╌>

Karine Jean-Pierre stresses peace as online talk of violence ramps up after Mar-a-Lago search

  
Via:  Nerm_L  •  2 years ago  •  75 comments

By:   Noah Garfinkel (Axios)

Karine Jean-Pierre stresses peace as online talk of violence ramps up after Mar-a-Lago search
There is no place for political violence in this country.

Sponsored by group News Viners

News Viners


Does this sound like a President who is in charge?  The official message is that Biden was completely out of the loop.  And a generic milquetoast condemnation of political violence doesn't inspire confidence in Biden's leadership.

A compliant press can publish all sorts of argle-bargle about Trump.  But Biden is supposed to be in charge now.  Blaming Trump won't excuse Biden's weakness.


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre on Tuesday called for people to remain peaceful and said the White House condems any future "political violence" after former President Trump's Mar-a-Lago home was searched by the FBI.

Driving the news: Jean-Pierre was responding to a question about the possibility of violence amid online talk on pro-Trump forums, with some even calling for a "civil war," NBC reports.

What she's saying: "Our message is that [...] there is no place for political violence in this country," Jean-Pierre said.

  • "We would ask Americans to remain peaceful in this time again," she added. [Violence] is something that we condemn."

Of note: Jean-Pierre said the White House was not briefed on the search, but declined to comment any further, referring the media to the Department of Justice.

Go deeper: Presidential Records Act and Trump search explained


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Nerm_L    2 years ago

Blaming Trump won't excuse Biden behaving like an accidental President.  Who is really in charge?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.1  Tessylo  replied to  Nerm_L @1    2 years ago

Funny how you make trumpturd the victim here.  It's absolutely fucking hilarious actually.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1.1.1  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  Tessylo @1.1    2 years ago
Funny how you make trumpturd the victim here.  It's absolutely fucking hilarious actually.

So, who is in charge?  Who is running the government?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2  Tessylo  replied to  Nerm_L @1    2 years ago

"The official message is that Biden was completely out of the loop."

No, that's not the official message.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.2.1  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @1.2    2 years ago
No, that's not the official message.

How about "Biden Clueless"?

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
1.2.2  cjcold  replied to  Texan1211 @1.2.1    2 years ago

How about the fact that the far-right wing is clueless and prone to violence.

They proved that on1-6.  

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
1.2.3  Greg Jones  replied to  Tessylo @1.2    2 years ago
"No, that's not the official message."

But it's the truth

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.2.4  Tessylo  replied to  cjcold @1.2.2    2 years ago

Hey, you stole my answer!

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
1.2.5  Texan1211  replied to  cjcold @1.2.2    2 years ago
How about the fact that the far-right wing is clueless and prone to violence. They proved that on1-6. 

My, my, my, what a FINE DEFLECTION!

LMMFAO.

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
1.2.6  Jack_TX  replied to  cjcold @1.2.2    2 years ago
How about the fact that the far-right wing is clueless and prone to violence. They proved that on1-6. 

It wasn't the right wing that set every major city in America on fire in 2020 in order to shout at the sky.  

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
1.3  afrayedknot  replied to  Nerm_L @1    2 years ago

“…an accidental President.”

Really? You’ve gone off the deep end. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.4  JohnRussell  replied to  Nerm_L @1    2 years ago
Blaming Trump won't excuse Biden behaving like an accidental President.  Who is really in charge?

If we're not going to blame Trump for the threat of political violence, we are we supposed to blame? No one in the Biden administration is promoting violence. 

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
1.4.2  afrayedknot  replied to    2 years ago

?

 
 
 
afrayedknot
Junior Quiet
1.4.3  afrayedknot  replied to  afrayedknot @1.4.2    2 years ago

…”OR”, more “appropriately”…,,,..?

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
1.4.4  Tessylo  replied to  afrayedknot @1.4.2    2 years ago

"?"

That's how I feel about every moronic utterance - which is every single one

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
2  Jeremy Retired in NC    2 years ago
The official message is that Biden was completely out of the loop.

That's cute that they even remotely think Biden knows where he is let alone what's going on around him.

"We would ask Americans to remain peaceful in this time again," she added. [Violence] is something that we condemn.

They didn't seem to condemn it during the Floyd Riots.  I wonder what changed....

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
3  Mark in Wyoming     2 years ago

reading this , one thing popped to mind .

 plausable deniability , or believable deniability if one wants .

 if it goes south , and he wasnt "in the loop", how can he be blamed ?

 others will take the heat and the fall.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1  Tessylo  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @3    2 years ago

Why should he have to deny something that he would not have been aware of?

President Biden learned of the trumpturd search when we did - when it came on the news.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
3.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  Tessylo @3.1    2 years ago
President Biden learned of the trumpturd search when we did - when it came on the news.

Ah! 

Obama's 3rd term!

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Principal
3.1.2  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Texan1211 @3.1.1    2 years ago
Obama's 3rd term!

I thought the very same thing when I heard that bullshit on the news this morning.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
3.1.4  cjcold  replied to    2 years ago

The FBI is under no obligation to inform Biden of a search.

Seems the far-right just doesn't understand how government works.

[delete]

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
3.1.6  Greg Jones  replied to  Tessylo @3.1    2 years ago
"President Biden learned of the trumpturd search when we did - when it came on the news."

So you admit he was out of the loop.....besides being totally out of touch

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3.1.7  evilone  replied to  cjcold @3.1.4    2 years ago
Seems the far-right just doesn't understand how government works.

They seem to understand how authoritarian government works.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.8  Tessylo  replied to    2 years ago

You're calling President Biden stupid?

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Drinker of the Wry
Junior Expert
3.1.9  Drinker of the Wry  replied to  cjcold @3.1.4    2 years ago
The FBI is under no obligation to inform Biden of a search.

No you're right, however given who's property was searched, I would be surprised is President Biden was made aware of the intent and request for a warrant.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.10  Tessylo  replied to  Greg Jones @3.1.6    2 years ago

No, I didn't.

That's trumpturd and his supporters/enablers.

 
 
 
Sunshine
Professor Quiet
3.1.11  Sunshine  replied to  Drinker of the Wry @3.1.9    2 years ago
I would be surprised is President Biden was made aware of the intent and request for a warrant.

Garland would definitely run something of this magnitude by his boss before proceeding.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.13  Tessylo  replied to    2 years ago

Nothing to understand regarding your idiocy.  That's obvious.  

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
3.1.15  Tessylo  replied to    2 years ago

It's nice when you keep proving my point.

 
 
 
GregTx
PhD Guide
3.1.17  GregTx  replied to    2 years ago

Makes as much sense as,

"Going by what you say or don't say."
 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
3.1.19  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  GregTx @3.1.17    2 years ago
"Going by what you say or don't say."

That's usually an indication that they have absolutely nothing of any substance to add but still want to be part of the conversation.  They're ike a child trying to be part of an adult conversation.

 
 
 
GregTx
PhD Guide
3.1.20  GregTx  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @3.1.19    2 years ago

Or just ankle biters...

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
3.2  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @3    2 years ago
reading this , one thing popped to mind .

 plausable deniability , or believable deniability if one wants .

 if it goes south , and he wasnt "in the loop", how can he be blamed ?

 others will take the heat and the fall.

Sorry, that pooch has been screwed.  Maybe it's time for a Clinton defense.

512

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
3.2.1  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Nerm_L @3.2    2 years ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

true

someone definitely IS dog knotted , thing is , who and how high and deep?

 
 
 
Gazoo
Junior Silent
3.3  Gazoo  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @3    2 years ago

Even if he was in the loop he still has plausible deniability via dementia. 

 
 
 
Mark in Wyoming
Professor Silent
3.3.1  Mark in Wyoming   replied to  Gazoo @3.3    2 years ago

cmon gazoo man , thats "low hanging fruit ", even i left that one on the vine , over ripe and over used from testing .

 besides we dont want him to do his scrunchy face and creepy whisper trying to imitate clint eastwood yet looking like walter with gas.

 
 
 
Gazoo
Junior Silent
3.3.2  Gazoo  replied to  Mark in Wyoming @3.3.1    2 years ago

Low hanging fruit, that’s very appropriate for this pres. Anyway, if asked he could say he doesn’t recall and it would be 100% believable. 

 
 
 
GregTx
PhD Guide
4  GregTx    2 years ago

So neither Garland nor Wray thought they should give the White House a heads up?

Bullshit...

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
4.1  Texan1211  replied to  GregTx @4    2 years ago
Bullshit...

Exactly.

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
5  Tessylo    2 years ago

What's bullshit here is what y'all are spreading.  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
8  Sean Treacy    2 years ago

DOJ sources are already calling it a spectacular backfire and trying to insulate Garland from the blame for the raid by claiming he did not approve it. 

He insists, though, that Garland had no prior knowledge of the date and time of the specific raid, nor was he asked to approve it. "I know it's hard for people to believe," says the official, "but this was a matter for the U.S. Attorney and the FBI."

The blame game has already started 

 
 
 
GregTx
PhD Guide
8.1  GregTx  replied to  Sean Treacy @8    2 years ago

That the USAG knew nothing specific or gave approval to the head of his investigative branch for something like this is as unbelievable as the White House not having been briefed.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
8.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  GregTx @8.1    2 years ago
That the USAG knew nothing specific or gave approval to the head of his investigative branch for something like this is as unbelievable as the White House not having been briefed.

Of course its unbelievable to sane thinkers.

The same folks who want us all to believe that no one informed the WH want us all to believe the only reason Trump hasn't been indicted is because of some 'protocols' involving former Presidents.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
8.1.2  Greg Jones  replied to  GregTx @8.1    2 years ago

I suspect one of the first things the Republican Congress will do will be to open an investigation into the corruption that pervades the FBI

 
 
 
Tessylo
Professor Principal
8.1.3  Tessylo  replied to  Greg Jones @8.1.2    2 years ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
8.2  Greg Jones  replied to  Sean Treacy @8    2 years ago

mc-mar-a-logo_web20220810120000.jpg

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Expert
8.3  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Sean Treacy @8    2 years ago
The raid on Mar-a-Lago was based largely on information from an   FBI   confidential human source, one who was able to identify what classified documents former President Trump was still hiding and even the location of those documents, two senior government officials told   Newsweek .
The officials, who have direct knowledge of the FBI's deliberations and were granted anonymity..

The lefts beloved "anonymous source".  We've seen how those work out for the Democrats.  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
9  Sean Treacy    2 years ago

Our message is that [...] there is no place for political violence in this country," Jean-Pierre said

Unless it's political violence democrats support.  

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
9.1  cjcold  replied to  Sean Treacy @9    2 years ago

If democrats supported violence, Trump would be dead long ago.

 
 
 
Texan1211
Professor Principal
9.1.1  Texan1211  replied to  cjcold @9.1    2 years ago
If democrats supported violence, Trump would be dead long ago.

Naw--Democrats desperately need Trump alive.

What else could they possibly bitch so much about?

Without Trump, they have nothing to run on.

 
 

Who is online



79 visitors