Trump Is Wasting No Time in Tearing Down the East Wing
By: Luke Broadwater (The New York Times)
What part of America will Osama bin Trump destroy today?
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
As roaring machinery tore down one side of the White House, President Trump acknowledged on Wednesday that he was having the entire East Wing demolished to make way for his 90,000-square-foot ballroom, a striking expansion of a project that is remaking the profile of one of the nation's most iconic buildings.
Mr. Trump was unsentimental as news of the demolition spread. "It was never thought of as being much," he said of the East Wing, which was home to the first lady's office and spaces used for ceremonial purposes. "It was a very small building."
The process of tearing down the East Wing was expected to be completed as soon as this weekend, two senior administration officials said, as Mr. Trump moved rapidly to carry out a passion project that he said was necessary to host state dinners and other events.
But the previously unannounced decision to demolish the East Wing was at odds with Mr. Trump's previous statements about the project, and underscored his intention to blast through the sensibilities of many in Washington to continue putting a lasting imprint on the White House.
The president also said on Wednesday that the ballroom would cost $300 million, $100 million more than initially estimated.
"In order to do it properly, we had to take down the existing structure," Mr. Trump said. He also said — somewhat cryptically — that "certain areas are being left." But the two senior administration officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the plans, confirmed that the entire East Wing was being demolished.
The West Wing and the White House residence, where the president lives, are not affected by the project, which is the largest renovation to the White House in decades.
When Mr. Trump first announced his plans for the ballroom, he pledged that the White House would not be touched by the construction.
"It won't interfere with the current building. It'll be near it but not touching it," he said in July. "And pays total respect to the existing building, which I'm the biggest fan of."
Upon further evaluation, the White House determined it was cheaper and more structurally sound to demolish the East Wing than to build an addition, one of the administration officials said.
On Wednesday, the Secret Service kept onlookers away as heavy machinery ripped away at hunks of the building.
The scope of the demolition, and Mr. Trump's repeated promises that the White House itself would not be affected by the work, were in many ways symbolic of how he has conducted his presidency. On a variety of issues, Mr. Trump has blown past norms and traditions, often moving so quickly that it can be too late for courts, Congress or the public to catch up.
The planned size of the ballroom would transform the footprint of the White House campus. At 90,000 square feet, the ballroom would be nearly double the size of the White House residence, which is 55,000 square feet.
The ballroom is only the latest renovation plan that Mr. Trump has undertaken since he took office for the second time. He is also leaving his mark on the Oval Office, which now features many gilded flourishes. He also paved over the Rose Garden; erected huge flag poles on the White House grounds; and is planning to build an arch in front of Arlington National Cemetery in the style of the Arc de Triomphe.
Sara C. Bronin, a law professor at George Washington University who led the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation under former President Joseph R. Biden Jr., said that Mr. Trump's decision to tear down the East Wing appeared to run afoul of the National Historic Preservation Act, which requires federal agencies to take into account the effects of their actions on historic places.
"The Trump administration's shortsighted decision to start demolishing parts of the White House is exactly the kind of action the N.H.P.A. was passed to circumvent," she said.
Mr. Trump has said that he is raising tens of millions of dollars in private donations to fund the project. The president plans to contribute some of his own money as well, though the amount has not been determined, one of the officials said.
"It's being paid for 100 percent by me and some friends of mine," Mr. Trump said.
The East Wing was built in 1902 during Theodore Roosevelt's presidency as an extension to the White House, but was overhauled in the 1940s at the request of President Franklin D. Roosevelt.
It was built primarily to conceal an underground bunker, the Presidential Emergency Operations Center. It also added formal work space for the White House staff, including the offices of the first lady. Lorenzo Winslow was the architect of that addition.
It has also housed the White House Social Office and served as a headquarters for planning parties, state dinners and other events.
With the demolition of the East Wing goes a slice of history. It was where President Bill Clinton met secretly with Dick Morris, a political adviser, without his staff knowing. It was where Vice President Dick Cheney was hustled to a bunker after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. Mr. Trump was rushed there, too, during protests in 2020.
The White House on Tuesday did not answer questions about the bunker, but one of the administration officials said the new structure would also have enhanced security features.
Amid backlash to the demolition, the White House has defended its decision, publishing photos of past renovations and construction projects undertaken by presidents.
The White House says the ballroom, once finished, will have a seated capacity of 650 people, though Mr. Trump said recently it would hold 999 people.
McCrery Architects is the lead architect. The construction team will be headed by Clark Construction, and the engineering team will be led by AECOM.
Edward Lengel, the former chief historian of the White House Historical Association, said the demolition may signal that the ballroom will be far closer to the main White House than initially described.
"Its proximity to the original Executive Mansion may be much closer — practically conjoined onto it," he said.
Shawn McCreesh contributed reporting from Washington, and Zachary Small from New York.
Luke Broadwater covers the White House for The Times.
Be a good human. Grossly derogatory comments, blatantly inflammatory comments, excessive trolling, mean-spirited taunting and insults, scamming, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed in compliance with the site's Terms of Service and the Code of Conduct. The moderators have the final word.
Tags
Who is online
167 visitors
What kind of American would do something like this? What kind of American would cheer the destruction of American history and heritage?
Just another lying Republican.
Tearing it down was always the plan. First of all Trump doesnt want any other building , which is what the East Wing was, standing between his magnificent self-homage and the White House itself. If the East Wing was left standing it would irritate him every time he looked at.
Secondly, without taking the East Wing out there isnt enough room to put the gigantic edifice Trump wants to put up to glorify himself. It would have to be smaller, and Trump hates smaller.
So he lied.
I am personally horrified at what he is doing to the White House. He seems to forget that the White House does not belong to him. It's known as the "People's House."
As a New Yorker I'm sure you remember that Trump promised to preserve art work on the facade of the Bonwit Teller building, which he bought and tore down to make way for the Trump Tower. He lied to the NY preservation group and destroyed the artistic pieces anyway.
Trump destroying history repeats itself.
No one will ever think about this again after the next panic over nothing distracts them , just like no one cares about the massive Obama renovation. The next president will happily use the ball room and it would be considered insane to go back to hosting state dinners under the current system,
Of course future presidents will use it, what choice will they have?
But unless they rent it out to hold mega weddings or the Academy Awards and so forth there it will sit idle the large part of the time.
There's only 535 members of Congress, maybe they can move that whole thing over to the Trump Room.
I am going to remind them. Count on it.
I am going be asking the next President when the legacy of our nation's First Ladies will be restored. I'm going to be asking how the next President will honor Eleanor Roosevelt, Bess Truman, Mamie Eisenhower, Jackie Kennedy, Lady Bird Johnson, Pat Nixon, Betty Ford, Rosalynn Carter, Nancy Reagan, Barbara Bush, (she who I will not name), Laura Bush, Michelle Obama, Melania Trump, Jill Biden.
That's a lot of First Ladies. That's a lot of American history and heritage that's been erased. And for what? A party room for the wealthy, the connected, the elite? How very American.
Queen Elizabeth danced in Gerald Ford's White House. Princess Diana was guest of Ronald Reagan who danced with John Travolta. If the People's House was good enough for REAL royalty then Trump certainly isn't going to improve anything.
Of the reasons Trump would have considered to keep the east wing, I guarantee you the honor of women did not make the list. By his own admission women exist for him to sexually assault, and when you are a star they let you do it. Pure sleaze is running the country.
I sent another message to the White House. Here it is:
It's too bad we don't have a time machine. I think it would be interesting to go 20 years into the future to see what people think about it then.
Of all the shitty things Trump does, this one barely makes my radar. I don't think I could care less.
Trump says he is personally going to chip in half of the building costs. Guess where that money will be coming from?
Trump says … ha, anything that starts with those words can be disregarded immediately. Just replace it with Trump lies and it will be realistic.