╌>

Newly appointed US attorney will attempt to charge James Comey despite prosecutors finding no probable cause: Sources - ABC News

  
Via:  John Russell  •  last year  •  16 comments

By:   ABC News

Newly appointed US attorney will attempt to charge James Comey despite prosecutors finding no probable cause: Sources  - ABC News
The new U.S. Attorney in Virginia is planning to ask a grand jury to indict former FBI Director James Comey for allegedly lying to Congress, sources said.

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Trump appointed longtime aide Lindsey Halligan to lead the case.

Donald Trump's handpicked U.S. Attorney in Virginia is planning to ask a grand jury in the coming days to indict former FBI Director James Comey for allegedly lying to Congress, despite prosecutors and investigators determining there was insufficient evidence to charge him, sources with direct knowledge of the probe told ABC News.

Earlier this week, prosecutors presented Lindsey Halligan -- Trump's former personal attorney whom he appointed to lead the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Virginia -- with a detailed memo recommending that she decline to bring perjury and obstruction charges against Comey, the sources familiar with the memo said.

A monthslong investigation into Comey by DOJ prosecutors failed to establish probable cause of a crime -- meaning that not only would they be unable to secure a conviction of Comey by proving the claims beyond a reasonable doubt, but that they couldn't reach a significantly lower standard to secure an indictment, the sources said.

Former FBI Director James Comey testifies before the Senate Intelligence Committee, Washington D.C., June 8, 2017.Mark Reinstein/Corbis via Getty Images

US attorney resigns amid pressure from Trump after sources say he refused to charge NY AG Letitia James


According to Justice Department guidelines, prosecutors are generally barred from bringing charges unless they can prove a defendant will "more likely than not be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt by an unbiased trier of fact and that the conviction will be upheld on appeal."

Despite their recommendations, Halligan -- who has never prosecuted a criminal case in her career as an insurance lawyer -- plans to present evidence to a grand jury before the statute of limitations for the alleged offense expires next week, the sources said.

Comey's attorney did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Halligan's apparent plan to seek charges against Comey follows a clear directive from Trump, who over the weekend directly called for prosecutions against Comey, Sen. Adam Schiff and New York Attorney General Letitia James.

"Nothing is being done. What about Comey, Adam 'Shifty' Schiff, and Leticia???" Trump wrote in a social media post on Saturday evening, directly addressing Attorney General Pam Bondi. "We can't delay any longer, it's killing our reputation and credibility. They impeached me twice, and indicted me (5 times!), OVER NOTHING. JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!!"

Lindsey Halligan, special assistant to the president, speaks with a reporter outside of the White House, Aug. 20, 2025.Jacquelyn Martin/AP, FILE

Trump says he is appointing Lindsey Halligan, one of his former attorneys, to lead key prosecutor's office


According to sources, Halligan's deputy -- a prosecutor who was briefly assigned to lead the office just a day before Trump appointed Halligan to the high-profile position -- has also expressed reservations about bringing the politically charged case.

Halligan has been spotted at DOJ headquarters in Washington, D.C., at least twice this week for meetings which, in part, centered around the Comey matter, sources said.

The United States Attorney's office in the Eastern District of Virginia -- which prosecutes the bulk of the country's national security cases -- has been thrown into tumult amid Trump's campaign to push for prosecutions of his political adversaries.


Erik Siebert, Trump's previous nominee to the position,resigned from the office after sources said he refused to bring charges against New York Attorney General Letitia James over unfounded allegations of mortgage fraud.

Trump later claimed he "fired" Siebert andquickly installed Halligan into the position, as he continued to make unprecedented calls for the speedy prosecution of his political foes.

"I just want people to act, they have to act, and we want to act fast," Trump said on Saturday. "They were ruthless and vicious. I was impeached twice. I was indicted five times. It turned out to be a fake deal. And we have to act fast, one way or the other, one way or the other: they're guilty, they're not guilty. We have to act fast. If they're not guilty, that's fine. If they are guilty, or if they should be charged, they should be judged. And we have to do it now."


Trump has long criticized Comey, who briefly served as the director of the FBI during Trump's first term but was fired over his handling of an investigation into alleged Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election.

The Department of Justice launched an investigation into Comey earlier this year after FBI Director Kash Patel claimed to discover "burn bags" containing sensitive documents at the FBI headquarters related to the Russia probe.

In July, CIA Director John Ratcliffe released a review that concluded the 2016 intelligence assessment over alleged collusion was "conducted through an atypical & corrupt process under the politically charged environments" of Comey and former CIA Director John Brennan.

When asked about the probe in July, Trump told reporters he believes Brennan and Comey are "truly bad people and dishonest people."

"I will tell you, I think they're very dishonest people. I think they're crooked as hell. And, maybe they have to pay a price for that," Trump said.

Comey and Brennan have both stood by the integrity of the 2016 intelligence assessment, arguing its findings on Russia's interference in the election were bolstered by bipartisan congressional investigations as well as former special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation on ties between Russia and Trump's 2016 campaign.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    last year

Another loser , fake, prosecution. 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1.1  Gsquared  replied to  JohnRussell @1    last year

Totally fake.

In Trump world you indict first and then manufacture some "evidence".

Trump's DOJ appointees aren't prosecutors, they're persecutors.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
1.1.1  1stwarrior  replied to  Gsquared @1.1    last year

Sez 12 years of the opposing side telling Trump that "We gotcha" - with no results because there was/is no evidence??

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1.1.2  Gsquared  replied to  1stwarrior @1.1.1    last year

You're kidding, right?  34 felony convictions, a judgment for civil fraud, multiple indictments with overwhelming evidence of his guilt that were withdrawn only because he was elected President (which is a rule I've always believed is inappropriate).

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
1.1.3  Sparty On  replied to  Gsquared @1.1.2    last year

lol ….. you mean 34 made up felony convictions from a kangaroo court, that were misdemeanors, that rarely if ever get charged?    Try harder counselor.

2020 election interference?    Dismissed

 Classified document handling case?    Dismissed

Impeachment one?    Acquitted 

Imoeachment two?   Acquitted

Etc, etc

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
1.1.4  evilone  replied to  Sparty On @1.1.3    last year
you mean 34 made up felony convictions from a kangaroo court, that were misdemeanors, that rarely if ever get charged?

I suppose you don't think the getaway driver in a bank robbery should be charged with a felony after getting caught driving through a red light? It was only a misdemeanor traffic violation... /s

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.5  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sparty On @1.1.3    last year
2020 election interference?    Dismissed  Classified document handling case?    Dismissed

Dismissed by who?  Not a judge. 

The cases were dropped by Jack Smith because Trump won the election and a sitting president cannot be put on trial. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.6  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Gsquared @1.1.2    last year

Trump has never "won" any of the cases that have been brought against him. He lost every one of the ones that went to a judge or jury for a verdict. 

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
1.1.7  Thomas  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.6    last year

But he turns those into wins through the wonders of doublespeak.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1.1.8  Gsquared  replied to  Sparty On @1.1.3    last year
a kangaroo court

In right wing speak, but known to everyone else as a jury composed of American citizens.

that were misdemeanors

Reality alert -  He was convicted of felonies.

rarely if ever get charged

Yet he was charged and convicted.

Try harder counselor.

Don't need to when it's so easy to show how completely wrong you are.

2020 election interference?    Dismissed
Classified document handling case?    Dismissed

Try reading Comment 1.1.2 again:  multiple indictments with overwhelming evidence of his guilt that were withdrawn only because he was elected President

Impeachment one?    Acquitted 
Imoeachment two?   Acquitted

Trump will forever remain an impeached President, the only one of who impeached twice.  A true disgrace.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
1.1.9  Sparty On  replied to  Gsquared @1.1.8    last year

[✘]

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
1.1.10  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.5    last year

And yet, Trump spanked his fan club once again.    
I wonder if he’s getting tired of ….. winning!

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.2  bugsy  replied to  JohnRussell @1    last year
Another loser , fake, prosecution. 

You are starting to sound what leftists called "MAGAs" for years

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
2  evilone    last year

They either had to kiss Trump's ass and indict or let it go and maybe be replaced with someone even more sycophantic. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  seeder  JohnRussell    last year
Trump’s newly appointed U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia has been made well aware that her case against former FBI Director James Comey is a dud. But as the president applies pressure to prosecute his political rivals, she’ll reportedly be moving forward with it nonetheless.

The new interim attorney, Lindsey Halligan,  has  no prior prosecutorial experience. A former Trump personal attorney and longtime Trump loyalist, her most recent claim to fame was serving as the president’s lead Smithsonian censor, as  she sought  to expose and correct an “overemphasis on slavery” in the museums.

Now, she’s been appointed to her new post with the expectation that she will do what her predecessor, Erik Siebert, failed to: aggressively indict the president’s foes, namely, New York Attorney General Letitia James and Comey—evidence be damned.

But while Halligan reportedly plans to ask a grand jury to indict Comey, she faces a glaring issue: The case is so flimsy that, ABC News  reports , prosecutors this week, citing insufficient evidence, advised Halligan in a memo to decline to move forward with perjury and obstruction charges against him.

“A monthslong investigation into Comey by DOJ prosecutors failed to establish probable cause of a crime,” ABC News’s sources said, “meaning that not only would they be unable to secure a conviction of Comey by proving the claims beyond a reasonable doubt, but that they couldn’t reach a significantly lower standard to secure an indictment.”

Halligan has had her own qualms about the case, according to ABC News, as has Attorney General Pam Bondi, per  The Wall Street Journal .

But Trump has been applying pressure, even publicly, for the cases against his enemies to proceed. The deadline to indict Comey is this Tuesday, when the five-year statute of limitations expires for accusations that he lied to Congress during his 2020 testimony regarding Russian interference in the 2016 election. In a Saturday  Truth Social post  addressed to Bondi—which praised Halligan—the president called for urgent action on prosecuting the weak cases against Comey, James, and Senator Adam Schiff, lest the administration kill its “reputation and credibility.”
 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    last year

Wow. Bringing charges against  a political figure after another prosecutor passed on the case. 

Democrats would never, ever do that. 

 
 

Who is online