╌>

BOMBSHELL: FBI Finds “Scant Evidence” to Prove That Jan 6 Riot Was “Result Of Organized Plot To Overturn” Election

  
Via:  XXJefferson51  •  5 years ago  •  131 comments

By:   Collin Rugg

BOMBSHELL: FBI Finds “Scant Evidence” to Prove That Jan 6 Riot Was “Result Of Organized Plot To Overturn” Election
NARRATIVE DESTROYED. According to a bombshell new report from the FBI, they found “scant evidence” that the January 6th Capitol riot was an organized plot to overturn the 2020 election results, a big blow to the Democrats’ agenda. On Friday, Reuters reported that FBI employees told them “the FBI at this point believes the violence was not centrally coordinated by far-right groups or prominent supporters of then-President Donald Trump

Leave a comment to auto-join group Americana

Americana

The democrat party dystopian narrative has been destroyed.  Jan. 6 was almost completely a disorganized mess with people acting on the spur of the moment carried by the emotions of a large crowd and there was never a plan even by those small groups that were determined to get in to do anything once they did get in.  The democrats are turning this into a star chamber shoe trial of common citizens swept up into this that are political prisoners being held many months in a jail without trial in solitary confinement and often tortured.  It’s time to end the charade and openly confront the democrats false narrative we’ve seen since that date.  It’s time to deal with those who assaulted capitol police officers or did major property damage and outright release everyone else. The government of the United States needs to release its political prisoners.  


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T



BOMBSHELL: FBI Finds “Scant Evidence” to Prove That Jan 6 Riot Was “Result Of Organized Plot To Overturn” Election


by ff3e8a14f5dd456f97929d49c513f98d-40x40.jpeg Collin Rugg about an hour ago updated 25 minutes ago



shutterstock_1828751057-758x430.jpg





NARRATIVE DESTROYED.


According to a bombshell new report from the FBI, they found “scant evidence” that the January 6th Capitol riot was an organized plot to overturn the 2020 election results, a big blow to the Democrats’ agenda.

On Friday, Reuters reported that FBI employees told them “the FBI at this point believes the violence was not centrally coordinated by far-right groups or prominent supporters of then-President Donald Trump, according to the sources, who have been either directly involved in or briefed regularly on the wide-ranging investigations.”

“FBI investigators did find that cells of protesters, including followers of the far-right Oath Keepers and Proud Boys groups, had aimed to break into the Capitol,” the report continued. “But they found no evidence that the groups had serious plans about what to do if they made it inside, the sources said.”

A senior law enforcement official who is now retired, told Reuters that 90-95% of the cases that the DOJ is going after are “one-off cases.” “Then you have five percent, maybe, of these militia groups that were more closely organized,” the former official noted. “But there was no grand scheme with Roger Stone and Alex Jones and all of these people to storm the Capitol and take hostages.”

The FBI also found that President Donald Trump had no involvement in the riot.

“More than 170 people have been charged so far with assaulting or impeding a police officer, according to the Justice Department,” the report stated. “But one source said there has been little, if any, recent discussion by senior Justice Department officials of filing charges such as ‘seditious conspiracy’ to accuse defendants of trying to overthrow the government. They have also opted not to bring racketeering charges, often used against organized criminal gangs.”




Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
2  Vic Eldred    5 years ago

Another lie disproved!

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2.2  Ronin2  replied to  Vic Eldred @2    5 years ago

It doesn't matter. The TDS driven have the bit between their teeth. They are going down their Jan 6th rabbit hole to the very end. They need something to at least try and distract voters from the latest Biden crisis in Afghanistan.

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
2.2.2  Ronin2  replied to  Tessylo @2.2.1    5 years ago

Despite all evidence to Nancy's kangaroo court investigation.

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
2.2.4  goose is back  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.2.3    5 years ago
they have no evidence

Except Ashli Babbitt was killed in cold blood, but they don't want to talk about that. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
2.2.5  JohnRussell  replied to  Ronin2 @2.2    5 years ago

[removed]

 
 
 
SteevieGee
Professor Silent
2.2.7  SteevieGee  replied to  goose is back @2.2.4    5 years ago
Except Ashli Babbitt was killed in cold blood, but they don't want to talk about that. 

[Deleted]

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.3  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @2    5 years ago

Relax Vic, not yet.

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
2.3.2  Hallux  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.3.1    5 years ago

I think that Trending Politics has tried its best to do so, but I remain of little faith when it comes to far right or to far left 'news' sites.

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
2.3.4  cjcold  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.3.3    5 years ago
our newer alternative media

Coupled to the same old lies and fascist propaganda.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
4  JohnRussell    5 years ago
According to a bombshell new report from the FBI

What is the name of this FBI report?  If it's an FBI report it has a name. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
4.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @4    5 years ago

 
 
 
Vic Eldred
Professor Principal
5  Vic Eldred    5 years ago

This just in:

The U.S. Capitol Police force is attempting to shut down a watchdog lawsuit that attempt to gain public access to materials pertaining to the Jan. 6 Capitol breach by arguing such content is "not public records."

In February, watchdog group Judicial Watch filed a lawsuit under the common law right of access to pubic records, after being denied access to any records by the Capitol Police. In January, the group had requested from the force the following:

  • Email communications between the U.S. Capitol Police Executive Team and the Capitol Police Board concerning the security of the Capitol on January 6, 2021. The timeframe of this request is from January 1, 2021 through January 10, 2021.
  • Email communications of the Capitol Police Board with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. Department of Justice, and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security concerning the security of the Capitol on January 6, 2021. The timeframe of this request is from January 1, 2021 through January 10, 2021.
  • All video footage from within the Capitol between 12 mp and 9 pm on January 6, 2021.

In response, Capitol Police told the court that footage of the Capitol is "solely for national security and law enforcement purposes," and therefore access to it is limited and controlled by the Capitol Police. 

The force goes on to argue that even if the records are public, the interest of the Capitol Police in keeping the records confidential "outweigh any public interest in those materials," according to a release from Judicial Watch.

"Any other police department in America would be investigated and defunded for such abusive secrecy. The Pelosi Congress is in cover-up mode regarding January 6," Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said. 

https://justthenews.com/government/courts-law/capitol-police-tell-federal-court-january-6-materials-are-not-public-records?utm_campaign=ligthouse&utm_content=capitol-police-tell-federal-court-january-6-materials-are-not-public-records&utm_source=social-jsr&utm_medium=facebook

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
5.2  Hallux  replied to  Vic Eldred @5    5 years ago

Why the runaround when the source of your post is Judicial Watch?

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.2.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Hallux @5.2    5 years ago

Judicial Watch is rated a conspiracy site on MBFC

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.2.5  JohnRussell  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.2.4    5 years ago

"So what" to the fact that they are conspiracy nuts?    LOL. jrSmiley_10_smiley_image.gif

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
5.2.7  JohnRussell  replied to  XXJefferson51 @5.2.6    5 years ago

Lets see, I've asked you five times for the name of the FBI report, and nothing. Can we assume there is no "FBI report"? 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
5.2.8  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @5.2.7    5 years ago

[deleted]

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
5.2.9  goose is back  replied to  JohnRussell @5.2.1    5 years ago
Judicial Watch is rated a conspiracy site on MBFC

I am sure SPLC lists them as a hate group too. 

 
 
 
goose is back
Junior Participates
5.2.10  goose is back  replied to  JohnRussell @5.2.7    5 years ago
I've asked you five times for the name of the FBI report, and nothing.

How often do you ask for reports in officer involved shootings or the Jessie Smollett case. 

 
 
 
Tacos!
Professor Guide
6  Tacos!    5 years ago

Here is the Reuters article.

I recommend trying to post from there. Why allow a seed to be derailed by arguments over the source?

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1  Trout Giggles  replied to  Tacos! @6    5 years ago

It's a good article which seems to contain facts and not opinions. thanks for bringing it here

 
 
 
Trout Giggles
Professor Principal
6.1.2  Trout Giggles  replied to  XXJefferson51 @6.1.1    5 years ago

my thank-you was for Tacos. Don't take credit for his comment. Bad Form

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Quiet
7  pat wilson    5 years ago

Why is this a "bombshell" news item ? It certainly doesn't lessen the atrocity of what happened on 1/6/2021.

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Expert
7.1  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  pat wilson @7    5 years ago

Probably should direct that question to the actual author of the article 

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Quiet
7.1.1  pat wilson  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @7.1    5 years ago

Who do you think I was addressing ?

 
 
 
Just Jim NC TttH
Professor Expert
7.1.2  Just Jim NC TttH  replied to  pat wilson @7.1.1    5 years ago

Well then you should probably click on one of the Reuters links in the comments and find the author of it then and ask them. Doubt the writer for Reuters is a member here.

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Quiet
7.1.3  pat wilson  replied to  Just Jim NC TttH @7.1.2    5 years ago

How 'bout this, I'm asking anyone who cares to answer.

And it really doesn't concern you.

 
 
 
bugsy
Professor Participates
7.1.4  bugsy  replied to  pat wilson @7.1.3    5 years ago
I'm asking anyone who cares to answer.

He answered you.

It concerned him.

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
7.2  Greg Jones  replied to  pat wilson @7    5 years ago

A minor riot is an atrocity?  jrSmiley_99_smiley_image.jpg  

 
 
 
Sean Treacy
Professor Principal
8  Sean Treacy    5 years ago

As if facts will get in the way of their conspiracies.

All you have to do is look at the indictments to realize what a fantasy the left has been peddling about January 6th. Just nonsense about insurrection. It's the same as the whole Mueller craze. They made all sorts of batshit crazy claims about what Mueller knew and would prove and then when you actually read the indictments you realize how demented they were . 

 
 
 
Hallux
Professor Principal
8.2  Hallux  replied to  Sean Treacy @8    5 years ago

No one who engages in politics is short of "batshit crazy claims".

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
8.3  JohnRussell  replied to  Sean Treacy @8    5 years ago

Why was the mob bashing down the door leading directly to the House Of Representatives chambers ?  You dont believe they found that door by accident do you? 

At a minimum, the mob intended to try and personally intimidate the legislators into refusing to certify the electoral count that day. 

 
 
 
Greg Jones
Professor Participates
8.3.1  Greg Jones  replied to  JohnRussell @8.3    5 years ago

The "mob" had no plan or direction

 
 
 
Ronin2
Professor Quiet
8.3.3  Ronin2  replied to  JohnRussell @8.3    5 years ago

How does it feel to be proven perpetually wrong? 

Does it ever sink in that your narrative just doesn't fit the facts?

Care to discuss why Garland and DOJ are releasing the BLM and Antifa rioters; and yet have the FBI hunting down the Jan 6th rioters; have them sitting in prison w/o charging them; and trying to prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law? Both attacked federal Officers; and both are guilty of destruction of federal property. Of course only one side was using Molotov Cocktails; committed arson; looting; and murder. But I guess those things get a pass in our new two tier justice system.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
8.3.4  JohnRussell  replied to  Ronin2 @8.3.3    5 years ago

I do not humor your delusions if I can help it. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
8.3.5  JohnRussell  replied to  Greg Jones @8.3.1    5 years ago
The "mob" had no plan or direction

They wanted to go into the House and Senate chambers to intimidate the congresspeople who were voting on the election results. 

Outside the door where Ashley Babbitt was killed there is a signage indicating it is leading to the Speaker's Lobby. 

The mob intended to end up there, of course , and they tried to bash the door down to get in. 

 
 
 
cjcold
Professor Quiet
8.3.6  cjcold  replied to  JohnRussell @8.3.5    5 years ago

Many of the riot ringleaders had been taken on reconnaissance tours of the building in the days before the attack by GOP Rep. Lauren Boebert. 

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
9  JohnRussell    5 years ago

This is the location where Ashley babbitt was killed

800

The two middle doors are open in this photo , but on Jan 6th they were closed locked and barricaded. The middle door on the right was bashed in and that is where Babbitt started to climb through. The guard that killed her was off to the left on the other side. 

If you look farther down the hallway you see a doorway on the left which appears to be about 20 ft or so from where Babbitt was killed.  This is a view of that door from the hallway.

800

That doorway, as you can see leads directly to the House Chamber.

So had Ashley Babbitt and her fellow mob members been allowed through, in a matter of seconds they would have been in the House of Representatives. 

They knew where they were trying to go and they knew what they wanted to do there. 

 
 
 
Thrawn 31
Professor Participates
10  Thrawn 31    5 years ago

Well of course it wasn’t organized, who the fuck thought that? I mean look at those idiots, they were just wandering around with their thumbs up their asses. They didn’t actually expect to get into the building, and there was even less of a plan once they got inside than they had when they were outside.

Ot was a total cluster fuck, like everything “trump”.

 
 
 
JohnRussell
Professor Principal
10.1  JohnRussell  replied to  Thrawn 31 @10    5 years ago

Some of them knew where they were going. They are seen in various videos checking out the signage on doors as they looked for the Senate and House chambers where they intended to confront the Congresspeople. 

 
 

Who is online


100 visitors