Fox Host Calls For Pro-MAGA Quotas At Universities
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Fox Host Calls For Pro-MAGA Quotas At Universities
September 14, 2025 Fox News , Hypocrisy
“This is an assault on not just a man and a family, but on the country itself. And we have seen in recent years rising rhetoric and, you know, funding of groups that are pushing anti-American ideology. He was very powerful in speaking against it. But other people need to take those threats seriously, realize this isn’t, you know, not that the loss of one man is a minor thing. But it’s not just the loss of one man.
We have very powerful, well-funded interests really trying to destroy the country. And they need to be investigated. Their networks need to be rooted out and they need to be dealt with as seriously as can be.”
– Fox contributor and Federalist editor-in-chief Mollie Hemingway last night, after which she posted the tweet below. Hemingway last appeared here in September 2024 when she called for “criminally charging” presidential debate moderators for being “unfair” to Trump.
We will reach the point that they call for all teachers everywhere sign a pledge of loyalty to Trump.
Not unlike the "Führereid" (Führer Oath) for civil servants and military personnel in Germany which was required after the death of President Hindenburg in 1934. The oath redirected loyalty from the state to Hitler himself, which is clearly what Trumps propaganda machine Fox News is suggesting he do. At first, I wondered how these despicable sycophants supporting Trump don't see this obvious move towards fascism, but now I realize this is what they want. This is what they dreamed of. Even though they have said in the past they hate fascism, the reality appears to be that they just hate other brands of fascism. When it's their own brand, when it's conservative Christian fascism, they couldn't be happier. They're like pigs wallowing in the mud. Trump acting like the rightwing conservative Christians Mussolini isn't a bug, it's a feature.
Isn't "conservative professor" an oxymoron? This ignorant Karen might as well be demanding an equal percentage of singing snails.
This is an unabashed lie, at least coming from the MAGA side of things.
I find it distressing in so many ways that the interests on the MAGA side often just say what they are doing but blame it all on the "left".
Such as?
Vomit inducing to say the least.
A very brief opinion piece which happens to be dishonest & misleading.
First off is the title which conflicts with the Hemingway post:
"Fox Host Calls For Pro-MAGA Quotas At Universities"
Pro-MAGA does not = Conservative. Conservative is the philosophy of William F Buckley and Barry Goldwater. MAGA is a counterrevolutionary movement dedicated to ending wokeism and restoring American exceptionalism and putting America first.
Then there is the post the author attaches from the DOJ employee who refused to accept his firing: Preet Bharara. Bharara uses the term swell the ranks of Conservative Professors and compares it to the Constitutionally illegal practice of DEI (IE: racial preference.) The reason that Hemingway is demanding some kind of equality of thought in academia is because the universities long ago plotted to staff the humanities completely with radical left professors to the point that we have had generations of young Americans indoctrinated with radical ideology.
Read her words: CONSERVATIVE PROFESSORS.
Your opinion guy is dishonest.
It does to a lot of rightwing conserves watching Fox News and you know it. Trying to obfuscate this with hilarious garbage about Buckley or Goldwater is what's truly dishonest.
FALSE.
If MAGA's are not conservatives it calls into question what they actually are, since they pay fealty to America's most famous and obvious traitor.
Links?
You made the claim. You defend it.
I did not claim it was false. You are claiming to know the breakdown of FOX viewership by political persuasion by making the claim of "FALSE"
Put your money where your mouth is.
True, pro-MAGA means fealty to Trump. It does seem that most conservatives are pro-MAGA, and it would be difficult to find someone pro-MAGA who is not conservative, but pro-MAGA is not a symbol for conservatism since MAGA routinely violates conservative principles such as the rule of law, family values, moral / ethical behavior, religion, etc.
That is like me saying that all democrats are radical left or that liberal is the same as progressive. I've said it many times, the MAGA movement is a counterrevolution. There is still a Conservative wing to the Republican party, the former Senate Leader Mitch McConnell was one of them. And there are traditional democrats like Sen Fetterman.
The fact remains that Hemingway used the term Conservative, not MAGA. She could have simply said mainstream beliefs or liberal or libertarian, any of which have zero representation as teachers when it comes to the teaching of the humanities at the university.
No, it's just a dumbass petridish war.
Not even remotely close.
I noted that it 'seems that most' conservatives are pro-MAGA because it is rare to find conservatives like Liz Cheney nowadays (rare as in a small minority) speaking out. Most seem to be towing the line for MAGA (even if they do not privately believe MAGA is getting things right). Do you not see the rubber-stamping by the GoPTRUMP in Congress? It is quite possible that a substantial minority of Republican conservatives are not MAGA, but they are being rather silent. Ergo: 'it seems'.
Do you not consider yourself pro-MAGA? Do you not routinely defend Trump and his minions, no matter what? Seems to me there are more Republicans who think like you than not nowadays.
Of course there is. Read carefully. I did not say that ALL conservatives are MAGA, I quite clearly made the point that 'it seems that most' conservatives are pro-MAGA. Does it seem to you that most conservatives are anti-MAGA??
Yeah well you are replying to me on the point I made, so moving to another point should be directed at someone else.
My point is/was that the GoP has been hijacked by a con-man demagogue. That the GoPTRUMP is violating fundamental principles of conservatism such as the rule of law, family values, moral / ethical behavior, religion, etc. Some who once strongly defended the rule of law, etc., now appear more willing to overlook violations if done by Trump and his minions. I believe this is happening because the majority of conservative Republicans are supporting/defending the MAGA movement.
Are you saying that Republicans should oppose a Republican President or his nominees or his policies?
It is quite possible that a substantial minority of Republican conservatives are not MAGA, but they are being rather silent.
They haven't been silent. Sen Tillis had many open disagreements with the President and resigned over it. The former Speaker opposed Trump over many issues and condemned him after Jan 6th. There are others and none remained silent. Most Republicans, despite their feelings about "Trump," are on board with the policies which are fairly logical: Safe streets, Sovereign borders and peace through strength.
Do you not consider yourself pro-MAGA?
How many times have I answered that question. Unlike many of my colleagues here I am 100% MAGA.
Do you not routinely defend Trump and his minions, no matter what?
FALSE. I don't go along with every detail of his Presidency. I have said more than once that I hate the way he has his cabinet members robotically praising him at every televised cabinet meeting. I also raised concerns over his policy on India which I believe to be a mistake.
Now that you had me explain myself, let me do the same with you. We know you hate Trump and you also hate his supporters, whom you just called his minions. You ignored and played down 4 years of radical rule which included allowing millions of unvetted migrants, traffickers, terrorists, criminals and fentanyl into America, a government spending induced inflation rate of 9%, the corruption of justice in order to stop a Presidential candidate, an expensive and destructive energy policy, and the rhetoric that has led to all the violence.
Do you not consider yourself woke?
Outstanding. You described the left wing agenda in five short lines. Could not have been better than this.
Interesting to see the attacks you will certainly get from any answers you receive. Most leftists don't want conversation, they want you to bend to their beliefs.
Bingo.
Tillis is dropping out because he knows MAGA will sic the dogs on him in a primary. Just for mumbling a few words in mild opposition to Trump.
Kevin McCarthy "condemned " Trump after Jan 6th and then almost immediately took it back and became subservient to Trump once again.
The republicans who stand up to Trump are few and far between.
Do you not consider yourself
there are a lot of people here who will predictably parrot progressive talking points day after day on topic after topic and still claim to be independent and non partisan.
If a member of Congress believes a PotUS (R or D) has put forth a bad policy or nominee, then it is their duty to oppose. That is at the very core of the CotUS. Something that (along with the rule of law) no longer seems to matter to pro-MAGA people.
Yet again you pretend that I have stated ALL when I have stated that it seems like most.
Yes, your posts reflect that.
I believe that you object to some details. But, ultimately, if Trump does something it would surprise me (and, no doubt others) if you did not wholeheartedly support it. And that is pretty much how Congress is operating. They have yet to stand up to Trump's illegal use of tariffs. And they projected their rubber-stamping philosophy right off the bat when they confirmed truly horrible choices such as Hegseth, Patel, Bondi, Gabbard, and Kennedy.
You just illustrated that you do not know. I do not oppose Trump because of personal hatred (I do consider him to be an abysmal human being with no redeeming qualities) but rather because of what he says and does as PotUS. Until you get that straight you will be wrong in your attempt to understand my positions.
Further, I do not hate his supporters. My best fried and plenty of family and friends are Trump supporters. I am critical of their misguided support for Trump. It is cultish and the word 'minion' seems like a mild reflection of that. Reality shows that 'minons' is accurate. Hell, even you recognize at least one aspect of this: the sick fawning over Trump in his cabinet meeting reality show. So again, you demonstrate that you have created circumstances that are not true and attribute them to me. You keep striking out, Vic.
Calling Biden's term "radical rule" is pathetically laughable. Just goes to show the ridiculous fantasy you have built. Biden's failure to secure the border is of course his key bad. I have no idea why he and the Ds were so lackadaisical here, but what took place is nowhere near "radical".
The spending definitely contributed to the inflation. So did the aftermath of COVID. And if you were honestly concerned about spending and inflation then you should be totally upset with Trump. But, no, you are concerned about robotic praise by cabinet members and do not even mention the outrageous spending and consumption taxes gratuitously imposed by Trump.
This is both a conspiracy theory and a truly stupid hypothesis given reality. Garland was overly cautious when dealing with Trump (a former PotUS). So much so that Trump was able to run out the clock and skirt accountability for his crimes. And Trump arguably (almost certainly) ran for PotUS as a way to counter lawsuits; not the other way around.
Another truly stupid claim. Promoting fossil fuel energy and tearing down clean, renewable efforts is a perfect example of a destructive energy policy. You are supporting a destructive energy policy.
Not sure what you have imagined here, but Trump's emotive, divisive rhetoric would be the prime example of rhetoric that could encourage violence. Best to take off those Trump rose-colored glasses because Trump is arguably the most hate-inducing PotUS we have seen in our lifetimes (and possibly in our history).
That is a political term. No, that never even enters my mind, and I never even use the stupid term. Of course, you probably think that anything to your left is 'woke' which seems to me would include the super majority.
Except in my case (since you are implying I do this), I never parrot progressive talking points. And I am indeed not affiliated with any political party and in fact am basically against political parties because they tend to shape minds via groupthink and mitigate critical thinking.
My positions are based on the facts as I see them and sound logic (at least that is the objective) and have zero reliance on the positions held by a political party.
As usual, a fine test of partisanship is when an individual not only cannot recognize independence but essentially denies it is even possible.
This is amusingly ironic penned from a Trump/MAGA perspective.
Okay.
when an individual not only cannot recognize independence but essentially denies it is even possible.
It's very easy to recognize and there are, of course, independent voices. A major sign that they aren't is when their opinions are consistently indistinguishable from progressive talking points.
At least they have a statement of purpose now. It is empty words and totally ignores the fact that Trump is getting ready to jail who he sees as his political enemies.
But pay no attention to what is happening right in front of oneself, there are trans people out there to stop from.... well, doing something
What about when their proclamations are consistently indistinguishable from dog whistles?
The question was do all Republicans do everything Trump wants. Clearly not, but he is a Republican President putting forward a Republican agenda.
Why should Republicans simply oppose him?
What planet are you on?
The only thing that has slowed down Trump are some of the courts.
“…do all Republicans do everything Trump wants…”
…all republicans in which he has surrounded himself. Any other is a pariah. The demonstrable truth.
You mean the dog whistles only leftists hear and react to?
Unfortunately, Nancy Pelosi would disagree with every word of that. Any thoughts on her demands of total democrat support?
I believe that you object to some details. But, ultimately, if Trump does something it would surprise me (and, no doubt others) if you did not wholeheartedly support it.
It's like asking me if I think Gen Patton should have been removed for slapping a soldier suffering from shell shock. You can't seem to understand that if it hadn't been for Trump the country would have gone the way Obama & Biden intended.
They have yet to stand up to Trump's illegal use of tariffs.
Did the Supreme Court rule on that? What makes it illegal? Tell us.
they confirmed truly horrible choices such as Hegseth, Patel, Bondi, Gabbard, and Kennedy.
I have no problem with those choices. The President gets to nominate, not the party out of power and the dems are out of power for a reason.
You just illustrated that you do not know. I do not oppose Trump because of personal hatred (I do consider him to be an abysmal human being with no redeeming qualities) but rather because of what he says and does as PotUS. Until you get that straight you will be wrong in your attempt to understand my positions.
Further, I do not hate his supporters. My best fried and plenty of family and friends are Trump supporters. I am critical of their misguided support for Trump. It is cultish and the word 'minion' seems like a mild reflection of that. Reality shows that 'minons' is accurate. Hell, even you recognize at least one aspect of this: the sick fawning over Trump in his cabinet meeting reality show. So again, you demonstrate that you have created circumstances that are not true and attribute them to me.
I don't believe any of that.
Calling Biden's term "radical rule" is pathetically laughable.
It was nothing less than somebody like Bill Ayers could only dream of. (Tell us again why Ayers is TEACHING instead of being in jail) You seem to think the Biden years were reasonable? I'll leave that one for our readers & the ages.
The spending definitely contributed to the inflation.
We can agree there.
And if you were honestly concerned about spending and inflation then you should be totally upset with Trump.
Not really. In the Trump first term budgets he had to rebuild a depleted military and once he lost the House Speaker Pelosi demanded he spend more in his second budget. He did produce a robust economy right up until Dr Fauci recommended that it be shut down.
Garland was overly cautious when dealing with Trump (a former PotUS). So much so that Trump was able to run out the clock and skirt accountability for his crimes. And Trump arguably (almost certainly) ran for PotUS as a way to counter lawsuits; not the other way around.
Garland was the most partisan, corrupt AG in US history. He met with prosecutors and even lent one out to prosecute a Presidential candidate, something that was against DOJ policy. He also conspired against parents and had the FBI scare the shit out of them. He prosecuted Pro Life individuals while ignoring abortion terrorists. His FBI investigated Catholics. And one can argue that the Jan 6th trespassers were languishing in prison for the better part of a year waiting for a trial. He prosecuted and imprisoned two Trump officials for ignoring a congressional subpoena, which is almost never done and that includes the second most corrupt AG Eric Holder who thumbed his nose at a subpoena and simply walked away. Anyone who thinks that Garland was an honest AG would also think Lavrentiy Beria a good cop.
Another truly stupid claim. Promoting fossil fuel energy and tearing down clean, renewable efforts is a perfect example of a destructive energy policy. You are supporting a destructive energy policy.
Forcing people to buy electric cars that are not yet practical and trying to move away from oil production long before it is realistically possible is what is stupid as well as being authoritarian.
Not sure what you have imagined here
How about defunding police departments going to cashless bail and appointing radical judges & magistrates.
Of course, you probably think that anything to your left is 'woke'
You I'm sure of. And that is what I am against: everything you were taught.
To some people, consistent disagreement with Trump means 'progressive' or 'liberal'. It is ideological/political naivety at play. It is also a clear sign that the individual does not realize that Trump is not a conservative politician but rather a con man putting on a show to self-aggrandize to feed his ego.
They should not simply oppose him, they should oppose him on the grounds that he is the reverse of all the supposed ideals that being a Republican stood for and that he is going to ruin (worse than he has already) the stature of the country abroad and the American dominance in science and technology.
Of course, deflection. D and R partisans are basically the same beast. Deflecting to the Ds shows an inability to recognize the current reality.
Whatever bizarre fantasy you have cooked up is largely irrelevant. Trump is not a savior, he is disaster. He is causing all sorts of harm to this nation and you consistently ignore it and claim, in the abstract, that no matter what he does it is far better than what a D would do. Pure blind partisanship, IMO.
There is no law that enables him to declare tariffs on a mere whim. A PotUS has conditional authority (i.e. unfair trade practices, national emergencies, threats to security) to impose tariffs. Trump routinely violates the conditions yet the spineless GOP in Congress refuses to rein him in. Trump merely declares 'unfair' and nobody stops him.
That you have no problem with the gross incompetence of these people is part of the problem. You, unfortunately, are one of many who think similarly.
Of course you do not. Your posts reflect a fantasized view of individuals. Basically, it is the fallacy of stereotyping and almost certainly confirmation bias. It does not surprise me a bit.
This is sad. You run back to his first term and flat-out ignore current reality. SMH. You do not even recognize that Trump is spending like crazy and directly contributing to inflation. Just incredible.
This is such an obviously distorted, fantasized view of reality based on publicly available facts, I think it is appropriate for ChatGPT to rip your over-the-top ridiculous claim apart. I fed your claim verbatim to ChatGPT:
Ridiculous, over-the-top partisan nonsense, Vic.
There was no force to buy electric cars. And we can always disagree on the rate of moving from oil production but Biden clearly did not impact that given we were breaking oil production records during his term. Again, pay attention to facts, Vic.
If there were a mandate to buy electric vehicles in the present, I would be against it. We do not have the infrastructure to support this. So what we should be doing is building the infrastructure. But of course Trump is doing what he can to stand in the way of that progress. And you applaud the idiot.
Defunding the police is brain-dead stupid so we will agree on that. I have not investigated cashless bail so I have no opinion yet other than to note that this was not a Biden initiative and no federal laws dealing with cashless bails came into effect during his term. Appointing radical judges and magistrates is just your opinion. Based on what I have seen in this and other posts, it is an opinion that seems to have quite a heavy dose of fantasy mixed with some facts.
Trump's tariffs, his harming trust in international relationships, his bungling of Ukraine, his firing of those who oppose him politically, his firing of Inspector Generals, his surrounding himself with incompetent sycophants, his insane spending, his dramatic overreach beyond criminals to deport anyone illegal even those who have domiciled in the USA for years raising families, working, and being decent members of their communities, his attempt to behave as a king, his leading a corrupt charge to rig the mid-term with illegal redistricting, his constant violation of the law, and his use of federal funds to surround himself with opulence beyond over-the-top compared to any prior PotUS. No prior PotUS in our lifetimes has been as bad as Trump and this might be true for US history as well. But Trump supporters just cannot see this ... it is a blindness of sorts, I suppose.
I'm sure that is true , but it is no longer the issue. Both-sideism is ruining our country. I wont say 'destroying' because that sounds too final.
People need to stop saying "yeah but what about the Democrats?" The Democrats are not tearing down the institutions and norm and traditions of our politics and government, the Republicans are, through their membership in the cult. Trump has to either be gone or to fail. He will never get better , he has deep psychological problems.
No, it means progressive or liberal when one constantly disagrees with "conservative" policies using the same talking points that progressives do. And of course, it's not just Trump. Defending progressive politicians and positions with progressive talking points etc..
is also a clear sign that the individual does not realize that Trump is not a conservative politician
He's not, but many of the policies he supports are, in fact, conservative. And when those conservative policies are consistently attacked from a progressive pov, then the criticism is in fact from a partisan progressive.
In whose estimation?
It's shocking, and depressing, that anyone who's lived through the last ten years can possibly say it. Literally as we sit here, we are in the middle of a coordinated campaign from democrats, incusing elected federal officials to call a left wing assassin a right winger or seed media with fake quotes from Kirk.
And you will justify with it with "But Trump," of course.
Obviously not yours.
It should be to anyone who looked at or believed what Republicans said that they stood for: fiscal conservancy, family values,
LOL.
You have literally no proof he is a left wing assassin. Left wing means he follows that political ideology. I accept that this guy was out to get Charlie Kirk and maybe hates Trump, but that doesnt make one a leftist. Neither does having a transgender friend.
He carved symbols into his bullets that are associated with a nilhilistic cult composed of dark web and 4 chan freaks . Are you telling us it is just a coincidence that all these symbols and phrases show up together?
Where is evidence from his social media that he is a leftist? If such existed the corrupt Trump DOJ would have produced it already.
The far right is losing their minds bathing themselves in group victimhood. And there is no one to stop them because our national media is a joke.
So show me where I do that. See, Sean, you have no argument. You are just making shit up here.
I know this because I know how I draw my conclusions and they are not based on what some partisan claims.
I have noticed that your posts to me essentially are personal in nature, not topical. Pretty much illustrates that you cannot deal with my arguments and must resort to penning posts that are dishonest and personal attacks.
Have you seen me criticize Trump for his attempts to secure the border, or criticize him for deporting criminals (when done legally with due process)? Have you seen me criticize Trump for his notion to clean up crime (I criticize his method of bypassing state sovereignty, not the idea of going after crime). Do you see me criticizing Trump for his promise to balance the budget or cut down our debt? No, I criticize his actions which do the opposite. Did I criticize the idea of reducing federal government waste? No, I criticized what Trump and Musk actually did and the truly stupid method that was effected.
To wit, you are posting made up personal shit ... again.
Now, Trump is imposing a consumption tax on individuals and this affects lower income people the most. Do you oppose this? If so, shall I consider you a progressive? (Your claims are ridiculous.)
I draw my conclusions based on what you post.
have noticed that your posts to me essentially are personal in nature, not topical. Pretty much illustrates that you cannot deal with my arguments and must resort to penning posts that are dishonest and personal attacks.
Do you see the irony here?
Have you seen me criticize Trump for his attempts to secure the border, or criticize him for deporting criminals (when done legally with due process)?
I distinctly recall you making repeated reality denying claims that there was absolutely zero evidence that Abrego Garcia was a gang member.
Have you seen me criticize Trump for his notion to clean up crime
Have you ever criticized Democratic officials for their crime policies?
Do you see me criticizing Trump for his promise to balance the budget or cut down our deb
Umm. Okay. I don't oppose generic promises from Democrats to "grow the economy" Does that mean I'm not conservative?
I look forward to you proving me wrong by criticizing democratic officials from conservative position. A true independent would criticize democratic policies and politicians around half the time, right?
You just make shit up and post it. Again, evidenced by the fact that you merely claim and cannot back up your claims.
Garcia has NOT been legally established as a gang member. That you think he was is you making shit up. And now we know that the Trump administration is trying to pull out all the stops to give them a justification for deporting him. With all their resources, they have been unable to even make a decent case that he is a gang member, much less get a legal ruling. You are making shit up.
No. There are all sorts of things on which I have not opined. I have not yet opined on specific states like Missouri moving to redistrict to help rig the midterms. Does that make me a conservative? Your 'arguments' are feeble.
Not how it works. You made the allegation, so prove it. Thus far all you have offered is bullshit.
Lol. This is what you wrote:
you continue to ignore the fact that there is no evidence tying him to MS-13
Do you even know what woke means?
All it means is aware. Which proves that the right wants it's patrons to be, "anti-woke", or, "Unaware". To dumb it down even further, they want their constituents to be dumb.
Show the evidence. The only 'evidence' was informal allegations based on hearsay, the clothes he wore and a totally confused misunderstanding of his tattoos. Pretty comical crap; yet this is what you cling to.
As I just noted, with all their resources, the Trump administration has been unable to even make a decent case that he is a gang member, much less get a legal ruling. You ignore this and try to rely upon mere allegations that went nowhere as 'evidence'.
Pretty pathetic, Sean. Your ability to back up your claims has been a spectacular failure. Somewhat amusing to watch.
Those who use 'woke' as a pejorative have ascribed their own meaning to the term.
That's comically false.
Your ability to back up your claims has been a spectacular failure
Perfect. You claimed you never argued something. I proved you did, and this is your response. You could not have proven my point any better.
You just penned another lie. And you expressed it vaguely to try to disguise the lie. What was this ' something ' that I supposedly never argued? Once you clearly establish that, prove I made this fantasy claim.
And you play the pathetic little game of linking to a comment of mine (which I fully support) and claim it means something other than what my words state.
And now you claim that there is evidence other than " informal allegations based on hearsay, the clothes he wore and a totally confused misunderstanding of his tattoos . ". Okay, let's see it!
Deliver the formal, credible evidence that Garcia is a gang member. And, if you can pull that off (
), give the evidence to Bondi because I am sure she would love a way to back up Trump's allegations with real evidence. Thus far, with all of her resources, she has failed to accomplish this.
Such bullshit. What do you hope to accomplish with this nonsense?
As recent as April of this year:
From:
KILMAR ARMANDO ABREGO GARCIA, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
KRISTI NOEM, ET AL.,
Defendants-Appellants
Page 27 (one of many references):
Page 196 (about as clear as it gets):
Pretty obvious that you will fail to support your bullshit claim given we have legal opinion directly on the question of Garcia's MS-13 membership evidence.
You have made a number of allegations about me personally and thus far have failed miserably to support your obvious bullshit. So, again, I ask what you think you will accomplish by posting false claims?
[✘]
[deleted][✘]
Lol, I love ChatGPT. What a useful tool in a debate when one can't defend against factual information. A product of the same people who program for Silicon Valley. So, Garland never did any of those things because he wasn't charged / S. Got it!
What will you do in 3 years when the point man for MAGA is so much different from Trump. He will have a much wider vocabulary with no open sentences. A self-taught sophisticated man who stood by as Vice President and observed the things that Trump came up against and the mistakes made along the way. What will you do then?
It will be a real problem if Trump's second term is only as successful as his first.
Something tells me you'll be just as vindictive towards him.
Why didn't a judge want Garcia deported to El Salvador?
"Often called a “Maryland man,” Abrego Garcia reportedly admitted to illegally immigrating to the United States in 2012, and by 2019, two judges had deemed him likely to be part of the Central American gang, Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13)."
"Jones first wrote “Guatemala” when describing Abrego Garcia’s testimony before the court, during which the illegal immigrant claimed to enter the United States after his family and its business were repeatedly targeted by Barrio 18, a longtime rival gang to MS-13 , leading Abrego Garcia’s parents to send him and his brother to live in the United States unlawfully."
Immigration Judge's 2019 Order Found Kilmar Abrego Garcia 'Subject to Removal' by Deportation But Granted 'Withholding of Removal' to Guatemala, Though Referencing El Salvador - Tennessee Star
The reason Garcia was in danger was because of his MS-13 gang membership. This bitter fight by the evil American left to keep him here exemplifies why this in not the type of due process an illegal migrant should be getting. An illegal migrant who does not show up for his/her hearing has effectively passed up on their right of due process and in the case of Garcia he need only be deported to a place outside of the reach of Barrio 18. All that should have taken less than a day.
If one would do their research on AI, they would see that many of these programs use Wikipedia as their source. It is well known that wikipedia is a left leaning website that has nothing but left wing editors. You are correct about the other ones. Probably programmed by left wing programmers that want answers to match an ideology. Much like some here that use AI to try and prove something.
An entirely dishonest response. The response did not claim that Garland did nothing merely because he was not charged. It added that he was not charged with any crimes as additional information.
Your post is an excellent demonstration of confirmation bias.
If someone other than Trump says and does what Trump is saying and doing, I will criticize him in the same way I criticize Trump.
Here again you post utterly flawed stereotypical thinking. Do you ever see me criticize Trump's vocabulary and open sentences? George Bush bungled the English language and I never criticized him for that. If you were to actually pay attention to my criticism of Trump, you would (maybe) recognize that I criticize his words and deeds. And by 'words' I am not talking about the way he speaks but rather what he actually says.
I can only hope that our economy remains healthy and the damage is limited to that of his first term.
You demonstrably have no idea how I think. But given how Trump has behaved thus far, it is hard to imagine him making a 180° and becoming a normal, rational PotUS.
Typical bullshit showing that you have not bothered to understand how LLMs work.
That is not how AI works. Go do some research before opining on a topic that you clearly have no expertise in.
Those who complain about AI here are those who are frustrated that the AI response routinely show they are wrong.
Oh dear!
Your post is an excellent demonstration of confirmation bias.
I think most people would agree with me, for the reasons I posted.
I will criticize him in the same way I criticize Trump.
Not really a shock.
I can only hope that our economy remains healthy
I'm so glad to hear you say that. So many want him to fail.
You demonstrably have no idea how I think.
Your commentary is all I have to go on.
Another example of confirmation bias. The judges who accepted that he might be part of a gang did so cavalierly based on a 'tip' by some individual, the clothing that Garcia wore, and tattoos. They did not legally rule that he was a member of MS-13.
What I provided was from the judge in a case that dealt with MS-13 membership legally . Did you just ignore this? April of this year?:
The judge stated that the claim by the government that Garcia is a member of MS-13 was unfounded.
You just ignore this clear legal statement. Confirmation bias!
What evidence exists that Garcia was a member of MS-13? Show us all what you think is evidence.
Your entire post was devoid of a rebuttal. No facts, no reasoning. Just 'nuh-uh'.
Obviously you could not think of a rebuttal.
Your entire point is premised on a legal impossibility. They don't "legally rule" on that because they don't have the power to do so. They can only rule on the questions before them, and the court did find there was sufficient evidence of his membership to deny him a bond. That was upheld on appeal. That is the only ruling the court can make. Is there sufficient evidence he was a gang member to deny him a bond, or not? The Courts said "yes"
Claiming they "didn't legally rule that he was a member of MS-13" is incredibly dishonest, as you are demanding the impossible for proof.
[deleted][✘]
Your posts are one bullshit claim after another yet you never offer any supporting facts (and I do!).
So show us all the evidence that Garcia is a member of MS-13.
Deliver it Sean, because until you do, you are just making shit up.
Bondi is dying for this evidence. You would be a hero (to her).
TIG you are literally claiming that because a court did not do something it has no power to do, you've made a compelling argument Garcia was not a MS-13 member.
It's beyond bad faith.
So show us all the evidence that Garcia is a member of MS-13.
Again? So you can ignore it and claim there's no evidence yet again? What's the point? You've been provided plenty of evidence from numerous sources including from family members, his employer, the police etc. And your response is to put your hands over your eyes and ears and say "it doesn't exist." An then fall back on claiming that since the thing that is impossible to happen didn't happen, that's proof that he's not a member.
It's tiresome and childish to engage with. If you want to dismiss all that evidence and claim he's not a gang member because it's politically inconvenient for you for him to be an MS-13 member (even though his membership is legally irrelevant to his deportation status) that's fine. Just be aware how transparent it all is.
The President proved it, I mean, it was right there printed on his knuckles, "M S 1 3" clear as day, almost as if the tattoo was floating off his knuckles! I mean, how is that not proof enough for every MAGA faithful! /s
How can anyone call themselves an American while also doubting our Commander-in-chief? Everything he does is so honest and always turns out to be correct! His nickname among MAGA circles is "Honest Don" who would never tell a lie and chopped down the cherry tree in the rose garden! /s
S h o w u s t h e e v i d e n c e .
Your claims are meaningless without evidence.
You don't just accept "People are saying" as evidence?
That's all it takes for most MAGAites. Of course, people said Trump raped a 13-year-old with his best friend Jeff Epstein so I guess we have to believe that too because, some people, including the victim, said it so it must be true, just like how some people said Garcia was a gang member, so it must be true. Right Sean?
So it seems you are implying that MS13 tatted on your knuckles is nothing ore than a fashion statement.
How moronic can one's post be?
Amazing, you are not aware that the 'tattoos' were Photoshopped?? Seriously, you did not even bother to check this out?? This has been public knowledge for months now.
It was a laughably bad Photoshop.
Truly horrible. It was text applied all on the same plane against a 3D hand. It was beyond amateurish and an obvious fake to anyone who gives a moment's thought.
If it were really photoshopped, then I admit my mistake. However, it does not take away from a court deeming him a member of MS13, something that had to be proven in court for them to make that decision.
The POS should have been booted long ago.
Immigration judges have an extremely low burden of proof. In the case of Garcia, the 'evidence' was merely an allegation by an informant and the clothes he wore. Basically, there is no credible evidence that he is or was a member of MS-13.
And this was back in 2019. It is now 2025 and the Trump administration is still absolutely dying to get some evidence showing that Garcia is a member of MS-13. They have even gone to the level of fabricating 'evidence' — pathetically with Trump showing an obviously fake photo of Garcia's hands with MS13 written in an extremely poor, amateurish attempt to make it look like a tattoo.
And it just is sickening when some/most Trump supporters not only buy this bullshit but just keep arguing and arguing when they cannot deliver any credible evidence that he is a member of MS-13 and cannot explain why the Trump administration —with the resources of the Federal government— have yet to provide any credible evidence.
Garcia has a clean record, was gainfully employed, is married and was raising a family with his wife. There is no evidence that he is or was a member of MS-13 and substantial evidence that he was engaged in a life that has nothing to do with gangs. And even with 5+ years after his hearing, there still is no evidence he did anything that would indicate he was a member of a gang; quite the opposite.
Good thing you aren't biased, otherwise one might wonder what possible basis you have to believe an informant who the police and judges viewed as credible isn't. And his wife. And his boss. And the biological father of his wife's children. And the Tennessee cops who pulled him over in his human trafficker boss's car full of immigrants and no coherent cover story. And the grand jury that indicted him for human trafficking.
They are apparently all engaged in a years long conspiracy to make poor Abrigo Garcia look like a bad guy. But he's just a normal "Maryland man" employed by human trafficker. And none of the evidence is credible, despite the judge's finding, despite the indictment for human trafficking
It's just anti-reason at this point and pure reflexive denial to keep claiming "evidence isn't evidence"
S h o w u s t h e e v i d e n c e G a r c i a w a s a m e m b e r o f M S - 1 3
You cannot do so. The Federal government cannot do so.
What do you think you will accomplish repeating a bullshit claim while failing at every turn to deliver the supporting evidence?
He will convince himself that you are in bed with the leftist plot to destroy the country/s
I've showed you the evidence numerous times. You ignore it. I'm not going to continuously spoon feed you the same things over and over and watch you pretend they don't exist. What do you think you will accomplish repeating a bullshit claim?
If you want to keep pretending there's no evidence an indicted human trafficker is anything but a normal "Maryland man" there's really nothing for me to do. You've made your own bed and have to live with it.
he Federal government cannot do so.
In what court case did they fail to do so? what judge ruled against the federal government on this issue?
If they could LEGALLY prove he was a MS-13 gang member, don't you thinkthey would bring that evidence to court to show the judge ? If the applied DUE PROCESS, there are very very few who would defend this guy, but since it has not been provided (just thrown out talk, without supporting evidence) and then FAKE evidence of a photoshopped hand finger tattoo that Trump tried to convince an interviewer was real, sorta has one questioning Trumps honesty on this case, as 47 has NO credibility to begin with. Tack on how he blatantly LIED about Garcia, and there is no way that without REAL evidence, that thinking people are gonna buy Trumps bullshit
If the shoe fits..... . S/
Oh now you move to the "but I did show the evidence" bullshit.
Okay, I let this go last time but since you bring it up again, you have moved the goalposts. I have never claimed that Garcia was a saint or that he even was a good guy. What I have claimed is that there is no credible evidence that Garcia was or is a member of MS-13.
You are desperate to move the goal posts and to engage in serial intellectual dishonesty.
So, moving the goal posts right back to this point (which, by the way, is a tangent you created when your other arguments fell flat):
Show us all the evidence that Garcia was or is a member of MS-13.
You cannot do so because there is no credible evidence. I gave you @4.3.39 the April, 2025 legal opinion that the 'evidence' was feeble. You have failed to produce any credible evidence that your claim of Garcia being a member of MS-13 has any standing.
Further, you are not the only one who failed at this. Trump, with the full power of the Federal government, has also failed to produce this evidence. The judge @4.3.39 just affirmed this in her legal ruling.
You have nothing. Trump has nothing. Just bullshit and dishonest tactics.
Since many Magas obviously can't get into college on their own merits this could help them. Of course, colleges will likely have to have special ed programs in place.
This is simply supposition that has no basis in trial or reality, but there has been years that many colleges and universities have reduced (dumbed down) the requirements to get into a university so that certain minorities have a better chance of getting in, then allowing many of them in over better qualified candidates. (Yes, there are other minorities that are better qualified than the minority that may have been let in due to DEI).
Since you referring to blacks why dont you just use the word. You have friends here.
and lots of them that think the same way
If you can prove that is what I was referring to, then go ahead and try.
You still haven't shown any left wingers that I am infatuated with that I should "shut up" about.
Maye you should try that first before you try and read my mind.....and fail doing so
Maybe you can prove the first sentence in 5.1.3
Historically, virtually every college and university in America had white affirmative action since their founding up until the 1960's. So how did those whites measure up against the minorities in intelligence, skills and qualifications? We'll never know because no minority was ever even allowed to compete.
Now some claim there was a "dumbing down" to allow minorities in, but the reality was that because minorities had never been even allowed to compete, there was a period where minorities would have to be even better than their white counterparts to get accepted or to get certain jobs. They didn't have the luxury of being a third or fourth generation doctor, attorney, banker, engineer etc.,
But I'm sure some bigoted asshole will try and claim anecdotally that they didn't have that either and they grew up poor so why isn't one of those spots at a college or jobs set aside for them? "Oh, how unfair!" they scream. Well, perhaps they should learn what virtually every single person not born white has to learn from early childhood, "LIFE ISN'T FUCKING FAIR!", so get over it and accept that most minority groups have it worse off than you, even if you did happen to get passed over for a DEI hire.
Prior to affirmative action there were colleges, and jobs, that would not allow blacks in. Literally. Affirmative action began before the Civil Rights Act, and it was determined it was still needed after the Civil Rights Act. There is room to debate when it should have ended, but the idea that it was always wrong and unfair to whites is totally incorrect.
That was some batshit crazy hyperbole in that post.
The only thing whites have benefited from in college admissions was legacy admissions. What that means is a very select few people who had famous or rich relatives that attended that school would get in only because of their associations. That was stupid then and is stupid now, especially when we see what schools churn out these days.
Many minorities got accepted in the thousands because of one reason....race. All through AA. No one can dispute that.
Thankfully, the SC ruled in 2023 that AA can no longer play a role in school admissions. Minorities have to compete based on their merit, not their race. It is illegal to consider admissions based on race.
True, however, times have changed. AA turned from allowing minorities to better schools to giving them preferences over whites and other minorities, even if they did not need that recognition.
The Supreme Court made the right ruling in 2023.
And this is why so many dems feel DEI is needed for minorities to get into college. Glad you understand the concept.
Good idea Molly, velvet is on the endangered fabric list. (snarcasm)
So they went from "merit based" to "MAGA based" in a hot minute.
Even if all mitigating criteria were erased and based strictly on merit, what is their excuse if MAGA doesn't meet the grade?
What if minorities work harder, prove smarter and end up as the new majority?
I never believe these far right wing arguments because even when they get want they say they want the goalposts shift again only to make ever more outrageous demands.
Ironic.
With quotas, even.
These people have some wacky fantasies about what actually goes on in college classrooms. Anything to get the base angry, even if it’s liberal ghost professors.