╌>

John Eastman loses his law license in California over 2020 election scheme

  
Via:  John Russell  •  7 months ago  •  7 comments

By:   Kyle Cheney (POLITICO)

John Eastman loses his law license in California over 2020 election scheme
Eastman helped architect Trump's legal effort to block Joe Biden's 2020 victory.

Leave a comment to auto-join group NEWSMucks

NEWSMucks


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


John Eastman, the veteran conservative attorney who devised a radical, last-ditch strategy to help Donald Trump subvert the 2020 election, can no longer practice law in California.

The California Supreme Court on Wednesday turned down Eastman's final bid to salvage his law license, upholding the decision by lower-court judges to order Eastman's disbarment over his role in the 2020 scheme. The court ordered that his name be "stricken from the roll of attorneys."

The decision ends a three-year disciplinary process punctuated by a lengthy and high-stakes trial that reviewed Eastman's emergence as a key architect of Trump's effort to pressure then-Vice President Mike Pence to singlehandedly block Joe Biden's Electoral College victory.

A judge on California's State Bar Court ordered Eastman's disbarment in 2024, but the decision was tied up in appeals ever since. In the interim, however, Eastman was suspended from practicing law.

Though the decision only applies to Eastman's license to practice law in California, disbarment decisions are typically adopted by authorities in other jurisdictions in "reciprocal" rulings. Eastman is also a member of the bar in Washington, D.C., though his license has been suspended there as well.

Eastman remains one of the highest-profile figures in Trump's orbit to face enduring consequences for his involvement in Trump's 2020 effort. The former clerk to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas was identified by former special counsel Jack Smith as a co-conspirator in Trump's alleged criminal plot to remain in power. He was also criminally charged in Arizona and Georgia, alongside a long list of Trump allies, in cases that were derailed by procedural and prosecutorial defects. Attorneys Rudy Giuliani and Kenneth Chesebro, allies of Eastman in the effort, were similarly disbarred.

Matthew Seligman, a constitutional law attorney who was a lead witness against Eastman at his disbarment trial, called the state supreme court's ruling "a just end to a story of injustice."

"Dr. Eastman tried to use his legal training to subvert the will of the American people in one of the gravest assaults on the American election system in our nation's history," Seligman said. "As the Court concluded, after that misconduct, Dr. Eastman cannot be trusted with the responsibility of serving clients as an attorney."

Jeffrey Clark, a former Trump administration official, is fighting potential disbarment in Washington, D.C., as well. Clark quickly weighed in on Eastman's California disbarment, calling it a "travesty" and encouraging Eastman to ask the U.S. Supreme Court for relief.

"The California Supreme Court has allowed to stand a State Bar Court recommendation that we contend departs from long-standing United States Supreme Court precedent protecting First Amendment rights, especially in the attorney discipline context," said Randall Miller, Eastman's attorney during his disciplinary proceedings. "We disagree with that outcome and believe it raises pivotal constitutional concerns regarding the limits of state regulation of attorney speech."

Miller said Eastman would ask the U.S. Supreme Court "to repudiate this threat to the rule of law and our nation's adversarial system of justice."

Eastman was brought into Trump's fold in the fall of 2020, as Trump pursued increasingly strained legal and political efforts to cling to power despite losing the election. Eastman helped craft litigation aimed at overturning the results in Georgia and other states, and pressed state lawmakers to assert the authority to change the results.

After courtroom efforts failed, Eastman helped Trump craft a plan to use the Jan. 6, 2021, session of Congress — when lawmakers were required to meet and certify Biden's victory in the 2020 election — to convince Pence to use his power to halt the proceedings. Trump latched onto the theory and spent weeks pressuring Pence to act, and Eastman spent the days before Jan. 6 huddling with Pence aides to convince them to adopt the strategy.

Pence ultimately refused, effectively sealing Biden's victory.

Outrage among Trump's supporters — assembled in Washington at the president's behest — led to the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol. During the violence, Eastman continued to pressure Pence to consider calling off the proceedings, leading to a dramatic and infamous exchange with Pence's top aides, as they sheltered from the mob inside the Capitol.

"Thanks to your bullshit we are now under siege," Pence's chief counsel at the time, Greg Jacob, said in an email to Eastman.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    7 months ago

He should thank God he's not in prison. 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1.1  Gsquared  replied to  JohnRussell @1    7 months ago

He may be at some point.  There is a felony case against him pending in Arizona.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.2  TᵢG  replied to  JohnRussell @1    7 months ago

Agreed.   What took so long for this to happen anyway?

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1.2.1  Gsquared  replied to  TᵢG @1.2    7 months ago

It can be a lengthy process.   The State Bar Office of Chief Trial Counsel filed disciplinary charges against him in January 2023.  There is a trial involved and then a review process.

This is a link to the State Bar website explaining some of what occurred:

.

You may find it interesting.

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Junior Quiet
1.3  Igknorantzruls  replied to  JohnRussell @1    7 months ago
He should thank God he's not in prison.

He should be glad he didn't face a firing squad, cause that's as treasonous(imho) as it comes. Crimes against our country of the worst kind.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2  seeder  JohnRussell    7 months ago
Matthew Seligman, a constitutional law attorney who was a lead witness against Eastman at his disbarment trial, called the state supreme court's ruling "a just end to a story of injustice." "Dr. Eastman tried to use his legal training to subvert the will of the American people in one of the gravest assaults on the American election system in our nation's history," Seligman said. "As the Court concluded, after that misconduct, Dr. Eastman cannot be trusted with the responsibility of serving clients as an attorney."
 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
3  Gsquared    7 months ago

Good riddance.  He is a disgrace.

From the State Bar of California website:

Attorney Profile

John Charles Eastman #193726
License Status: Not Eligible to Practice Law
CONSUMER ALERT

This attorney has been charged with a felony. The felony matter is pending in the Superior Court of Arizona, County of Maricopa (case no. CR2024-006850). For more information, contact the court in the jurisdiction where the case is pending. The State Bar posts consumer alerts online when lawyers are charged in a criminal court with a felony or felonies.  Anyone who believes they have been the victim of attorney misconduct is urged to file a complaint with the State Bar.

DISCLAIMER: The filing of criminal charges does not constitute a finding of guilt or professional misconduct. Criminal defendants are presumed to be innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

 Address: Constitutional Counsel Group, 1628 N Main St # 289, Salinas, CA 93906-5102

Phone: 909-257-3869  |  Fax: 714-844-4817

Email: Not Available  |  Website: Not Available

Date License Status  Discipline  Administrative Action 
Present Not eligible to practice law in CA    
3/30/2024 Not eligible to practice law in CA   Ordered inactive 23-O-30029 
1/26/2023   Disciplinary charges filed in State Bar Court 23-O-30029 
12/15/1997 Admitted to the State Bar of California
 
 

Who is online






84 visitors