I would probably tell you what I "really" think if I were able to open and read the article.  Sorry it's so much trouble to copy and paste it. 

Everyone is not aware of your issues seeing content Buzz.

=========================================================

A t this point, court room sketches of   Donald Trump   are nothing new — but   Christine Cornell 's most recent drawings of the former president and his attorney   Alina Habba   might just take the cake.

On Thursday, January 11, Trump and his lawyer   sat side by side   in the Manhattan Supreme Court for the 77-year-old's   civil fraud case   made against him by New York Attorney General   Letitia James .

In recently released sketches, which have since been spread across news broadcasts and throughout social media, Cornell portrayed Trump's angry expressions by drawing a   scowl on his face   as he grumpily sat with his arms crossed inside of the court room.

Meanwhile, the   talented sketch artist   accentuated Habba's facial features with exaggerated cheek bones, protruding lips and a sharpened chin.

Cornell drew Habba's fingers so it looked like she was   scolding the judge , and many anti-Trump trolls compared the drawing of her hands to a vulture's talons.

Social media users had a field day poking fun at both Trump and Habba after the sketches quickly became a   viral topic of discussion .

"Wow Habba really does look like a character from   Looney Tunes ," one person joked, as another quipped: "Attention, courtroom artist needs more orange, stat!"

A third user applauded Cornell for her   impressive portrayal   of Trump's "Resting Loser Face," while a fourth praised, "these are good depictions it’s how I see these people anyway."

Never miss a story — sign up for the   OK!   newsletter to stay up-to-date on the best of what OK! has to offer. It’s gossip too good to wait for!

"The artist HAS to be a Democrat," someone guessed, as another declared, "these sketches capture them perfectly."

The release of the court sketches came after both sides of the $370 million civil fraud trial delivered their   closing speeches .

Ahead of the closing arguments, Trump went on one of his many rants from outside of the court room, claiming the case against him is " election interference   at the highest level" and insisted he’s had "no rights" throughout the trial itself, as   OK!   previously reported.

"It is indeed a   terrible witch hunt ," Trump informed reporters on Thursday. "As you know, I want to speak, I want to make this summation. At this moment, the judge is not letting me make this summation because I’ll bring up things that he doesn’t want to hear. And it’s a very unfair trial, nobody’s seen anything like this."

He continued: "We have a situation where a statute was used that doesn’t give me a jury. I really have   no rights , and it’s sad. And nobody, nobody thinks it's constitutional people. Legal scholars are writing about it like it’s something they’ve never seen before. So it’s interference, it’s political interference, and it’s something that shouldn’t be allowed."

The nearly over trial was a result of a 2022 lawsuit filed against Trump by James — who accused the ex-POTUS, his two adult sons and the Trump Organization as a whole of inflating the net worth of Mar-a-Lago and other real estate properties by billions of dollars in an effort to get better tax benefits and loan terms.

Thanks, JR.

Another member thinks the former 'president' has been singled out and targeted by James because of who he is.  I think that is ridiculous.  It's about time the former 'president' scumbag has to pay for what was has been an ongoing fraud for many, many, many years which he benefitted from.

Trump is such a crybaby.  I'm sure he'll win the votes of nannies and babysitters.  Actually I don't think his image is sufficient - in order to be more realistic it should be more cartoonish.

Trump is such a crybaby.

As Alfred Dreyfus was a crybaby?

Night and Day.  Alfred Dreyfus was wrongly charged and convicted, and I'll bet that even Trump knows what's going to happen to him and why.  

Alfred Dreyfus was wrongly charged and convicted

Bingo!

Ah, since you are comparing him to Dreyfus you do assume he will be convicted.  Whether or not he is guilty of the crimes he will be convicted of is the question in your mind.  In my mind the dilemma will be with the SCOTUS, i.e. whether or not the conservative judges he appointed will will allow law or loyalty to prevail. 

Ah, since you are comparing him to Dreyfus you do assume he will be convicted.  Whether or not he is guilty of the crimes he will be convicted of is the question in your mind.

Correct.


In my mind the dilemma will be with the SCOTUS, i.e. whether or not the conservative judges he appointed will allow law or loyalty to prevail.

While I do expect the verdict in the Trump cases to be appealed, I don't think those appeals will go all the way to the SCOTUS. If they did I am sure the judges that you classify as "Conservative" will rule via merit. (Btw, for the first time I got to correct one of your sentences.)

The former 'president' is a loser and anyone who votes for him is a loser.

But the former 'president' hasn't been wrongly charged and hopefully the turd will be behind bars for the rest of his loser hateful life.

That will teach me to copyread what I write before I post it.  I will will will be more careful.

He's such a whiny and hateful little loser bitch

Trump, if he has any sense of reality, should be quite concerned.   I suspect his facial expression is a combination of anger, frustration, and fear.

But whatever it is does not matter to me.   Trump is a traitor;  the only PotUS in our history who tried to steal a presidential election.   He engaged in fraud, coercion, lying, and incitement in his attempt to circumvent the CotUS (violating his oath of office) and attack the foundation of democracy — the vote of the electorate.

Bring on the trials dealing with Trump as PotUS (vs. private citizen Trump) and hold him accountable so that his horrible precedent does not live on.