╌>

Walmart to Increase Prices Due to Trump Tariffs

  
Via:  John Russell  •  last year  •  64 comments

By:   Ahmad Austin Jr. (Mediaite)

Walmart to Increase Prices Due to Trump Tariffs
Walmart will soon begin increasing prices across its inventory in response to the tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump.

Sponsored by group SiNNERs and ButtHeads

SiNNERs and ButtHeads


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


Walmart will soon begin increasing prices across its inventory in response to the tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump.

The announcement was made during a Thursday morning call with investors. On the call, company executives to expect the increases as "post-tariff" inventory arrives in stores. Walmart was previously able to avoid significant price hikes due to the fact that much of its inventory had been purchased prior to the tariffs.

CNN business and politics correspondent Vanessa Yurkevich joined The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer to break down the earnings call:


Wolf, America's largest retailer, largest employer — and, really, a bellwether for the U.S. economy — posted strong sales growth in the 2nd quarter, but definitely faced some headwinds from tariffs. And we saw that profits in the second quarter did not meet Wall Street's expectations; and that's actually why you see Walmart stock down right now about four-and-a-half percent.
Listen, tariffs was the big point of conversation on this one hour call with investors. A lot of questions about what price pressures were going to be trickling down to consumers. You had the CEO Doug McMillon of the company saying that so far, tariff impacts have been gradual so consumers haven't reacted so much to price hikes; but where they're now putting out post-tariff inventory and they're going to see price level increases on a week-to-week basis. So that's obviously concerning for the company.

Walmart has hinted at price increases for months, prompting outbursts from the president on social media. In one post, Trump urged the company to simply "eat" the tariffs and not raise consumer prices.


Red Box Rules




Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that are known plagiarists, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt/deflect the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted.  Any use of the term "Brandon", "Traitor Joe", or any variations thereof, when referring to President Biden, will be deleted.  Right wing trolls can expect to have their irrelevant questions and comments deleted. Posting debunked lies will be subject to deletion. Use of the terms "leftist" or "lefty" will also be subject to deletion. ©





 


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
1  seeder  JohnRussell    last year
 On the call, company executives to expect the increases as "post-tariff" inventory arrives in stores. Walmart was previously able to avoid significant price hikes due to the fact that much of its inventory had been purchased prior to the tariffs.
 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1  Ozzwald  replied to  JohnRussell @1    last year

2 main things to take from this.

  1. Most retailers will be increasing prices in response to Trump's tariffs.
  2. Most retailers will use it as an excuse to increase prices more than to simply compensate for the tariffs.

1 other thing to expect is that when the tariffs are lowered or removed when Trump is gone, the subsequent prices will lower very slowly and not for the full amount.  Trump is giving retailers an excuse to jack it to the consumers again.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
1.1.1  Krishna  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1    last year
Most retailers will use it as an excuse to increase prices more than to simply compensate for the tariffs.

I would change that to say "some" will do that. Many will not.

Why? Because if they raise prices and their competitor (That sells the same product) doesn't they will lose business. 

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Krishna @1.1.1    last year
I would change that to say "some" will do that. Many will not.

image.axd?picture=%2F2021%2F01%2Foptimism.jpg

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
1.1.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.2    last year
Optimism

Is it really optimism? I think it's just hoping that those robbing the dead on the battlefield will be a bit merciful and finish the job if they find anyone still squirming.

franco-prussian-war-looting-the-bodies-of-dead-soldiers.jpg?s=1024x1024&w=gi&k=20&c=GEnADaLilE4FGU58aMucPyWwe0cksAXPPbPZyfvOvP4=

The tariffs will have an impact regardless of which side of the aisle you call home. Sadly, on top of that impact, there are also going to be those taking advantage of the unnecessary war to make a profit since with uncertainty also comes opportunity for the unscrupulous. And if there is a thing that Trump and his supporters seem to not even understand let alone have, it's scruples.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.4  Ozzwald  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @1.1.3    last year
The tariffs will have an impact regardless of which side of the aisle you call home. Sadly, on top of that impact, there are also going to be those taking advantage of the unnecessary war to make a profit since with uncertainty also comes opportunity for the unscrupulous.

Capitalism at its finest.

 
 
 
fineline
Freshman Silent
1.1.5  fineline  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.4    last year

Oh yes, the vampires of wall street.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2  Trout Giggles    last year

oh boy I see I will have to school Mr G on why everything is so gd expensive....

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
2.1  Krishna  replied to  Trout Giggles @2    last year
oh boy I see I will have to school Mr G on why everything is so gd expensive...

And apparently the full effect of tariffs are not yet being fully felt. (It will gradually get worse in the next few months).

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
3  seeder  JohnRussell    last year
In one post, Trump urged the company to simply "eat" the tariffs and not raise consumer prices.

Walmart is too big to care what Trump thinks. 

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
3.1  Krishna  replied to  JohnRussell @3    last year
Walmart is too big to care what Trump thinks. 

They actually care more what Trump does, Also they care what their competitors are doing.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4  Jeremy Retired in NC    last year

All the more reason to buy American.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4.1  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4    last year

Will "American" match the Walmart prices ? 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1    last year

If you can find it....

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.1.2  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  JohnRussell @4.1    last year

Yes.  You just have to know how to shop.

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
4.2  Ozzwald  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4    last year
All the more reason to buy American.

Looking for a new TV.  Can you advise on a quality American brand???

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
4.3  Krishna  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4    last year
All the more reason to buy American.

For some things. In some cases on some items they still may be cheaper to buy non-American. In addition, in a few rare cases people might want to buy some items that just aren't produced here.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.3.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Krishna @4.3    last year
In some cases on some items they still may be cheaper to buy non-American.

So you are telling everbody the tariffs arent a problem.  

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4.3.2  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4.3.1    last year

Talk about driving a Mack Truck through the eye of a needle.  

Krishna offered the reasonable suggestion that not every item will be affected by tariffs and that it is possible that some domestic products are cheaper than foreign imports.

That is entirely different from claiming that tariffs are not a problem.

Your comment implies a stubborn refusal to accept facts that do not comport with your wishes.

This ....

rangizzz-via-Shutterstock_295357133-1024x576.jpg

.... is a terrible way to operate.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5  seeder  JohnRussell    last year

Its amazing that so many people do not realize that there are many millions of Americans who require low prices on consumer stuff. Not "desire", need. 

 
 
 
Gazoo
Masters Silent
5.1  Gazoo  replied to  JohnRussell @5    last year

I agree, that is why i don’t understand your stance on illegals. They take resources we could use to help the millions of Americans that need help. Americans should be a priority over any and all foreigners.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
5.1.1  Krishna  replied to  Gazoo @5.1    last year
They take resources we could use to help the millions of Americans that need help. Americans should be a priority over any and all foreigners.

Some businesses prefer to higher immigrants. Why? because in some cases they will do difficult jobs-- and for much lower wages that Americans demand.

And in some cases where the business is unionized, the business can save money by hiring immigrant (non-Union) labour. In some cases that's illegal but in certain industries its widespread,

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
5.2  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @5    last year

[✘]

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
6  TᵢG    last year

Nah, this is just more bullshit from 'the left'.   More fake news.   No way could Trump's tariffs cause prices to rise.   After all, it is the foreign nations who pay the tariffs.   Trump knows what he is doing ... he is just so smart that normal people cannot understand his brilliance.   The Donald works in mysterious ways.

1280

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
6.1  Krishna  replied to  TᵢG @6    last year
he is just so smart that normal people cannot understand his brilliance.   The Donald works in mysterious ways.

True.

(In fact nobody's ever seen anything like it!)

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
6.1.1  Krishna  replied to  Krishna @6.1    last year
he is just so smart that normal people cannot understand his brilliance.   The Donald works in mysterious ways.
True. (In fact nobody's ever seen anything like it!)

In any event-- thanks you for your attention to this matter!

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
7  Sparty On    last year

After 40 year high inflation and record costs from the previous four years now you are concerned about higher costs?     Hilarious!

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.1  TᵢG  replied to  Sparty On @7    last year

Your presumption that higher prices was not a concern for those not in the Trump cult is flawed.   Seems to me that most of the electorate viewed high prices as one of the top issues for the election.   It was even a key campaign point for Harris.

Trump, if you recall, promised to bring prices down ... quickly.   Instead, he engages in gratuitous tariffs which are and will continue to drive prices up.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
7.1.1  Sparty On  replied to  TᵢG @7.1    last year

My “presumption” was based on empirical data observed here on NT.    Few if any here that are bagging on Trump right now we’re bagging on Biden back then.   It was usually someone/something else’s fault.    The was the narrative here with those folks.

So not a presumption at all.    Try again.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.1.2  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sparty On @7.1.1    last year

Do you have anything to say about Walmart announcing they will raise prices?  The article isnt about what you think of Newstalkers. 

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
7.1.3  JBB  replied to  Sparty On @7.1.1    last year

The only hypocrisy on display above is that of MAGA who bagged hard on President Biden when Covid and Putin's war in Ukraine induced a worldwide disruption of supply chains which then caused inflation everywhere in the world now give Trump a complete pass for Trump's own tariff induced and US specific inflation!

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
7.1.4  Krishna  replied to  Sparty On @7.1.1    last year
It was usually someone/something else’s fault.

Which be more widespread than many people realize.

Some people (of both parties!) don't take responsibility for their actions. Other people do.

(Guess which group is more sucessful in life...?)

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
7.1.5  Krishna  replied to  JBB @7.1.3    last year
Trump's own tariff induced and US specific inflation!

Tariffs are inflationary. Things that are tariffed become more expensive. Someone has to pay it. 

(Yes, some businesses "eat the cost". Some don't. In addition, certain businesses get "carve outs"-- they are excused by the gov't from paying tariffs-- or get price breaks),

Economists have a saying:

In a tariff war there are no winners.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
7.1.6  Krishna  replied to  TᵢG @7.1    last year
Trump, if you recall, promised to bring prices down ... quickly.

Promises made, promises kept!

And don't forget how he ended the Wars in Ukraine, Gaza in his first day in office (Oh I almost forgot how he ended that blow up between India and Pakistan.

(People are saying he should be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize!!!)

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
7.1.7  JBB  replied to  Krishna @7.1.6    last year

original Uh, no...

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.1.8  TᵢG  replied to  JBB @7.1.7    last year

And he keeps repeating that the war never would have happened if he was PotUS.

Trump routinely makes unfalsifiable claims and claims that are entirely ambiguous.   We are stuck with an incompetent criminal con-man bullshit-artist as PotUS for 3 1/2 more years.   Never thought I would see this in the USA.

 
 
 
JBB
Professor Principal
7.1.9  JBB  replied to  TᵢG @7.1.8    last year

We, the US, were supposed to be better.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
7.1.10  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @7.1.2    last year
Do you have anything to say about Walmart announcing they will raise prices?

Why would I?    I’ve got no reason to armchair quarterback their operation.   I’m not on their board of control.     It’s a free market.     They are free to make such decisions for their own reasons.    Again, why are you suddenly so concerned about cost increases?    Don’t recall you starting any similar discussions during the Biden administration regarding much higher cost increases.    Seems very hypocritical.

The article isnt about what you think of Newstalkers.

I didn’t say Newstalkers.    I was referring to people posting on Newstalkers as empirical evidence.    See above.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.1.11  TᵢG  replied to  Sparty On @7.1.10    last year
Again, why are you suddenly so concerned about cost increases?

Because these price increases were a result of a pointless and stupid notion by the current PotUS.   An unforced error.

Why would I?

Then why opine on anything? 

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
7.1.12  Sparty On  replied to  TᵢG @7.1.11    last year
Because these price increases were a result of a pointless and stupid notion by the current PotUS.   An unforced error.

opinions on that vary buy one could have the same opinions about many of Bidens actions.    And yet, radio silence when that happened.    Near total silence.   One still wonders why the left was so silent during Bidens record 40 year high costs.

Then why opine on anything?

Because.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.1.13  TᵢG  replied to  Sparty On @7.1.12    last year

Deflection to Biden, pitiful.

Do you accept the fact that tariffs increase consumer prices?   Do you recognize that Trump’s tariffs were unnecessary.

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
7.1.14  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  TᵢG @7.1.13    last year

Can\t there be some kind of law that could be used to deport Trump to the land of his ancestors?

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
7.1.15  MrFrost  replied to  Sparty On @7.1.10    last year
Why would I?    I’ve got no reason to armchair quarterback their operation.

Then why are you commenting on this article?

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
7.1.16  Sparty On  replied to  TᵢG @7.1.13    last year
Deflection to Biden, pitiful.

Nah, the pitiful thing is the denial at play related to cost and fee increases during the Biden administration.   It’s not deflection.    It’s a apt comparison regardless of attempts to characterize it otherwise

Do you accept the fact that tariffs increase consumer prices?

Sure but discussion of higher consumer prices only of tariffs, is a pathetically inadequate analysis of their total net effect.    Interestingly cost increases related to tariffs are minuscule compared to increases during the Biden administration.    And yet, the usual left leaning talking heads here were largely silent to that.    Oh yeah, now we hear about higher costs.   Pathetic.

 Do you recognize that Trump’s tariffs were unnecessary.

No but opinions do vary I suppose.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
7.1.17  Sparty On  replied to  MrFrost @7.1.15    last year

I was answering a question.    You have a problem with that now?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.1.18  TᵢG  replied to  Sparty On @7.1.16    last year
Nah, the pitiful thing is the denial at play related to cost and fee increases during the Biden administration.

Where do you see denial that inflation took place under Biden's watch and that government spending was a factor?

Another strawman from you.

Sure but discussion of higher consumer prices only of tariffs, is a pathetically inadequate analysis of their total net effect.  

That is not the analysis.   The analysis is that Trump has imposed unnecessary tariffs and started trade wars when one of his key priorities was to lower prices.

Face the facts instead of this endless pitiful deflection and feeble attempts to defend Trump.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
7.1.19  bugsy  replied to  Sparty On @7.1.17    last year

‘I was answering a question.    You have a problem with that now?’

It normally becomes a problem when the answer you give correctly is an answer they don't want to hear or see.

 
 
 
Krishna
Professor Guide
7.1.20  Krishna  replied to  JBB @7.1.7    last year

If someone was foolish enough to believe Trump’s claim (that he could stop that war in 24 hrs.) it raises an interesting question. 

If he could do that . . . then why didn’t he? 🧐

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
7.1.21  Sean Treacy  replied to  Krishna @7.1.20    last year

Yes, it’s very embarrassing so many progressives took that literally.  Very sad. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.1.22  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @7.1.21    last year

I doubt progressives voted for Trump, and certainly that they took Trump seriously.

It is without a doubt embarrassing for Trump supporters to see the stark contrast between what Trump promises vs. what he actually delivers.   And if you suggest that people did not believe Trump's myriad promises as at least in the ballpark, then on what basis did they vote for him?

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
7.1.23  Sparty On  replied to  TᵢG @7.1.18    last year
Where do you see denial that inflation took place under Biden's watch and that government spending was a factor? Another strawman from you.

You wish.    I base it on observation and memory.    Please lie to us and say you hammered on Biden like you are on Trump right now.    Not a strawman.    Actually the exact opposite of a strawman.   A steelman argument.

  

That is not the analysis.   The analysis is that Trump has imposed unnecessary tariffs and started trade wars when one of his key priorities was to lower prices.

Face the facts instead of this endless pitiful deflection and feeble attempts to defend Trump.

Your opinion is noted, again and still disagreed with.    Again.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
7.1.24  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @7.1.22    last year

The only people who took that as a literal promise are progressives,  

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.1.25  TᵢG  replied to  Sparty On @7.1.23    last year
Please lie to us and say you hammered on Biden like you are on Trump right now.

Why would I do that?    But obviously you seem to think that Trump's criticism-worthy words and deeds are no worse than Biden's.   If so, that is some mighty powerful partisan bias at play IMO.

Basically, another nuh-uh from you.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.1.26  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @7.1.24    last year
The only people who took that as a literal promise are progressives,  

You keep ignoring the point:

TiG@7.1.22 ☞ It is without a doubt embarrassing for Trump supporters to see the stark contrast between what Trump promises vs. what he actually delivers.   And if you suggest that people did not believe Trump's myriad promises as at least in the ballpark, then on what basis did they vote for him?

Of course you will refuse to acknowledge the stark difference between what Trump promised / promises and what he actually delivers.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.1.27  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sparty On @7.1.23    last year
Please lie to us and say you hammered on Biden like you are on Trump right now.  

Why would anyone hammer on Biden the way they hammer on Trump? The concept is absurd. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.1.28  TᵢG  replied to  JohnRussell @7.1.27    last year

That kind of response (@7.1.23) is basically 'I really do not have a rebuttal so I will just make up a false reality'.

Trump does it all the time, so ...

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
7.1.29  Sean Treacy  replied to  TᵢG @7.1.26    last year
acknowledge the stark difference between what Trump promised / promises and what he actually delivers.

As I've yOu aren't actually talking about a promise so that's not really relevant.

But if your point is a politician fell short of what he "promised," .... umm Okay.  Trump the first politician you ever came across? 

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
7.1.30  Sean Treacy  replied to  JohnRussell @7.1.27    last year
Why would anyone hammer on Biden the way they hammer on Trump? The concept is absurd. 

It's really the inability to even recognize what happened during Biden's four years that I find most surprising.  Almost a mental  block keeping them from recognizing how crazy their lies got.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
7.1.31  seeder  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @7.1.30    last year

The idea that Biden is as big of a crook, cheat, moron, liar , and bigot as Trump is bizarre.   This is basically why we call MAGA a cult. 

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
7.1.32  TᵢG  replied to  Sean Treacy @7.1.29    last year
But if your point is a politician fell short of what he "promised," .... umm Okay.  Trump the first politician you ever came across? 

As usual, you downplay Trump's actions and attempt to cast them as normal rather than extreme.   Always trying to defend / excuse Trump.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
7.1.33  Sparty On  replied to  TᵢG @7.1.25    last year
Basically, another nuh-uh from you.

Basically not.

 
 
 
Sparty On
Professor Guide
7.1.34  Sparty On  replied to  JohnRussell @7.1.31    last year

Still defending that senile old man?      Sad.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
7.1.35  Trout Giggles  replied to  Sean Treacy @7.1.21    last year

when are we supposed to take his words literally?

 
 

Who is online





96 visitors