╌>

Wacko MAGA Congresswoman Wants Charlie Kirk To Lie In Honor In The Capitol Rotunda

  
By:  John Russell  •  last year  •  19 comments


Wacko MAGA Congresswoman Wants Charlie Kirk To Lie In Honor In The Capitol Rotunda
 

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


First the preliminary information

copilot





did charlie kirk deny the result of the 2020 election











Yes— Charlie Kirk repeatedly denied the legitimacy of the 2020 U.S. presidential election , promoting the baseless claim that it was stolen from Donald Trump.

🧨 Key Actions and Statements

  • In the days leading up to January 6, 2021, Kirk tweeted that Turning Point Action and Students for Trump were “sending 80+ buses full of patriots to DC to fight for this president.” He later deleted the tweet.

  • He funded transportation for rally attendees and paid a $60,000 speaking fee to Kimberly Guilfoyle, who told the crowd:

  • Kirk was deposed by the House January 6 Committee , where he invoked the Fifth Amendment.

  • He continued to push conspiracy theories about voter fraud, especially in Arizona, claiming that tens of thousands of ballots were illegal and calling for audits and decertification.

  • Even in later years, Kirk maintained that the 2020 election was “rigged” and “stolen,” though he urged supporters not to boycott future elections.

🧠 Broader Impact


Kirk’s denialism helped solidify his role as a key MAGA influencer , especially among young conservatives. His organization, Turning Point USA, became a hub for election conspiracy rhetoric and mobilization efforts.

If you’d like, I can show how Kirk’s election denialism compares to other figures in the MAGA movement or how it shaped youth political engagement post-2020.

====================================================================================

Rep. Mace to introduce resolution authorizing Charlie Kirk to lie in honor at US Capitol

“Charlie Kirk was more than a leader, he was a man of faith, integrity, and conviction,” Congresswoman Mace said. “He gave young Americans the courage to speak boldly, to live out their beliefs, and to never waver in the defense of freedom. It is only fitting his life be remembered in the Capitol, where the freedoms he defended are enshrined. His legacy will endure, and his faith will continue to inspire millions.”

===========================================================================

G0wsfQNWkAMrxcp?format=jpg&name=small

============================================================================

_116380947_gettyimages-1230458849.jpg





Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  author  JohnRussell    last year

There is no bridge too far for lunatics like Nancy Mace. 

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
2  Mark in Wyoming     last year

I asked google ( i know , but its my friend ) who authorized laying in state / honor ? 

 simple answer i got since there is no law pertaining to the issue , is it is designated by a concurrent resolution passed by both the house and senate  since both have control over the use of the rotunda .

 google went on to differentiate as to what lying in state and lying in honor is because there is a distinction .

lying in state is usually reserved for those that have served in government or government service .

lying in honor is usually reserved for civilians who had no government service history  but had an impact on the nation.

 the caveat i see is that the dead persons family also has to consent to it . they have the final say . 

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.1  MrFrost  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @2    last year

Thanks for posting this. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2  author  JohnRussell  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @2    last year

Thats all well and good. My seeded article is pointing out the absurdity of this request. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3  Greg Jones    last year

Nothing can be more absurd than this display by the Congressional Dems "honoring" some criminal drug addict

Why were US Democrats wearing Ghana’s kente cloth?

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
3.1  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Greg Jones @3    last year

Lol.  A decades long heroin addict antivax conspiracy theorist being appointed as Sec. of Health and Human Services is at least 1,000 times more absurd.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.1.1  bugsy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1    last year

Yes, that is much better than a crack and heroin addict actually running the White House while his father drooled in his morning oatmeal s/

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
3.1.2  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  bugsy @3.1.1    last year

Could there be a clearer sign of a bot infestation in this site than a supremely moronic comment like that?

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.1.3  bugsy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.2    last year

Yes, there are bots everywhere.

Only bots can make responses I did, but no way they could have made the idiotic one you did s/

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
3.1.4  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  bugsy @3.1.3    last year

Is RFK Jr. all of the things I mentioned.  Duh, yes.  100%, indisputable, as admitted to by RFK Jr. himself.  Bot, otoh, wants us to think that Hunter was running the WH.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.1.5  Trout Giggles  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.4    last year

which really is stupid

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.1.6  bugsy  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.1.5    last year
which really is stupid

Yes, thinking there are bots all over the site really is stupid.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
3.1.7  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  bugsy @3.1.6    last year

Suggesting that Hunter Biden was running the WH is so incredibly stupid that it goes way beyond human level trolling.  A bot has no brain to stop itself when maximum human stupidity has been exceeded.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.8  Sean Treacy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.7    last year

Jack Tapper said he was acting as his dad's chief of staff.  I guess Tapper is now a bot. 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
3.1.9  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Sean Treacy @3.1.8    last year

You must like shooting fish in barrels.  Of course Hunter Biden will vociferously deny the most idiotic accusations about him such as this … but he is Hunter Biden, so it is axiomatic in conservative circles that he doesn’t just lose every argument, his voice is to be universally treated as permanently irrelevant.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.1.10  bugsy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.7    last year
Suggesting that Hunter Biden was running the WH is so incredibly stupid that it goes way beyond human level trolling

It has been reported by real sources that he attended many meetings in the WH, without any credentials, without any clearance. Why would he be in those meetings other than to make decisions he knows the drooler in chief could not make?

I understand there are bots that are programmed to continually defend Biden on social media sites. 

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.1.11  bugsy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.9    last year
universally treated as permanently irrelevant.

Would you listen to a known drug addict, hooker paying, money laundering idiot?

Sounds like you do

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.1.12  Greg Jones  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.7    last year

"Suggesting that Hunter Biden was running the WH is so incredibly stupid that it goes way beyond human level trolling.  A bot has no brain to stop itself when maximum human stupidity has been exceeded."

It's not clear who was really running the White House, but it is painfully obvious that it wasn't drool-in-soup Joe
 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
4  Gsquared    last year

She's an idiot.

 
 

Who is online