╌>

Kilmar Abrego Garcia detained by ICE in Baltimore

  
Via:  Jeremy in NC  •  last year  •  103 comments

By:   Emily Crane

Kilmar Abrego Garcia detained by ICE in Baltimore
Alleged MS-13 gangbanger Kilmar Abrego Garcia was again detained by ICE Monday, his lawyer said -- as he faces the possibility of being deported to Uganda.

Leave a comment to auto-join group Today's America

Today's America


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Alleged MS-13 gangbanger Kilmar Abrego Garcia was again detained by ICE Monday — as he faces the possibility of now being deported to Uganda.

"Today, ICE law enforcement arrested Kilmar Abrego Garcia and are processing him for deportation," Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said.

"President Trump is not going to allow this illegal alien, who is an MS-13 gang member, human trafficker, serial domestic abuser, and child predator to terrorize American citizens any longer."

The 30-year-old had reported to the ICE Field Office in Baltimore just after 7:30 a.m. after being released from a Tennessee jail last week as he awaits trial on human smuggling charges.

Abrego Garcia, who was brought back to the US in June after being deported to his native El Salvador earlier this year, had rejected an offer last week to plead guilty to the charges.

US officials offered to send him to Costa Rica if he copped to transporting migrants living illegally in the US - or risk being sent to Uganda, his lawyers argued in court documents.

"They're holding Costa Rica as a carrot and using Uganda as a stick," his lawyer, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, said outside the ICE field office in downtown Baltimore.

"They're weaponizing the immigration system in a way that's completely unconstitutional."

Abrego Garcia was detained by immigration authorities shortly after reporting for a scheduled interview.

He has since filed a lawsuit in federal court in Maryland seeking an order for him not to be deported anywhere unless he has had the chance to contest being sent there, his lawyer said.

"I expect there's going to be a status conference very promptly, and we're going to ask for an interim order that he not be deported, pending his due process rights to contest deportation to any particular country," Sandoval-Moshenberg said.

The smuggling allegations stem from a 2022 traffic stop during which the construction worker was pulled over on a Tennessee highway with eight passengers in the car, but no luggage.

Local cops had suspected human smuggling but he was not charged at the time.

He was also previously accused of physically abusing his wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, a US citizen who has been fiercely advocating on his behalf.

The Trump administration has said it is trying to deport Abrego Garcia months before his trial is scheduled in Tennessee, alleging that the married father is a danger to the community and an MS-13 gang member.


Red Box Rules

No personal insults
No death wishes of any individual

Trolling, taunting, spamming, references to "MAGA" and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that vote up their own comments, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. deleted [ph]


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
1  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC    last year
"Today, ICE law enforcement arrested Kilmar Abrego Garcia and are processing him for deportation," Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said.

Anybody NOT see this coming?

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
1.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1    last year
Anybody NOT see this coming?

I bet many of the dem congress already had their plans to go to say goodbye to their hero  before he left.  They will forget about him in a week or less as soon as they think their are no more political points to be made.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
1.1.1  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Right Down the Center @1.1    last year
I bet many of the dem congress already had their plans to go to say goodbye to their hero  before he left.

I imagine they are all in their basements trying to figure out how to keep him.  

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
1.1.2  Right Down the Center  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.1.1    last year

I hope their constituents note that their congress people care more about an illegal criminal than they do about the citizens 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
1.1.3  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Right Down the Center @1.1.2    last year

If they haven't already then there is a problem.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1    last year
Anybody NOT see this coming?

Maybe this time they will follow Constitutional law and give him due process.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.2.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2    last year
time they will follow Constitutional law and give him due process.

They already did. There's been a final deportation order for years. 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.2.1    last year
They already did.

Then why did SCOTUS order him returned?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.2.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2.2    last year
hen why did SCOTUS order him returned?

This has been explained numerous times. The final deportation order allowed him to be deported to any country but El Salvador because he claimed a rival gang there  put his life in danger. Uganda is not El Salvador. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
1.2.4  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2    last year

They did.  It resulted in him getting sent home.  Then Democrats cried (no surprise there), he was brought back to the US and now he's being sent somewhere else.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2.5  Ozzwald  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.2.3    last year
The final deportation order allowed him to be deported to any country but El Salvador because he claimed a rival gang there  put his life in danger.

And if he was provided due process, why wasn't that followed?

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
1.2.6  goose is back  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2.5    last year
And if he was provided due process, why wasn't that followed?

They fucked up, now they will send him to Uganda.  He's probably wishing the Democrats would have stayed out of it, he can look forward to living in a mud hut and eating grasshoppers. 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2.7  Ozzwald  replied to  goose is back @1.2.6    last year
They fucked up, now they will send him to Uganda.

Correct, by not providing due process.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
1.2.8  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2.5    last year
And if he was provided due process, why wasn't that followed?

That is a good question.  Why wasn't he deported earlier in accordance with the order?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.2.9  Sean Treacy  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2.5    last year

becuase he was being held in jail on the human trafficking charge. 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2.10  Ozzwald  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.2.9    last year
becuase he was being held in jail on the human trafficking charge

When was he officially charged?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.2.11  Sean Treacy  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2.10    last year
hen was he officially charged?

March. 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2.12  Ozzwald  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.2.11    last year
March.

In court?  Cannot find that anywhere.  Please provide a link to that March court case.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.2.13  Sean Treacy  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2.12    last year

You can't find reports of him being indicted?  Really?  Try typing the words "Abrego Garcia indictment". I'm confident you can puzzle this out. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.2.14  Tacos!  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.2.13    last year

He was deported in March. He was not indicted until he returned to the US in June.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2.15  Ozzwald  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.2.13    last year
You can't find reports of him being indicted?

Nope,[✘]

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.2.17  bugsy  replied to  goose is back @1.2.16    last year

And just like the left wing media, most leftists here will ignore these stories. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.2.18  TᵢG  replied to  bugsy @1.2.17    last year

I think it is common knowledge that the Trump DoJ indicted this man.   It is also obvious that he is a political pawn whose life is being unnecessarily fucked with by Trump and his minions.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
1.2.19  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @1.2.18    last year
It is also obvious that he is a political pawn whose life is being unnecessarily fucked with by Trump and his minions.

His life was fucked by his own actions.

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
1.2.20  goose is back  replied to  TᵢG @1.2.18    last year
Trump DoJ indicted this man.

Are you saying he is innocent of the charges? 

unnecessarily fucked with by Trump and his minions.

Show me where "all" the accusations are false and I might agree with you.  

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.2.21  TᵢG  replied to  goose is back @1.2.20    last year
Are you saying he is innocent of the charges? 

No.  Where do you see that?

Show me where "all" the accusations are false and I might agree with you.  

Agree with me on what ... your strawman?

My point was that Garcia is a political pawn.   Did you not see that??

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.2.22  Tacos!  replied to  goose is back @1.2.16    last year

And not one of those stories was from March. The issue was not “has he been indicted,” but “when was he indicted.”

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
1.2.23  goose is back  replied to  TᵢG @1.2.21    last year
My point was that Garcia is a political pawn.

The Democrats turned him into a political pawn.  ICE fucked up and sent him back to El Salvado, they are correcting that now. 

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
1.2.24  goose is back  replied to  Tacos! @1.2.22    last year
And not one of those stories was from March

and your point is?  He didn't get deported for the trafficking. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
1.2.25  TᵢG  replied to  goose is back @1.2.23    last year
The Democrats turned him into a political pawn. 

Trump is the agent here.   This is his game.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
1.2.26  Tacos!  replied to  goose is back @1.2.24    last year

I told you my point. The issue was about the timing of the indictment. I have no other point beyond answering the question. If you don’t understand still, just scroll up a little and read some of the thread.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.2.27  bugsy  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.2.19    last year
His life was fucked by his own actions.

Some here believe life choices are the fault of someone else. 

No one made him come here illegally. 

No one made him beat his wife...at least twice

No one made him deal drugs.

No one made him smuggle other illegals into the country.

No one made him join a notorious lethal gang.

But go ahead leftists......keep coddling him..

You are the best spokespeople for 8 more years of Vance

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
1.2.28  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  bugsy @1.2.27    last year
Some here believe life choices are the fault of someone else. 

It's mind boggling the number of people that are arguing to keep this POS in the country.  And with THE MOST PATHETIC excuses.  

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
1.2.29  Right Down the Center  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.2.28    last year
It's mind boggling the number of people that are arguing to keep this POS in the country. 

They wait for Trump to decide about it and take the opposite side.  Any critical thinking on their own has been thrown out the window. 

It is pathetic

And with THE MOST PATHETIC excuses.  

When the real reason is but but but Trump trying to defend it is impossible so they resort to some real weak bullshit.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1.2.30  JohnRussell  replied to  Right Down the Center @1.2.29    last year

If the administration had just provided due process the opposition to it would have been much less. If we didnt deport hispanics to Africa, if we didnt build a camp for detainees in the middle of an alligator habitat, or send them to a third country gulag, the perception most likely would have been different.[✘]

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
1.2.31  Right Down the Center  replied to  JohnRussell @1.2.30    last year
If the administration had just provided due process the opposition to it would have been much less. If we didnt deport hispanics to Africa, if we didnt build a camp for detainees in the middle of an alligator habitat, or send them to a third country gulag, the perception most likely would have been different.

If all that were true the folks would have just found something else to whine about.  

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
1.2.32  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Right Down the Center @1.2.29    last year
When the real reason is but but but Trump

When that happens, like in 1.2.30, I just let them blather on.  90% of the time they are running off what somebody told somebody that told somebody and completely oblivious to facts.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2.33  Ozzwald  replied to  goose is back @1.2.16    last year
Gee that was hard.

Then why didn't you find links that applied???

1st link = The United States fetched Kilmar Abrego Garcia from El Salvador on Friday, nearly three months after his mistaken deportation

2nd link = Same as above, referencing the indictment AFTER he was already deported.

3rd link =  Again, referencing the indictment AFTER he had already been deported.

Sean and I were discussing due process before the initial deportation and Sean claimed that he had been indicted BEFORE that deportation.  None of your links support Sean's claim.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2.34  Ozzwald  replied to  bugsy @1.2.17    last year
And just like the left wing media, most leftists here will ignore these stories.

Not ignoring them, they just have nothing to do with the discussion.  It is easy to supply links to articles if you are not concerned with what the articles are about.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2.35  Ozzwald  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.2.28    last year
It's mind boggling the number of people that are arguing to keep this POS in the country.

Have not seen anybody arguing that.  The argument is that if you are going to deport someone you should do so legally without violating their Constitutional rights.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
1.2.36  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2.35    last year
Have not seen anybody arguing that. 

You should pay closer attention.

The argument is that if you are going to deport someone you should do so legally without violating their Constitutional rights.

His rights weren't violated.  He was apprehended, he was charges, he went to trial, he was deported.  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.2.37  Sean Treacy  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2.33    last year
ean and I were discussing due process before the initial deportation and Sean claimed that he had been indicted BEFORE that deportatio

No, you are completely misrepresenting what I said.  This was all hashed out months ago and it's tiresome constantly repeating basic facts. His indictment is not relevant to whether he's deportable.  He's been deportable since the final deportation order was entered. The indictment is  only relevant to whether the feds want to keep him in jail and have him serve time for human trafficking in America before deporting him.

I will lay out the chronology as simply as I can for you. 

1.   A Deportation order was entered  for Abrego Garcia in 2019.  He claimed he was threatened by a rival gang in el salvador so the order allowed him to be deported to any country but El Salvador. He received all the required  due process before the deportation order was entered. 

2.   He was picked up and deported to El Salvador. Per the deportation order, he could be deported to any country but El Salvador. 

3.   He was indicted for human trafficking.  Even if he's found not guilty of human trafficking, he can be deported to any country in the world but El Salvador. 

This was all discussed in numerous seeds months ago. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
1.2.38  Right Down the Center  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.2.32    last year

541057479_10239788712720564_420094255802773045_n.jpg?_nc_cat=108&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=833d8c&_nc_ohc=oXrpRSujsfoQ7kNvwEY_KAS&_nc_oc=AdlrJcinrN79K0hVFk8vWLjZlWw9FwPd7F-2mbjMi_Cge--ZK3iXrkIlVzJu5ZguErM&_nc_zt=23&_nc_ht=scontent-bos5-1.xx&_nc_gid=PrUVfaBOpdCcH-Pfr6PZqw&oh=00_AfVZODUCNM493z7z-cdXttLKFCfuCHtpYiXnt4GMELzWbw&oe=68B7B458

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
1.2.39  Right Down the Center  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.2.37    last year
This was all discussed in numerous seeds months ago.

And it will continue to be ignored three months from now.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
1.2.40  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Right Down the Center @1.2.38    last year

I want him to come out and declare his support for oxygen....

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.2.41  bugsy  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2.34    last year
they just have nothing to do with the discussion.

Maybe you should read 1.2.16 again. Every link has to do with the illegal, drug pushing, wife beating, human smuggling POS this seed is about.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
1.2.42  bugsy  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.2.36    last year
He was apprehended, he was charges, he went to trial, he was deported

This is what most on the left are pissed about. They are fighting to keep one of their voters in the country.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
1.2.43  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  bugsy @1.2.42    last year
They are fighting to keep one of their voters in the country.

They are fighting to keep illegals / criminals in the country.  To the point they have gone to other countries in attempts to retrieve those that have been deported.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
1.2.44  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.2.37    last year
A Deportation order was entered  for Abrego Garcia in 2019. 

The existence of that deportation order eliminates ALL crying and whining about "due process".  The order IS THE RESULT of the due process.

He claimed he was threatened by a rival gang in el salvador so the order allowed him to be deported to any country but El Salvador. He received all the required  due process before the deportation order was entered. 

That eliminates all the whining and crying about "allegedly" being in a gang.  

He was picked up and deported to El Salvador. Per the deportation order, he could be deported to any country but El Salvador. 

That, really, was the only problem in the deportation.  They could have snatched him from the El Salvador prison and dropped him ANYWHERE.  There was no need to bring him back to the US.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
1.2.45  Sean Treacy  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.2.44    last year
he existence of that deportation order eliminates ALL crying and whining about "due process"

It ends the discussion. Or does at least for  those who believe in the rule of law and who don't think due process means infinity appeals until you get the result you want. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
1.2.46  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.2.45    last year
It ends the discussion.

you would think it would.  But you know a certain demographic has a problem accepting facts.

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
1.2.47  goose is back  replied to  Ozzwald @1.2.33    last year
Sean and I were discussing due process before the initial deportation and Sean claimed that he had been indicted BEFORE that deportation.  None of your links support Sean's claim

It's my understanding he was deported because he had an order for deportation, just not to El Salvador, second, he was illegal, third he was a member for a gang.  

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2.48  Ozzwald  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @1.2.36    last year
You should pay closer attention.

I await your links...

His rights weren't violated.

Then why did they force the Trump administration to bring him back?

He was apprehended, he was charges, he went to trial, he was deported.

True, false, false, true.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.2.49  Ozzwald  replied to  Sean Treacy @1.2.37    last year
No, you are completely misrepresenting what I said.

backpedal-dog.gif

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
2  1stwarrior    last year

FFS - follow the damned law and deport him - period.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
2.1  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  1stwarrior @2    last year

Sad thing is, they did initially.  Then a liberal "judge" made an idiotic ruling and he was brought back.  

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
3  Right Down the Center    last year
"They're holding Costa Rica as a carrot and using Uganda as a stick," his lawyer, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, said outside the ICE field office in downtown Baltimore.

No shit.  Should have taken the deal.  More Dem congress people would have flown to Costa Rica for a photo op than Uganda.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
3.1  bugsy  replied to  Right Down the Center @3    last year

Funny thing is his lawyer cried that he could not be sent to Uganda because he does not speak the language, however, from his whiny little press conference yesterday, he can't speak English either. 

I would think Costa Rica would be a much better place for him since they speak Spanish there, but most on the left loves their rapists, killers, wife beaters and drug dealers, otherwise, they would have no voters. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC    last year

Just saw this bit of comedy:

Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s lawyer rips ICE plan to deport him to Uganda, whines ‘he doesn’t even speak the language’ — English

Kilmar Abrego Garcia’s attorney slammed Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s plan to  deport the alleged MS-13 gangbanger to Uganda , where “he doesn’t even speak the language” — even though the African country’s official language is English.

Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, one of his lawyers, pledged to “fight tooth and nail against any form of deportation to Uganda” or nearby countries.

You can't make up this level of utter stupidity.  

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.1  bugsy  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4    last year

Obviously he can't speak English either since he used an interpreter at his "news conference" yesterday. 

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.1.1  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  bugsy @4.1    last year

And we all know that is was 100% bs.  That fkr speaks english.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
4.1.2  bugsy  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.1.1    last year

The things most on the left fall for.

Freaking hilarious.

 
 
 
freepress
Freshman Silent
5  freepress    last year

Alleged.

Why won't ICE or this administration actually provide evidence in court and give him due process?

If he's guilty they can put him in jail and then deport him without question.

It's this administration that admitted they made the mistake of deporting him to begin with. If he is guilty of crimes then why don't they use lawful courts and due process in light of this administration making the mistake?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1  TᵢG  replied to  freepress @5    last year
Why won't ICE or this administration actually provide evidence in court and give him due process?

Because the guy is a political pawn.   They do not give one shit about what is right or legal, they have placed a stake in the ground and unfortunately, this guy is the pawn they are using in their sick game.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.1.1  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @5.1    last year
They do not give one shit about what is right or legal

Is that why Democrats are fighting so hard to keep him?  They don't care about what is right or legal?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1.2  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @5.1.1    last year
They don't care about what is right or legal?

What a totally confused question.   What is right is to go after criminals.   They deported him by mistake but now are using him as the political football in their struggle to always 'win' no matter how wrong they are.   It is sick.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
5.1.3  Right Down the Center  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @5.1.1    last year
Is that why Democrats are fighting so hard to keep him? 

They want to keep him because they care about his rights.  That is why they yelled so loudly when Obama deported so many on a fast track that kept them from seeing their day in court.  S/

They don't care about what is right or legal?

Of course they don't.  In a few weeks when they get their photo ops and sing their songs for CNN and MSNBC they will forget his name.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
5.1.4  Ozzwald  replied to  Right Down the Center @5.1.3    last year
That is why they yelled so loudly when Obama deported so many on a fast track that kept them from seeing their day in court.

Is that the same reason that republicans yelled so loudly about Obama not providing due process?  Since republicans were NOT looking for any excuse to impeach Obama and a violation of the Constitution would NOT provide that opportunity?  S/

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
5.1.5  Right Down the Center  replied to  Ozzwald @5.1.4    last year
Is that the same reason that republicans yelled so loudly about Obama not providing due process?

Please give link.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
5.1.6  Ozzwald  replied to  Right Down the Center @5.1.5    last year

Please give link.

4blz3h.jpg

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
5.1.7  Snuffy  replied to  Right Down the Center @5.1.5    last year

Well nuts, once again the request for evidence to verify someone's point was ignored. Why bother to try to have a discussion when it's just 'trust me bro' type shit.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.1.8  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.2    last year
What a totally confused question.  

Nothing confusing about it.  When you look at the WHOLE comment and not cherry picked lines.

What is right is to go after criminals.

Yet Democrats flew to el Salvador in a pathetic attempt to bring him back to the US.  

They deported him by mistake but now are using him as the political football in their struggle to always 'win' no matter how wrong they are.

This "mistake" was WHERE he was sent.  Not the deportation.  

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.1.9  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Right Down the Center @5.1.3    last year
They want to keep him because they care about his rights. 

They don't give a shit about his rights.  

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1.10  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @5.1.8    last year
Yet Democrats flew to el Salvador in a pathetic attempt to bring him back to the US.  

You do not know that he was sent to El Salvador illegally??

This "mistake" was WHERE he was sent. 

Yes, so you do know that he was sent there illegally.   You object to politicians attempting to right this wrong??

As for deporting him, Trump is not just deporting criminals, he is going after any illegal.   Even those who have domiciled here for years, with jobs, raising families, being part of the social fabric, and not engaging in crime.   It is one thing to deport someone who just crossed the border.   It is, for those who have a shred of human decency, a very different matter to disrupt families, etc. for those who have been here for years.   Especially when individuals are sent to prisons ... in nations other than their homeland.   This is a sick level of cruelty.

But Trump does it so for some that means it is good.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.1.11  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.10    last year
You do not know that he was sent to El Salvador illegally??

Don't you mean he was sent home before a partisan hack judge made a ruling AFTER he left the country?

As for deporting him, Trump is not just deporting criminals, he is going after any illegal. 

They never said they would overlook those here illegally.  It's laughable, but not surprising, that you are supporting having illegals in the country.  

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
5.1.12  Right Down the Center  replied to  Snuffy @5.1.7    last year

Not a surprise.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
5.1.13  Right Down the Center  replied to  Ozzwald @5.1.6    last year

You have no point

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1.14  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @5.1.11    last year
Don't you mean he was sent home before a partisan hack judge made a ruling AFTER he left the country?

No, the reality is that it was illegal to send him back to El Salvador.

They never said they would overlook those here illegally. 

Trump campaigned on criminals (and the insane).   Do you not recognize the humane difference between deporting criminals and those who recently crossed our borders vs. deporting one or both parents in a family that has domiciled here for years, are behaving properly, are employed, are raising families (with children who are citizens jus soli), etc?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.1.15  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.14    last year
No, the reality is that it was illegal to send him back to El Salvador.

and why not El Salvador?  

Do you not recognize

I recognize the requirement to deport those who cross the border illegally.  Doesn't matter if they've been here 15 minutes or 15 years.  

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
5.1.16  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @5.1.15    last year
and why not El Salvador?  

Go find out the facts.   This is old news and was widely discussed.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
5.1.17  Ozzwald  replied to  Snuffy @5.1.7    last year
Well nuts, once again the request for evidence to verify someone's point was ignored.

You want me to prove a negative?  Really???

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.1.18  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @5.1.16    last year

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
5.1.19  Snuffy  replied to  Ozzwald @5.1.17    last year
Well nuts, once again the request for evidence to verify someone's point was ignored.
You want me to prove a negative?  Really???

Well, in your post of 5.1.4 you posted this

Is that the same reason that republicans yelled so loudly about Obama not providing due process?  Since republicans were NOT looking for any excuse to impeach Obama and a violation of the Constitution would NOT provide that opportunity?  S/

You were asked for a link and you refused to do so with your posting of 5.1.6 telling the requestor he just didn't get your point. And now you're trying to say your comment of republicans yelling at Obama for not providing due process was really a negative statement? 

So what you're saying is that Republicans did not yell at Obama. I know you're wrong on this because I know the Republicans yelled at Obama a lot. 

So what are you trying to say? 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
5.1.20  Ozzwald  replied to  Snuffy @5.1.19    last year
Well, in your post of 5.1.4 you posted this
Is that the same reason that republicans yelled so loudly about Obama not providing due process?  Since republicans were NOT looking for any excuse to impeach Obama and a violation of the Constitution would NOT provide that opportunity?  S/

So, just what do you thing the "S/" stands for???

So what you're saying is that Republicans did not yell at Obama.

Nope, never said that.  Are you trying to troll me?  I said that the republicans never challenged Obama about due process during his deportations.

 
 
 
Perrie Halpern R.A.
Professor Guide
5.1.24  Perrie Halpern R.A.  replied to  Ozzwald @5.1.20    last year

The rest of this thread was removed for no value. [ph]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
5.2  seeder  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  freepress @5    last year
Why won't ICE or this administration actually provide evidence in court and give him due process?

Because ICE picked him up for deportation because he is here illegally. 

If he's guilty they can put him in jail and then deport him without question.

Yeah, no.   

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.3  Sean Treacy  replied to  freepress @5    last year
n't ICE or this administration actually provide evidence in court and give him due process?

He had his due process and a final deportation was ordered. What do you think due process is? 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6  Sean Treacy    last year

He's had his due process and his day in Court. He lost.  Send him to Uganda. 

Sadly for him, he probably won't live in a compound surrounded  armed guards to like the socialist who will be the next mayor of New York does in Uganda.  

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
7  Tacos!    last year

Boy, they really got a hard-on for this one dude, who by most accounts, seemed to be living the ordinary family life.

And if it’s not him, they’re collecting day laborers at Home Depot. My HEE-rows!

Meanwhile, we know where the actual gang members are. It’s not a fucking secret. But you never see ICE in the neighborhoods with actual criminals. Probably too scary.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
7.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Tacos! @7    last year
seemed to be living the ordinary family life.

Yep. What ordinary family man among us hasn't been identified by local gang experts as a gang member, accused of human trafficking and beating women and been identified as a threat to his step-children's safety by their father.  

The perfect poster child for democrats.  

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
7.1.1  Tacos!  replied to  Sean Treacy @7.1    last year

Accused? The president accused Haitians of eating dogs and cats. That doesn’t make it true. I have no special love for this guy, but if he is a criminal, the government should have to prove it.

How much energy, manpower, and money is being spent in this one guy? Did we even work this hard on Osama bin Laden or Al Capone? Y’all act like he’s the Unabomber - you know the Unabomber. He was Trump’s uncle’s favorite student. Allegedly.

Meanwhile, as I said, we know where the criminals are, but ICE wants to chase non-criminals across farms.

But nothing this administration does could possibly be done in a better way, right?

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
7.1.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  Tacos! @7.1.1    last year
Accused? The president accused Haitians

Is it the PResident who accused him? Or his wife, the local police, the father of his step children, his partner in trafficking women, the Tennessee state police etcc,

It's all some giant conspiracy against this ordinary family man.  

hat doesn’t make it true.

Just like you bizarrely calling him an ordinary family guy doesn't make it true either. 

 I have no special love for this guy

Really? Calling him an ordinary family man at this point sure seems like it. Do most ordinary family men have restraining orders filed against them? Handle the  women they traffic so roughly that even MS-13 had qualms over it? 

 much energy, manpower, and money is being spent in this one guy

So on this thread you are against enforcing the rule of law. Hard to keep up sometimes. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
7.1.3  Tacos!  replied to  Sean Treacy @7.1.2    last year
Just like you bizarrely calling him an ordinary family guy doesn't make it true either. 

I didn’t call him that. Others have.

So on this thread you are against enforcing the rule of law.

Why do you need to lie? I want to see the guy get a trial. That’s an endorsement of enforcing the law.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
7.1.4  Sean Treacy  replied to  Tacos! @7.1.3    last year
idn’t call him that. Others have.

So he's living an ordinary family life, but he's not an ordinary family guy. Got it.

I want to see the guy get a trial,.  That’s an endorsement of enforcing the law.

There's a final deportation order in effect. How many trials does he get?  You are complaining that the Admin is in fact enforcing the law (a final deportation order) because he's supposedly a guy living an ordinary family life, which apparently exempts him from valid judicial orders. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
7.1.5  Tacos!  replied to  Sean Treacy @7.1.4    last year
Got it.

No you don’t “got it” at all. I clearly said,

this one dude, who by most accounts, seemed to be living the ordinary family life.

That means it’s not coming from me. It’s coming from other people. Got it now?!

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Expert
7.1.6  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  Tacos! @7.1.5    last year

Well, it seems to me that if one "quotes" a group to prove a point, said person certainly does appear to agree with "other people". Otherwise, why would one bring it up?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
7.1.7  Tacos!  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @7.1.6    last year
Well, it seems to me that if one "quotes" a group to prove a point, said person certainly does appear to agree with "other people".

That's a bold, unwarranted assumption. It's also wrong, which should not be surprising.

Otherwise, why would one bring it up?

I thought I was pretty plain, but I will try to clarify for you, if you are genuinely interested.

The government is putting out a big effort for a guy that has a reputation (other than the government's opinion) for being a harmless family man. My comment was about priorities based on available information. I make no judgement for myself about what kind of person he really is.

I want my government going after genuinely bad people, like they promised. I want them behaving in a way that is efficient and also shows respect for the law.

But thus far, in this particular case, the government appears to be behaving secretively, dishonestly, and in opposition to the law. And doing so with very high effort and expense for this one person whom no one had ever even heard of before.

The government has openly lied about this person, claiming he has MS-13 tattooed on his knuckles. He does not. This was supposed to show his gang affiliation. Curiously, he's not actually being charged with that.

Now, as I understand it, they are charging him with human smuggling and transport of illegal aliens for financial gain. But they don't want him to have a trial. They just want to deport him without proving the charge.

If they had just had a regular trial for this guy to begin with, he might already be deported. The government's unwillingness to pursue normal procedure sends the message that they believe they will lose in court. At this point, considering the dirth of probative evidence that he is a criminal, and against the backdrop of his positive reputation, the government just looks like they're trying to save face.

 
 
 
Snuffy
Professor Participates
9  Snuffy    last year

I think Democrats have bigger issues than worrying about this guy.

Insha Rahman, vice president of advocacy and partnerships of the far-left criminal justice reform group, Vera Institute of Justice, caused an uproar on social media after she told Democrats on Monday that   migrant crime and carjackings   "don't matter to that many Americans."

During a political strategy session about crime and safety at the Democratic National Committee's summer meeting in Minneapolis, Minnesota, Rahman urged Democrats to seize on President   Donald Trump's   crime crackdown, calling it a "political liability."

"Don't take the bait in talking about migrant crime or carjackings or the things that actually don't matter to that many Americans, and then go to the policy proposals that we think work," Rahman instructed Democrats on Monday.

I mean, WTF? Migrant crime and car jackings and crime in general doesn't actually matter to that many Americans? Hard to see how this is just a "messaging problem". If this is a take-away from their summer DNC meeting, all I can say is God help them. 

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
9.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  Snuffy @9    last year
Migrant crime and car jackings and crime in general doesn't actually matter to that many Americans?

He said out loud what many democrats seem to be thinking.

 
 

Who is online




84 visitors