╌>

BIDEN: 'When You File, Get a Ballot, Fill It, Uh Out, You Have to Sign an Affidavit, If You Don't, Say It's Me!"

  
Via:  Nerm_L  •  6 years ago  •  32 comments

By:   Sean Hannity

BIDEN: 'When You File, Get a Ballot, Fill It, Uh Out, You Have to Sign an Affidavit, If You Don't, Say It's Me!"
Former Vice President Joe Biden continued to confuse millions of Americans Tuesday night when he launched into a bizarre tirade regarding mail-in...

Sponsored by group News Viners

News Viners


Joe Biden let the cat out of the bag during the debate(?).

Joe Biden explained how his campaign intends to selectively harvest votes.


Yes, the source is Sean Hannity.  But the only thing published is a quote by Joe Biden during the debate(?).  Biden's statement stands on its own. 


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



Former Vice President Joe Biden continued to confuse millions of Americans Tuesday night when he launched into a bizarre tirade regarding mail-in ballots, affidavits, testifying, and legitimate voting.

"Here's the deal. When you file, get a ballot, and you fill it out, you're supposed to have an affidavit. If you didn't know, someone say that this is me. You should be able to, if in fact you can verify that's you when if in before the ballot is thrown out. That's sufficient to count, not someone who made a mistake not dotting the correct 'I'. Who they voted for, testify, say who they voted for, say it's you, that's totally legitimate," Biden rambled.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Nerm_L    6 years ago

Joe Biden used obtuse political language to suggest that door-knockers may be filling out ballots for people and acting as a witness on affidavits.

Of course, this certainly isn't nationally coordinated.  Just because Joe Biden IS the Democratic Party doesn't mean he'll use that position for personal political gain.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Nerm_L @1    6 years ago

Thats not what he meant Nerm. 

I'll "translate" it for you.

-

When you send in a mail in ballot you are supposed to have an affidavit from a witness. If you sent it in without an affadavit and the election office notifies you that your vote is no good, go there with identification proving you are you. Then they should count the ballot. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1    6 years ago

PS. Sean Hannity is a moron. 

 
 
 
Gazoo
Masters Silent
1.1.2  Gazoo  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1    6 years ago

Then why didn’t biden say that? We all know why, some just won’t admit it.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1.1.3  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1    6 years ago
Thats not what he meant Nerm. 

Yeah, yeah, yeah.  I've heard the same thing from Trumpsters. 

Now we're stuck with Biden but hearing the same song & dance.


320

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1.1.4  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.1    6 years ago
PS. Sean Hannity is a moron. 

Yep, Hannity is, how do you day it? 

DEPLORABLE.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
1.1.5  Jasper2529  replied to  JohnRussell @1.1.1    6 years ago
When you send in a mail in ballot you are supposed to have an affidavit from a witness.

Maybe that's true where you live, John. My wife and I received our mandatory, universal mail-in ballots, and neither of us have to provide "an affidavit from a witness". All we have to do is fill out the ballot, seal it in the provided envelope ... and then either mail it via USPS ... or place it into a special election mail box within our county ... or hand-deliver it to our county board of elections office.

It seems that Biden and many others don't know the differences between verified absentee ballots with universal (unverified) mandatory mail-in ballots.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  Nerm_L @1    6 years ago
Joe Biden used obtuse political language to suggest that door-knockers may be filling out ballots for people and acting as a witness on affidavits.

That is FRAUD!   Ballot Harvesting is what turned CA blue and keeps the city of Philadelphia the most corrupt polling place in the nation.

There is no question that the dems are going to sow chaos and then try to steal the election.

In every Presidential election the American people should know the winner within 12 hours of when all the polls close!

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2    6 years ago

Sean Hannity is a moron. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.1    6 years ago

That's a great comeback.  Saying it once is of little value. Saying it twice is something elseeee.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
1.2.3  JBB  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.1    6 years ago

The American Moron Association must strongly protest that statement. Technically, Hannity is an imbecile or a common waterhead...

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1.2.4  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  Vic Eldred @1.2    6 years ago
That is FRAUD! 

No, that is business as usual for Democrats.  It's all quite legal and if it's not then Biden will issue an Executive Order.

Can a President pardon a political party?  Guess we'll find out.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
1.2.5  Vic Eldred  replied to  Nerm_L @1.2.4    6 years ago
No, that is business as usual for Democrats. 

I'm afraid you are right once again. Yet another stain on what has long been the delinquent of American political parties.


Can a President pardon a political party?

Good question.


Guess we'll find out.

I hope not.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
1.2.6  Ender  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.1    6 years ago

And Carlson just won a court case on the stance that he doesn't tell the truth.

 
 
 
Ender
Professor Expert
1.4  Ender  replied to  Nerm_L @1    6 years ago

Where the hell do you get that? Did we read the same sentence?

From what I got out of it, he is saying a ballot should not be invalidated just because someone didn't cross a T or some other stupid reason.

And if that was the case, they should be able to have someone say yes that he how they wanted to vote.

Making something like that into some kind of conspiracy, is just that.

SMH

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2  JBB    6 years ago

256

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  JBB @2    6 years ago

I'm holding on to that so that after this election we won't again hear that the polls weren't really that far off.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
2.1.1  JBB  replied to  Vic Eldred @2.1    6 years ago

[deleted]

Clinton only won the popular vote by about 3% allowing Trump to squeak out an EC inside straight in a few swing states. Butt, Biden is way ahead in all of them, too...

There is no EC path open for Trump this time.

Biden is winning 8-10%. So, Trump is doomed.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
2.1.2  Jasper2529  replied to  JBB @2.1.1    6 years ago
Clinton only won the popular vote by about 3%

In a presidential election, the popular vote doesn't count ... not even for Hillary.

 
 
 
Jasper2529
Professor Quiet
3  Jasper2529    6 years ago
“Here’s the deal. When you file, get a ballot, and you fill it out, you’re supposed to have an affidavit. If you didn’t know, someone say that this is me. You should be able to, if in fact you can verify that’s you when if in before the ballot is thrown out. That’s sufficient to count, not someone who made a mistake not dotting the correct ‘I’. Who they voted for, testify, say who they voted for, say it’s you, that’s totally legitimate,” Biden rambled.

Pressing "1" for English.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4  JohnRussell    6 years ago
"Here's the deal. When you file, get a ballot, and you fill it out, you're supposed to have an affidavit. If you didn't know,  that means someone to say that "this is me." You should be able to have it counted, if in fact you can verify that's you  before the ballot is thrown out. That's sufficient to count.,. not someone who made a mistake not dotting the correct 'I'. If you testify who you voted for,  and say it's you, that's totally legitimate," Biden rambled.

I fixed the original text to make it more understandable for some of you. 

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1  Vic Eldred  replied to  JohnRussell @4    6 years ago

Democrats are approaching it differently than they did in 2000, when they were oh, so, particular about those military ballots:

"In 2000, the nation’s politics hung in the balance of a recount fight in Florida. George W. Bush had beaten Al Gore by a few hundred votes in the seminal swing state, and Democrats went all-in to reverse this result and hand the presidency to Gore. One of the lawyers hired by the Democrats during the recount fight was Mark Herron, how drafted a memo detailing how to disqualify military absentee ballots. (Memo is below.) His work had an   immediate affect , as recalled by Bill Sammon in 2001:

The main battlegound was Duval County, home to more military families than any other county in Florida. Duval had more absentee ballots from overseas than any other county – 618 of 3,500 cast statewide. Five Gore lawyers showed up at the elections office at 9 a.m. Friday to disqualify as many of those ballots as possible.

Tom Bishop, one of the Republican lawyers, was incensed as he watched the Democrats, armed with the smoking-gun memo, blatantly go about disqualify large numbers of military ballots.

“They had their little cheat sheet they were using, and they objected on every single possible ground they could, no matter how spurious,” Bishop told Sammon. “It was so bad that there was rolling of the eyes by even some of the Democrats there who were watching their lawyers work.”

Before Nov. 17, the Duval supervisor of elections compared signatures on ballot envelopes against signature cards on file. He could find only two absentee ballots that could not be included because the signatures did not match.

“But now the Democrats insisted that they be allowed to compare all signatures, one by one. For seven tedious hours, they bitterly argued that signatures on more than 100 envelopes did not precisely match the signature cards – although some envelopes had been signed by sailors on rolling seas in hostile situations,” Sammon wrote.

“You could clearly tell it was the same person´s signature, but they would object because it didn´t have a certain curlicue or didn´t have a certain twist or it was smaller,” Bishop told him.

The Democrat lawyers sought to disqualify military ballots that had no overseas postmark on the grounds that some voters might have marked their ballots a day or two after the election and then mailed them in.

In some counties, half or nearly all the overseas ballots were rejected, many of them military ballots that apparently didn’t have postmarks.

Orange County, for example, rejected 117 of its 147 overseas ballots. In Hillsborough County, 74 of the 135 ballots were rejected after Democrats raised concerns about postmark or signature problems. Alachua County rejected half of the 56 ballots it received. St. Lucie rejected 13 of 14 and Lake County, all five.

“The party of the man who wants to be the next commander in chief is trying to throw out the votes of the men and women he will be commanding,” charged Jim Post, a Republican lawyer in Duval County, where 107 ballots were rejected.

Thomas Spencer, a Miami attorney for Bush, said the GOP legal team would weigh whether to sue this weekend. “One of the problems with those ballots is it is so difficult under Florida and federal law that you almost have to be a rocket scientist to comply,” he said.

Earlier this week, Mark Herron, a Tallahassee lawyer helping shepherd Democratic presidential election lawsuits through the local courts, sent a five-page letter to Democratic attorneys throughout Florida giving them tips on how to lodge protests against overseas ballots.

Such protests had to be filed before the ballot was taken out of the envelope. The letter focused on protesting military ballots.

Herron said he was retained by the DNC on election night.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.2  Vic Eldred  replied to  Tessylo @4.1.1    6 years ago

I provide links.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
4.1.3  Split Personality  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1    6 years ago

An 8 year old article from Breitbart about something that happened 20 years ago in Florida?

I was certain the topic was about Biden's speech and how discombobulated it looks in a transcript.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.4  Vic Eldred  replied to  Split Personality @4.1.3    6 years ago

Not to be forgotten or forgiven.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
4.1.5  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1    6 years ago
In 2000, the nation’s politics hung in the balance of a recount fight in Florida. George W. Bush had beaten Al Gore by a few hundred votes in the seminal swing state, and Democrats went all-in to reverse this result and hand the presidency to Gore.

Didn't Senator Joe Biden and Senator Al Gore spend a decade together?

One thing that is different this time, Democrats aren't waiting to lawyer up.  Democrats even have the Podesta Plan this time.

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
4.1.6  Vic Eldred  replied to  Nerm_L @4.1.5    6 years ago

Yes sir....They are taking no prisoners!

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
4.1.7  Split Personality  replied to  Vic Eldred @4.1.4    6 years ago

The transcript?

Or the fact that Bush still became POTUS in spite of the supposed dirty tricks in FL by the Dems?

Forgiven?

You love the biggest rat fucker of all time and buy in completely when he says

“One man’s dirty trick is another man’s civic participation.”  Roger Stone
 
 

Who is online







130 visitors