╌>

The Woke's Pandemic Power Grab

  
Via:  XXJefferson51  •  3 years ago  •  20 comments

By:   J. Peter Zane

The Woke's Pandemic Power Grab
Government knows best, so shut up: The left simply wants control. Their ideological justification for this is that they ought to run things because they are smarter and better than everyone else. During COVID they have insistently claimed they were following the science to justify their power-grabbing policies. Let’s be clear, science is the most powerful tool humans have created to understand and tame nature. But science is not a book of absolute truths; it is the story of the never-ending...

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

It is time to not only resist the woke but to openly mock them and laugh at them to their faces when they try to use government to enforce their intolerant whims.  


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



COVID-19 is our first woke crisis.

The global pandemic is the excuse the left has been waiting for to vastly expand its control. Power brokers in government, the media and corporate America have consistently invoked often-shifting science, which must never be questioned , to impose coercive policies that diminish individual freedom while increasing dependence on government.

None of this is new; the left has been at it at least since the Progressive era in the early 1900s. To some degree an expansion of government authority was an inevitable and necessary response to the global pandemic. But taking a step back, it is clear that the left has used this temporary crisis to turbo-charge and entrench a radical ideology that represents a vast and divisive transformation of our politics and our national character.

The forces they are unleashing appear ascendant, and so COVID-19 is providing a window into America’s unsettling future, which includes these elements.

Government knows best, so shut up: The left simply wants control. Their ideological justification for this is that they ought to run things because they are smarter and better than everyone else. During COVID they have insistently claimed they were following the science to justify their power-grabbing policies. Let’s be clear, science is the most powerful tool humans have created to understand and tame nature. But science is not a book of absolute truths; it is the story of the never-ending quest for better answers to hard questions. It works because it has the freedom to change as new data and discoveries emerge. That, for instance, is why we no longer rely on leeches to treat everything from epilepsy to gout.

Such flexibility is anathema to authoritarians, whose power rests on their claims of infallibility. During COVID-19, governments have imposed a series of onerous policies – overly broad lockdowns , school closures , mask mandates – with questionable positive impacts. I’ll be the first to admit that reasonable arguments exist for all these measures, and most government interventions. The problem is the extraordinary effort to silence meaningful debate about these complex issues.

The people are children (Part 1): The response to COVID has been defined by the robust efforts of local, state and federal governments to control personal behavior. The underlying assumption of broad mask mandates and economic lockdowns is that individuals are incapable of assessing their levels of risk, of deciding whether it is safe for them to go into work, eat at a restaurant, work out at a gym, so the government must decide for them.

The people are children (Part 2) : Some Americans have protested government policies that have injured their pocketbooks and health while infringing on their individual liberty, but the larger story is that most citizens haven’t raised a peep even as lockdowns have threatened their children’s education (and futures) and destroyed their opportunity to make a living. As Jonathan Haidt and Greg Lukianoff detailed in their seminal book, “The Coddling of the American Mind,” the rise of the welfare state, helicopter parenting, and the politics of grievance have destroyed traditional notions of personal responsibility. Americans increasingly believe both that someone else is responsible for their problems and that someone else should solve them. This has created a conformist policy of assent that makes people willing to do what they are told, no questions asked.

Bread without circuses: In addition to legal actions, threats and public shaming, the deeply indebted federal government has sought to silence dissent to its questionable policies by doling out trillions of dollars it does not have. Today, they buy our assent; in the future they may, as in China, just demand it.

The real inequality: COVID has exposed the growing divide in America between the powerful elites who are largely insulated from the policies they make and endorse and the rest of the people who suffer the consequences. Lockdowns and school closings have had an outsized negative impact on the poor, the young and people of color . Many of the low-paying jobs they’ve lost are not coming back. High earners have been relatively unscathed and many have thrived, thanks to the soaring stock market . Basically, the wealthy boomers who run the country have been happy to inflict massive pain on the young and poor in the hopes of protecting their own health.

Everyone is the same: It has been clear from the start that the elderly are at far greater risk of contracting COVID than anyone else. As of Feb. 17 , 81% of COVID deaths have been among people 65 and older. Just one quarter of 1% of deaths have been among those 24 and younger. A rational response to the pandemic would have been to isolate and support the subset of imperiled Americans – including rigorous screening programs to ensure that the fragile elderly living in nursing homes do not come in contact with carriers. Instead, most governments have imposed one-size-fits-all policies that have exacted a devastating toll on hundreds of millions of Americans for whom COVID is no more deadly than the flu. They have rejected a data-based, nuanced approach because they want to use the crisis to maximize their seizure of power.

Everyone is different : Once the vaccine was developed, most governments temporarily forsook collectivism for social justice. After making sure they got the first shots, our leaders created complex formulas regarding who should come next. Along with taking the obvious approach – start with vulnerable Americans who are most at risk – they also arrogantly sought to tell us which  jobs were “essential” and which races more deserving.

When the history of COVID-19 is written years from now, only some of the chapters will describe the emergence of the deadly virus and the heroic efforts of caregivers and researchers to contain and vanquish the effects of this lethal pathogen. Much of it, instead, will show how woke elites used the crisis to fundamentally transform America.







aHR0cDovL2ltZ2hvc3RzLmNvbS90LzIwMjEtMDIvMTQ5MTM4L2ZkMGU2Y2ZlNjY5ZmEyNTNhYjY5M2JiZTIwZGYwOWIyLmpwZw.jpg?v=1614283807-jNEgIcUpoy2FMzmR53t57jKlYmT2sL_Yhf0zun0MlGk








J. Peder Zane is an editor for RealClearInvestigations and a columnist for RealClearPolitics.



Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1  seeder  XXJefferson51    3 years ago
COVID has exposed the growing divide in America between the powerful elites who are largely insulated from the policies they make and endorse and the rest of the people who suffer the consequences. Lockdowns and school closings have had an outsized negative impact on the poor, the young and people of color. Many of the low-paying jobs they’ve lost are not coming back. High earners have been relatively unscathed and many have thrived, thanks to the soaring stock market. Basically, the wealthy boomers who run the country have been happy to inflict massive pain on the young and poor in the hopes of protecting their own health.

Everyone is the same: It has been clear from the start that the elderly are at far greater risk of contracting COVID than anyone else. As of Feb. 17, 81% of COVID deaths have been among people 65 and older. Just one quarter of 1% of deaths have been among those 24 and younger. A rational response to the pandemic would have been to isolate and support the subset of imperiled Americans – including rigorous screening programs to ensure that the fragile elderly living in nursing homes do not come in contact with carriers. Instead, most governments have imposed one-size-fits-all policies that have exacted a devastating toll on hundreds of millions of Americans for whom COVID is no more deadly than the flu. They have rejected a data-based, nuanced approach because they want to use the crisis to maximize their seizure of power.

Everyone is different: Once the vaccine was developed, most governments temporarily forsook collectivism for social justice. After making sure they got the first shots, our leaders created complex formulas regarding who should come next. Along with taking the obvious approach – start with vulnerable Americans who are most at risk – they also arrogantly sought to tell us which  jobs were “essential” and which races more deserving.

When the history of COVID-19 is written years from now, only some of the chapters will describe the emergence of the deadly virus and the heroic efforts of caregivers and researchers to contain and vanquish the effects of this lethal pathogen. Much of it, instead, will show how woke elites used the crisis

https://thenewstalkers.com/vic-eldred/group_discuss/12361/the-wokes-pandemic-power-grab
 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1    3 years ago

Do you ever write something original as the first comment on your seeds? "We" would like to hear something in your own words

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.1  Ozzwald  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1    3 years ago
"We" would like to hear something in your own words

Well he did state in a different seed that he wanted to reinstate slavery.  Don't know if that counts.

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
1.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  Ozzwald @1.1.1    3 years ago

He really said that? 

wow

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1.3  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1    3 years ago

I put a lot of my own opinion and ideas on the various issues.  Why nit pick about post #1?  I’m in broad general agreement with everything the author wrote.  I have said stuff like this ever since the re open the economy debate and the mask issue became prominent in early May.  

 
 
 
Ozzwald
Professor Quiet
1.1.4  Ozzwald  replied to  Trout Giggles @1.1.2    3 years ago
He really said that? 

Yup.

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
2  Gsquared    3 years ago
it is clear that the left has used this temporary crisis to turbo-charge and entrench a radical ideology that represents a vast and divisive transformation of our politics and our national character 
openly mock... and laugh

That's what we are doing to this article.

      800

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gsquared @2    3 years ago

We are well aware of the attempts to severely limit the economic freedom, individual rights, and religious liberty of those of us who dare to disagree with the secular progressive left and the branch covidians.  We are the resistance and we will not be shut up or silenced.  

 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
2.1.1  Gsquared  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1    3 years ago
We are the resistance

You are one guy sitting in his room poring over right wing websites.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gsquared @2.1.1    3 years ago

Real Clear is not a right wing web site.  I do go to a lot of Christian and conservative websites to get the truth and share it with those seculars and leftists who believe alternative non facts.  

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.3  Trout Giggles  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1    3 years ago

We "WE" are going to continue to live our lives as "WE" see fit

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.4  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Trout Giggles @2.1.3    3 years ago

Feel free.  Just don’t try to impose what you see fit for yourselves upon the rest of us.  

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
2.1.5  Trout Giggles  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.4    3 years ago

We won't. We want to live in peace and harmony same as you. We want to be free to worship or not worship, patronize the businesses we like, and raise our families just the same as you.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gsquared @2    3 years ago
  1. Liberals can’t handle a fair and balanced site like real clear politics where this article came from.  
 
 
 
Gsquared
Professor Principal
2.2.1  Gsquared  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2    3 years ago

A.  Reactionaries are so addle-brained they wouldn't know what fair and balanced is if it smacked them in the fundament.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.2.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gsquared @2.2.1    3 years ago

This sums it up perfectly!  

https://www.instagram.com/p/CLuXIgmg2SU/?igshid=jpln9ja2s5ce

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.3  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Gsquared @2    3 years ago

Pointing at and laughing at secular progressive ideology and its adherents when they try to impose their ideas and beliefs upon the rest of us

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3  seeder  XXJefferson51    3 years ago
science is not a book of absolute truths; it is the story of the never-ending quest for better answers to hard questions. It works because it has the freedom to change as new data and discoveries emerge. That, for instance, is why we no longer rely on leeches to treat everything from epilepsy to gout.

Such flexibility is anathema to authoritarians, whose power rests on their claims of infallibility. During COVID-19, governments have imposed a series of onerous policies – overly broad lockdowns , school closures , mask mandates – with questionable positive impacts. I’ll be the first to admit that reasonable arguments exist for all these measures, and most government interventions. The problem is the extraordinary effort to silence meaningful debate about these complex issues.

The people are children (Part 1): The response to COVID has been defined by the robust efforts of local, state and federal governments to control personal behavior. The underlying assumption of broad mask mandates and economic lockdowns is that individuals are incapable of assessing their levels of risk, of deciding whether it is safe for them to go into work, eat at a restaurant, work out at a gym, so the government must decide for them.

The people are children (Part 2) : Some Americans have protested government policies that have injured their pocketbooks and health while infringing on their individual liberty, but the larger story is that most citizens haven’t raised a peep even as lockdowns have threatened their children’s education (and futures) and destroyed their opportunity to make a living. As Jonathan Haidt and Greg Lukianoff detailed in their seminal book, “The Coddling of the American Mind,” the rise of the welfare state, helicopter parenting, and the politics of grievance have destroyed traditional notions of personal responsibility. Americans increasingly believe both that someone else is responsible for their problems and that someone else should solve them. This has created a conformist policy of assent that makes people willing to do what they are told, no questions asked.

Bread without circuses: In addition to legal actions, threats and public shaming, the deeply indebted federal government has sought to silence dissent to its questionable policies by doling out trillions of dollars it does not have. Today, they buy our assent; in the future they may, as in China, just demand it.
https://thenewstalkers.com/vic-eldred/group_discuss/12361/the-wokes-pandemic-power-grab?g=53#cm1527818
 
 
 
321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu
Sophomore Guide
3.1  321steve - realistically thinkin or Duu   replied to  XXJefferson51 @3    3 years ago
Some Americans have protested government policies that have injured their pocketbooks and health while infringing on their individual liberty, but the larger story is that most citizens haven’t raised a peep even as lockdowns have threatened their children’s education (and futures) and destroyed their opportunity to make a living

True and many Americans have died. I'll take a job loss and staying home for a while over taking a big chance of an early death. 

half a million Americans are already dead from this pandemic, I don't plan on adding to that number, I follow CDC recommendations and think we all should.

trump tried to make ignoring Covid 19 fashionable, IMO: trump just wanted it to "just disappear" so he didn't have to fight covid during his election.

In reality diseases don't just disappear and trump was feeding Americans Bull Shit, sadly many of his followers once again believed trump even when reality showed different. 

Sad. . 

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4  seeder  XXJefferson51    3 years ago

Now this governor got it exactly right about covid-19 from day one.

GetFile.aspx?guid=458c9766-9646-4244-81c0-16ed977e8fb3&SiteName=Newsmax&maxsidesize=600

Hailing her state as the only one in the U.S. that did not declare shelter-in-place orders, mask mandates, business closures, or defining essential business, South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem fired back at the national failing of U.S. health experts during the pandemic.

"I don't know if you agree with me, but Dr. [Anthony] Fauci is wrong a lot," Noem said during her CPAC speech Saturday, pointing to the top U.S. infectious disease expert who told her South Dakota would get up to 10,000 COVID-19 hospitalizations in a day.

Her state never got over 600, she said.

"My administration resisted the call for virus control at the expense of everything else," she continued, noting hospitalizations and not infection rates were her primary concern. "We looked at the science, the data, and the facts, and then we took a balanced approach.

"Truthfully, I never thought that the decisions that I was making were going to be unique. I thought that there would be more than would follow basic conservative principles, but I guess I was wrong."

The early lockdowns were a step that would have locked down her state through the fall when the pandemic peaked, she said, calling out the "coercion, the force, and the anti-liberty steps the governments take to enforce them."

"Often the enforcement isn't based on facts; justifying these mitigation efforts has been anything but scientific," Noem said.

Noem got laughs as she noted ABC's George Stephanopoulos asked New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo to give Noem advice on handling the pandemic.

"Now seems like a really good time to remind everyone of what Gov. Cuomo was doing in New York," she said, breaking down the allegations involving Cuomo's withholding of COVID-19 death counts of seniors in longterm living facilities, after he mandated the homes to take in infected patients instead of sending them to an empty Navy ship and field hospitals.

"Now, that is the media's COVID hero."

Read more:

such wonderful common sense....

 
 

Who is online

Vic Eldred
Snuffy
evilone


62 visitors