╌>

Live updates: Judge orders SNAP funded despite shutdown; GOP debates filibuster

  
Via:  John Russell  •  last year  •  26 comments

By:   The Hill staff (The Hill)

Live updates: Judge orders SNAP funded despite shutdown; GOP debates filibuster
A federal judge on Friday ordered the Department of Agriculture to tap its emergency funds to keep the program feeding millions of Americans afloat amid the government shutdown. U.S. District Judge John McConnell's ruling prevents the administration from completely drying up the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits for more than 40 million Americans starting Saturday.…

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


A federal judge on Friday ordered the Department of Agriculture to tap its emergency funds to keep the program feeding millions of Americans afloat amid the government shutdown.

U.S. District Judge John McConnell's ruling prevents the administration from completely drying up the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits for more than 40 million Americans starting Saturday. "SNAP benefits have never, until now, been terminated," he said at a hearing, ordering $5.25 billion be released.

Meanwhile, on the 31st day of the government shutdown, Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) warned against ending the filibuster, an action President Trump insisted the Senate take to pass the government funding bill with a simple majority.

Trump posted Thursday night on Truth Social that it was "time" for the GOP to use the so-called nuclear option to "Get rid of the Filibuster, and get rid of it, NOW!"

Johnson noted the "important safeguard" the filibuster offers. "If the shoe was on the other foot, I don't think our team would like it."

Trump left the White House on Friday morning for a weekend at his Florida estate after returning Thursday from a five-day, three-country swing through Asia and an evening of Halloween celebration at the White House.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    last year

Everyone in Congress and the administration will try to take credit for this decision. 

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
2  George    last year

Lets do the Math, Snap spends about 100 billion a year, that is about 2 billion a week, so this Judge just bought the democrats 2.5 to 3 weeks before they are under the gun again. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  George @2    last year

I think the shutdown will be settled next week. 

 
 
 
charger 383
Professor Silent
3  charger 383    last year

When the government is shut down we should not have to pay taxes to it.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
3.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  charger 383 @3    last year
When the government is shut down we should not have to pay taxes to it.

And their salaries withheld.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3.2  evilone  replied to  charger 383 @3    last year
When the government is shut down we should not have to pay taxes to it.

When the government is shut down we should prorate the Congressional pay for the days they fuck around.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
4  Nerm_L    last year

See?  We do not need elected officials.  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5  Sean Treacy    last year

What an insane, lawless overreach.

Activist judges are the actual danger to democracy. 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
5.1  1stwarrior  replied to  Sean Treacy @5    last year

Evidently, didn't get the memo from SCOTUS - you ain't the friggin' boss - get over it.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
6  Tacos!    last year
A federal judge on Friday ordered the Department of Agriculture to tap its emergency funds to keep the program feeding millions of Americans afloat amid the government shutdown.

Argentina gets $40 Billion, (which no one in America asked for) but the government has to be ordered to feed hungry Americans.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
7  Greg Jones    last year
 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
7.1  Snuffy  replied to  Greg Jones @7    last year

I don't know if that's true. The Trump administration did use the contingency funds during a previous shutdown in his first term.

This stands in opposition to the law and prior practice, including by the Trump Administration itself. Also, the Administration could use its legal transfer authority — the same authority it already used to provide additional funds to WIC — to supplement the contingency reserves, which alone are not enough to fund families’ full benefits for November. The Administration must use all available options to fund November benefits for the 1 in 8 people in the U.S. who need SNAP to afford their grocery bill.

2018-2019 shutdown:   On December 21, 2018, during the first Trump Administration, a continuing resolution (CR), under which SNAP had been funded, expired. For SNAP and other appropriated entitlements CRs have historically provided that funds are available for “payments due on or about the first day of any month” that begins within 30 days of the end of the CR. As a result, states were able to issue SNAP benefits for January 2019.

On January 8, 2019, the Administration directed states to issue SNAP benefits for February 2019 by January 20, before the end of the 30-day window authorized by the CR. [8]   Every state was able to do so. Another CR was enacted on January 25, 2019, ending the shutdown, but USDA issued several pieces of guidance during this period that spoke to the availability of SNAP’s contingency fund for SNAP benefits. [9]

In a January 10, 2019 Q&A, [10]   USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) stated that contingency funds could be used to pay benefits for new applicants:

SNAP’s Contingency Reserve Is Available for Regular SNAP Benefits, as USDA and OMB Have Ruled in Past | Center on Budget and Policy Priorities

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
7.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Snuffy @7.1    last year

Even if you assume the president has the legal authority to use contingency funds, the problem is an unelected district court judge ordering the president on how to his exercise discretionary power. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.1.2  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @7.1.1    last year

He should his power to resign. Or should we say abdicate? 

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
7.1.3  Snuffy  replied to  Sean Treacy @7.1.1    last year

Yes, I agree with that. This bit about judge shopping and partisanship has gotten out of hand and needs to be fixed. Judges are doing it because Congress has gotten so fucked up they have hamstrung themselves. I would say we need a Constitutional Convention to fix Congress and impose term limits (as well as a few other things) but I'm also very concerned about all the other crap that would come up. The American public is also so divided. The teaching of civics in public schools has declined so much since the 60's that a great many people just don't know how government is supposed to work. 

The other issue is that normal SNAP funding is around $9.3 Billion a month. The $5 to $6 Billion available in the contingency funds would only cover a couple of weeks and would remain empty until a new budget is passed. If there is a national disaster that occurs before it's refunded then there's no money for emergency food issues that could arise. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
7.1.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @7.1.2    last year

He was elected to exercise his discretionary powers. That’s how democracy works. If you don’t like it, vote for the opposition.

yet again, this shows how progressives think “democracy” is just unelected people exercising arbitrary powers to achieve the goals they want. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.1.5  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @7.1.4    last year

Trump should resign because he is a criminal who belongs in prison. 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
8  Gsquared    last year

An excellent ruling by a common sense judge.

Republicans hold all the levers of power but they blame the Democrats because they think they are entitled to their votes.  Meanwhile, Trump and his reactionary supporters would rather let American children starve than talk to the Democrats about reaching a compromise.  The voters will not look favorably on the Republicans in the next elections.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
9  Greg Jones    last year

The Republicans want to OPEN the government, which is why they vote YES for a clean CR, the Dems want to keep it CLOSED and keep voting NO.

The voters are smart enough to figure it out.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
9.1  Gsquared  replied to  Greg Jones @9    last year

The Republicans could open the government today if they wanted to.  Oh yeah, they're not in Washington.  Most of them are at home with their thumbs up their ...

The voters know who the problem is, and they don't think it's the Democrats.

More Americans blame Trump and Republicans in Congress for shutdown than Democrats

The survey, conducted Oct. 24-28, finds a combined 52% of voters blame Trump and congressional Republicans (Emphasis added) for the stalemate, while 42% blame Democrats in Congress and 4% blame all of the players.

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
9.1.1  George  replied to  Gsquared @9.1    last year

The republicans can’t open the government without agreeing to the graft the democrats are demanding, I say keep it shut down. No pay-offs for votes.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
9.1.2  Right Down the Center  replied to  Gsquared @9.1    last year
The Republicans could open the government today if they wanted to. 

Yes, and all they have to do is give in to the extortion.  The dems could open it up by voting to open it up

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
9.1.3  Gsquared  replied to  George @9.1.1    last year
I say keep it shut down

... and kick 20 million Americans off their health insurance... and starve poor children...

Got it.  The Republican Way.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
9.1.4  Gsquared  replied to  Right Down the Center @9.1.2    last year

Your claim of "extortion" is a distortion.

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
9.1.5  George  replied to  Gsquared @9.1.3    last year
starve poor children...

Exactly what democrats are doing to extort the government to buy votes.

256

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
9.1.6  Tacos!  replied to  George @9.1.5    last year

That’s not actually a thing. No one is asking for that.

 
 

Who is online


131 visitors