Trump Judge Says Some Women Are Just a "Warm, Wet Hole"
By: Ellie Quinlan Houghtaling (The New Republic)
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Melissa Isaak is part of Donald Trump's newly appointed class of immigration judges.
One of the Trump administration's newest immigration judges said that some women are just a "warm, wet hole."
Melissa Isaak, an Army veteran and reservist, was hired by the Justice Department on April 8 as a temporary immigration judge. She was permitted to begin hearing cases immediately, according to an announcement from the Executive Office for Immigration Review.
In 2007, Isaak graduated from Barry University School of Law, a low-ranked law school where less than half of recent grads passed the bar exam on their first try. Afterward, she joined the law firm Brock & Stout in Alabama for two years, and in 2009 began her own private practice, self-styled as a "divorce attorney for men," where she has worked ever since.
She does not have any immigration court experience, but her name was attached to several high-profile, non-divorce cases. Isaak was a defense attorney for three of the January 6 Capitol rioters (she later withdrew from two of the cases), and she also helped Alabama Republican Roy Moore dismiss a defamation suit from a woman who said he molested her when she was 14. That legal saga is still ongoing—an appeals court overturned Moore's multimillion-dollar win against his accuser late last week.
During an interview with pickup artist Anthony Dream Johnson in 2021, Isaak claimed that "there are two types of women."
"There are good, solid, valuable women who are major assets to men, if you're a good woman," Isaak said. "And then there's a warm wet hole."
Here is video of Trump's newly hired immigration judge Melissa Isaak calling women a "warm, wet hole":
"There's two types of women. There are good, solid, valuable women who are assets to men ... Then there's a warm, wet hole." https://t.co/jbJXtfpTkYpic.twitter.com/Y9v8aLdxFq
— FactPost (@factpostnews) April 27, 2026
The following year, she gave a speech on the matter for Johnson's manosphere convention, 21 Studios' Make Women Great Again, titled "Divorcing Feminism."
"If the only thing you have to offer a man is sex, that's what you are," Isaak said. "And guess what? Guess who else has a warm, wet hole? Every other woman out there. What a horrible existence."
She compared that to a "real woman," a subtype that she said was meant to "catapult a man."
"We're powerful women, we are, if we use it in the right way," Isaak said, specifying the necessity to use that energy for men.
"I've had people get offended, and they say, 'You know, it's horrible that you say warm, wet hole.' I mean, well, if you have one and it's not warm and wet you might want to seek some gynecological intervention," Isaak said to crickets.
Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that are known plagiarists, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt/deflect the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted. Any use of the term "Brandon", "Traitor Joe", or any variations thereof, when referring to President Biden, will be deleted. Right wing trolls can expect to have their irrelevant questions and comments deleted. Posting debunked lies will be subject to deletion. Use of the terms "leftist" or "lefty" will also be subject to deletion. ©
Tags
Who is online
102 visitors
Sounds like another disgusting Trump approved crackpot.
Wow.
The context was that there were two types of women. I wonder how many have that view.
Melissa Isaak sounds like a MAGA white nationalist completely unable to fairly decide immigration cases.
That term was created by the SPLC.
We have recently learned that when something doesn't exist it sometimes is manufactured.
LOL.
Nope. I wonder if it's being a Trump supporter that makes it so easy for some to tell bald faced lies, or if it's being a rightwing religious conservative that makes the ends justify the means. Whatever the case, it's clear that the rightwing religious conservatives support putting and keeping a woman in a subservient role and they're apparently supposed to like it. It's as if they're saying "Hey all you women out there, your place is to serve a man in the best way you can. If you do, then you'll be really happy and that will make God happy to. If you don't, you're just a rebel slut who will never find true happiness!". I know they feel this way because one of my MAGA cousins in Arkansas almost said that verbatim not too long ago. Fucking useless pieces of chauvinistic scum. No wonder so many MAGAites are incels.
Nope.
she sounds like a self-hating woman...like she wants to trade her "warm, wet, hole" for a stiffy
then call me a rebel slut who has found happiness
[✘]
As many conservative Christian women, and sadly conservative Muslim women as well, are raised to be. They're taught from childhood that they were born with a subservient role to play in life and if they don't live according to that role, they will be cursed by God and end up in hell, or Jahannam for Muslims. They are taught 'equality' of the sexes is Satanic and that a woman must submit and be subservient to the man just as the man must be subservient to God. Interesting though that we never actually get to hear from this supposed God, we only get its words and desires passed to us through men, who, strangely enough, tell us that God put them in charge of everything and that we're not supposed to challenge men's authority over women because if you do you'll go to a place of eternal torment, that's never been proven to exist, after death. No, that doesn't sound suspicious at all... /s
And yet, millions of women cling to that lie like their lives depend on it, throwing away their freedoms in this life all for some fantasy promise of something better in the next. Truly a sad reality for so many women and humanity as a whole. Think where we might be now if women hadn't been held back in so many fields for so long. If women had been encouraged to seek higher education, getting into the sciences, math, technology and engineering two hundred years ago, not just within many of our lifetimes.
We might even a cure for cancer...all cancers
Only 2? I lost count after infinite.
Agreed. no two are the same, thankfully.
For a professional woman to defend Johnson's antiwoman ideals and reduce other women to 'a warm, wet hole' is the height of arrogance and stupidity. Is she so blind as not to know that if Johnson's idea were to become a reality, she would never be a judge, never be asked her opinion outside of maintaining a household and reduced to only the roles of wife and mother. She would just be a warm, wet hole for most men.
but...but...she's different!
I'm sure she keeps telling herself that. Nancy Mace and the other GOP House women thought they was different too.
I’m guessing she’s more of the cold, clammy, and dry variety.
To be fair in cetain conditions the same can be said about some men