╌>

$56 trillion national debt leading to a spiraling crisis: Budget watchdog warns the U.S. is walking a crumbling path

  
Via:  Nerm_L  •  9 months ago  •  8 comments

By:   Nick Lichtenberg (Fortune via Yahoo Finance)

$56 trillion national debt leading to a spiraling crisis: Budget watchdog warns the U.S. is walking a crumbling path
Trump is putting the U.S. economy on a "sugar high" and leaving other people holding the bill when it comes due a decade from now, according to the CRFB.

Sponsored by group News Viners

News Viners

Is Federalism the answer?

This analysis ignores the additional $5 trillion spent by local and state governments.  On top of that local and state spending, the Federal government is transferring an additional $1 trillion to local and state governments.  As the Federal government edges ever closer to the fiscal cliff, local and state governments will be forced to carry more of the burden.  

Could we reach the point where local and state governments become responsible for almost all discretionary spending?  That may not make government smaller but government will become closer to the constituents it serves.


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


February 17, 2026 -- The United States is rapidly accelerating toward a definitive tipping point in its financial history, the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget (CRFB) wrote in response to the latest 10-year outlook from the Congressional Budget Office. The nonpartisan budget watchdog issued a stark assessment: The current trajectory of borrowing, which is running at double the 50-year historical average, is simply mathematically unsustainable.

The CRFB cautioned that without immediate legislative intervention, the federal government faces a future defined by exploding interest costs, insolvent trust funds, and a national debt burden that will shatter post-World War II records within four years.

It amounts to a report card for the Trump administration's first year back in office—potentially its last truly impactful year of President Donald Trump's term, if midterm elections swing either or both of the House and Senate to Democrats. The CBO updated its projections to account for the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), Trump's tariff regime, changes in immigration, and other factors. "With debt approaching record levels, interest costs exploding, trust funds approaching insolvency, and deficits expected to remain more than twice as large as the oft-discussed 3% of GDP target," the CRFB argued, "lawmakers should come together to enact significant deficit reduction."

The numbers: breaking records and breaking the bank


According to the new CBO projections, the federal debt held by the public is on track to reach a record 120% of gross domestic product (GDP) by 2036. In sheer dollar terms, the pile of money owed by the government is projected under the CBO's baseline scenario to balloon from nearly $31 trillion today to a staggering $56 trillion over the next decade.

The speed of this accumulation is unprecedented in peacetime. The CRFB notes that debt held by the public currently hovers around 100% of GDP, which is already roughly double the 50-year historical average. Under the current baseline, federal debt is set to surpass the all-time record of 106% of GDP—set in the aftermath of World War II—by fiscal year 2030.

The driving force behind this surge is a structural mismatch between what the government spends and what it collects. Spending is projected to grow from 23.1% of GDP in 2025 to 24.4% by 2036. In contrast, revenue is trailing significantly, rising only marginally from 17.2% of GDP to 17.8% over the same period.

Consequently, the U.S. is facing a decade of massive deficits. The CBO projects annual budget deficits will total $24.4 trillion over the coming decade, exceeding $3 trillion annually by 2036. As a share of the economy, these deficits are expected to average 6.1% of GDP—more than twice the 3% target that economists and the CRFB suggest is necessary to place the national debt on a sustainable path.

It could easily get worse, too. If the Supreme Court strikes down much of Trump's tariff regime, as expected, and if lawmakers make temporary previsions in the OBBBA permanent while reviving the Affordable Care Act health insurance subsidies, a core Democratic promise, the CRFB estimates debt spiking to 131% of GDP by 2036, rather than 120%. Under these conditions, the deficit would reach $3.8 trillion in 2036, and the risk of a full-blown fiscal crisis would grow exponentially.

512

The looming debt spiral


The most alarming aspect of the new outlook is the compounding danger of high interest rates interacting with high debt—the mechanics of what the CRFB calls a "debt spiral." The CRFB warns that later in the decade, the average interest rate on all federal debt is projected to exceed the rate of nominal economic growth. Economists refer to this dynamic as "R>G" (rate > growth). When the cost of servicing past debt grows faster than the economy that supports it, debt accumulation becomes self-perpetuating, making a fiscal crisis increasingly likely.

Interest costs are already set to "explode" under current law. Nominal interest payments on the debt will more than double, jumping from $970 billion in 2025 to $2.1 trillion by 2036. As a share of the total economy, interest costs will rise from a record 3.2% of GDP in 2025 to 4.6% by 2036. This diversion of resources means that nearly $1 out of every $5 of federal revenue will eventually be consumed just to service the debt, crowding out investment in other national priorities.

512

Policy choices and the 'sugar high'


The deterioration of the fiscal outlook is partially the result of recent aggressive policy changes. The CRFB analysis points specifically to OBBBA, which the CBO estimates will add $4.7 trillion to the debt through 2035 when accounting for interest and economic effects. While the CBO projects that new tariffs will subtract $3 trillion from the deficit, the net result of recent legislative, administrative, and economic changes has been to add roughly $1.4 trillion to borrowing projections between 2026 and 2035 compared to estimates made just a year prior.

These policies are expected to produce a temporary economic "sugar high." The CBO projects real GDP will surge by 2.2% in 2026, driven by stimulus from the OBBBA, before slowing to a sustained rate of 1.8% per year thereafter. Inflation is expected to follow a similar trajectory, with the personal consumption expenditure (PCE) price index rising to 2.7% in 2026 before settling back toward the Federal Reserve's 2.0% target by 2030.

However, the stimulus comes at the cost of higher interest rates. The CBO expects the 10-year Treasury yield to climb from 4.1% in 2026 to 4.4% by 2031, driven in large part by the federal government's insatiable need to borrow capital.

Trust funds on the brink


Beyond the headline debt numbers, the report highlights an imminent liquidity crisis for the safety net programs relied upon by millions of Americans. Several major government trust funds are approaching insolvency, meaning they will soon lack the reserves to pay full benefits.

The Highway Trust Fund is projected to deplete its reserves by fiscal year 2028, followed closely by the Social Security retirement trust fund in 2032. Upon insolvency, federal law mandates that spending be cut to match incoming revenue. The CRFB estimates this would result in an immediate 40% cut to highway spending and a devastating 28% across-the-board cut to Social Security retirement and survivor benefits.

To visualize the impact, the watchdog group calculates that a typical couple age 60 today, who retire at the moment of insolvency, would face an $18,400 annual cut in benefits.

512

The path forward


In their concluding assessment, the CRFB urged lawmakers to abandon the recent trend of adding to the debt and instead work to stabilize the nation's finances. With debt approaching record levels and deficits remaining more than twice the size of the "oft-discussed 3% of GDP target," the group argues that significant deficit reduction is no longer optional.

The group suggests the necessary adjustments to spending and revenue could be achieved through regular legislative order or a bipartisan fiscal commission. However, the window for gradual adjustment is closing. As the CBO data indicates, with the arrival of "R>G" and the looming exhaustion of trust funds, the U.S. is running out of time to avert a fiscal collision that has been decades in the making.



For this story, Fortune journalists used generative AI as a research tool. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing.


Red Box Rules

Be a good human.  Grossly derogatory comments, blatantly inflammatory comments, excessive trolling, mean-spirited taunting and insults, scamming, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed in compliance with the site's Terms of Service and the Code of Conduct.  The moderators have the final word.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Nerm_L    9 months ago

Easy money results in hard choices.  All the middlemen in our services economy won't be able to muddle through this mess.

The United States either becomes productive again or our economy will be frittered away trying to sustain an unsustainable debt.  

 
 
 
Jack_TX
Professor Quiet
1.1  Jack_TX  replied to  Nerm_L @1    9 months ago
Easy money results in hard choices.

Yes. 

All the middlemen in our services economy won't be able to muddle through this mess.

It's not like you're going to produce your way out of this in a steel mill, either.

At some point we collectively need to develop some fiscal responsibility.

As long as we keep thinking they're spending somebody else's money, this isn't going to get any better.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2  Split Personality    9 months ago
For this story, Fortune journalists used generative AI as a research tool. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing.

Still needed an editor to correct the misinformation.?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  JohnRussell    9 months ago

Lets end all help to the poor and working class and keep giving billionaires whatever they want.  Then we can all go to hell together. 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4  Sean Treacy    9 months ago

Getting rid of billions in revenue from tariffs will surely help. 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1  Ozzwald  replied to  Sean Treacy @4    9 months ago
Getting rid of billions in revenue from tariffs will surely help.

Who pays those billions in revenue from tariffs again?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
4.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Ozzwald @4.1    9 months ago

Importers, businesses, customers etc...

You do understand we and all our descendants, will now pay for the money we have to borrow to make up for this loss, right? 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.1.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Sean Treacy @4.1.1    9 months ago
You do understand we and all our descendants, will now pay for the money we have to borrow to make up for this loss, right?

You understand that we Americans are already paying the tariffs, right?  Importers and businesses just push the cost down to the customers.

AI Overview
Tariffs are taxes paid directly to the U.S. government by 
domestic companies (importers) that bring foreign goods into the country, not by the foreign country itself. These companies often pass the costs on to consumers through higher prices or absorb them, acting as a tax on domestic businesses and consumers. 
Kiel Institute for the World Economy +4
Key details regarding who bears the economic burden of tariffs:
    • Importers Pay Directly: When foreign goods arrive, U.S. customs brokers or companies pay the duty to the U.S. Treasury.
    • Consumer Impact: Research indicates that the majority of recent tariffs (nearly 100% in some studies) are passed through to U.S. consumers and firms, resulting in higher prices on goods like electronics, clothing, and machinery
    • Economic Burden: While importers pay the duty, the cost may be shared if foreign exporters lower their prices to remain competitive, though studies show this is less common than passing the cost to consumers.
    • Impact on Foreign Exporters: While not paying the tax directly, foreign firms may suffer from reduced sales volume or lower profit margins if they are forced to lower prices to absorb the tariff costs. 

Kiel Institute for the World Economy +6

In summary, tariffs act as a tax on domestic companies and consumers, rather than a tax paid by the foreign government.
 
 

Who is online



117 visitors