from 1915 to 1934, more than a century after its successful revolution, under the flimsy justification that it was there to ensure political stability following the assassination of multiple Haitian presidents.   In reality,   it mounted the occupation to prevent France or Germany from gaining ground in the region, which was viewed as strategically valuable. During this time, the US set up a   system of forced labor , and sold Haitian land to American corporations. 

The takeover also sent a demeaning message: that Haiti wasn’t capable of handling its own affairs. 

“A lot of scholars have talked about … rhetoric that’s used to justify invasion around civilizing a society,” says   Jamella Gow , a sociologist at Bowdoin University. “This notion of Haitians as backwards, criminal and dangerous started way back then.” The association of Haiti with voodoo practices, something self-help author Marianne Williamson, who ran in the Democratic presidential primary in 2020 and 2024, evoked this week, is another tactic that’s been used to suggest that they’re a “mysterious … migrant other,” says Gow.

In the decades since, the US’s treatment of Haitian immigrants has built on and reinforced these ideas. That was evident in the 1970s, when a wave of Haitian migrants sought asylum in the US as they tried to escape political persecution from   US-backed dictator Jean Claude Duvalier.   Many of these arrivals were detained   and denied asylum, though they met the qualifications for it.

These practices set a precedent for the detention of asylum-seekers, a punitive approach the US still employs now. In a 1980   Haitian Refugee Center v. Civiletti   case, the Fifth Circuit ruled that the US government had singled Haitians out and practiced blatant racism in its immigration policies. Despite this decision, then-President Jimmy Carter and his successors   managed to find loopholes to keep up this approach . In the years that followed, while a surge of Cuban and Haitian migrants came to the US around the same time, Haitian people were far more likely to   stay in detention compared to their Cuban counterparts

The stigmatization of Haitian immigrants continued, too, in subsequent decades, including efforts to associate Haitians with illnesses, such as HIV. In the early 1980s, when no scientific name had been given to HIV/AIDS,   the press and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention deemed it the 4H disease   — which stood for “Haitians, Homosexuals, Hemophiliacs, and Heroin users,” in part because some of the early cases of the illness included Haitian people. 

A fear of HIV — and the framing of Haitian immigrants as carriers of disease — was among the reasons that led the US to detain Haitian asylum seekers at Guantanamo Bay during the 1990s. (Thousands were detained and deported, while some who   were HIV-positive   were threatened with indefinite detention.) That’s part of a long history of the US government deeming immigrants   health hazards   in order to stymie their entry into the country — a practice that was again   embraced during the Covid-19 pandemic

Both the Trump and Biden administrations used a   federal authority known as Title 42   to turn away migrants due to public health concerns during and following pandemic. Haitians were one of the largest groups turned away at the southern border on these grounds, Lindsvoog said. 

Other attacks on Haitians were also evident in both administrations, such as when Trump himself referred to Haiti as a “shithole” country, and when border patrol officers were   captured riding on horses and using their reins   to confront Haitian immigrants under Biden. 

These types of attacks have real consequences


In the town of Springfield, Ohio, the latest GOP invective is already doing real-world harm. 

On Tuesday, Trump gave the conspiracy its largest platform yet, and since then, the claims about the immigrants, which have been   repeatedly debunked , have only spread. 

In the wake of all this, Haitian immigrants in Springfield — the town in which the GOP claims the pet eating is taking place — have experienced property damage and are keeping their children home from school out of concerns for safety,   the Haitian Times reports .

Springfield’s city hall was also evacuated on Thursday   in response to a bomb threat,   and two elementary schools were evacuated on Friday   due to concerns about public safety.   The municipality’s mayor   has said he believes both incidents are tied to the claims that have been made about Haitian migrants. 

Springfield, a town of roughly 60,000 people in the southwestern part of the state, has found itself in Republican crosshairs due to the changes it’s seen since 2020. About 15,000 Haitian people have moved to Springfield for jobs   following a manufacturing boom there , and while the growth in population has helped rejuvenate the town ,   it’s also put   pressure on social services   in the form of longer wait times at medical clinics and more competition for affordable housing, fueling some animosity toward the newcomers.

That anger only intensified in 2023, following a school bus accident that killed 11-year-old Aiden Clark, since the driver of the car involved was a Haitian immigrant. Republicans and right-wing figures have since invoked Clark’s death to highlight the threat immigrants pose —   something his parents have begged them to stop doing

This hostility toward Haitian immigrants has resulted in neo-Nazis and Republican lawmakers spreading lies about immigrants eating not just pets, but also ducks from the local parks. There is no evidence of this, Springfield officials have said. One instance of a woman — neither an immigrant nor of Haitian descent — eating a cat took place in Canton, Ohio, which is many miles away. 

Tropes about people eating pets aren’t new, and have long been used to demonize immigrant communities in the US,   including Asian immigrants . Such stereotypes allow Republicans to paint immigrants, including Haitian people, as “forever foreigners” in a bid to ostracize them. The focus on pets, in particular, is designed to undercut immigrants’ humanity, and to suggest that they could harm something people hold dear, says Jackson. 

“This kind of language, this kind of disinformation, is dangerous because there will be people that believe it, no matter how ludicrous and stupid it is, and they might act on that kind of information and act on it in a way where somebody could get hurt. So it needs to stop,” White House spokesperson John Kirby said at a press briefing Tuesday. 

Vance downplayed these concerns after Tuesday’s presidential debate when he was asked about his comments by   NBC’s Yamiche Alcindor . “What do I think is a bigger problem? Insulting 20,000 people or the fact that my constituents can’t live a good life because Kamala Harris opened the border?” Vance said. 

As US history — and the threats Springfield faced this week — makes clear, however, these racist ideas can have a direct influence on policies, and lead to immediate, and dire, consequences. 

The post   America’s long history of anti-Haitian racism, explained   appeared first on   Vox .



Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    2 months ago
Tropes about people eating pets aren’t new, and have long been used to demonize immigrant communities in the US,    including Asian immigrants  . Such stereotypes allow Republicans to paint immigrants, including Haitian people, as “forever foreigners” in a bid to ostracize them. The focus on pets, in particular, is designed to undercut immigrants’ humanity, and to suggest that they could harm something people hold dear, says Jackson.  “This kind of language, this kind of disinformation, is dangerous because there will be people that believe it, no matter how ludicrous and stupid it is, and they might act on that kind of information and act on it in a way where somebody could get hurt. So it needs to stop,” White House spokesperson John Kirby said at a press briefing Tuesday. 
 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
2  Tessylo    2 months ago

Every time the former 'president convicted felon and rapist and traitor and racist scumbag is asked about the bomb threats and the threats to Springfield, he doubles, triples, quadruples down.  What a hateful son of a bitch.  What a racist.  Him and Vance.

He says they're terrorizing and taking over the town.  

He and Vance and maga are the terrorists.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3  Sean Treacy    2 months ago

I’m shocked, shocked, that vox didn’t mention the slave revolt resulted in a race war against whites. . From Wikipedia sanitized version

thousands of slaves attended a secret vodou ceremony as a tropical storm came in — the lightning and the thunder were taken as auspicious omens — and later that night, the slaves began to kill their masters and plunged the colony into civil war . [ 47 ] The signal to begin the revolt had been given by Dutty Boukman , a high priest of vodou and leader of the Maroon slaves , and Cecile Fatiman during a religious ceremony at Bois Caïman on the night of 14 August. [ 48 ] Within the next ten days, slaves had taken control of the entire Northern Province in an unprecedented slave revolt. Whites kept control of only a few isolated, fortified camps. The slaves sought revenge on their masters through "pillage, rape, torture, mutilation, and death". [ 49 ] The long years of oppression by the planters had left many blacks with a hatred of all whites, and the revolt was marked by extreme violence from the very start. The masters and mistresses were dragged from their beds to be killed, and the heads of French children were placed on pikes that were carried at the front of the rebel columns . [ 4

maybe putting kids on pikes caused pushback? Seems relevant. So does the billions upon billions of aid americans have given haiti. But VOX is a far left site that pushes propaganda, rather than reality.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @3    2 months ago

The American slave Nat Turner led a brief revolt that involved the murder of dozens of people , including white women and children.  Slaveowner families. 

Was Nat Turner vile for using killing to try and gain freedom?  If the choice was killing white people or remaining a slave, what choice would you have liked him to make?  

-

from the wiki article you link

In October 1790, another wealthy free man of color,  Vincent Ogé , demanded the  right to vote  under the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen. When the colonial governor refused, Ogé led a brief 300-man  insurgency  in the area around Le Cap, fighting to end racial discrimination in the area.  He was captured in early 1791, and brutally executed by being "broken on the  wheel " before being beheaded.

It is not pleasant to think that a war for freedom led to "atrocities". What about the atrocities that set the stage for this "race war" as you call it? 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1    2 months ago
as Nat Turner vile for using killing to try and gain freedom? 

Yes. Targeting unarmed women and kids for murder in cold blood is vile. 

a.  He was captured in early 1791, and brutally executed by being "broken on the   wheel  " before being beheaded.

Yes, the punishments for treason were horrific whether black or white.  

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.2  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.1    2 months ago
Yes. Targeting unarmed women and kids for murder in cold blood is vile. 

Yes, better he remained a slave and watch his women and children be physically and sexually abused, not to mention live their entire lives without knowing freedom. 

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
3.1.3  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1    2 months ago
Was Nat Turner vile for using killing to try and gain freedom? 

No, he thought that he was a prophet called upon by God to lead his people to freedom.  Today, many here would mock Nat for his beliefs.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.2    2 months ago
r he remained a slave and watch his women and children be physically and sexually abused

Or he could have killed anyone who tried to stop him and not kill women and children who posed no threat to him. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.5  Texan1211  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.4    2 months ago
Or he could have killed anyone who tried to stop him and not kill women and children who posed no threat to him. 

I wonder if the same logic will be applied to Israel trying to free itself from the fear of terrorists.

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
3.1.6  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.2    2 months ago

It’s good to see that you’ve changed your mind and that historical context has a place in evaluating morality.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.7  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.4    2 months ago
By the time the My Lai massacre ended, 504 people were dead. Among the victims were 182 women— 17 of them pregnant—and 173 children, including 56 infants.

My Lai Massacre : Vietnam War & Colin Powell ‑ HISTORY

I dont recall Calley being deported , or any of the others that committed this massacre. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.8  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @3.1.6    2 months ago

Comment on the topic or you will be deleted. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.9  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.7    2 months ago
Comment on the topic or you will be deleted. 

Is the topic My Lai now?

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
3.1.10  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.8    2 months ago

[]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.11  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.9    2 months ago

He made his comment before I posted a comment about My Lai. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.12  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.11    2 months ago

[]

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.13  Texan1211  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.12    2 months ago

[]

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.14  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.13    2 months ago

The topic is not me .  

If you make one more comment on this article that is not about the TOPICS brought up in this seed I will delete every single further comment you make. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.15  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.13    2 months ago

If you want to comment about the Haitian revolution, or Nat Turner, or My Lai, do so.  Any other of your bullshit is going bye bye. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.16  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.14    2 months ago
The topic is not me .

Exactly right, which my posts clearly illustrate.\

Has it occurred to you that me asking if My Lai was the topic now (Since YOU commented on it) [deleted][]

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.17  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.7    2 months ago

What about it? You are defending those tactics, not me.

you must be outraged that calley was punished. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.18  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.17    2 months ago

Calley represented the southern male military mindset, no?   If not, why not?  You are fine with Trump and Vance denigrating all Haitians over an historical incident from over 200 years ago. Do you know many atrocities were occurring in the same relative time frame by Europeans ? 

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
3.1.19  Kavika   replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.2    2 months ago

Some will always try to deflect from what the perpetrators of slavery/genocide did with whataboutisms and ''they did bad too''...Sad that they can't face reality and quit making excuses.  

The excesses of that contemptible treatment is the very reason why the Haitian Revolution was so successful: the treatment of slaves and Mulattoes in Haiti was so bad that it forced the most violent and ultimately, the most successful slave insurrection in history.

For nearly a decade in the late 18th century, Haiti accounted for more than one-third of the entire Atlantic slave trade. Conditions for these men and women were atrocious; the average life expectancy for a slave on Haiti was 21 years. Abuse was dreadful, and routine.” (Haiti: a long descent to hell, The Guardian).

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Senior Expert
3.1.20  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.18    2 months ago
Calley represented the southern male military mindset, no? 

Can you describe that and how it contributed to his actions?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.21  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.18    2 months ago
 Calley represented

My position is perfectly consistent.  Yours is not. 

ou are fine with Trump and Vance denigrating all Haitians over an historical incident from over 200 years ago

They are? I've not heard either one reference it.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.22  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Kavika @3.1.19    2 months ago

We have people who think the slaves uprising, and being violent about it across the board, is 100 times worse than putting people into slavery for their entire lives.  It started with Columbus over 500 years ago. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.23  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.21    2 months ago

You are the one offering the explanation why the Hatians are despised by people like Trump and Vance, strongly implying that the actions Haitians took 200 and some years ago in their revolution play a part in it. 

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.24  Texan1211  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.22    2 months ago

Who believes that?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.25  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.23    2 months ago
e one offering the explanation why the Hatians are despised by people like Trump and Vance

No, I was addressing some of the missing history from this seed that purports to be about history. 

 
 
 
Kavika
Professor Principal
4  Kavika     2 months ago

Another racist group, The Proud Boys is marching in Springfield, Trump and his followers must be proud.

 
 

Who is online

Thomas
JohnRussell
Jack_TX
Sean Treacy


477 visitors