Mom gets standing ovation after calling for 'mass exodus' from public schools
By: Sam Dorman
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13c1e/13c1ea88e81906f30b380738719adc76182502ab" alt=""
The wannabe police state is at it again.? Trying to label opponents of its goals and policies as domestic terrorists if we demonstrate or speak out about them. Free speech, free association, assembly, and rights to petition government to address grievances are all being threatened by this dystopian government. The Orwellian language in this case by the regime regarding parents is over the top and the article is a great response to it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13c1e/13c1ea88e81906f30b380738719adc76182502ab" alt=""
Mom gets standing ovation after calling for 'mass exodus' from public schools
Concerned mom's comments come amid uproar over DOJ's announcement directing the FBI to investigate violence at school board meetings
Florida mom Quisha King called for a "mass exodus" from the public school system , arguing that school systems left parents with no other choice for fighting left-wing ideas.
Her comments came during the annual Family Research Council's Pray Vote Stand Summit during a Thursday panel on " Fighting Indoctrination on a National Scale."
"I really think at this point the only thing to do is have a mass exodus from the public school system – that's it," King said. In response, she received prolonged applause, and many in the audience stood to their feet at the Leesburg, Virginia, event.
King previously drew national attention for her speech opposing critical race theory (CRT) in June. She works with the group Moms for Liberty, which is one of many battling CRT and other ideas across the nation.
PARENTS CONTINUE BLASTING DOJ, SCHOOL BOARDS AMID PROBE INTO VIOLENT THREATS
"With this FBI thing, it just made me realize – what else are we supposed to do?" King asked. "Standing up to these people doesn't seem to matter. I mean, we have – all of us – we've been at these school board meetings, we've been voicing our opinions, we're writing articles, we're emailing teachers – we're doing all that stuff. And they don't care. I'm like the only thing left to do is to just peace out."
She added that "it has to be us doing it together" in order to "really send the message that you do not have the right to indoctrinate our children."
Her comments came amid an uproar over the Department of Justice's announcement that the FBI would investigate potential violence at school board meetings. Attorney General Merrick Garland's memo on the issue raised concerns as it appeared to be in response to a National School Boards Association (NSBA) letter suggesting that officials were encountering a form of "domestic terrorism."
"While spirited debate about policy matters is protected under our Constitution, that protection does not extend to threats of violence or efforts to intimidate individuals based on their views," Garland's memo states.
Still, critics like Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., have raised concerns about DOJ restricting free speech – pointing to language in NSBA's letter that disparaged anti-CRT efforts.
Good for her. The less educated the American public is, the more likely it is to believe all the disinformation and conspiracy theories circulated on Social Media and FOX NEWS. That will give the Trump*suckers more power and votes for their Pied Pipers.
In America, the Private school and home school students in general test better to get into college and get better grades there than public school graduates. So, the more that take that route the better off we will be.
I have to admit that I attended a Private High School in the city of my birth and youth, and do feel that the smaller classes, discipline, more focused individual attention and varied extra-curricular activities guided me to my academic standing, wherein I received a personal note from the Dean of John's Hopkins Medical School accepting me, but I chose to stay in Canada, and a different profession. Although I never in my life owned or even wanted a gun or a rifle except a childhood water pistol and cap gun, I was my high school marksman champion using army rifles refurbished to shoot 22s, and I'm shown here receiving the trophy for it at the school's Games Day. I suppose if I had ever been the right age to take part in a war where Canada was involved, I would have been a sniper.
My exasperation with the American educational system has been repeated many times on this site.
I attended private schools for grades 1-12 and for my four yr. degree. I attending public schools for kindergarten and Jr. college AA degree in my rural oriented community.
I have to believe this is a complaint in search of a problem. I keep seeing people freak out about CRT, but I don’t see any curricula or homework assignments on it.
The US AG’s son in law operates a company that benefits from selling CRT curriculum to school districts. Talk about a conflict of interest.
I can talk about it, given that information. I don’t see a connection between a son in law of the federal attorney general and local school districts. I also don’t see the actual implementation of a CRT curriculum. I mean I don’t really agree with much of what CRT says, but I also cannot fathom why you would bother trying to teach something like in a K-12 school.
There is no great mystery to all this. Many "conservative" parents dont want their kids taught that America has been a racist country for almost all of its history, even if it is true. They would rather idiotically call everyone they dont like "communists".
America is not a racist country. There are individuals here who are racist but they are a small minority and it is not in any way systematic.
They are not up front in calling it that. There are none the less school districts that implement language from the theory in their overall curriculum. Parents are upset because they have seen stuff their kids brought home from school and what they heard in distant learning during the earlier part of the pandemic.
Then the people who are complaining can claim that anything is CRT and they don’t need proof. Pretty convenient if your main goal is to just be outraged.
So vague as to be useless, and yet easily attacked. All you have to do is ignore context. You can teach kids about public transportation but just because they used to say Mussolini made the trains run on time that doesn’t mean you’re teaching kids Fascism.
How do any of those parents know what they are seeing or hearing is CRT? How many of these parents studied CRT at the few law schools that have courses on it? None, I’ll bet. I think it’s more likely that something ordinary in the curriculum is being called CRT and they’re just going with it.
I’m no racial studies scholar (and willing to admit it), but what little I know of CRT strikes me as being far too esoteric, abstract, and niche to ever be something that is taught in K-12.
What they might talk about is a history of racism in this country, and that’s legitimate. It’s also something that has been taught for generations. There also might be some discussions of why people are protesting. That seems to be fair game, too. I really doubt 8 year olds are going to be getting into how various institutions and laws result in unequal outcomes for people of color.
And if you think the curriculum means telling white children that they were born racist, some moron might do a thing like that, but that’s not what CRT is.
I’ve told you before I don’t do copy and paste. Make your own points. Everything else will be ignored.
Whatever. It’s not like you are the only one here to see it. That opposition to CRT is strong in the African American community is evidence enough that significant elements of it are being taught to our children.
So you don’t have an actual response that is relevant to our conversation?
CRT isn't taught in any public K-12 schools at all in this country. It's only taught in graduate school and law school.
That’s the progressive left elites cover story but it is not the truth. The national teachers unions strongly disagrees.
Don't read Washington examiner.
I will read it. There were enough links within the section of the article to support its conclusions.
The biden police state is at it again. They are trying to label opponents of its goals and policies as domestic terrorists if they demonstrate or speak out about them. Our free speech, free association, assembly rights, and rights to petition government to address grievances are all being threatened by this dystopian regime. The Orwellian language in this case by the regime regarding parents resistance is way over the top and this article is a great response to it.