Panic Rooms, Birth Certificates and the Birth of GOP Paranoia - POLITICO
By: JOHN BOEHNER
Panic Rooms, Birth Certificates and the Birth of GOP Paranoia
How America's center-right party started to lose its mind, as told by the man who tried to keep it sane.
In the 2010 midterm election, voters from all over the place gave President Obama what he himself called "a shellacking." And oh boy, was it ever. You could be a total moron and get elected just by having an R next to your name—and that year, by the way, we did pick up a fair number in that category.
Retaking control of the House of Representatives put me in line to be the next Speaker of the House over the largest freshman Republican class in history: 87 newly elected members of the GOP. Since I was presiding over a large group of people who'd never sat in Congress, I felt I owed them a little tutorial on governing. I had to explain how to actually get things done. A lot of that went straight through the ears of most of them, especially the ones who didn't have brains that got in the way. Incrementalism? Compromise? That wasn't their thing. A lot of them wanted to blow up Washington. That's why they thought they were elected.
Some of them, well, you could tell they weren't paying attention because they were just thinking of how to fundraise off of outrage or how they could get on Hannity that night. Ronald Reagan used to say something to the effect that if I get 80 or 90 percent of what I want, that's a win. These guys wanted 100 percent every time. In fact, I don't think that would satisfy them, because they didn't really want legislative victories. They wanted wedge issues and conspiracies and crusades.
To them, my talk of trying to get anything done made me a sellout, a dupe of the Democrats, and a traitor. Some of them had me in their sights from day one. They saw me as much of an "enemy" as the guy in the White House. Me, a guy who had come to the top of the leadership by exposing corruption and pushing conservative ideas. Now I was a "liberal collaborator." So that took some getting used to. What I also had not anticipated was the extent to which this new crowd hated—and I mean hated—Barack Obama.
By 2011, the right-wing propaganda nuts had managed to turn Obama into a toxic brand for conservatives. When I was first elected to Congress, we didn't have any propaganda organization for conservatives, except maybe a magazine or two like National Review. The only people who used the internet were some geeks in Palo Alto. There was no Drudge Report. No Breitbart. No kooks on YouTube spreading dangerous nonsense like they did every day about Obama.
"He's a secret Muslim!"
"He hates America!"
"He's a communist!"
And of course the truly nutty business about his birth certificate. People really had been brainwashed into believing Barack Obama was some Manchurian candidate planning to betray America.
Mark Levin was the first to go on the radio and spout off this crazy nonsense. It got him ratings, so eventually he dragged Hannity and Rush to Looneyville along with him. My longtime friend Roger Ailes, the head of Fox News, was not immune to this. He got swept into the conspiracies and the paranoia and became an almost unrecognizable figure.
I'd known Ailes for a long time, since his work with George H.W. Bush in the early 1990s. He'd gone to college in Ohio, and since we had that connection, he sought me out at some event and introduced himself. Years later, in August of 1996, when I was in San Diego for the Republican National Convention, I ended up having dinner with Ailes and a veteran broadcasting executive named Rupert Murdoch. At that dinner they told me all about this new TV network they were starting. I had no idea I was listening to the outline of something that would make my life a living hell down the line. Sure enough, that October, Fox News hit the airwaves.
I kept in touch with Roger and starting in the early 2000s, I'd stop in and see him whenever I was in New York for fundraisers. We'd shoot the breeze and talk politics. We got to know each other pretty well.
Murdoch, on the other hand, was harder to know. Sometimes he'd invite me to watch the Super Bowl in the Fox box, or he'd stop by the office. Wherever he was, you could tell he was the man in charge. He was a businessman, pure and simple. He cared about ratings and the bottom line. He also wanted to make sure he was ahead of any political or policy developments coming down the line. He was always asking who was up, who was down, what bills could pass and what couldn't. If he entertained any of the kooky conspiracy theories that started to take over his network, he kept it a secret from me. But he clearly didn't have a problem with them if they helped ratings.
At some point after the 2008 election, something changed with my friend Roger Ailes. I once met him in New York during the Obama years to plead with him to put a leash on some of the crazies he was putting on the air. It was making my job trying to accomplish anything conservative that much harder. I didn't expect this meeting to change anything, but I still thought it was bullshit, and I wanted Roger to know it.
When I put it to him like that, he didn't have much to say. But he did go on and on about the terrorist attack on the U.S. Embassy in Benghazi, which he thought was part of a grand conspiracy that led back to Hillary Clinton. Then he outlined elaborate plots by which George Soros and the Clintons and Obama (and whoever else came to mind) were trying to destroy him.
"They're monitoring me," he assured me about the Obama White House. He told me he had a "safe room" built so he couldn't be spied on. His mansion was being protected by combat-ready security personnel, he said. There was a lot of conspiratorial talk. It was like he'd been reading whacked-out spy novels all weekend.
And it was clear that he believed all of this crazy stuff. I walked out of that meeting in a daze. I just didn't believe the entire federal government was so terrified of Roger Ailes that they'd break about a dozen laws to bring him down. I thought I could get him to control the crazies, and instead I found myself talking to the president of the club. One of us was crazy. Maybe it was me.
I have no idea what the relationship between Ailes and Murdoch was like, or if Ailes ever would go off on these paranoid tangents during meetings with his boss. But Murdoch must have thought Ailes was good for business, because he kept him in his job for years.
Places like Fox News were creating the wrong incentives. Sean Hannity was one of the worst. I'd known him for years, and we used to have a good relationship. But then he decided he felt like busting my ass every night on his show. So one day, in January of 2015, I finally called him and asked: "What the hell?" I wanted to know why he kept bashing House Republicans when we were actually trying to stand up to Obama.
"Well, you guys don't have a plan," he whined.
"Look," I told him, "our plan is pretty simple: we're just going to stand up for what we believe in as Republicans."
I guess that wasn't good enough for him. The conversation didn't progress very far. At some point I called him a nut. Anyway, it's safe to say our relationship never got any better.
Besides the homegrown "talent" at Fox, with their choice of guests they were making people who used to be fringe characters into powerful media stars. One of the first prototypes out of their laboratory was a woman named Michele Bachmann.
Bachmann, who had represented Minnesota's 6th Congressional District since 2007 and made a name for herself as a lunatic ever since, came to meet with me in the busy period in late 2010 after the election. She wanted a seat on the Ways and Means Committee, the most powerful committee in the House. There were many members in line ahead of her for a post like this. People who had waited patiently for their turn and who also, by the way, weren't wild-eyed crazies.
There was no way she was going to get on Ways and Means, the most prestigious committee in Congress, and jump ahead of everyone else in line. Not while I was Speaker. In earlier days, a member of Congress in her position wouldn't even have dared ask for something like this. Sam Rayburn would have laughed her out of the city.
So I told her no—diplomatically, of course. But as she kept on talking, it dawned on me. This wasn't a request of the Speaker of the House. This was a demand.
Her response to me was calm and matter-of-fact. "Well, then I'll just have to go talk to Sean Hannity and everybody at Fox," she said, "and Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, and everybody else on the radio, and tell them that this is how John Boehner is treating the people who made it possible for the Republicans to take back the House."
I wasn't the one with the power, she was saying. I just thought I was. She had the power now.
She was right, of course.
She was a conservative media darling and, by then, the conservative media was already eyeing me skeptically. She had me where it hurt. Even if I wanted to help her, and I sure as hell didn't, it wasn't a decision I had the power to make on my own. That power belongs to a little-known but very important group called the Steering Committee.
I knew there was no way the Steering Committee would approve putting Bachmann on Ways and Means. The votes just weren't there. If I even pushed the issue, they wouldn't have let me leave the meeting without fastening me into a straitjacket. But then, Bachmann wouldn't go on TV and the radio to explain the nuances of House Steering Committee procedure. She'd just rip my head off every night, over and over again. That was a headache I frankly didn't want or need.
I suggested the House Intelligence committee to Bachmann as an alternative, and mercifully, she liked it. It would be a good perch for anyone wanting to build up their foreign policy chops for a run for president, which she was already considering— Lord help us all. None too pleased was the man preparing to take up the gavel as chairman of the Intelligence Committee, Rep. Mike Rogers from Michigan, an army veteran who had also served in the FBI. So I took my lumps from Rogers, and Bachmann took her seat on the committee.
The funny thing is, Michele Bachmann turned out to be a very focused, hardworking member—even though she spent a few months later in 2011 on a short-lived campaign for president. She showed up to the committee, did her homework, and ended up winning over her fellow members with her dedication. Mike Rogers was impressed—and I have to admit, so was I. The whole situation ended up working out well for everyone. As one of those old Boehnerisms goes, "Get the right people on the bus, and help them find the right seat."
In January 2011, as the new Republican House majority was settling in and I was getting adjusted to the Speakership, I was asked about the birth certificate business by Brian Williams of NBC News. My answer was simple: "The state of Hawaii has said that President Obama was born there. That's good enough for me." It was a simple statement of fact. But you would have thought I'd called Ronald Reagan a communist. I got all kinds of shit for it—emails, letters, phone calls. It went on for a couple weeks. I knew we would hear from some of the crazies, but I was surprised at just how many there really were.
All of this crap swirling around was going to make it tough for me to cut any deals with Obama as the new House Speaker. Of course, it has to be said that Obama didn't help himself much either. He could come off as lecturing and haughty. He still wasn't making Republican outreach a priority. But on the other hand—how do you find common cause with people who think you are a secret Kenyan Muslim traitor to America?
Under the new rules of Crazytown, I may have been Speaker, but I didn't hold all the power. By 2013 the chaos caucus in the House had built up their own power base thanks to fawning right-wing media and outrage-driven fundraising cash. And now they had a new head lunatic leading the way, who wasn't even a House member. There is nothing more dangerous than a reckless asshole who thinks he is smarter than everyone else. Ladies and gentlemen, meet Senator Ted Cruz. He enlisted the crazy caucus of the GOP in what was a truly dumbass idea. Not that anybody asked me.
POLITICO
Tags
Who is online
117 visitors

The crazies have taken over!
Without a doubt they have.
I'm so glad he wrote this article. The problem is that his own party will no longer take heed.
I was never a fan of his but he basically told it like it is. From the rise of the tea party to how some of them don't even want to govern.
I’d say NONE of them want/wanted to govern. They just wanted to yell about random conspiracies and other shit, “own the libs” by saying no to everything, and collect the paycheck while they tried to negotiate a tv deal.
How many actual policy ideas or legislation have the Tea Party, or their even less evolved QAnon cousins, put forward? How many have they stumped for? How many have made it to the floor in either the House or Senate? Zilch. They claim to want to change Washington, they just have absolutely no idea what they want to change it into, hence why they just sort of wander about Capitol Hill spewing out some insane nonsense from time to time and the. Leave without having g actually done anything.
"... how do you find common cause with people who think you are a secret Kenyan Muslim traitor to America?"
Easy, make them think that Hillary is the Neo-Bolshevik Lesbian Dominatrix of the Muslim Brotherhood.
You mean she is not? She is a busy woman though with all you said plus running the pedo ring in NY...
One of the things I've always liked about Boehner was his straight way of talking. His tenure as House Speaker....meh. I enjoyed this article and confirmed some things I always thought about Roger Ailes (he's certifiably insane)
It almost reads like he was run over by them.
Yeah, Ailes is a wackadoo.
It sounds like Ailes started believing his Networks own lies...
I am surprised he was so critical of all of them.
I think he's been holding back all these years
I bet he has. Can you imagine being one of the only adults in the room with a couple hundred toddlers?
I had to laugh at him calling cruz the head lunatic.
The saddest part of all is that compared to Trump, Cruz looked sane.
Blah, blah, blah ... Boehner is either blind or deliberately delusional.
The TEA Party were activists; not politicians. Activists are hardliners uninterested in compromise, reform, or even governing. Activists seek naked power to impose their ideology onto society by any means. Activists are motivated to either control government or destroy government to obtain unilateral power. In the same manner activists will either seek to control the political party or destroy the political party to obtain power.
Activists fight for their opponents to lose; they are not fighting to win. Only by destroying and eliminating opposition can activists obtain unilateral power. And activists won't be satisfied until they obtain unilateral power.
The Republican Party made a mistake by attempting to accommodate and compromise with the TEA Party. Compromise only opened the door to the Republican Party's own destruction.
Democrats are facing the same problem within their own party.
You are 100% correct Nerm. I said it back in 2010 (Jesus that was a while ago) back when Newsvine was a thing. The Tea Party are extremists, and the GOP was/did make a huge mistake in thinking they could use them to attain power and then control or discard them.
Apparently the GOP didn’t realize that extremists cannot be controlled or reasoned with, and exactly what I said was going to hope. To the GOP happened and peaked in the form of the Trump administration. No interest in compromise or actual governance, no real plan on why to do or how to do it, just seeking power for powers sake and to tell others what to do.
The trick was that they successfully pushed the BS that those 'extremists' were 'grassroots activists' even though they all knew that the former Republican House Majority leader, Dick Armey and his minions were the catalyst, fund raisers and organizers.
They set a tone, by disrupting town halls and turning them into circuses. I attended one here in Indiana where they screamed and demanded answers to the most inane questions, making it impossible for other citizens to participate.
Today, I see Republicans representing Indiana use the term 'radical left' while hypocritically supporting everything coming out of the 'radical' right. Of course, they still call their 'extremist' views as based in the 'grassroots'.
You are implying that activist and extremist are interchangeable words. Activists march by the thousands to support a cause. That is not extreme, it’s simple unity. My daughter is wholly non-political but she marched for BLM, she is the furthest thing from a political extremist.
Activists use power to reshape society according to a conceptual model of an ideal society. Activists dedicate themselves to destroying and eliminating undesirable elements that do not conform to the conceptual model of an ideal society. What constitutes an ideal society is not arrived at democratically; self-appointed elites establish the conceptual model of an ideal society based upon their own experiences and beliefs.
As I stated, activists are hardliners uninterested in compromise, reform, or even governing. In order to reshape society according to a conceptual model of an ideal society, activists must obtain power and eliminate opposition.
Activists are not about making society better. Activists are about eliminating the existing society and replacing it with a better society according to their conceptual model of an ideal society. Activists are only extremists when opposition threatens their power to reshape society. A compliant society does not require extremist methods to eliminate the existing society and replace with an ideal society based upon the conceptual model of self-appointed elites.
Evangelicals are united in activism the same way that BLM is united in activism.
So, if you marched in a Black Lives Matter gathering, you aren’t supporting fairness and equality, you are actually trying to reshape society in some vaguely negative way according to Nerm. Do you not see how dumb that sounds? I think you need to step back and imagine the world from some perspective other than your own. If anything is extremist, it’s your myopic view of humanity.
From what little I have read of his book, he didn't refute anything you said. So how is Boehner blind or delusional?
Boehner makes this statement: "To them, my talk of trying to get anything done made me a sellout, a dupe of the Democrats, and a traitor."
That's a correct assessment. But what that really means is that it wasn't about Obama or Democrats any longer. It wasn't about scoring political points any longer or getting anything done. The challenge was to rebuild the Republican Party.
The Republican Party drifted rudderless since 2010. What the Republican Party needed was someone who would rebuild the Republican Party by fighting their own party. Unfortunately that someone was Donald Trump. The political left will doubtless express outrage but the country dodged a bullet with Trump. Trump proved to be more progressive than Ronald Reagan who was the previous Republican to rebuild the party.
Nope. donald did nothing that would be even remotely progressive.
Well that confirms that Boehner is neither blind or deliberately delusional.
Oops.
Oops what? Boehner accurately described what was happening in a superficial manner. Anyone could see that.
Boehner was either blind or deliberately delusional to believe the TEA Party was only a superficial veneer overlaid on normal politics. Boehner is essentially whining that the TEA Party didn't play by the rules of politics based on seeking political leverage to get something done. Again, that only states the obvious; accurate but misses the point entirely.
Even the blind or deliberately delusional?
"The Republicans are the party that says government doesn't work and then they get elected and prove it."
-P.J. O'Rourke
Excellent seed.
Boehner confirms from the inside what has been pretty clear from the outside: the Republican Party is now dedicated to
- ending democracy in America,
- replacing it with a White Supremacist patriarchal plutocracy,
- withdrawing all rights from people of color... and women... .
- and of course... always.. tax cuts for the rich.
Colorful language!
The history of suppressing the native vote is part and parcel of US history. The latest bills in AZ have produced these billboards. Taking our children refers to the ''Indian Boarding Schools'' and those are the headstones of children that died at one of the boarding schools, Carlisle Indian School.