‘Where is all the white supremacy stuff?’: Bill O’Reilly debunks Dem claims with cold, hard facts
By: John Dougherty
There is no systemic or institutional racism in the USA Today. Racism as expressed by those into white supremacy are a tiny fringe outside the mainstream of our Exceptional American culture. To say otherwise is nothing more than race hustling demagoguery. Biden and democrats are engaging in gross exaggeration and outright lies to say that is problem in America or that we haven’t lived up to the ideals expressed by the founding fathers they then denigrate for not being sufficiently enlightened enough for the time in which they lived. It’s time to stand up to those who would accuse America and Americans of being not being good enough for them and those who reject MLK’s peaceful protest and his dream where they can shove it and what UN natural acts they can engage themselves in.
S E E D E D C O N T E N T
Bill O’Reilly on Thursday pushed back against strident claims increasingly being made by President Joe Biden, Democrats, and far-left pundits that “white supremacy” is a widespread and growing problem.
In a segment during his show on streaming network “The First,” the former Fox News host produced newly uncovered data showing that federal cases involving alleged white supremacists over the past two years were minuscule.
By comparison, O’Reilly noted, arrests and prosecutions of left-wing Antifa and Black Lives Matter agitators since the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis last spring have been legion.
“Where is all the white supremacy stuff?” O’Reilly asked as he began his segment, noting there are “no visible signs” of it around most of the country outside of “a few kooks” online.
“But is it a pervasive problem?” The host continued, noting that Biden intimated last week — during a CNN town hall — that the problem was so bad he would be ensuring the Justice Department focused on it.
O’Reilly went on to cite DoJ data showing that in all of 2019, there were only five federal cases brought against 75 alleged white supremacists. In 2020, he continued, there were just five more cases brought against 14 suspected white supremacists.
Turning to state prosecutions, O’Reilly said the number of cases amounted to just five in 2019 and three in 2020, involving eight and nine persons respectively.
Taken together, state and federal prosecutions involving alleged white supremacists amounted to just 18 cases and 106 people, O’Reilly continued.
“Now, those are the facts. You can’t alter them, you can’t spin them,” O’Reilly said, indicating that the problem appears minuscule and certainly not on the level it’s being portrayed by the Biden administration and Democrats.
But during a CNN-sponsored town hall event last week, Biden claimed that the problem is widespread, including throughout police and military ranks.
“I got involved in politics to begin with because of civil rights and opposition to white supremacists, the Ku Klux Klan. And the most dangerous people in America continue to exist. That is the greatest threat to terror in America: domestic terror,” Biden told a town hall participant,”
“And so I would make sure that my Justice Department and the Civil Rights Division is focused heavily on those very folks. And I would make sure that we, in fact, focus on how to deal with the rise of white supremacy,” the president added.
Conversely, O’Reilly said he asked his research staff to find out the number of “far-left” Antifa and BLM members who have been arrested just in 2020.
The host said the number was in the “thousands,” including “more than 300” on the federal level.
“Because of Portland, because of Minneapolis, because of Seattle, thousands of far-left people. So, 106 white supremacists, two years,” versus thousands, O’Reilly said, adding that the president does not seem concerned with the latter.
The host went on to suggest that the purpose behind the white supremacist narrative being pushed by the left is political.
“The far-left progressive movement — and that includes the media, which enables it — they were successful with the white privilege stuff,” he said, going on to note that during that time there was very little pushback on the narrative.
“So then they said, you know, that white privilege thing worked so well, let’s bump it up to white supremacy,” he continued, “and therefore we can bring in the founding fathers who forged the Constitution because they were all white supremacists.”
The objective, he explained, was to then claim all of the founding principles including capitalism, the criminal justice system, and Judeo-Christian principles are likewise racist.
“And we can put in its place socialism, maybe Communism. We can put in its place equity — favorable treatment for marginalized groups,” he added.
Tags
Who is online
50 visitors
How many white supremacy 'cases' were not filed, but swept under the rug?
BTW, look what white privilege has done for Bill O'Reilly, he had 32 million dollars to pay off Lis Wiehl sexual harassment and a renewed contract from Fox News until they learned of the whopping amount he pay-out of his own pocket! Bill O'Reilly is speaking volume speaking from is new "hell" outside of "the Station."
We understand how these "situations" are established and reported on in this country.
FBI Investigation: [UNCLASSIFIED] White Supremacy Infiltration Of Law Enforcement 2006
Why would that happen?
Why are you asking me? I mean one could glean that 'attackers' will 'phone-jack' other people with additional threats of violence if they come forward and complain. Use your common-sense and creative imagination on this as you do to form counterpoints. Besides, unlike the FBI which needs violence to occur, we can in discussion talk about rhetoric, intent, and acts.
Taco, excuse me, but it is not my intention to answer 'idle' questions, per se. I do not come here to humor you or any Trump conservative. I take you and those other conservative seriously—before an action is taken.
Because you're the one who suggested it might be happening. Who else am I gonna ask?
OK, "phone jack?" Like it's a verb?
I don't even know what that means. So I don't know why I would glean it. I thought a phone jack was something in the wall that you plugged your phone into.
OK, well my common sense tells me that
1) People report crimes and they get prosecuted regardless of color.
2) My common sense also tells me that there is a shitload of white people in prison so it's not like there is some widespread practice of white violent crime being swept under the rug.
3) And my common sense also tells me that if there were such crime that went ignored, there would be massive protests all over the country, because we have seen that in many cases where the public thought the authorities were too slow to prosecute someone who committed a crime against a person of color.
Yes, well, it would require a pretty creative imagination to conclude (without apparent evidence) that violent crime by white supremacists was being swept under the rug anywhere in this country.
It's not an idle question CB, and you know it. Take some responsibility for the things you write. You started this topic, not me. I responded directly to your comment. You asked this:
And I want to know why you think there would/could be any.
Read the links or not. I don't want to hold your hand on this one. Go figure it out for yourself. Now, are you going to tell me you don't know what that means? It's an idiom. So, not an attack.
And one more thing: I ain't some 'messenger' for you to rhetorically shoot. Read, listen, grow, develop, and argue the statements, links, and facts. Don't waste my time with weak attempts at getting personal or being condescending.
I will just flag that shit and call it a day!
Wow. What an amazing exchange. You made a comment and I asked why it would be true. Pretty simple. But you want to act like somebody is doing something to you.
You have supplied me with zero links about crimes being swept under the rug. In fact, you haven't given me links at all.
If you're just going to write random nonsense and get mad when someone asks you to clarify it, then I think I and others will "figure" that your suggestion was a work of fiction.
I haven't done anything like that. I literally just asked you why you suggested the thing you did. You decided to engage in this freak out all on your own.
Be my guest.
Letterman to OReilly: Youre a goon
A 'round' for EverYBodY! This is Billo, Beck, Rush, and 'the gang' mentions. Ahh! Those were the days, my friend. . . we thought they'd never end. . . .
Really, it all just took too long to just blow over.
The White Power/White Supremacy movement is, of course, a very significant problem. According to the Department of Homeland Security, it is the most persistent and legal threat within the U.S., however, it is not just a problem in the U.S. It is becoming very well-documented, but much more needs to be done both in terms of understanding and combating this exceptionally serious threat.
lethal threat
As I wrote earlier, this "privilege freak" has 32 million dollars to shell out to Lis Wiehl (possibly five other women as well) on a sexual harassment case which got him fired from his flagship and thrown out into the proverbial bushes. Like he can determine a lie when he hears one and yet is morally bankrupt and lies about his reasons for not taking the women to court to clear his name and safe his job from cutting his butt loose.
Talk about demagoguery and brass balls. Now, Bill gets his voice back after Trump is tossed out. No credibility to low credibility. These are the anglings of one of many individuals trying to win over the audience listeners of a recently deceased mega-broadcaster. Guess which one.