╌>

Trump administration will pay a French company $1 billion in taxpayer funds to not build wind farms

  
Via:  Gsquared  •  8 months ago  •  14 comments

By:   Ella Nilsen/CNN

Trump administration will pay a French company $1 billion in taxpayer funds to not build wind farms
The Trump administration announced it will pay nearly $1 billion to French energy giant TotalEnergies in exchange for the company abandoning plans to build offshore wind farms in the Atlantic Ocean and instead pursue fossil fuel projects in the US.

Sponsored by group The Reality Show

The Reality Show


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


The Trump administration announced it will pay nearly $1 billion to French energy giant TotalEnergies in exchange for the company abandoning plans to build offshore wind farms in the Atlantic Ocean and instead pursue fossil fuel projects in the US.

The current administration has   thrown up roadblocks   at every turn for offshore wind projects; a type of energy that President Donald Trump has personally reviled for years. After   trying and failing   to block construction on more mature projects, this announcement is the first sign of a new strategy: The federal government is paying to stop wind farms before they begin.

Last year, the Trump Interior Department took the step of stopping the approval of federal permits for renewable energy projects, a move that effectively killed offshore wind projects in early development. Monday’s deal builds on that, by trying to ensure companies can’t continue building under a future administration friendlier to offshore wind.

The government is paying back TotalEnergies for federal leases it purchased under the Biden administration to develop two offshore wind farms off the coasts of New York and North Carolina. The Justice Department will use nearly $1 billion in taxpayer funds to reimburse the company for money it spent to purchase leases under the Biden administration.

Together, those two projects could have generated more than 4 gigawatts of electricity for US households and businesses, according to developers.

Instead, TotalEnergies will now spend the money on the development of a new liquified natural gas plant in Texas that will help export US LNG overseas to Europe, CEO Patrick Pouyanné said in a statement. The money will also go towards the company’s development of oil drilling operations in the Gulf of Mexico and shale oil projects elsewhere in the US.

“Considering that the development of offshore wind projects is not in the country’s interest, we have decided to renounce offshore wind development in the United States, in exchange for the reimbursement of the lease fees,” TotalEnergies CEO Patrick Pouyanné said in a statement. “These investments will contribute to supplying Europe with much-needed LNG from the US and provide gas for US data center development.”

US Interior Sec. Doug Burgum in a statement repeated prior claims that offshore wind is “one of the most expensive” forms of energy and is too unreliable because energy is only produced when the wind is blowing. While offshore wind is more expensive than other forms of renewable energy because of its unique supply chain constraints, wind has no fuel costs and states   negotiate set power price agreements   with developers that don’t fluctuate — unlike natural gas and oil.

“We welcome TotalEnergies’ commitment to developing projects that produce dependable, affordable power to lower Americans’ monthly bills while providing secure US baseload power today—and in the future,” Burgum said in the statement.

But the move could worsen the   growing electricity crunch   in the US, as power-hungry data centers and home a nd vehicle electrification collide headlong into a lack of available power. That dynamic has sent prices spiking in mid-Atlantic states in particular.

The move “will actually cause a further energy deficit in our country and increase the cost of energy certainly along the East Coast,” said Elizabeth Klein, former director of the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management under the Biden administration.

Klein said the scrapped New York project in particular would be a blow to the region, which is badly in need of new electricity sources.

“For the current administration to be cutting that off makes no sense at all,” Klein said.

The Oceantic Network, an offshore wind industry trade association, blasted the TotalEnergies repayment as one that raises US energy prices with little benefit to utility customers.

“Paying to remove affordable, homegrown energy out of the equation leaves American consumers struggling to pay their electricity bills,” said Sam Salustro, Oceantic’s senior vice president of policy and market affairs. “This is political theater meant to obscure the fact that offshore wind capacity is being pulled out of the pipeline when energy prices are skyrocketing.”

It’s unclear whether the TotalEnergies settlement is the first of many to come. The Interior Department did not respond to CNN’s request for comment on whether it was negotiating more agreements with other companies.

However, some energy companies have publicly said they would also want their lease money back if the Trump administration won’t let them develop offshore wind projects. The leases for several undeveloped offshore wind projects off the Atlantic, Pacific and Gulf coasts total more than $5 billion, and that doesn’t include additional pre-development costs incurred by developers.

German renewables company RWE, which paid more than $1.2 billion for three leases off the coasts of New York, California and the Gulf of Mexico, is one of the companies expecting to be reimbursed.

“If we never get the right to build the plants, I assume we’ll get the money we’ve already paid back. And if necessary, through legal action,” RWE CEO Markus Krebber said   at a recent press conference .

An RWE spokesperson declined to comment on whether the company is actively negotiating with the federal government and how much money it is seeking.

In addition, while TotalEnergies was able to offer to reinvest offshore wind money into oil and gas operations that the Trump administration favors, many other offshore wind developers don’t have the same fossil fuel-rich portfolio.

TotalEnergies is “opting to take the billion dollars, which is a good deal for them but not a good deal for American taxpayers or the energy needs of our country,” Klein said.


Red Box Rules

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that are known plagiarists, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt/deflect the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted.  Any use of the term "Brandon", "Traitor Joe", or any variations thereof, when referring to President Biden, will be deleted.  Right wing trolls can expect to have their irrelevant questions and comments deleted. Posting debunked lies will be subject to deletion. Use of the terms "leftist" or "lefty" will also be subject to deletion. ©


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Gsquared    8 months ago

The INSANITY of the Trumpist regime compounds daily.

 
 
 
Bob Nelson
Professor Guide
2  Bob Nelson    8 months ago

Wanna bet that Total won't be in any hurry to invest?

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Junior Quiet
3  Igknorantzruls    8 months ago

What ? You never heard about the "Arthur" of The Art of the Deal who thought he should become King Arthur again and write a wrong pseudo nym not to be confused with the realities delved in alternate fax machined to an irrationed old fashioned super unnatural nature certainly proven to be a mother, FCkr of US 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4  Trout Giggles    8 months ago

He hates wind because he can't make any money of it and neither can his rich oil donors

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
4.1  evilone  replied to  Trout Giggles @4    8 months ago

He's always hated wind. I remember back in 2006 when he bitched about how ugly the wind turbines were offshore from his Scottish golf resort. He claims they reduce property values, make noise, smell and cause cancer.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1.1  devangelical  replied to  evilone @4.1    8 months ago
He claims they reduce property values, make noise, smell and cause cancer.

so does he ...

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
4.1.2  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  devangelical @4.1.1    8 months ago

Funny.

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Junior Quiet
4.2  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Trout Giggles @4    8 months ago
He hates wind because he can't make any money of it

I thought he was jealous of it. No worries Don, you Blow MORE !

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.2.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Igknorantzruls @4.2    8 months ago

from what I hear he can be his own windmill

 
 
 
Igknorantzruls
Junior Quiet
4.2.2  Igknorantzruls  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.2.1    8 months ago
he can be his own windmill

and he causes cancer as well

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
4.3  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Trout Giggles @4    8 months ago

He's such a blowhard he could produce 4 gigawatts of electricity himself without a propeller.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
4.3.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @4.3    8 months ago

How do you think they power Mar-a-Lago?

 
 
 
Buzz of the Orient
Professor Expert
4.3.2  Buzz of the Orient  replied to  Gsquared @4.3.1    8 months ago

Well, considering his attitude about renewable energy, most likely not by means of solar panels. 

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
4.3.3  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Buzz of the Orient @4.3.2    8 months ago

Blowhard power.

 
 

Who is online






93 visitors