╌>

Conservative investment funds steal page from left to exclude ‘woke’ corporations

  
Via:  XXJefferson51  •  4 years ago  •  22 comments

By:   Vivek Saxena

Conservative investment funds steal page from left to exclude ‘woke’ corporations
“I sometimes say this real slow when talking to professional economists, but we believe the companies that focus on their profits will be better investments than those that focus on social justice,” 2ndVote Advisers ETF director Andy Puzder said. Indeed, for the most part, going “woke” still means going “broke,” in that companies who embrace left-wing radicalism tend to suffer significant declines in earnings.

Leave a comment to auto-join group We the People

We the People

This is good news for conservative investors.  Liberals have had their social funds for some time and the two new ones here join a handful of others that do likewise for us.  Go woke go broke is the go to advice for the market place. Way to go to help us get our money out from our political opposition wearing economic clothing.  


S E E D E D   C O N T E N T


In response to so many Fortune 500 companies from Lockheed Martin to Coca-Cola going “woke,” a group of conservative Wall Street players have launched two special investment funds that contain no “woke,” left-wing companies.





The American Conservative Values ETF and the 2ndVote Advisers ETF are both “led by directors who seek companies that have not launched ad campaigns or issued bulletins that they think prioritize liberal politics more than profits,” according to a report from The Washington Times published Sunday.

“I sometimes say this real slow when talking to professional economists, but we believe the companies that focus on their profits will be better investments than those that focus on social justice,” 2ndVote Advisers ETF director Andy Puzder said.

Indeed, for the most part, going “woke” still means going “broke,” in that companies who embrace left-wing radicalism tend to suffer significant declines in earnings.


Procter & Gamble takes massive $8 billon hit as Gillette launched its ‘toxic masculinity’ campaign https://t.co/bQ82dsMNi9 Conservative News (@BIZPACReview) August 1, 2019





















Because corporations going “woke” is a recent phenomenon, American Conservative Values ETF and 2ndVote Advisers ETF are constantly evolving.

On Friday, for instance, American Conservative Values ETF dropped its shares in Bank of America, Lowe’s, American Express and even the Nasdaq.

In a press release, the ETF accused the first three companies of having “begun teaching their employees Critical Race Theory (CRT).”

“In light of news that these companies have instituted employee training based on critical race theory, which teaches that America is an inherently racist and evil country, we cannot in good faith continue investments into these with our investors’ money,” ETF CEO William Flaig said in a statement.

The ETF meanwhile pulled its shares of Nasdaq because late last year it “sought and has since received approval from the Securities and Exchange Commission for new rules that force companies with listed shares on NASDAQ to meet racial and gender requirements in the name of forced diversity quotas.”

Sounds about “woke.”


United Airlines vows 50% of new pilots hired will be women or minorities to reflect passenger diversity https://t.co/Y4eScYTGbS pic.twitter.com/GixIWzlptd — Conservative News (@BIZPACReview) April 7, 2021

As of late August 2021, the list of dropped/boycotted companies included all of the following:

  • American Express Company
  • Bank of America Corporation
  • Lowe’s Companies, Inc.
  • Nasdaq, Inc.
  • Delta Air Lines, Inc.
  • The Coca-cola Company
  • Apple Inc
  • Amazon Com Inc
  • Alphabet Inc Class C
  • Alphabet Inc Class a
  • Blackrock Inc
  • Comcast Corp-class a
  • Salesforce.com Inc
  • Walt Disney Co/the
  • Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc
  • Facebook Inc-class a
  • General Motors Co
  • Goldman Sachs Group Inc
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • Jpmorgan Chase & Co
  • Nike Inc -cl B
  • New York Times Co Class a
  • Progressive Corp
  • Starbucks Corp
  • At&t Inc
  • Twitter Inc
  • Verizon Communications Inc
  • Walmart Inc

All this comes as the war against “woke” is heating up across America, with even some high-profile left-wingers saying they’ve had enough .

In May, the 92-year-old Consumers’ Research nonprofit started producing commercials slamming “woke” corporations such as American Airlines, Coca-Cola and Nike for placing political ideology ahead of their customers.

“Increasingly we’re seeing companies taking their eye off the ball. Our focus is always on the consumer. And that’s what it should be for these companies as well, but increasingly we’re seeing them work to curry favor with woke politicians, rather than focusing on serving their consumers,” the non-profit’s executive director, William Hild, told CNBC at the time.

Like other “woke” media outlets, CNBC painted them with a negative brush: It trashed the non-profit as a “dark money group” and mocked them for “casting” the CEOs of “woke” corporations “much like opposition candidates in a political campaign.”


https://t.co/wgVwNN3EwJ Go woke, go broke. — Jack Furnari (@JackBPR) May 19, 2021

The ad-purchasing came around the same time that “woke” corporations began espousing false Democrat Party talking points about the election integrity laws being pursued by Republican governors across the state.

Speaking about this phenomenon in April, Fox News host Steve Hilton said the corporations had no idea what they were talking about. It was as if they were just reading a script written by the Democrat National Committee.

“These CEOs are either lying or wading into America’s most inflammatory issues without knowing what they’re talking about,” he said.

“The only actual proposal that undermines democracy is the Democrats’ HR1, which among other anti-American horrors, unconstitutionally nationalizes elections and pushes banana republic atrocities like ballot harvesting, which replaces one person, one vote with one union activist, 500 votes.”


CEOs of over 100 ‘woke’ corporations put on notice: ‘You want to behave like Dem politicians? Fine. That’s how we’ll treat you.’ https://t.co/SUuRU3qlvP pic.twitter.com/3gbLl63Ia4 Conservative News (@BIZPACReview) April 12, 2021

He further warned the CEOs of “woke” corporations to be careful of what they wish for.

“You think you can buy off the mob with pandering press releases while business as usual continues? Oh, no. You want to behave like Democrat politicians? Fine. That’s how we’ll treat you. You have no idea how painful this is gonna get for your companies and for you personally,” he said.

And indeed, in the months since Hilton’s these corporations have faced relentless attack ads from Consumers’ Research and now even stock market competition from the American Conservative Values ETF and the 2ndVote Advisers ETF.

Why invest in “woke” when you can invest in profit? 




Article is LOCKED by author/seeder
 

Tags

jrGroupDiscuss - desc
[]
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1  seeder  XXJefferson51    4 years ago

Conservative investment funds take aim at ‘woke’ corporations

Fortune 500 corporate boardrooms increasingly have embraced a “woke” agenda — such as Gillette lecturing its shavers about toxic masculinity and Bank of America having guest speakers declare capitalism evil.

In response, some Wall Street players now are offering exchange traded funds (ETFs) that exclude left-wing companies, taking a page from the activist playbook that created investment programs to boycott enterprises deemed environmentally unfriendly.

A pair of investment programs that launched in the last year — the American Conservative Values ETF and the 2ndVote Advisers ETF — are led by directors who seek companies that have not launched ad campaigns or issued bulletins that they think prioritize liberal politics more than profits.

In the process, the ETFs seek to influence not only the behavior of investors but also of company directors.

“I sometimes say this real slow when talking to professional economists, but we believe the companies that focus on their profits will be better investments than those that focus on social justice,” said Andy Puzder , a director of 2ndVote Advisers.

On Friday, the American Conservative Values ETF said it had dumped shares in several companies that have recently embraced critical race theory in seminars and training, according to investigative reports by Christopher Rufo, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute.

“Recent actions by Bank of America Corp. , Lowe’s Co. Inc., American Express Co. and Nasdaq Inc. have caused considerable concern and outrage among politically conservative investors,” the American Conservative Values said in a statement, adding that it would encourage investors to boycott those companies.

William Flaig, CEO of the American Conservative Values ETF, said reports of left-wing-mandated training at those companies required the fund to dump shares during one of its rebalancing periods.

“In light of news that these companies have instituted employee training based on critical race theory, which teaches that America is an inherently racist and evil country, we cannot in good faith continue investments into these with our investors’ money,” Mr. Flaig said.

Similarly focused investment vehicles have existed for some time, such as Ave Maria Maria Funds, which seeks to direct investor money to companies that hold true to Roman Catholic values.

The new stock portfolios seek to combat not only what company directors may say or do but also what increasingly powerful asset managers may direct a company to do.

So far, the 2ndVote Advisers’ Life Fund and its ESG Neutral Fund are beating the S&P 500 year-to-date average, with the latter returning 27.1% in 2021, according to the fund. (ESG is shorthand invented by leftist investors for judging a company’s “environmental, social and corporate governance.”)

The American Conservative Values ETF, meanwhile, is “seeking to boycott ownership of companies that are most hostile to conservative values,” Mr. Flaig said.

Since its inception in November, the American Conservative Values ETF has seen returns of 38.57%, according to its prospectus.

At the moment, the heaviest weighted stocks in 2ndVote Advisers’ ESG Neutral Fund are Rotune 500 companies like agribusiness Mosaic Co., Brighthouse Financial annuities and travel tech firm Sabre.

Some Silicon Valley stocks also may be included, as their returns have been too soaring for investors to ignore, even if the conservative managers bristle at censorship by Twitter or Facebook.

“FAANG [Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix and Google] can’t be ignored,” Mr. Flaig said.

There is no purity in the process of weeding out left-wing firms, the directors of the funds told The Washington Times, noting that companies are not all liberal or all conservative and fund managers have to maintain some flexibility.

“Recall that many of our holdings are liberal companies, there is only so much advocacy we can do and still confidently deliver predictable large-cap returns,” Mr. Flaig said.

Recent corporate activity seems to shrink the available pool of conservative investments. Stories of Verizon, Raytheon and others mandating critical race theory seminars for executives and staff reflect a commitment to a leftist outlook, the directors said.

“Coke, Delta, Disney, Nike, Blackrock ,” said Mr. Flaig, rattling off a list of flagship American brands that have established left-wing policies in recent months. “You can see there a suppression of First Amendment rights and a hostility to conservative values.”

Dan Grant, CEO of 2ndVote Advisers, said it takes a kind of aggressive posturing against conservative ideas to land a company on the fund’s “no-buy” list.

2ndVote Advisers derives its name from the idea of what people do with their money represents their second choice after the one they make in voting, as well as expresses support for the Second Amendment.

The ETF weighs six factors to rank companies from 1 (most liberal) to 5 (most conservative). Not one company among the thousands tested has scored a 5 across the board, and the highest overall scores were a handful of 4s.

Nearly three-quarters of the companies in the S&P 1500 — 73% — graded out with a score of 1 or 2 and 27% earned a 3, according to Mr. Grant.

Ratings are subject to change, as the American Conservative Values ETF’s Friday announcement showed.

“We try to stay on top of the news cycle,” Mr. Flaig said.

However, he noted that the news cycle could be misleading. Statements from company executives do not automatically earn a disinvestment because often such statements amount to something of a PR stunt and a closer look at the company’s balance sheet and bottom line might reflect less political posturing, Mr. Flaig said.

Last week, U.S. authorities announced an investigation into Deutsche Bank ’s asset management arm, which regulators in the Biden administration believe used ESG statements as publicity more than investment guidelines.

Even Tariq Fancy, who invented the ESG concept while running “sustainable investing” at the BlackRock investment management company, has acknowledged that actually running a company along “green” lines as opposed to just talking about doing so are two completely different things.

“In truth, sustainable investing boils down to little more than marketing hype, PR spin and disingenuous promises from the investment community,” Mr. Fancy wrote in a USA Today op-ed in March.

All that language has proved profitable for asset managers, however, as millions have poured into ESG funds, which doubled in 2020.

The divide between what a company says and what it does may strike ESG supporters and regulators examining Deutsche Bank as a drawback, but for the conservative funds managers it is a plus. Even Mr. Fancy noted that “to advance real change in the environment simply doesn’t yield the same return.”

Managers at 2ndVote Advisers and American Conservative Values say that investors like BlackRock have been able to boost liberal politics more than profits in some companies via the huge positions they have acquired in those firms.

BlackRock CEO Larry Fink isn’t shy about this. In a recent letter to investors, he noted BlackRock ’s commitment to having companies it backs “carbon neutral” by 2050, a goal he acknowledged would require a “transformation” of the U.S. economy as it is wrenched away from cheap, reliable energy sources.

“Transform the U.S. economy?” American Conservative Values’ Mr. Puzder said. “Larry Fink has a radical environmental agenda, but who the hell elected Larry Fink to transform the U.S. economy?”

Investors voting large blocs of shares have reshaped corporate boardrooms, but what the new conservative-based funds seek to do is reimpose balance, according to Mr. Grant.

“If you treat everybody fairly, you’ll score just fine,” he said of 2ndVote’s investing metrics. “The question we ask is, Is a company actively trying to restrict what the right is doing? What we don’t want is investment in companies that declare, ‘We’re not being neutral; we are opposed to half the country.’”

“If you’re fair, if you’re not prohibiting free speech, or only matching employee donations to liberally approved charities or retaliating against employees who exercise their rights, then there’s no problem,” Mr. Grant said. “If you treat everybody fairly, you’ll score just fine.”

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1    4 years ago

I do dabble a bit in ideological investing.  I also buycott companies targeted by the left.  Two of the funds above I hadn’t heard of before finding these articles.  The other American Conservative Values Fund, I am an active investor in.  I hold BIBL a large cap Christian values fund and WWJD an International ETF with like objectives.  My ideological fund other than ACVF is MAGA which has done well.  I’m going to buy 2nd vote and the anti ESG fund before the market opens tomorrow.  It’s great to know what companies to not invest in and have an investment choice that steers clear of companies that punish my beliefs.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1    4 years ago

4efv0l.jpg

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
1.2.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  XXJefferson51 @1.2    4 years ago
As of late August 2021, the list of dropped/boycotted companies included all of the following:
  • American Express Company
  • Bank of America Corporation
  • Lowe’s Companies, Inc.
  • Nasdaq, Inc.
  • Delta Air Lines, Inc.
  • The Coca-cola Company
  • Apple Inc
  • Amazon Com Inc
  • Alphabet Inc Class C
  • Alphabet Inc Class a
  • Blackrock Inc
  • Comcast Corp-class a
  • Salesforce.com Inc
  • Walt Disney Co/the
  • Dick’s Sporting Goods Inc
  • Facebook Inc-class a
  • General Motors Co
  • Goldman Sachs Group Inc
  • Johnson & Johnson
  • Jpmorgan Chase & Co
  • Nike Inc -cl B
  • New York Times Co Class a
  • Progressive Corp
  • Starbucks Corp
  • At&t Inc
  • Twitter Inc
  • Verizon Communications Inc
  • Walmart Inc

All this comes as the war against “woke” is heating up across America, with even some high-profile left-wingers saying they’ve had enough .

In May, the 92-year-old Consumers’ Research nonprofit started producing commercials slamming “woke” corporations such as American Airlines, Coca-Cola and Nike for placing political ideology ahead of their customers.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
2  Split Personality    4 years ago

Investments have nothing to do with ideology.

ACVF ETF is a either a fraud or doing their investors a deliberate disservice while collecting their fees.

If they were really sincere, they would not be invested in some of these companies,

but I imagine SOMETHING has to keep the company solvent.

512

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Split Personality @2    4 years ago

I own a few hundred dollars of the fund.  I’ve done well with it.  I’m highly diversified and risk appropriate for a 61 year old.  You seem to have missed this point from post #1.

There is no purity in the process of weeding out left-wing firms, the directors of the funds told The Washington Times, noting that companies are not all liberal or all conservative and fund managers have to maintain some flexibility.

“Recall that many of our holdings are liberal companies, there is only so much advocacy we can do and still confidently deliver predictable large-cap returns,” Mr. Flaig said.

Recent corporate activity seems to shrink the available pool of conservative investments. Stories of Verizon, Raytheon and others mandating critical race theory seminars for executives and staff reflect a commitment to a leftist outlook, the directors said.

“Coke, Delta, Disney, Nike, Blackrock ,” said Mr. Flaig, rattling off a list of flagship American brands that have established left-wing policies in recent months. “You can see there a suppression of First Amendment rights and a hostility to conservative values.”

Dan Grant, CEO of 2ndVote Advisers, said it takes a kind of aggressive posturing against conservative ideas to land a company on the fund’s “no-buy” list.

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
2.1.1  Split Personality  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1    4 years ago
I own a few hundred dollars of the fund.  I’ve done well with it.  I’m highly diversified and risk appropriate for a 61 year old.  

The year low was 24 and the high is 33 ?

We must have a vastly different opinion of what it means to "have done well with it".

You seem to have missed this point from post #1 .

I missed nothing. Among all the virtue signaling memes and the headline is one paragraph saying it is all for show?

They are sucking in $$ from a target audience and you are participating in the Warren Buffet empire along with

Silicon Valley libbies and Elon Musk.

Congratulations on passing an imaginary purity test.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.2  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Split Personality @2.1.1    4 years ago
The year low was 24 and the high is 33 ? We must have a vastly different opinion of what it means to "have done well with it".

The low was at or near opening.  How would an investment of $24,000 now being $33,000 in nine months not be good?  
 
As to the rest, the fund only excludes the worst of the worst when it comes to woke, crt, punishing or targeting conservative employees, and censoring conservatives in public or on line.  I like it.  It’s not meant as a purity test.  It helps stay out of really bad ones and contributes to the woke going broke.  

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
2.1.3  Split Personality  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.2    4 years ago

You only invested a "few hundred dollars".  Was that too, symbolic?

Was that was your confidence level in an ideological fund that would rather virtue signal than do the best possible job creating wealth for it's investors?

Sorry that's not the way I am invested and I don't give a rip that the CEO of Home Depot is a Thumper that thinks the election was stolen.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.4  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Split Personality @2.1.3    4 years ago

I invest for my age and risk level across small medium large caps, value and growth, foreign and domestic and mixed, domestic and foreign stock markets, stocks bonds cash and commodities.  Mine is a conservative portfolio with a small tolerance for risk to appreciate gains with most for income and capital preservation.  Probably 5% of my portfolio is designated for partisan ideological virtue signaling and another like about in particularly unpopular commodities and industries.  The rest is normal investing other than knowing what to sell out of.  I don’t mind dabbling a bit in anti virtue signaling.  As to above it was simply an example of 1000 shares invested at the beginning compared to now, not me personally.  I’ve done good with my small  positions in the Bible fund and the What Would Jesus Do fund as well as the Make America Great Again fund.  I’m going to get the one to counter invest social justice funds and the 2nd vote fund.  I have no problem making investment choices that damage the economic portfolio of the ESG types and the woke investor.  

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
2.1.5  Split Personality  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.4    4 years ago

YOU aren't the topic, are you?

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.6  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Split Personality @2.1.5    4 years ago

You kind of made me the topic which I don’t mind on this seed because we should all have a good idea of what we or our advisors are doing with our life savings and investments. I was just so tired of the usual political topics the last couple of days that I seeded on related side issues, investing and comedy today and getting Christians out of Afghanistan and an unusual covid outbreak among the vaccinated yesterday.   Not the usual traffic.  

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
2.1.7  pat wilson  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.4    4 years ago
Make America Great Again fund

Did you un-check the box for monthly donations, lol.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
2.1.8  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  pat wilson @2.1.7    4 years ago

No.  It’s an actual ETF and it’s stock ticker is MAGA when it’s traded through a brokerage account or Stash account.

KEY DATA

  • OPEN $37.27
  • DAY RANGE 37.20 - 37.27
  • 52 WEEK RANGE 24.73 - 39.13
  • MARKET CAP N/A
  • SHARES OUTSTANDING 350K
  • TOTAL NET ASSETS $12.700M
  • BETA N/A
  • NAV $37.22
  • NAV DATE 08/27/21
  • NET EXPENSE RATIO 0.72%
  • TURNOVER % 27%
  • YIELD 2.06%
  • DIVIDEND $0.77
  • EX-DIVIDEND DATE Dec 28, 2020
  • AVERAGE VOLUME 2.17K
 
 
 
Ender
Professor Principal
2.1.9  Ender  replied to  XXJefferson51 @2.1.6    4 years ago

Look in my eyes what do you see.

I'm the cult of personality.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3  seeder  XXJefferson51    4 years ago

People regardless of ideology unless they are socialist and totally opposed to investing should be educated on these matters as if their life goals of saving for retirement, health savings expenses, kids education, wedding, other long term savings goals depend upon it because they do.  Even if you have a hired financial professional it’s still good to know what they are doing and why

 
 
 
Split Personality
Professor Guide
3.1  Split Personality  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3    4 years ago

By the way, the link is to a different seed and therefore the seed, title and picture are inappropriate

but since it's just the two of us

how about you fix it so I don't have to lock it.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.1  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Split Personality @3.1    4 years ago

It’s fixed.  The link was didn’t belong there before was from the other article open tab from that site I’d considered seeding here but did not.  That one would have gotten 10x the hits and posts this one got.  

 
 
 
pat wilson
Professor Participates
3.1.2  pat wilson  replied to  XXJefferson51 @3.1.1    4 years ago

You aught to review your comments before clicking on "Post Your Comment". Your post is incoherent.

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.4  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  Tessylo @3.1.3    4 years ago

How about not disrupting the seed and comment on the topic which is conservative ETF’s giving conservatives investment options that avoid investing in openly woke can corporations, or at least on investments and investing in general?  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
3.1.5  seeder  XXJefferson51  replied to  pat wilson @3.1.2    4 years ago

My rushed post s not on topic.  Conservatives pulling their investment dollars out of anti conservative openly woke companies.  

 
 
 
XXJefferson51
Senior Guide
4  seeder  XXJefferson51    4 years ago

The Dow, Nasdaq, and S&P 500 are all looking good so far this year.  

 
 

Who is online



92 visitors