╌>

Jeanine Pirro Reportedly Abandons Case Against Six Democratic Lawmakers

  
Via:  Gsquared  •  9 months ago  •  7 comments

By:   Yahoo News

Jeanine Pirro Reportedly Abandons Case Against Six Democratic Lawmakers
D.C. U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro is reportedly ending her office's investigation into six Democratic members of Congress who advised service members and intelligence officers to "refuse illegal orders...

Sponsored by group The Reality Show

The Reality Show


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


D.C. U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro is reportedly ending her office's investigation into six Democratic members of Congress who advised service members and intelligence officers to "refuse illegal orders," NBC reported on Monday.

Three people familiar with the case told the outlet that Pirro has opted to stop pursuing the probe. This month, a grand jury unanimously declined to indict Sens. Mark Kelly (D-AZ) and Elissa Slotkin (D-MI), as well as Reps. Jason Crow (D-CO), Chris Deluzio (D-PA), Maggie Goodlander (D-NH), and Chrissy Houlahan (D-PA). In November, the six lawmakers, all of whom either served in the military or in U.S. intelligence, released a video telling people in those fields they have a legal obligation to refuse unlawful orders from superiors.

The video angered President Donald Trump, who said the lawmakers "should be in jail right now."

"IT WAS SEDITION AT THE HIGHEST LEVEL, AND SEDITION IS A MAJOR CRIME. THERE CAN BE NO OTHER INTERPRETATION OF WHAT THEY SAID!" he wrote days after the video was released. He also claimed their actions might be "punishable by death."

Pirro's efforts to indict the lawmakers drew widespread criticism from legal experts. That no grand juror voted to indict was seen as a massive rebuke.

Last week, The New York Times reported that Pirro had abruptly ordered her office to seek indictments against the six lawmakers.

"For reasons that remain unclear, Jeanine Pirro, a longtime ally of Mr. Trump, abruptly instructed her team to seek an indictment of the lawmakers, all of whom had served in the armed forces or the intelligence community," the Times stated. "Her prosecutors then faced a decision that many in the department under Mr. Trump have confronted: Comply or resist. They chose the first."

The DOJ could still opt to pursue the case in another jurisdiction.


Red Box Rules

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that are known plagiarists, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt/deflect the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted.  Any use of the term "Brandon", "Traitor Joe", or any variations thereof, when referring to President Biden, will be deleted.  Right wing trolls can expect to have their irrelevant questions and comments deleted. Posting debunked lies will be subject to deletion. Use of the terms "leftist" or "lefty" will also be subject to deletion. ©


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Gsquared    9 months ago

The treasonous Trumpist regime is trying to prosecute (persecute) six highly patriotic Americans on totally bogus grounds.  What a disgrace.  History will never forgive the Trumpist monstrosity.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Gsquared @1    9 months ago

I question anyone's patriotism who think these lawmakers should go to prison. They exercised their First Amendment rights. I think that's still legal

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1.1.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1    9 months ago
They exercised their First Amendment rights.  I think that's still legal

Not if the Trumpist regime has its way.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
1.2  Split Personality  replied to  Gsquared @1    9 months ago

Piroo's case was actually second the DoJ's case which also fizzled out.

DOJ Drops Case Against Sen. Mark Kelly Over “Illegal Orders” Video

A federal grand jury in Washington, D.C., has   unanimously rejected   the Justice Department’s attempt to indict Sen. Mark Kelly and five other Democratic lawmakers for their November 2025 social media video urging military and intelligence personnel to refuse unlawful orders   NBC News .

The video, which Kelly and others released, told service members:   “You can refuse illegal orders”   and warned that the administration was “pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens”   POLITICO . President Donald Trump later called the lawmakers “traitors” and accused them of “sedition at the highest level,” suggesting possible death penalties   NBC News .

They had nothing but someone insisted that they embarrass themselves to prove a point to Mark Kelly.

How did that work out.

Now we'll see how many Pentagon Generals still have their balls intact.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.2.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Split Personality @1.2    9 months ago

I'm so glad the grand jury didn't indict. Now maybe the MAGA that went around calling him and the others "traitors" will find a nice fork and knife and eat some crow

fucking so-called "military patriots" called him a traitor

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2  Split Personality    9 months ago

All of the air escaped her balloon...jrSmiley_54_smiley_image.gif

I'm actually embarrassed for her.

 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
2.1  MrFrost  replied to  Split Personality @2    9 months ago

Not to worry, she'll just get drunk and everything will be fine. 

 
 

Who is online






92 visitors