╌>

Trump to drop his $1.8B 'slush fund' after outrage over paying his allies: report

  
Via:  Gsquared  •  5 months ago  •  155 comments

By:   Yahoo News

Trump to drop his $1.8B 'slush fund' after outrage over paying his allies: report
'Anti-Weaponization Fund' has infuriated lawmakers and faces major legal roadblocks

Sponsored by group The Reality Show

The Reality Show


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


President Donald Trump will reportedly abandon plans for a nearly $1.8 billion compensation fund designed to pay his allies and alleged "victims" of government "weaponization."

A pending decision, according to Axios and Punchbowl, follows a federal court ruling that temporarily blocks the administration from funding or making any payments from what critics have called a "slush fund" to enrich the president's aggrieved supporters.

The scheme has also come under heavy fire from members of Congress, where lawmakers abruptly abandoned a series of votes before Memorial Day after hitting an impasse over plans to funnel taxpayer dollars into the fund.

This is a developing story.


Red Box Rules

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that are known plagiarists, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt/deflect the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted.  Any use of the term "Brandon", "Traitor Joe", or any variations thereof, when referring to President Biden, will be deleted.  Right wing trolls can expect to have their irrelevant questions and comments deleted. Posting debunked lies will be subject to deletion. Use of the terms "leftist" or "lefty" will also be subject to deletion. ©


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Gsquared    5 months ago

Trump's attempt to extort the U.S. government failed and his Thug Fund is dead.  It looks like Trump's cop beaters won't get paid.  No word yet on the Thug-in-Chief's tax evasion immunity.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @1    5 months ago

trump and his DOJ rent-boy todd are trying to get off the judicial hook before their hearing about attempting to defraud the court ...

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.1.1  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @1.1    5 months ago

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @1    5 months ago

trump spent this last weekend trying to polish this grift turd and revive it ...

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
2  evilone    5 months ago

He didn't do this because he wanted to, or it was just 'unpopular' it was blatantly illegal. A judge was trying to get the original filing reopened and multiple groups were suing the settlement.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3  Trout Giggles    5 months ago

Good! Now throw away the pardons and send them all back to prison!

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
3.1  evilone  replied to  Trout Giggles @3    5 months ago

The stupidest ones are already back from committing new crimes. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
3.1.1  devangelical  replied to  evilone @3.1    5 months ago

... primarily for sex crimes and/or as child predators. maga!

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
4  TᵢG    5 months ago

And kill the IRS immunity deal.

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
4.1  evilone  replied to  TᵢG @4    5 months ago
And kill the IRS immunity deal.

I'm pretty sure that will follow soon. Since there was no formal settlement there can be no immunity.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5  JohnRussell    5 months ago

I wonder how many of them went out and spent money they didnt have because Trump promised it to them. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
5.1  devangelical  replied to  JohnRussell @5    5 months ago

... one of the child sex victims told LE that she had been promised money by the J6 perp for her silence. maga!

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
6  Ozzwald    5 months ago
Trump to drop his $1.8B 'slush fund' after outrage over paying his allies

Raise your hand if you think this will be the end of it and he won't try to get his "slush fund" a different way.....

4b307d34-846f-4fde-8423-388a8af331d5_text.gif

Now raise your hand if you think he is already planning a different way to get it...

giphy.gif

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
6.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Ozzwald @6    5 months ago

The Democrats in the Senate are introducing legislation to permanently ban Trump's Thug Fund.  That doesn't mean Trump won't try to find another way to steal our money.

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
6.1.1  Sean Treacy  replied to  Gsquared @6.1    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
evilone
Professor Guide
6.1.2  evilone  replied to  Gsquared @6.1    5 months ago
That doesn't mean Trump won't try to find another way to steal our money.

This one was a real stretch... what's he going to try next? "I told Scott just to write me a big beautiful billion dollar check from the US Treasury."

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
6.1.3  Ozzwald  replied to  Gsquared @6.1    5 months ago

That doesn't mean Trump won't try to find another way to steal our money.

Republicans are giving him money for his ballroom, reflecting pool, UFC fight, and for gold leafing a bunch of statues around DC.  What's another billion stuffed somewhere else?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1.4  Trout Giggles  replied to  evilone @6.1.2    5 months ago
"I told Scott just to write me a big beautiful billion dollar check from the US Treasury."

It could happen

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
7  Sean Treacy    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
8  Tacos!    5 months ago
President Donald Trump will reportedly abandon plans…

Wait. So it IS up to him? Hasn’t he been telling the press that he had nothing to do with the settlement agreement?

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
8.1  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  Tacos! @8    5 months ago

By next week he will claim he never heard of it and doesn't know anything about it.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1.1  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @8.1    5 months ago

... then he'll throw todd blanche under the bus.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
8.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Gsquared @8.1    5 months ago

Because by then his dementia will be significantly worse. Of course, he won't remember any of this

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
8.1.3  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Trout Giggles @8.1.2    5 months ago

I don’t think dementia has anything to do with Trump’s lifetime history of selective memory.  Dementia might be a positive for Trump.  Can you imagine if he forgot how to lie?  That would be game over for this pig.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1.4  devangelical  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @8.1.3    5 months ago

he already can't remember the lie he started a sentence with by the time he contradicts himself as he finishes it.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
8.1.5  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  devangelical @8.1.4    5 months ago

But that’s ok because he is smarter than all of us so his lies will never be detected … or so he thinks.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
8.1.6  devangelical  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @8.1.5    5 months ago

his lies are rarely detected by most knuckle dragging maga morons, his supporters ...

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
8.1.7  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  devangelical @8.1.6    5 months ago
his lies are never detected by most knuckle dragging maga morons

Trump has always loved being the smartest person in the room and he accomplishes this by entering the room alone and then only inviting those dumber than he is to join him. He knows whether they're stupid or not by seeing if they'll grovel before him for a tiny handful of nuts. It really is embarrassing to see just how many pitifully stupid people there are in our country. I'd blame our education system but a large portion of Trumps base likely never even finished high school. I think the religious conservatives stuffing bullshit and lies into their children's heads contradicting what they're supposed to be learning in school has a larger part to do with the dumbing down of America than just underfunded public schools. Without these poorly educated bigots, Trump would not have been able to rape America the way he is now. These poorly educated religious bigots were literally asking for it.

"We won with poorly educated. I love the poorly educated," - Donald J Trump
 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
9  Right Down the Center    5 months ago

Not sure this is not a win for Donald.  He can say he tried and it was the mean ole courts that would not let him do it.  Another promise kept.  That may be enough for many of his followers.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.1  TᵢG  replied to  Right Down the Center @9    5 months ago

Trump tried to steal almost $1.8 billion to pay off supporters.

His attempt was thwarted.

Yet you think that getting caught and stopped might be a win for him because 'he tried'.

So I suppose you think it was a win for Trump to fail to steal the 2020 election.   Or fail to outlaw Jus Soli.   Or fail to stop the Ukraine war.   Or fail to lower prices.   ... on and on ...   because he tried.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
9.1.1  Right Down the Center  replied to  TᵢG @9.1    5 months ago
Yet you think that getting caught and stopped might be a win for him because 'he tried'.

 That may be enough for many of his followers.  Notice how I said "may be".  I don't know what his followers think but they do believe alot of what he says and may believe this also.

So I suppose you think

Might want to ease up on supposing what I think.  You have yet to be correct.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
9.1.2  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Right Down the Center @9.1.1    5 months ago

That crowd is generally not a fan of these:

512

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.1.3  TᵢG  replied to  Right Down the Center @9.1.1    5 months ago
Notice how I said "may be".

I am well aware of your use of weasel words.

Does not change the fact that instead of criticizing Trump for trying to steal almost $1.8 billion in taxpayer revenue to use to pay off supporters, you try to find some illogical spin that presents this failure to steal as a positive.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
9.1.4  Tacos!  replied to  Right Down the Center @9.1.1    5 months ago
I don't know what his followers think but they do believe alot of what he says and may believe this also.

Stop pretending you are not in that group. Your words of consistent support over many seeds in many months make plain that you are.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
9.1.5  Right Down the Center  replied to  Tacos! @9.1.4    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
9.1.6  Right Down the Center  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @9.1.2    5 months ago

Not so sure that is the case

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
9.1.7  Right Down the Center  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.3    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
9.1.8  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.3    5 months ago
I am well aware of your use of weasel words.

Our nation is currently being run by a confusion of weasels.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
9.1.9  Tacos!  replied to  Right Down the Center @9.1.5    5 months ago

Typical MAGA response. You deflect by pretending you are being attacked. If you had something thoughtful to say, you’d say it. Instead, every comment only confirms what I wrote.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
9.1.10  Right Down the Center  replied to  Tacos! @9.1.9    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.1.11  TᵢG  replied to  Right Down the Center @9.1.5    5 months ago

Do you condemn Trump for trying to steal almost $1.8 billion in taxpayer revenue to use to pay off supporters?

Do you condemn Trump for starting an illegal war with no clear strategy, no clear endgame, and damaging the national and world economies, only to wind up in a situation where Iran is controlling the Strait of Hormuz?

Do you condemn Trump for unilaterally demolishing the East wing and now force taxpayers to spend billions to build a suitable infrastructure for anything that would wind up replacing it?

Do you condemn Trump for abusing the DoJ to go after political enemies?

Do you condemn Trump for unnecessarily causing prices to rise via tariffs and Iran rather than fall?

On and on ... you post comments that attempt to spin away the outrageous wrongdoings of Trump.   What drives you to try to defend this corrupt, incompetent, vindictive psychopath?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
9.1.12  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tacos! @9.1.4    5 months ago

that was beautiful!

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
9.1.13  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.11    5 months ago

Queue RDtC response:  nobody but DJT can tell you why he does what he does, so until you can read his mind it is entirely plausible that he has good intentions.

Seriously, the extremes these guys will go to to defend Trump while pretending they are just being independent thinkers is nauseating.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
9.1.14  devangelical  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @9.1.13    5 months ago

they're covering the political retreat of their master back to his rally point, only to find out that they've been left behind ...

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.1.15  TᵢG  replied to  Hal A. Lujah @9.1.13    5 months ago

How can anyone possibly believe feeble, obvious attempts to defend Trump accomplish anything other than illustrate, yet again, that there is no defense for most of what Trump has done wrong?

1280

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
9.1.16  devangelical  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.15    5 months ago

narcissists are mentally unable to admit their own errors ...

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
9.1.17  Right Down the Center  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.11    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
9.1.18  Right Down the Center  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.11    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
9.1.19  Trout Giggles  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.15    5 months ago

because they think we are dumb. We know who the dummies are here

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.1.20  TᵢG  replied to  Right Down the Center @9.1.17    5 months ago

You consider my questions @9.1.11 to be nonsense?   

And there you have it, another example of a feeble attempt to defend Trump.   In this case, labeling questions about serious wrongdoings and failures by Trump as 'nonsense'.

Clearly, you cannot defend Trump's wrongdoings.   Why do you try?   Why do you even want to defend this vindictive, dangerous, incompetent psychopath?

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.1.21  TᵢG  replied to  Right Down the Center @9.1.18    5 months ago

Asking you to opine on serious questions about Trump is not making it about you.   Buy a vowel.

Your refusal to opine shows that you know there is no defense for Trump ... yet you still try to defend him.   Why?   To what end?

Support for Trump is irrational, irresponsible, and unpatriotic.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.1.22  TᵢG  replied to  Trout Giggles @9.1.19    5 months ago

And per Trump, you just proved that you are intelligent.

You know that dumb is spelled with a 'b'.   Most people, per Trump, do not know that.

I wonder when he learned that dumb ends in a 'b'?

This man is an idiot:

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
9.1.23  Right Down the Center  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.20    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
9.1.24  Right Down the Center  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.21    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
9.1.25  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.11    5 months ago
What drives you to try to defend this corrupt, incompetent, vindictive psychopath?

I'm pretty sure it's their ideological opposition to those their religion has deemed "sinners" coupled with their desire to create a white conservative Christian 'Promised Land' here in America where they are eternally in charge, their religion might as well be codified in the constitution and their level of privilege and superiority isn't even questioned and thought of as 'deserved' by minorities, which has always been the dream of many white conservative Christians.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
9.1.26  Trout Giggles  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.20    5 months ago
Why do you even want to defend this vindictive, dangerous, incompetent psychopath?

because he lives to troll

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
9.1.27  Trout Giggles  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.22    5 months ago

probably the same day this video came out

I knew dumb ended with a B when I was in first grade. One of the first words I wanted to learn how to spell

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
9.1.28  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Trout Giggles @9.1.19    5 months ago

We know who the dummies are

I would bet money that Trump would spell that with a b.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.1.29  TᵢG  replied to  Right Down the Center @9.1.23    5 months ago

A perfect illustration of an absurd level of downplaying by you of the failures and wrongdoing of this administration.

You will not even condemn Trump's attempt to steal almost $1.8 billion in taxpayer revenue to pay off supporters.

So who do you think will read your comments and think that the $1.8 billion slush fund is good because you think the question is nonsense?

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
9.1.30  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Trout Giggles @9.1.27    5 months ago
One of the first words I wanted to learn how to spell

One of the first elementary school insults I can remember was "There's no 'i' in dumb, but there is a 'U'!".

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
9.1.31  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Right Down the Center @9.1.1    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
9.1.32  Trout Giggles  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.1.30    5 months ago

that's a good one!

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
9.1.33  Right Down the Center  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @9.1.31    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
9.1.34  Right Down the Center  impassed  TᵢG @9.1.29    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
9.1.35  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @9.1.26    5 months ago
he lives to troll

not here ...

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
9.1.36  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @9.1.31    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.1.37  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @9.1.36    5 months ago

Do you condemn Trump for trying to steal almost $1.8 billion in taxpayer revenue to use to pay off supporters?

Do you condemn Trump for starting an illegal war with no clear strategy, no clear endgame, and damaging the national and world economies, only to wind up in a situation where Iran is controlling the Strait of Hormuz?

Do you condemn Trump for unilaterally demolishing the East wing and now force taxpayers to spend billions to build a suitable infrastructure for anything that would wind up replacing it?

Do you condemn Trump for abusing the DoJ to go after political enemies?

Do you condemn Trump for unnecessarily causing prices to rise via tariffs and Iran rather than fall?

On and on ... you post comments that attempt to spin away the outrageous wrongdoings of Trump.   What drives you to try to defend this corrupt, incompetent, vindictive psychopath?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
9.1.38  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.37    5 months ago
Do you condemn Trump for trying to steal almost $1.8 billion in taxpayer revenue to use to pay off supporters?

Prove he "stole $1.8 billion.

Do you condemn Trump for starting an illegal war with no clear strategy, no clear endgame, and damaging the national and world economies, only to wind up in a situation where Iran is controlling the Strait of Hormuz?

If you think everything going on with Iran is new you really haven't been paying attention to the last almost 50 years.

Do you condemn Trump for unilaterally demolishing the East wing and now force taxpayers to spend billions to build a suitable infrastructure for anything that would wind up replacing it?

No different than tearing up parts to build a basketball court.

Do you condemn Trump for abusing the DoJ to go after political enemies?

As much as you condemn Democrats. (You silence has been noted over the years.)

Do you condemn Trump for unnecessarily causing prices to rise via tariffs and Iran rather than fall?

As the left put it....The President doesn't control prices.

On and on ... you post comments that attempt to spin away the outrageous wrongdoings of Trump.[✘]

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
9.1.39  devangelical  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @9.1.38    5 months ago

oh look, another maga-vet that can't seem to answer direct questions, or comprehend political and constitutional realities ...

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.1.40  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @9.1.38    5 months ago
Prove he "stole $1.8 billion.

Of course, the cliche response:  "Prove it".

And this is how it goes.   First of all, Trump's deal with the DoJ is widely known.   So you pretending Trump did not try to steal these funds is pointless dishonesty.

Second, no matter how much additional information I or anyone else posts, you will claim it is not proof.

So play your pathetic little game on a site where gullible people might buy your bullshit.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.1.41  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @9.1.38    5 months ago
No different than tearing up parts to build a basketball court.

You claim that putting in a basketball court is as destructive as destroying the East Wing.    How, exactly, do you think this will influence anyone with a brain?

As the left put it....The President doesn't control prices.

The PotUS does not control prices but he sure as hell can take actions that will cause prices to rise.

You denying that tariffs and the illegal Iran war have not caused prices to rise is despicable.

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
9.1.42  Tacos!  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @9.1.38    5 months ago
Prove he "stole $1.8 billion.

This strawman is either deliberate dishonesty for the purpose of trolling, or you’re so urgently focused on the tribal nature of politics that it’s just lazy. Read the line YOU quoted. It says Trump was “trying to steal” - not that he had actually done it. This is the kind of thing that will get you accused of trolling. Most people here just want an honest discussion of the issues, but then you pull something like this, which makes it impossible.

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
9.1.43  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @9.1.38    5 months ago

No different than tearing up parts to build a basketball court.

Obama built a basketball court using hundreds of millions of tax payer dollars?  What a moronic comparison.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
9.1.44  devangelical  replied to  Tacos! @9.1.42    5 months ago

the maga debate team isn't very ... deep.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
9.1.45  1stwarrior  replied to  Tacos! @9.1.42    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
9.1.46  1stwarrior  replied to  devangelical @9.1.44    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
9.1.47  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  1stwarrior @9.1.45    5 months ago
I'd like to see some "honest discussion of the issues" instead of the daily grinding of "I hate Trump".

I think it's just difficult to have an honest discussion with someone who wants the starting premise to be "Donald Trump is a normal, average IQ, average temperament, average educated normal everyday President" before getting into a debate over some specific policy issue.

The starting point for conservatives is soooooo far from reality that rational patriotic Americans can't even fathom starting there. It's like going into a debate club competition and being told "Okay, so debate team 1 will take the position that a fence around a private pool is required to avoid potential harm to children due to the attractive nuisance doctrine, and debate team 2 will take the opposite position. Oh, and for the sake of argument, we'll assume that children don't exist."

What is the point of even having that argument? It's certainly not an "honest discussion".

So, if any Trump fans are willing to start the conversation acknowledging that yes, Trump is a convicted felon and he is an accused pedophile and was accused by over two dozen women of sexual assault and was found liable in court for one of them, cheated on all three of his wives, paid multiple porn stars a quarter million to keep quiet about his affairs during a campaign, tried to extort the leader of Ukraine for dirt on Biden, inspired an attempted insurrection on his behalf and then pardoned the violent felons who beat officers, again, on his behalf, enacted what the court has found were illegal and unconstitutional tariffs, I mean the list just goes on and on and on. To try and boil it down to just "I hate Trump" is being intentionally obtuse and therefore nowhere close to 'honest'.

So, what would be the point of having a faux "honest discussion" with an intentionally obtuse person?

While sad, that's the reality.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.1.48  TᵢG  replied to  1stwarrior @9.1.45    5 months ago

An honest discussion requires that both sides be honest and deal with reality.

If one holds that Trump is fit to be PotUS —given all he has done and continues to do— then that is holding an irrational and demonstrably wrong position.   And yes, I am quite aware that this is my opinion, so spare us all the cliché platitude.

Seriously, what does it take for some to recognize that Trump is well beyond unfit to be PotUS given even a subset of this list below?  The first bullet alone illustrates his unfitness.  When in history have we tolerated such incompetence and corruption?

Trump:

  • tried to steal the 2020 election through fraud, coercion, lying, and incitement
  • surrounded himself with incompetent sycophants (Bill Pulte being the most recent)
  • tried to keep classified documents and obstructed their safe return for months
  • engaged in true lawfare, blatantly so, directing the AG (never should be done) to go after select political opponents (e.g. Comey, James, Cook, ...)
  • coerced private businesses (e.g. Perkins Coie LLP) and universities (e.g. Harvard) with threats of denying federal business opportunities/funding
  • overstepped authority and effectively killed USAID, which was congressionally approved, and abruptly, irresponsibly cut life-critical funding worldwide
  • removed watch dogs (e.g. inspectors general, FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter,...) and fired DoJ attorneys, et.al. who worked on his indictments
  • unilaterally destroyed the East Wing
  • accepts outrageously expensive gifts such as the Qatar jet (which will now cost at least $400 million in taxpayer dollars to prepare)
  • tried to rename the Kennedy Center and arrogantly put his own name as top billing
  • abused the use of the National Guard to deploy to cities as a political show
  • more than doubled ICE personnel with demonstrably poorly vetted, poorly trained individuals, and then unleashed them en masse into communities
  • abused tariff power, which pointlessly damaged USA reputation worldwide and triggered trading partners to strategically establish trade alternatives other than the USA
  • pulled back from WHO, UN, UNFCCC, etc. reducing the USA's international leadership
  • pushes anti-climate change initiatives (as if trying to further damage the environment)
  • burdens taxpayers to foot $1 billion to provide the necessary security infrastructure for whatever replaces the East Wing
  • blatantly attempts to steal the 2026 midterms by coercing states to gerrymander for political (not census) reasons
  • failed miserably on his campaign promise to lower prices
  • failed miserably on his campaign promise to end the Ukraine war
  • is a national embarrassment given he is the voice, face, and hand of the USA, yet publicly trolls our allies (in particular, Canada) and whines about not being awarded the Peace Prize and then vindictively threatens not to be motivated for peace
  • has substantially increased both deficit spending and the national debt (in direct opposition of his promises)
  • tried to create a $1.776 billion slush fund using taxpayer dollars to pay his supporters after commuting the sentences of his mob that violently breached the Capitol to disrupt a session of Congress
  • has created an IRS invulnerability for himself, his sons, and his businesses
  • used DoJ to vindictively go after E. Jean Carroll because she won a lawsuit against him

Trump does not view the presidency as a solemn duty but rather as a license to do whatever pleases him personally.

How does this level of abuse of the powers and influence of his office for personal gain NOT cross well past the line of fitness to serve as PotUS?

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
9.1.49  Tacos!  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @9.1.38    5 months ago
No different than tearing up parts to build a basketball court.

What do you think he tore up? Where did you hear that?

Here is a picture of that court:

p44_hoops.jpeg?q=75&w=1014&fm=webp

As you should be able to clearly see, the tennis court is still there. All he did was have some some extra lines painted on the court for basketball, and brought in some portable hoops. And, by the way, he paid for this with his own money.

This is something you could have discovered on your own just by Googling the matter instead of blindly accepting some horror story that FoxNews told you.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
9.1.50  1stwarrior  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.48    5 months ago

You get that from your AI/ChatGPT sources?  As usual, they are wrong

President Donald Trump's achievements span his historic first term and his subsequent administration, encompassing significant shifts in economic policy, trade, judicial appointments, and foreign affairs. [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]
Economy & Taxes
  1. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017: Signed the largest tax overhaul in decades, lowering individual income tax rates and permanently slashing the corporate tax rate from \(35\%\) to \(21\%\). [ 1 , 2 ]
  2. Deregulation Drive: Eliminated numerous federal regulations across multiple sectors, aiming to lower business compliance costs.
  3. "No Tax on Tips" and Overtime Relief: Championed tax exemptions for tips and overtime pay to increase take-home pay for working families. [ 1 , 2 ]
  4. Energy Independence: Achieved record levels of U.S. oil and natural gas production, making the nation a net exporter of energy. [ 1 ]
  5. Record Low Unemployment: Oversaw pre-pandemic economic metrics that included a 3.5% national unemployment rate, a 50-year low. [ 1 ]
Judiciary & Law
  1. Supreme Court Appointments: Appointed three Supreme Court Justices—Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett—securing a conservative majority.
  2. Federal Judiciary Reshaping: Appointed over 200 judges to federal appeals and district courts.
  3. Criminal Justice Reform (First Step Act): Signed bipartisan legislation aimed at reducing recidivism and easing mandatory minimum sentences for certain nonviolent offenses. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]
Trade & Manufacturing
  1. USMCA Negotiation: Replaced NAFTA with the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), which included stricter rules of origin for auto manufacturing.
  2. Phase One China Trade Deal: Imposed tariffs on hundreds of billions of dollars of Chinese goods to curb intellectual property theft and reduce the trade deficit, leading to a negotiated initial trade agreement.
  3. Withdrawal from TPP: Pulled the United States out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations on his first day in office.
  4. Steel and Aluminum Tariffs: Levied tariffs on imported steel and aluminum to protect domestic manufacturing industries. [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]
National Security & Immigration
  1. Defense Spending Increases: Secured significant budget increases for the Department of Defense and established the U.S. Space Force as a separate military branch.
  2. Border Security and Wall Funding: Redirected funds and utilized emergency powers to construct sections of the U.S.-Mexico border wall.
  3. Dismantling ISIS Caliphate: Oversaw military operations that defeated the territorial caliphate of ISIS in Iraq and Syria, including the raid that killed leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.
  4. Abraham Accords: Brokered historic normalization agreements between Israel and several Arab nations, including the UAE, Bahrain, Sudan, and Morocco.
  5. NATO Contributions: Successfully pressured NATO allies to increase their defense spending to meet the alliance's 2% of GDP target.
  6. Elimination of Terrorist Leaders: Authorized operations resulting in the deaths of major terrorist leaders, including Qasem Soleimani.
Healthcare & Domestic Policy
  1. Right to Try Act: Signed legislation allowing terminally ill patients to access experimental treatments that have not yet received full FDA approval.
  2. VA MISSION Act: Expanded healthcare choices for military veterans, enabling them to see private doctors outside the Veterans Affairs system.
  3. Operation Warp Speed: Spearheaded a public-private partnership that accelerated the development, manufacturing, and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines in record time.
  4. Repeal of Individual Mandate: Eliminated the financial penalty associated with the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate.
Science, Technology & Environment
  1. Withdrawal from the Paris Climate Accord: Withdrew the U.S. from the global climate agreement, arguing it placed an unfair economic burden on American workers and businesses.
  2. Space Exploration Priorities: Signed directives instructing NASA to return American astronauts to the Moon and establish a foundation for future missions to Mars.
  3. Great American Outdoors Act: Signed legislation providing billions in funding for national park maintenance and permanently funding the Land and Water Conservation Fund. [ 1 , 2 ]

Google AI sources

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
9.1.51  devangelical  replied to  devangelical @9.1.44    5 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.1.52  TᵢG  replied to  1stwarrior @9.1.50    5 months ago

You assume that my list came from AI.   Wrong, this is a list I have been accumulating.   Next you claim that my list is wrong yet provide no facts and not even a rebuttal.

Instead you list some accomplishments of Trump.

So you totally fail to rebut my claims and then pretend that listing some accomplishments somehow overrides the reasons why Trump is unfit.

If that is all you can offer, why even bother to post?

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
9.1.53  1stwarrior  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.52    5 months ago

[ deleted ]

[ ✘ ] Nah - only gave you 25 accomplishments WITH the links. Those links are easy to follow - just click on them.

No claims were made other than claims by you.

365 WINS IN 365 DAYS: President Trump’s Return Marks New Era of Success, Prosperity

One year ago today, President Donald J. Trump returned to office with a resounding mandate to restore prosperity, secure the border, rebuild American strength, and put the American people first. In just 365 days, President Trump has delivered truly transformative results with the most accomplished first year of any presidential term in modern history.

From negative net migration for the first time in 50 years to the largest homicide drop on record, trillions in reshored investments, peace deals ending multiple wars, record energy production, and massive bureaucracy cuts, President Trump has put America First with urgency — and he’s just getting started.

Then, if you've got the time, there is a list of 365 things accomplished by Trump.

[ deleted ]

[ ✘ ] The constant bashing of Trump is purely one of frustration by the opposing party. However, they haven't been able to "totally screw" his administrative operations and actions. Sure they hate and totally dislike him as a person, but, they don't have a leg to stand on in matching nor beating his actions and their results - thus far.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
9.1.54  1stwarrior  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.1.47    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
9.1.55  1stwarrior  replied to  Tacos! @9.1.42    5 months ago

Well, he filed a suit against the IRS for $10B - the suit was dropped and DOJ converted the funding into a $1.775B Anti-weaponization Fund as a fund that was designed to financially compensate Trump allies, conservative figures, and January 6 rioters who claimed they were targets of political "lawfare" or unfair investigations by previous administrations.

Only Raskins keeps saying Trump was trying to steal it.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
9.1.56  seeder  Gsquared  replied to  1stwarrior @9.1.53    5 months ago

Man, have they got you and the rest of the magas fooled!  Just amazing.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
9.1.57  JohnRussell  replied to  1stwarrior @9.1.53    5 months ago

Trump is the most corrupt US president in history.   Just say you dont care and we can move on. 

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
9.1.58  1stwarrior  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.29    5 months ago

trying to steal almost $1.8 billion in taxpayer revenue

No validity other than Jamie Raskins and the U. S.  House Judiciary Committee Democrats to that statement.   Instead of pursuing personal damages in court, Trump's legal team settled with his own administration's Department of Justice (DOJ). In exchange for dropping the suit, the DOJ agreed to use the federal Judgment Fund to establish a $1.776 billion "Anti-Weaponization Fund".  

DOJ rolls out nearly $1.8B ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’ as part of Trump’s IRS settlement

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
9.1.59  Tacos!  replied to  1stwarrior @9.1.55    5 months ago
the suit was dropped and DOJ converted the funding into a $1.775B Anti-weaponization Fund as a fund that was designed to financially compensate Trump allies, conservative figures, and January 6 rioters who claimed they were targets of political "lawfare" or unfair investigations by previous administrations.

Yes. There are two possibilities for how that happens, and both require Trump.

The first would be a settlement. That is an agreement between plaintiff (Trump) and defendant (The United States government) to drop the suit forever so long as certain conditions are met - namely, the creation of this fund.

The second possibility is that the President (Trump) simply ordered his Attorney General to create the fund.

There is no scenario where the DOJ just creates the fund on its own initiative. Even if they did do that all on their own (which would be illegal) there is nothing stopping Trump from proceeding with his lawsuit against the government. Why would the government - or any plaintiff in any case - just cough up money with no agreement not to sue in the future? The answer is that they would not. Lawsuits just don’t work that way.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
9.1.60  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @9.1.56    5 months ago

no shortage of scum in trump's pond for those suckers that still support him ...

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.1.61  TᵢG  replied to  1stwarrior @9.1.58    5 months ago
No validity other than Jamie Raskins and the U. S.  House Judiciary Committee Democrats to that statement.

Oh come on, 1st, you seriously are going to put this in a post??

This fund is entirely illegal.   It came from the DoJ under Trump's control negotiating a 'deal' with Trump.   Good grief man.

Trump was trying to get $1.776 billion of our tax dollars under his control to basically bribe supporters.   He had no legal right to that money and that, 1st, is theft.

What drives you to try to defend this thief??

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.1.62  TᵢG  replied to  Gsquared @9.1.56    5 months ago
Just amazing.

Sickening!

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
9.1.63  devangelical  replied to  Tacos! @9.1.59    5 months ago

POS/POTUS and the acting AG colluding to defraud the court, realizing what they did, and then trying to make believe it didn't happen, only to abandon the idea today ...

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
9.1.64  Tacos!  replied to  devangelical @9.1.63    5 months ago
only to abandon the idea today

Yeah. Kinda like bank robbers deciding not to commit a robbery when they realize everyone just watched them enter the bank with their guns.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
9.1.65  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  1stwarrior @9.1.58    5 months ago
Trump's legal team settled with his own administration's Department of Justice

"Ah, Mr. Fox, I see you're here to represent Mr. Fox?"

"Yes Mr. Fox, I'm here to represent Mr. Fox to settle the matter over how many chickens Mr. Fox is owed."

"Of course, Mr. Fox, we're happy to coordinate the transfer of chickens to Mr. Fox, how many chickens would that be?"

"Oh, I don't know, how about nearly two billion, does that sound fair Mr. Fox?"

"More than fair, Mr. Fox, I'll get on it right away."

"Thank you, Mr. Fox. And now that I'm thinking about it, Mr. Fox is already pretty full. How about we give those chickens to Mr. Fox's crew who helped him pull that one job a while back? I mean, even though they weren't successful, some of them went to jail for Mr. Fox, so I'm sure keeping a chicken in each loyal foxes pot will make Mr. Fox very happy."

"You got it Mr. Fox."

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
9.1.66  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  devangelical @9.1.39    5 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
9.1.67  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.40    5 months ago
Of course, the cliche response: "Prove it".

And the expected response. And without the proof of course.

First of all, Trump's deal with the DoJ is widely known. So you pretending Trump did not try to steal these funds is pointless dishonesty.

Yeah, that's not proof he tried to steal anything. That's your OPINION.

Second, no matter how much additional information I or anyone else posts, you will claim it is not proof.

You have yet to provide any "additional information". We only see your opinion. [deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
9.1.68  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.41    5 months ago
You claim that putting in a basketball court is as destructive as destroying the East Wing.

Either way, there has been no damage to the WH. [deleted]

[✘] You denying that tariffs and the illegal Iran war have not caused prices to rise is despicable.

Exactly where did I deny anything on the tariffs and I've already game my statement on your supposed "illegal Iran war". [deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
9.1.69  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Tacos! @9.1.42    5 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
9.1.70  Trout Giggles  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.61    5 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
9.1.71  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.40    5 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
9.1.72  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @9.1.71    5 months ago
YOU HAVE NOT IDEA WHAT YOU ARE RESPONDING TO

jrSmiley_88_smiley_image.gif

Do you mean 9.1.37 ?

And what a well thought out intellectual insult that lets everyone see the level of emotional maturity reached. Thank you for making sure anyone reading along could see which side of the argument was coming from an elementary school playground.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
9.1.73  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.1.72    5 months ago

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
9.1.74  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @9.1.73    5 months ago
Please try to keep up.

jrSmiley_78_smiley_image.gif

You're the one who said it was 3.1.37 which is all I was clarifying.

I find it very humorous that some wrongly believe others aren't 'keeping up' but are just oblivious to the fact that they'd been lapped several times already.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
9.1.75  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.1.74    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
9.1.76  1stwarrior  replied to  1stwarrior @9.1.53    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
9.1.77  1stwarrior  replied to  1stwarrior @9.1.54    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
9.1.78  1stwarrior  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @9.1.75    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
9.1.79  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  1stwarrior @9.1.78    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
9.1.80  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @9.1.75    5 months ago
read the ENTIRE thread

jrSmiley_78_smiley_image.gif

I did, and you do not present facts. You say many times to "prove it" as if that's some sort of defense for what is fucking obvious to everyone else. Basically, your defense is that it wasn't "stolen" because TRUMPS DOJ™ "settled" with TRUMPS attorneys™ in a case NO ONE ELSE got to hear or see on a wildly outrageous $10 billion claim. How FUCKING GULLIBLE do you have to be to believe ANY of that was legit and wasn't outright THEFT!?!

"We won with poorly educated. I love the poorly educated," - Donald J Trump

I guess that was the smartest thing he ever did.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.1.81  TᵢG  replied to  1stwarrior @9.1.78    5 months ago

Instead of posting entirely unsupported, vague, generic insults, why not make an actual point with a supporting argument?

Show that you have a legitimate point to make.

It was illegal (Appropriations Clause, 31 U.S.C. § 1304, 28 U.S.C. § 2414, and 31 U.S.C. § 1341) for Trump, controlling the DoJ, to make a deal with the DoJ that transfers $1.776 billion of taxpayer revenue to his control for paying political supporters.    It was illegal (26 U.S.C. § 7217) for Trump to make a deal with the IRS to hold him, his sons, and his businesses immune from IRS audits.

And beyond being illegal, these acts are extremely unethical.

If any other PotUS made these 'deals' you would be up in arms.   Why, in this case, are you trying to defend Trump?   How is that rational?

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
9.1.82  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.81    5 months ago
If any other PotUS made these 'deals' you would be up in arms.

Well, unless that PotUS was another rightwing conservative Republican or their kin...

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.1.83  TᵢG  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.1.82    5 months ago

Maybe.   There does seem to be some cultish tie with Trump that goes way beyond blind partisanship.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
9.1.84  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.1.80    5 months ago
I did, and you do not present facts

And exactly was said that TiG responded to that started this whole thing?  When you can answer that we can talk.

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.1.85  TᵢG  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @9.1.84    5 months ago

It was illegal (Appropriations Clause, 31 U.S.C. § 1304, 28 U.S.C. § 2414, and 31 U.S.C. § 1341) for Trump, controlling the DoJ, to make a deal with the DoJ that transfers $1.776 billion of taxpayer revenue to his control for paying political supporters.    It was illegal (26 U.S.C. § 7217) for Trump to make a deal with the IRS to hold him, his sons, and his businesses immune from IRS audits.

And beyond being illegal, these acts are extremely unethical.

What kind of irrational thinking would lead anyone to approve of these acts?

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
9.1.86  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.85    5 months ago

Nope.  That is not what the post you replied to said.  Try again.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
9.1.87  1stwarrior  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.81    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
9.1.88  1stwarrior  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.83    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
9.1.89  1stwarrior  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.81    5 months ago

[deleted]

[✘] DOJ reports to the AG - not Trump. Sorry - thought you knew all of those hierarchies.

There were five attorneys involved - and not one of them was named Trump. I'm sure you'll come up with the party affiliations of each to "support" your claims of Trump telling them what to do.

The DOJ and their attorneys settled the Trump claim to the IRS - not Trump.

[deleted][✘]

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
9.1.90  1stwarrior  replied to  1stwarrior @9.1.88    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
9.1.91  devangelical  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.1.74    5 months ago
I find it very humorous that some wrongly believe others aren't 'keeping up' but are just oblivious to the fact that they'd been lapped several times already.

maga republicans are the welcome exception to not mocking and humiliating the mentally challenged in america ...

 
 
 
TᵢG
Professor Principal
9.1.92  TᵢG  replied to  1stwarrior @9.1.89    5 months ago

The DoJ reports to the AG who reports to Trump.

Do you actually think that you can persuade people that the DoJ reports to the AG and that is the end of it?   That Trump is not calling the shots?  That the AG is not doing the bidding of Trump?

I would seek to disabuse you of that entirely naive expectation.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
9.1.93  devangelical  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.92    5 months ago
I would seek to disabuse you of that entirely naive expectation.

I believe that metaphorical train left the station years ago ...

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
9.1.94  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.92    5 months ago
That the AG is not doing the bidding of Trump?

Blanche is an even more efficient brown noser than his predecessor.

park2-628x628.jpg TCFHZUJLW5FIBOBRNHQFP6EHQE.jpg

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
9.1.95  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  1stwarrior @9.1.87    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
9.1.96  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  TᵢG @9.1.92    5 months ago
The DoJ reports to the AG who reports to Trump.

I think it's become abundantly clear that the Trump defenders have become desperate as their defenses of his actions get weaker and weaker to the point that now they just demand everyone suspended their disbelief when listening to their full-throated defenses of their dear Leader. They're like someone who doesn't speak a foreign language that just starts speaking louder because they think they're not being understood, when the reality is everyone else already knows exactly what they're saying, they're just mocking them for being so stunningly gullible.

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
9.1.97  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  1stwarrior @9.1.90    5 months ago
"D" - what you're doing is considered harassment - a strong violation of the CoC.

I was unaware that there was a CoC policy against harassing moronic arguments and wildly inaccurate statements. If there is, then I sincerely apologize for shredding the clearly stupid conservative narrative that somehow Trump loyalists in the DOJ should be trusted to be absolutely non-partisan in their decision to just hand Trump $1.8 billion in taxpayers' money without even bothering to go to court, the two sides (which are on the same side) "talked it out" and just agreed to pay Trump nearly $2 billion. And the excuse they used for their gullible followers to explain why they would pay out on a completely spurious lawsuit that anyone with more than half a brain knows Trump would have lost? "Well, he sued for $10 billion so settling for $1.8 billion was a good deal!". Doh! There I go again exposing and harassing conservative arguments, my bad.

 
 
 
George
PhD Expert
9.1.98  George  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.1.97    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
9.1.99  devangelical  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.1.97    5 months ago

I wouldn't expect much independent thought from those that have been told what to do and think for most of their life.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
9.1.100  Trout Giggles  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.1.97    5 months ago
There I go again exposing and harassing conservative arguments, my bad.

Please continue because it's obvious to me somebody is making up rules that don't exist in the COC

 
 
 
Hal A. Lujah
Professor Participates
9.1.101  Hal A. Lujah  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.1.97    5 months ago

"Well, he sued for $10 billion so settling for $1.8 billion was a good deal!"

Hey, using Trump math that is a 600% savings!

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
9.1.102  1stwarrior  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.1.97    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
9.1.103  1stwarrior  replied to  Trout Giggles @9.1.100    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
9.1.104  1stwarrior  impassed  TᵢG @9.1.92    5 months ago
✋🏼
 
 
 
MrFrost
Professor Guide
9.2  MrFrost  replied to  Right Down the Center @9    5 months ago

Not sure this is not a win for Donald.  He can say he tried and it was the mean ole courts that would not let him do it.  Another promise kept.  That may be enough for many of his followers.

Well, most of his followers ARE pretty stupid, so some may buy that line of bullshit. 

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
9.2.1  devangelical  replied to  MrFrost @9.2    5 months ago

window licking stupid ...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
9.2.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  devangelical @9.2.1    5 months ago

lead paint chip eating stupid

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
9.2.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Trout Giggles @9.2.2    5 months ago
lead paint chip eating stupid

...that is only surpassed by their stubborn refusal to accept reality.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
9.2.4  Right Down the Center  replied to  MrFrost @9.2    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
9.2.5  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Right Down the Center @9.2.4    5 months ago

Agreed, so perhaps rightwing conservatives should stop slandering patriotic Americans.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
9.2.6  Right Down the Center  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.2.5    5 months ago

 Luke 4:23

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
9.2.7  devangelical  replied to  Right Down the Center @9.2.6    5 months ago

glock 18: 9mm

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
9.2.8  Trout Giggles  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @9.2.5    5 months ago

absolutely because they aren't the patriotic Americans they think they are

esp veterans who support this inept, incompetent, criminal, narcissistic POS.

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
9.2.9  Right Down the Center  replied to  devangelical @9.2.7    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Right Down the Center
Professor Participates
9.2.10  Right Down the Center  replied to  devangelical @9.2.7    5 months ago
glock 18: 9mm

glock 19 is more than enough for my needs.  And it is legal

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
10  Sean Treacy    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
11  1stwarrior    5 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
12  seeder  Gsquared    5 months ago

Trump still loves his Thug Fund... although he doesn't know anything about it:

President Trump sidestepped a question Wednesday about whether his $1.8 billion anti-weaponization fund is a dead idea or just on hold after acting Attorney General  Todd Blanche   said there were no plans to move forward with it.

“It’s a… I’d have to ask the lawyers,” Trump said in the Oval Office. “I don’t know.”

He called the fund a “beautiful thing,” but said he didn’t come up with the idea and went on to say the fake news, especially CNN, “have abused our people so badly.”

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
12.1  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @12    5 months ago
Thug Fund

J6 traitor bonus ...

“have abused our people so badly.”

... fuck him. unamerican maga scum deserve the abuse ...

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
12.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Gsquared @12    5 months ago

And what has he been doing for the last decade? He's certainly not "loving" the American people

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
12.2.1  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @12.2    5 months ago

he's loving their money that he's grifted. his true believer well has run dry, so he and his family have moved on to the US treasury.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
12.3  Thomas  replied to  Gsquared @12    5 months ago
He called the fund a “beautiful thing,”  but said he didn’t come up with the idea and went on to say the fake news, especially CNN, “have abused our people so badly.”

He must have a chubby for Collins.

And she smiles for Colbert:

512

Bet that Frosts his cookies

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
12.3.1  devangelical  replied to  Thomas @12.3    5 months ago

he left his cookies in melania's purse, and she's in NYC, with her big-dicked secret service team ... 

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
12.3.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Thomas @12.3    5 months ago

Well...not only is Colbert funny but he's cute, too

He makes me smile

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
12.3.3  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  devangelical @12.3.1    5 months ago
he left his cookies in melania's purse, and she's in NYC, with her big-dicked secret service team ... 

Didn't you hear, Trump had all of her secret service agent's genitals replaced with something that would remind her more of him...

s-l400.jpg

 
 

Who is online










95 visitors