╌>

Pentagon fires Stars and Stripes' top editor, publisher and a reporter | AP News

  
Via:  Gsquared  •  3 months ago  •  31 comments

By:   JOCELYN NOVECK (AP News)

Pentagon fires Stars and Stripes' top editor, publisher and a reporter | AP News
The editor-in-chief of Stars and Stripes says the Pentagon has fired him as well as its publisher and a reporter.

Sponsored by group The Reality Show

The Reality Show


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


The Pentagon on Friday fired the editor-in-chief of Stars and Stripes and a top reporter for insubordination after they spoke publicly against any interference by the Defense Department in the military news outlet that has a long history of editorial independence. It was the latest move by an administration that has grown increasingly aggressive toward the news media.

The newspaper's publisher, who announced his impending retirement days ago, was also dismissed.

Erik Slavin, editor-in-chief of the military newspaper that is partly funded by the Pentagon, told The Associated Press he was dismissed for insubordination after an interview he gave that objected to potential censorship by the U.S. military. He received a notice of separation, as did publisher Max Lederer — who had just announced his upcoming retirement — and Middle East reporter Lara Korte, Slavin said.

The moves come at a time when the Trump administration, in its second term, has been progressively combative toward the media — including sharply curtailing Pentagon access for the press corps that covers the Defense Department. Trump or other parts of the executive branch have also, in policy and in the courts, grappled with The Wall Street Journal,The Associated Press and The New York Times — in addition to using the FCC to target broadcast networks.

Slavin said he was being fired "for stating in a CBS interview that hypothetical censorship of news for service members would constitute a red line." Korte participated in the same interview.

"I stand by the principle that Stars and Stripes must remain editorially independent, as required by law and by the department's own policies," Slavin said.

Media leaders are troubled


National Press Club President Mark Schoeff Jr. called the firing of Slavin "another brazen attempt by the Pentagon to dictate coverage of the military" and said it should be immediately reversed.

"Firing a newspaper editor after he publicly defended his newsroom's editorial independence is deeply troubling, and it should concern every journalist and every member of the U.S. military who depends on independent reporting," Schoeff said.

Neither Lederer nor Korte immediately responded to emailed requests for comment. Korte said on X: "Today, I was informed that the Department of Defense is firing me for insubordination after I told a CBS reporter that I work for Stars and Stripes — not the Pentagon, not the administration, and not any policy maker."

Earlier this week, longtime publisher Lederer announced his retirement effective at the end of September. He made his announcement a few weeks after the Pentagon installed a new deputy publisher, an active duty service member, under him at the newspaper without his prior knowledge. Three Democratic senators on Thursday wrote to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, asking why the new deputy — Navy Capt. William Urban — had been installed.

The retirement of Lederer, who had been at Stars and Stripes for three decades and publisher since 2007, comes as Hegseth's Pentagon has moved to exert editorial control and eliminate what it asserts are "woke distractions."

"Stars and Stripes will be custom tailored to our warfighters," Sean Parnell, Hegseth's spokesman, wrote in January on X. "It will focus on warfighting, weapons systems, fitness, lethality, survivability and ALL THINGS MILITARY. No more repurposed DC gossip columns; no more Associated Press reprints."

In April, the Pentagon fired Jacqueline Smith, ombudsman for the newspaper, whose job had been to safeguard editorial independence.

Lederer, the second full-time civilian in the position, wrote in a staff memo this week that it had "become clear that my philosophy of leadership, and my understanding of the value and mission of Stars and Stripes, differ in fundamental ways from the direction the leadership of the Department of Defense has for the organization."

Newly installed Pentagon leader outlines his plan


In a letter posted on Stars and Stripes, Urban wrote of his plans and said: "I understand that I am now part of a team, committed to editorially independent journalism that best serves our most important customer, which is our service members, their families, and our greater military community."

"I am a media junkie who has served as a communication professional engaged in being a spokesman for some of the hardest Public Affairs assignments in the Navy and Department of War for more than 20 years," he wrote.

It was unclear whether Urban, currently titled "military deputy to the publisher," would now become head publisher. "I can't comment on what my role will be in the future," he told the AP.

In a telephone interview, Urban said Stars and Stripes has "a strong team of professional journalists that are focused on the mission of providing our military service members and their families the best possible product. That mission is going to continue. All of us in leadership will continue to advocate for … the best possible journalism going forward."

He said he had no formal journalism experience but cited his years in public affairs and communications. He said he would be focused on expanding digital journalism at the paper, because the service members to which it caters are often young and are "digital natives."

"I think we need to get better on the digital side," he said, "to make sure that we are reaching as many service members as we possibly can and having the impact that we should be having."


Red Box Rules

Trolling, taunting, spamming, and off topic comments may be removed at the discretion of group mods. NT members that are known plagiarists, repeat comments, or continue to disrupt/deflect the conversation risk having all of their comments deleted. Please remember to quote the person(s) to whom you are replying to preserve continuity of this seed. Any use of the phrase "Trump Derangement Syndrome" or the TDS acronym in a comment will be deleted.  Any use of the term "Brandon", "Traitor Joe", or any variations thereof, when referring to President Biden, will be deleted.  Right wing trolls can expect to have their irrelevant questions and comments deleted. Posting debunked lies will be subject to deletion. Use of the terms "leftist" or "lefty" will also be subject to deletion. ©


Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Gsquared
Professor Expert
1  seeder  Gsquared    3 months ago

Another move toward fascism by the Trumpist regime.

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
1.1  Thomas  replied to  Gsquared @1    3 months ago

Another move toward fascism by the Trumpist regime.

You are too generous. Maybe "further into" would be a more appropriate wording?

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
1.2  devangelical  replied to  Gsquared @1    3 months ago

they're already in it up to their necks so far ...

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
2  Thomas    3 months ago
Lederer, the second full-time civilian in the position, wrote in a staff memo this week that it had "become clear that my philosophy of leadership, and my understanding of the value and mission of Stars and Stripes, differ in fundamental ways from the direction the leadership of the Department of Defense has for the organization."

What do you think the translation of that little coded message is?

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
2.1  Split Personality  replied to  Thomas @2    3 months ago

The Stars & Stripes was unique among this country's newspapers and periodicals.

We depended on the Stars & Stripes for over twenty years and always received fair and balanced reporting.

It was only a matter of time before the toy soldiers would grab control to add their propaganda message and federalize the paper.

Pentagon Funding and Structure

According to Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell, Stars and Stripes is part of the Defense Media Activity and   receives some funding from the Department of Defense POLITICO . A person familiar with newspaper operations told CBS News that   about $15 million of its roughly $29 million annual budget comes from tax dollars , which is roughly   half of its total funding CBS News . The remaining funds are generated through   subscriptions and advertising revenue CBS News .

The paper’s staff are Defense Department employees, but it has long maintained   editorial independence   and is   congressionally mandated to be governed by First Amendment principles POLITICO . This means that while it is funded in part by the Pentagon, it is not directly controlled by Defense Department leadership in its reporting.

Recent Overhaul Plans

In January 2026, the Pentagon announced plans to   modernize Stars and Stripes , refocusing its content on “ALL THINGS MILITARY” and away from what the Pentagon described as “woke distractions” POLITICO . The overhaul includes stopping reliance on wire services like the Associated Press and adapting operations to serve a new generation of service members POLITICO .

Funding Context

The $15 million Pentagon contribution is part of a broader defense media budget, and the paper’s funding is separate from the Pentagon’s military budget requests for operations or conflicts Stars and Stripes +1 . The remaining revenue streams — subscriptions and ads — are critical to the outlet’s financial balance, especially given its declining print circulation and online readership CBS News .

In summary:   Stars and Stripes is partially funded by the Pentagon (about $15 million annually) and the rest by its own revenue, with a recent Pentagon initiative to modernize its operations while preserving editorial independence  

In other words, when the subscribers and advertisers start to decline to participate, the paper will shrink even smaller and the Pentagon will have to contribute more to just another White House mouthpiece.

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
2.1.1  devangelical  replied to  Split Personality @2.1    3 months ago

I'm sure it's just a coincidence that this change happened soon after revised death, casualty, and damage reports came in ...

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
2.1.2  1stwarrior  replied to  devangelical @2.1.1    3 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
2.1.4  1stwarrior  replied to  1stwarrior @2.1.2    3 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
3  Trout Giggles    3 months ago
In a letter posted on Stars and Stripes, Urban wrote of his plans and said: "I understand that I am now part of a team, committed to editorially independent journalism that best serves our most important customer, which is our service members, their families, and our greater military community." emphasis mine

Do you know the meaning of editorially independent journalism...Sir?????

Don;t worry your little head about it. You'll do what they tell you and not think about it

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
3.1  Split Personality  replied to  Trout Giggles @3    3 months ago

Bill Urban graduated from Annapolis in 1997 so he is in 29 years, the last 11 of which have all been Public Affairs postings.

As an O6 already, the difference between O6 and O7 is negligible in retirement.

He isn't going anywhere or rocking his boat.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
3.1.1  1stwarrior  replied to  Split Personality @3.1    3 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
3.1.2  Split Personality  replied to  1stwarrior @3.1.1    2 months ago

I asked CoPilot

It said basic pay for an O6 over 30 years which was $15,188.00 for O6

but only $15,896 for O7 over 30 years because of some ceiling set by Congress.

Either co pilot is wrong (again) or the retirement calculation is better than the actual pay scale.

The real jump is at O8 

thanks for your input.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
3.1.3  1stwarrior  replied to  Split Personality @3.1.2    2 months ago

Got my data from

Since it is AI, not really too sure I am 'bout trusting it.

 
 
 
1stwarrior
Professor Participates
3.1.4  1stwarrior  replied to  Split Personality @3.1.2    2 months ago

[✘]

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4  Jeremy Retired in NC    3 months ago

Pretty vague as far as why he was dismissed.  

 
 
 
Dismayed Patriot
Professor Quiet
4.1  Dismayed Patriot  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4    3 months ago
Pretty vague as far as why he was dismissed.

Pretty clear why he was dismissed, he dared speak the truth and was fired for it.

When Senator Mark Kelly dared speak the truth, this administration tried to prosecute him, so I'm not surprised that this wannabe fascist administration is doing this kind of thing. I hope conservatives are ready for a Democratic President firing the fuck out of anyone who dares to claim they won't be absolutely loyal to the Democratic President and do whatever they're told no matter what. The precedent has been set.

 
 
 
Jeremy Retired in NC
Professor Guide
4.1.1  Jeremy Retired in NC  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4.1    3 months ago
he dared speak the truth and was fired for it.

After reading the article - that's speculation.   

When Senator Mark Kelly dared speak the truth

Cool story.  Unrelated but cool story.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Participates
4.1.2  Split Personality  replied to  Dismayed Patriot @4.1    3 months ago
I hope conservatives are ready for a Democratic President firing the fuck out of anyone who dares to claim they won't be absolutely loyal to the Democratic President and do whatever they're told no matter what.

Doubtful, even the GOP Senators desperately want a return to normalcy.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  Split Personality @4.1.2    2 months ago

They could have normalcy if they would locate their spines

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Participates
4.1.4  Veronica  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.1.3    2 months ago

Or balls....

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
4.1.5  Trout Giggles  replied to  Veronica @4.1.4    2 months ago

they should check somebody's purse

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Participates
4.1.6  Veronica  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.1.5    2 months ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.1.7  devangelical  replied to  Trout Giggles @4.1.5    2 months ago

check the lint in the corners of your purse, those are the pearls they're clutching these days ...

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Participates
4.1.8  Veronica  replied to  devangelical @4.1.7    2 months ago

jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
4.2  devangelical  replied to  Jeremy Retired in NC @4    3 months ago

... especially for most of those that have their heads so far up trump's ass.

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Participates
5  Veronica    3 months ago

We all knew this was coming.  Sometimes I think the end will never come.  If any of this shit occurred under Obama what would all those Trump ball suckers say?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Veronica @5    3 months ago

IMPEACH THE BASTARD!!!!!

that's what they would say

 
 
 
Veronica
Professor Participates
5.1.1  Veronica  replied to  Trout Giggles @5.1    3 months ago

I think they would use the word "hang".

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
5.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Veronica @5.1.1    3 months ago

Thanks for the correction

 
 
 
Thomas
Professor Guide
5.2  Thomas  replied to  Veronica @5    3 months ago
 If any of this shit occurred under Obama what would all those Trump ball suckers say?

"Ahhhhhh" ???

 
 
 
devangelical
Professor Principal
6  devangelical    3 months ago

 
 

Who is online

CB


130 visitors