Opinion The Harris-Trump election shouldn’t be close. Here’s why it is.
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
www.washingtonpost.com /opinions/2024/09/29/harris-trump-tight-election/
The Harris-Trump election shouldn’t be close. Here’s why it is.
Eugene Robinson 5-7 minutes 9/29/2024
It is absolutely, completely, totally ridiculous that this election is even close. But here we are.
The choice between Vice President Kamala Harris and former president Donald Trump should not be a tough call. Harris is a former prosecutor; Trump, a felon. Harris gives campaign speeches about her civic values; Trump rants endlessly about his personal grievances, interrupting himself with asides about sharks and Hannibal Lecter . Harris has outlined a detailed set of policy proposals for the economy ; Trump nonsensically offers tariffs as a panacea, describing this fantasy in terms that make it clear he doesn’t understand how tariffs work .
Also, Harris never whipped thousands of supporters into a frenzy and sent them off to the Capitol, where they smashed their way into the citadel of our democracy, injuring scores of police officers and threatening to hang the vice president, in an attempt to overturn the result of a free and fair election. Trump did.
Yet polls tell us that either candidate could win. The Post’s polling average has Harris ahead by 2 percentage points nationally. The Post also finds that Harris holds leads in four of the seven crucial swing states — 3 percentage points in Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, 2 points in Michigan, less than a point in Nevada — but adds a note of caution: “Every state is within a normal-sized polling error of 3.5 points and could go either way.”
So how is it possible that this is not a done deal? I’m not sure there’s a definitive answer, but I can throw out a few theories.
One obvious potential factor is that Harris would be the first woman to serve as president and commander in chief. It amazes me that the preceding sentence can be written in 2024 — decades after the careers of Margaret Thatcher, Indira Gandhi, Golda Meir and so many other women who have led their nations in peace and war. But, again, here we are.
Harris and her advisers have made the decision not to lean into the history-making aspects of her candidacy, which I think is wise — if only because Trump so desperately wants to have a fight over gender and race. Trump and his running mate, Sen. JD Vance (Ohio), are trying hard to win the votes of men who equate manhood with cartoonish machismo — men who somehow feel that their status and prospects are threatened because they are men.
An Associated Press poll released on Thursday found that about 4 in 10 Americans believe Harris’s gender “will hurt her chances of getting elected this fall,” which suggests the manly-men act by Trump and Vance might be having some impact. Then again, the issue of reproductive rights, along with gratuitous insults such as Vance’s “childless cat ladies” slur , might be driving enough women into Harris’s corner to offset Trump’s harvest of dudes. I find it hard to conclude that gender alone answers the question of why Harris doesn’t have a bigger lead.
Deep in the numbers, you can find other hypotheses. Trump got 74 million votes in the 2020 election. Joe Biden got 81 million — thankfully — and won the electoral vote 306-232. But Trump’s showing means he started his 2024 campaign with a big base of support, and it has remained loyal.
White voters without a college degree are a key component of Trump’s base, and two recent polls — one by the New York Times and one by CNN — showed Harris with a huge deficit of roughly 35 points to Trump among this segment. That is worse than Biden did against Trump in 2020, when he lost this big demographic by 32 points, according to a Pew Research Center analysis . Whites without a college degree make up 42 percent of the electorate — meaning that if Harris were matching Biden’s performance with this group, she would add a full point to her overall national lead.
This might suggest that Trump’s red-meat-to-the-base campaign strategy is not as crazy as it looks. His vicious demagoguery on immigration — the lies he keeps telling about Haitian immigrants eating cats and dogs , for example — invites working-class Whites to see their jobs and communities as under threat. That kind of tribal appeal likely does not win Trump many new voters, but it might keep some of the old ones on his side.
Still, though, how does any of this overcome Trump’s manifest unfitness? How does any of it erase his pathetic performance in the debate? How does it nullify the fact that he awaits sentencing by a New York judge after 34 guilty verdicts in a criminal trial? If the answer is buried somewhere in some poll, I can’t find it.
The truth about the election might be simple: It is what it is. Look at the trend lines in the polling averages. Trump had a narrow but consistent lead over Biden. Soon after Harris became the candidate, the lines crossed, and she took a lead over Trump. Since taking that lead, she has not surrendered it. In fact, she has slowly expanded it.
It is possible that Harris could pull ahead decisively. But it is also quite possible that this race will still be too close to call on Election Day. And at that point, the question we face will not be theoretical, but urgently practical: With Democrats’ huge advantage in money and volunteers, will they be able to turn out their supporters in numbers big enough to overwhelm any hidden population of Republican voters that the pollsters might be missing?
The people, not the pollsters, will give that answer.
Tags
Who is online
414 visitors
Lets not underestimate the political power of misogyny.
"The people, not the pollsters, will give that answer."
Yes they will, and don't surprised when they reject this lame brained empty headed phony as unqualified and unfit to be president and C-in-C.
That comment is equivocal, and prone to subjective interpretation.
It's close because Democrats have lost their mind the last 10 years, focusing on allowing as many illegal aliens into the country as possible and throwing resources at them, ensuring men can use the same bathroom with little girls, and obsessing over race more than the Dixiecrats. Thus Trump, the most unpopular candidate in history, is a coinflip from winning.
And, rather than understanding the obvious, they double down on their biological obsessions and think its because " Harris would be the first woman to serve as president and commander in chief."
The obvious is that Trump should never be allowed to be president again. He is much more like the villain in a superhero movie than a leader of real people.
Fool Republicans keep asking him to rein his insanity in. He would rather take a shit in the middle of 5th avenue than rein himself in.
Yet you can't figure out why he's so close to winning. If the leaders of the Democratic Party were capable of some self-awareness, they'd be heading to a Reagan sized blowout.
I know what people like you say, which I dont agree with.
Why is Trumps day to day campaign now so heavily into racism and racist imagery?
Because he knows thats what his base responds to.
Yesterday he complained about Detroit, Philadelphia and Atlanta, by name. Why is that ? LOL.
Why has he doubled his support among blacks and hispanics and lost white voters since 2016, if his campaign is just white identity politics?
Heavily into racism. Got any evidence to support that?
Democrat run bastions perhaps?
Is Trump surrendering swing state cities already? That's good!
the daily news
. Trump is running the most nativist, xenophobic campaign in modern times
So you believe that is why minority support for Trump has doubled?
Are minorities supporting Trump, if they are, because he's not racist? Please.
The only demographic Trump is still winning is poorly educated white evangelical fundies...
One obvious potential factor is that Harris would be the first woman to serve as president and commander in chief.
While I agree there are a small group of people (voters?) that would not want a woman to be president I believe there is an even bigger group that would vote for her because she is a woman regardless of qualifications.