╌>

US races to accomplish Iran mission before munitions run out

  
Via:  Nerm_L  •  8 months ago  •  35 comments

By:   Michael R. Gordon, Shelby Holliday (The Wall Street Journal via MSN)

US races to accomplish Iran mission before munitions run out
 

Sponsored by group News Viners

News Viners

Trump is on a short deadline dictated by logistics and supply chains.  Trump is under increasing pressure to accept whatever deal he can get.  

Too bad Trump abandoned MAGA because he is demonstrating the simple fact that factories are necessary to fight wars.  Burning though a munitions stockpile in a matter of days while waiting 2 years for replacements isn't the way to project strength.


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


When the U.S. military’s top general laid out the risks to President Trump of launching a major and extended attack on Iran, one of the issues he flagged was America’s stockpile of munitions.

Now that is being put to the test, as the U.S. races to destroy Iran’s missile and drone force before it runs out of interceptors to fend off Tehran’s retaliation, current and former officials and analysts say.

The precise size of the U.S. stock of air-defense interceptors—what the Pentagon calls magazine depth—is classified. But repeated conflicts with Iran and its proxies in the Middle East have been eating into the supply of air defenses in the region.

Since Saturday morning Tehran time, the U.S. and its allies in the region have pounded an array of leadership and military targets in the country, including Iran’s missile launchers, drones and airfields. One reason the U.S. and Israel struck first, a senior official said Saturday, was to blunt Iran’s ability to retaliate with its missiles and drones.

It isn’t yet clear how long the strikes will need to last. “The heavy and pinpoint bombing, however, will continue, uninterrupted throughout the week or, as long as necessary to achieve our objective of PEACE THROUGHOUT THE MIDDLE EAST AND, INDEED, THE WORLD!” Trump posted on social media on Saturday.

Iran’s retaliation on Saturday has been more ragged than in the 12-day war when it fired more than 500 missiles and many more attack drones. Israel’s announcement that Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, was killed in an airstrike could also hasten an end to the conflict, though it is far from clear who might succeed him.

Still, U.S. Central Command said Saturday that its force has already mounted a largely successful defense against hundreds of Iranian missile and drone attacks, though some have managed to hit their targets, especially in Arab Gulf states that are close to Iran. The conflict isn’t over, and there are still more U.S., Israeli and Iranian strikes to come.

“One of the challenges is you can deplete these really quickly,” said Kelly Grieco, a senior fellow at the Stimson Center think tank who used to teach at the Air Command and Staff College. “We’re using them faster than we can replace them.”

The Thaad antimissile system was deployed to Israel in 2024, along with the U.S. Army troops to operate it, as the Biden administration sought to protect the country against Iran. A Thaad has also been deployed to Jordan, where many U.S. combat aircraft are now deployed. A major concern for the Pentagon is to maintain a sufficient stock of interceptors for the Thaad, which U.S. forces also operate in South Korea and Guam, to deter North Korea and China.

The Pentagon is also racing to replenish stocks of Patriot and Standard Missile interceptors, which also take out aerial threats and are being used to defend against Iranian missiles and drones. Patriots take out lower-flying threats, while SM-3s can intercept ballistic missiles above the Earth’s atmosphere.

Air-defense interceptors aren’t the only munitions that are in short supply. The U.S. is also expending sea-launched Tomahawk cruise missiles, widely known as TLAMs, and aircraft-launched weapons against Iranian targets. This comes on the heels of Operation Rough Rider, the U.S. campaign last year when the U.S. used long-range precision weapons against Yemen-based Houthi militants.

“The Trump administration has fired TLAMS at an extraordinary rate in operations around the globe, in the Middle East against Iran and the Houthis as well as in Nigeria on Christmas Day,” said Becca Wasser, a senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security.

Those weapons are well-suited for striking infrastructure and would be in high demand in the early weeks of a potential conflict with China.

“When we wargame, TLAMS are some of the first munitions to go within that first week of a U.S.-China conflict,” Wasser said. To compensate for the shortfall, she added, the Pentagon would need to double down on procurement and production.

The continuing air campaign against Iran doesn’t appear to have featured U.S. long-range antiship missiles, which the U.S. would also need if there was a conflict with China.

One development that will ease the strain on the American supply of offensive munitions is the involvement of Israel’s military, which it said carried out the strikes against Iran’s military leadership.

But Israel has concerns about its munitions supply as well. It is still low on Arrow 3 air-defense interceptors, another U.S. official says. Israel is also low on air-launched ballistic missiles, a weapon it used to take out Iranian missile launchers this summer and to attack Hamas leaders in Qatar last year, the official said.

Jonathan Conricus, a former spokesman for the Israel Defense Forces who is a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, said he was “underwhelmed so far by the amount of missiles that the Iranians have been able to fire.”

“Eventually it boils down to numbers,” he added. “How many interceptors will we have versus how much launchers will they be able to field and fire.”

The U.S. moved a large supply of missiles and interceptors to the regions, including from partners that have interceptors. If the war drags on and more interceptors are needed, the Pentagon would need to decide whether to access stockpiles in the Pacific, a U.S. official said.


Red Box Rules

Be a good human.  Grossly derogatory comments, blatantly inflammatory comments, excessive trolling, mean-spirited taunting and insults, scamming, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed in compliance with the site's Terms of Service and the Code of Conduct.  The moderators have the final word.


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Nerm_L    8 months ago

Trump's shock & awe is on a supply chain leash.  Even Trump can't escape that vulnerability with bluff & bluster.  

So, where are the factories Trump promised?

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
1.1  MrFrost  replied to  Nerm_L @1    8 months ago

So, where are the factories Trump promised?

They will be built in 2 weeks. 

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Participates
2  GregTx    8 months ago

number of new factories built since 2024

Per COPILOT 

The number of new factories built since 2024 has been significant, with a record $19.7 billion invested in construction of manufacturing facilities in June 2024. This investment reflects a 19% increase from the previous year and a 100% increase from June 2022. The total investment in manufacturing plants reached $235.5 billion, up by 19% from the same period a year ago and 217% from the same period in 2019. This trend indicates a strong commitment to industrial growth and self-sufficiency in the U.S. manufacturing sector. 
 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
2.1  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  GregTx @2    8 months ago

Just an FYI:  The US dollar has devalued by 30% since 2019. 

The amount of dollars being spent really doesn't say much about how many factories are being constructed.

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Participates
2.1.1  GregTx  replied to  Nerm_L @2.1    8 months ago
Just an FYI: The US dollar has devalued by 30% since 2019. 

Yeah, I've felt it. Okay, so are you suggesting it's actually up only 187% since 2019? At least 30-40 factories have been built or begun construction possibly 50+  according to the same source. Is the problem that they weren't munitions factories? Seems rather neocon...

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
2.1.2  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  GregTx @2.1.1    8 months ago
Yeah, I've felt it. Okay, so are you suggesting it's actually up only 187% since 2019? At least 30-40 factories have been built or begun construction possibly 50+  according to the same source. Is the problem that they weren't munitions factories? Seems rather neocon...

I'm suggesting that dollar investments aren't very informative.  

I doubt we'll deploy troops dressed in loincloths.  The military requires much, much more than munitions.  While the current concern is focused on munition stockpiles, that doesn't tell the whole story either.  

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Participates
2.1.3  GregTx  replied to  Nerm_L @2.1.2    8 months ago

Okay Nerm, increased manufacturing facilities is increased manufacturing facilities...

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.2  Split Personality  replied to  GregTx @2    8 months ago

Most of which was invested in new electric vehicle tech like EV batteries which Ford just shuttered and GM and Stellantis are following them.

Besides that AI takes all the info it gathers including the Administrations own exaggerated propaganda and throws out  numbers that no one can quantify,

please avoid AI.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
2.2.1  Bob Nelson  replied to  Split Personality @2.2    8 months ago

Ground-breaking ceremonies with lots of reporters and photographers.

Then..... nothing...

Get the good headlines, and then wait for MAGA to go away...

Foxconn

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.2.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Split Personality @2.2    8 months ago

So...are we going to throw EV batteries at Iran?

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.2.3  Split Personality  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.2.2    8 months ago

If they were dropped from altitude, they are probably illegal by U.N. or Geneva standards because of the chemicals, volatility and difficulty in extinguishing when burning.

Maybe we can get a medal for suggesting it.

 

 
 
 
GregTx
Professor Participates
2.2.4  GregTx  replied to  Split Personality @2.2    8 months ago

Why? It's the future, haven't you heard?...

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.2.5  Split Personality  replied to  GregTx @2.2.4    8 months ago

Assuming you are talking about AI.

After ATT came through the neighbor hood and knocked over my mailbox, created a flood by breaking the neighbors water line and now I find a major leak in the sprinkler system right next to the mailbox.

Contractor declines claim and blames line burying contractor but they decline because they weren't on that lawn.

I started a damage claim with ATT and they emailed me the Claim number several times, finally the claims adjuster called with the correct claim number stating that "nothing works right" after AT&T committed to AI and laid off a lot of the customer relations peeps.

My own work where I already know the correct answer, but I am required to Cite, I cannot cite as easily or find the correct cite in three times as longsearching.

On the other hand, the IT engineers working with accounting gush with praise about how it crunches numbers.

320

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3  Bob Nelson    8 months ago

The question is what the Iranian people will do. I spent some time there, a decade ago. They were astonishingly open about their distaste for the Ayatollahs... and about their distaste for America. (I was using my French passport, of course!)

Will they be outraged that America is once again trying to impose a government on them... or relieved to see Khomeini dead. I don't know.

I'm pretty sure that occupying a country that has over 90 millions people will not be simple...

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
3.1  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  Bob Nelson @3    8 months ago
The question is what the Iranian people will do. I spent some time there, a decade ago. They were astonishingly open about their distaste for the Ayatollahs... and about their distaste for America. (I was using my French passport, of course!)

Were they demanding a secular, western style government to replace the Ayatollahs?  Or were they demanding liberal reforms for the orthodox theocratic government?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3.1.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Nerm_L @3.1    8 months ago

Iran has millions of people that live in big cities and live an urban existence with culture, shopping, and universities. They have millions of people that live in the countryside that are backwards, totally tied to strict religious observance, and a somewhat primitive lifestyle. 

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
3.1.2  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.1    8 months ago
Iran has millions of people that live in big cities and live an urban existence with culture, shopping, and universities. They have millions of people that live in the countryside that are backwards, totally tied to strict religious observance, and a somewhat primitive lifestyle. 

So, a lot like America...with one side wanting to force everyone to live under religious conservative rulers who force their religious morality on the nation through laws, and the other side just wanting to live their lives in peace free of religious tyranny so they can marry who they want, dress how they want and worship any God they want or none.

It is a bit funny to see the rightwing religious conservative Christo-fascists pushing for another unprovoked war that just so happens to be against their ideological twins, they just push a different brand of theocracy. And now multiple American soldiers' lives have been lost in an unprovoked war of aggression started by another Republican President without the approval of congress. It's hard to imagine where to really go from here now that Trump and the moronic dingleberries that put him in power have shat all over our nation and global allies. It will take decades to recover from these un-American psychos even if we do get a rational intelligent progressive in the oval office.

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
3.1.3  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.1    8 months ago
Iran has millions of people that live in big cities and live an urban existence with culture, shopping, and universities. They have millions of people that live in the countryside that are backwards, totally tied to strict religious observance, and a somewhat primitive lifestyle. 

That does not answer my questions.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3.1.4  Bob Nelson  replied to  Nerm_L @3.1    8 months ago
Were they demanding a secular, western style government to replace the Ayatollahs?  Or were they demanding liberal reforms for the orthodox theocratic government?

They still remembered Mossadegh. They wanted democracy, although I'm not sure they know what that means. (I'm not sure Americans know, either... but that's for another day.  jrSmiley_89_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3.1.5  Bob Nelson  replied to  JohnRussell @3.1.1    8 months ago

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3.1.6  Bob Nelson  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @3.1.2    8 months ago

The similarities in behavior are among religious fanatics are so much more significant than any nitpicking theological details. Christ or Mohammed? No matter. Obedience is what's important!

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.1.7  Trout Giggles  replied to  Nerm_L @3.1    8 months ago

I saw an interview with the Iranian Crown Prince (the last Shah's son) talking about how he would bring democratic principals and ideals to Iran. Maybe he could. Or he could turn out to be just like his father

 
 
 
Nerm_L
Professor Expert
3.1.8  seeder  Nerm_L  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.1.4    8 months ago
They still remembered Mossadegh. They wanted democracy, although I'm not sure they know what that means. (I'm not sure Americans know, either... but that's for another day.

The CIA engineered the coup that removed Mossadegh 73 years ago.  The United States installed Shah Reza Pahlavi who sold out Iran to British and US interests.  The Iranian people rose up and threw out the US and European meddlers in 1979.  Now the US is back with new, improved meddling.

Today Iranians want less severe enforcement of Sharia law and lower prices.  Very similar to the Ukrainian Maiden protests of 2004.  Seems the United States cannot avoid wading into quagmires.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.1.9  Sean Treacy  replied to  Nerm_L @3.1.8    8 months ago
The United States installed Shah Reza Pahlavi

No they didn't. 

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
3.1.10  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.1.5    8 months ago

Iran doesn’t need any help collapsing their country.  Without water human life ceases to exist, and water scarcity is on an irreversible trajectory in Iran.  Nuclear ambitions should be the least of either country’s worries, since their days are numbered by nature and their failure to come up with working solutions.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3.1.11  Trout Giggles  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.10    8 months ago

If they weren't so anti-science they could find working solutions to their water problem

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
3.1.12  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Trout Giggles @3.1.11    8 months ago

If god wasn’t such a fake solution to everything then science could actually get a foothold.  Religion poisons everything, everywhere.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.1.13  bugsy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.12    8 months ago
Religion poisons everything, everywhere.

If you mean progressivism and climate change, you are correct.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
3.1.14  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  bugsy @3.1.13    8 months ago

By golly, you’re half right!  Climate change does poison everything, everywhere.  That is a massive improvement for you.  Baby steps …

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.1.15  bugsy  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @3.1.14    8 months ago

Can you point out on the doll where climate change has hurt you?

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
3.1.16  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  bugsy @3.1.15    8 months ago

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
3.1.17  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Bob Nelson @3.1.6    8 months ago
The similarities in behavior are among religious fanatics are so much more significant than any nitpicking theological details. Christ or Mohammed? No matter. Obedience is what's important!

Well, they share the same root so it should be expected. Islam, Christianity and Judaism all worship the same God and yet each one claims exclusivity so it's to be expected. Abraham worshiped the ancient God of the Hebrews, YHWH, Yehovah, whatever you want to call it, and that God supposedly made two promises, one to Abraham and one to Hagar, the maid Abraham knocked up before getting his supposedly 90-year-old wife pregnant with Isaac.

7  The angel of the  Lord  found Hagar near a spring in the desert; it was the spring that is beside the road to Shur.   8  And he said, “Hagar, slave of Sarai, where have you come from, and where are you going?”  “I’m running away from my mistress Sarai,” she answered. 9  Then the angel of the  Lord  told her, “Go back to your mistress and submit to her.”   10  The angel added, “ I will increase your descendants so much that they will be too numerous to count .” 11  The angel of the  Lord  also said to her: “You are now pregnant and you will give birth to a son. You shall name him   Ishmael, [ a ]  for the  Lord has heard of your misery. 12  He will be a wild donkey of a man; his hand will be against everyone   and everyone’s hand against him, a nd he will live in hostility toward [ b ]  all his brothers.” 13  She gave this name to the  Lord  who spoke to her: “You are the God who sees me,” for she said, “I have now seen [ c ]  the One who sees me.”   14  That is why the well was called Beer Lahai Roi [ d ] ; it is still there, between Kadesh and Bered. 15  So Hagar bore Abram a son, and Abram gave the name Ishmael to the son she had borne." - Genesis 16:7-15

So, three religions spring from the same root. Judaism following the Isaac branch, Islam following the Ishmael branch and Christianity claiming the Isaac root and then the subsequent Jesus branch (after they claim Isreal gave up their birthright by giving Jesus up to the Romans for execution). So here we are, with two of the three Abrahamic religions dragging our sons and daughters out to die in their overseas religious war against the third. Can anyone on the right really look themselves in the face and say "Yes! Iran was an imminent threat! It's all justified!" without at least feeling a little hollow inside, knowing how fucking hypocritical and blatantly partisan they sound?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
3.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Bob Nelson @3    8 months ago
m pretty sure that occupying a country that has over 90 millions people will not be simple...

Who said anyone was doing that?

 
 
 
shona1
Professor Quiet
3.3  shona1  replied to  Bob Nelson @3    8 months ago

Morning..not much I don't think...just because the Ayatolla is out of the way doesn't mean any drastic change will happen..

If anything the country will implode as the factional fighting will start up and the "mine is bigger than yours" game will begin..

Throw in the religious factions and the military and the infighting will commence...

Iran's hatred of America, Israel and the West will not lessen and any uprising will soon be quelled..the one a few weeks ago was doomed before it even started..

Tens of thousands of people is not going to do it, millions need to uprise and that's not going to happen..they will be squashed and no one will give a stuff about them within a few weeks...

Iran will fall into the same basket of failed uprisings or replacing one tyrant with another as in China, Syria, Libya, Myanmar, Iraq etc etc..because Iran's hatred of America, Israel and the West is far greater than anything else...

So no I wouldn't get to excited about the Ayatolla carking it and some miraculous change happening in Iran anytime soon..

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
3.3.1  Bob Nelson  replied to  shona1 @3.3    8 months ago

        nailed-it-90pcs31x4ioi9vr9.gif

 
 

Who is online




92 visitors