Enough Is Enough … I Choose VIOLENCE! | The Daily Caller
By: dailycaller
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Editor's Note: We've received a lot of feedback about this newsletter. At the Daily Caller, we publish a wide range of strongly-worded opinions. Robust debate matters, and the values of free expression require that we host voices with which readers may strongly disagree. That said, the Daily Caller does not condone violence in any form, especially political violence. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not represent the position of the Daily Caller. The examples outlined in the piece refer to hypothetical instances of self-defense, not political violence or extrajudicial mob action. We've spoken with the author, who reiterated that is his position, and explicitly rejects any incitement to violence.
Greetings, Dear Reader,
Today, I choose violence. Literally.
I know calls for violence are generally frowned upon. The issue is … I simply don't care.
Part of the social compact in this country going all the way back to its founding there are simply some things you do not do. When you do those things, well, you might just end up with a few extra knots in your head.
Thus, the title of today's newsletter …
A CALL FOR VIOLENCE
It's all about cost, and the cost is not high enough.
In some places, the cost is nonexistent. We need to reinstitute a public debt for anti-social and subversive behavior. In my opinion, some of this cost needs to be summary and ultra-violent.
Is this a call for violence? Yes. Explicitly it is.
The law is not enough. Or, it's non-existent. Somewhere deep down inside we've always known no one is coming to help us. We need to help ourselves.
It reminds me a bit of this old bar fight story from good ol' Teddy. Sometimes bullies require immediate and overwhelming force.
Text excerpt describing Theodore Roosevelt's barroom confrontation in Mingusville, Montana Territory, from An Autobiography (1913).
They "hustled him out and put him in the shed." Ah yes, Teddy knew how to deal with bullies.
Thursday bothered me a bit, on two fronts. One is that Comey got indicted, and the reaction was predictably unhinged. I'm not going to unpack the case, it seems clear he lied to Congress. An Eastern District of Virginia grand jury, hardly a bastion of conservatism, returned an indictment. Just like they did over censorship and Kimmel's firing, amnesiac liberals squealed about political perversion of the Department of Justice.
Steven Bannon went to prison for four months. It wasn't even that long ago and he wasn't even the only one. All he did was defy a congressional subpoena. Democracy will survive if James Comey spends time in jail for lying to Congress to cover up a subversive conspiracy to undermine Trump.
Let's do Fauci next, how about that? He definitely lied to Congress too. Then let's investigate Ilhan Omar, AOC, Barack Obama, and everyone in Clinton world. Let's put Biden world through the wringer. I'm freshly out of shits.
Truth be told I don't even care if Comey or Fauci end up in jail. As long as the arrest and adjudication process absolutely ruins them.
I also don't care if Democrats turn around and do the same thing to Republicans. The GOP is full of morally bankrupt, lying elites too. Swamp creatures, profiteers, unpatriotic turncoats, transactional voters in the Senate. Let's purge them.
If this is the new normal, I'll take it. Your squeals are music to me. They are the soundtrack of nature healing.
There should be a cost. For the lies, for taking the American people for granted, for selling them out at every end. For bullying them nonstop. Let's reinstitute the cost.
Moving past the legal "violence," let's get to the actual violence, shall we?
Alvin Bragg's office dismissed a felony assault charge yesterday. That shouldn't be a shock to anyone — nobody is more renowned for soft on violent crime prosecutions than Bragg. What is shocking though is in this particular case the act was caught on film. What's more, the assailant then went on social media and bragged about doing it.
Pro-life advocate Savannah Craven Antao was doing a man-on-the-street video in Harlem, New York, when she was abruptly and viciously assaulted by a woman she was interviewing.
Brianna J. Rivers, a brutish, hulking woman, socked Antao in the face twice the moment she was distracted.
This is dead-to-rights felony aggravated assault. It should result in prison time and probation.
Prosecutors initially downgraded the charge to a misdemeanor, then dismissed the charges altogether.
And the message couldn't be clearer.
The message is clear: In liberal jurisdictions, it's open season on assaulting conservatives. https://t.co/VfSHQV1l3h — Geoffrey Ingersoll (@GPIngersoll) September 26, 2025
How do we fix this? In corrupt legal scenarios, where the judges, prosecutors and even police are all a part of a rigged system, what do we do?
Choose violence.
We all know the government is not going to help you in your time of need. Especially a Soros-sponsored government.
Conservatives looking to peacefully assemble and publicly debate need to be realistic. Nobody is going to help you. In fact, they're going to encourage violence. They're going to excuse, justify and encourage it.
We saw as much with Charlie Kirk. They were practically begging someone to go after him, and when someone did, they quickly justified it.
Well, I think now that we know the extent of it, the time to go as lambs to the slaughter is OVER.
In real terms, this means: Bring security with you that's dying to dole out drubbings. I'm sure a fair amount of ex-cons who found Jesus loved Charlie Kirk. Maybe they need work?
Whatever works. We need to reinstitute the cost.
So some activist takes the sign next to your table at a public debate, like what happened here ? She gets instantly clotheslined. I don't care if police are present. Do it anyway. In fact, be wildly disproportionate.
A fat black lady assaults your on-camera talent? Book the kind of security that has no qualms hospitalizing her and people like her.
Dudes rope up your car and start vandalizing it ? Bros dismounting with cudgels will fix that real quick. Turn it into an instant brawl. Break bones.
Force corrupt police to intervene. I want blood in the streets.
Speaking of costs, such a posture is indeed costly. It'll cost money, firstly. Security isn't cheap. It'd likely cost about $1,000 a day for just two guys. It'll also come at a social cost, and a legal cost. Bragg might not prosecute militant liberals, but he'll certainly take a conservative organization to court if his street brutes are harmed.
But you know what else isn't cheap? The social compact in America. It comes at a cost. If patriots aren't willing to step up and bear the burden, our people will continue to be harassed, assaulted, even killed with impunity.
What's clear to me in these two examples is that liberals believe they have a monopoly on both legal and extra-legal acts of violence. They don't. We need to show them they don't.
We must stop clutching our principles and shouting "stop." They own the legal system. That will achieve nothing. We need action. Disproportionate. Violent. Action.
Pain and suffering.
We need to raise the cost of obviating the social contract. Measure it in blood if necessary. Change requires pain, and you're either taking it or inflicting it.
I know which side I'm on, and I'm more than ready to start putting people in the shed.
Tags
Who is online
149 visitors
A fat black lady shoves you at a protest? Have on hand hired goons who will beat her up and send her to the hospital.
What this writer is calling for is escalating street violence.
What a twisted column. Of course, "Beat them into submission" always is the appropriate response. /s
the duty of the state is to protect people from violence and punish those who commit it. When dystopian states like New York fail to prosecute assaults for partisan reason or basic incompetence. people will protect themselves.
A state letting people who brutally assault others on camera get off Scot free is simply incompatible with a functioning society. This reaction is what always happens when governments lose legitimacy. It’s human nature.
This is exactly what he says
And you think that is defensible?
do you think it’s defensible to let people assault others on camera and escape punishment?
If progressives don’t start enforcing laws against their own, that response is inevitable. either the state punishes violence or vigilantes will take defending themselves into their own hands. Progressive governments need to protect all their citizens, not just the privileged ones.
People have a total right to defend themselves, and have the right to bodyguards. If they have their bodyguards beat people up and put them in the hospital because the person was shoved by a protester then the person and the bodyguards will likely end up in jail.
BURN IT DOWN!
And they did.
Increasingly it is clear that the right wing is no longer freedom loving patriots. They claim freedom and seem angry/happy to do word combat with the "libs" online but since they cannot win with words or ideas or policies it has devolved into wanting extremism against their fellow Americans.
This is just because their hatred of the left that they love to argue with, has become a mission of repression and suppression of the "left" just so they can claim a hollow victory. It is NOT a victory if everyone in America loses their freedom of speech because right wing extremists don't want to hear the other side. We are Americans and should be on the same side when it comes to safety and free speech.
The mind set of many of today's right wingers.
A question from a right wing asshole at a Charlie Kirk rally in 2021: